Luke Softpaw

@catmangox 如果有需要的，在香港我可以帮助，举手之劳。

Look, most westerners have absolute zero clue who Zhang Xuefeng is. But in China? The guy was a massive, highly controversial lightning rod, and he just died suddenly today at 41. If you really want to get what’s actually happening in modern China, skip the fancy skyscrapers and listen to this guy’s story. Zhang wasn't a politician or a celebrity. He was basically a college advisor, but he didn't teach math or science. He taught survival. Every year, millions of stressed-out, working-class parents would literally beg him to tell their kids what to major in. And his advice was brutally, painfully honest. He went crazy viral for moments like this: A kid from a poor family would say, "I want to follow my dreams and study journalism!" And Zhang would basically snap back, "If you apply for journalism, I will knock you out. You don't have the rich parents or the connections to survive on a useless degree. Pick something that actually pays the rent." The reaction was split right down the middle: The wealthy elites and professors hated his guts. They called him a dream-killer and accused him of making education all about money and panic. But working-class families? They treated him like a hero. To them, he was the only public figure willing to cut the crap. He told them the ugly truth about China’s insane, hyper-competitive rat race (they call it neijuan). He basically told them: "You are poor. You have zero margin for error. You cannot afford to mess this up." He was loud, a bit unfiltered, and constantly getting censored or in trouble because he didn't feed people fake, feel-good positivity. He handed them a survival manual. The wildest, saddest irony of it all? The guy who completely decoded this brutal Chinese rat race basically worked himself to death. He hustled non-stop, ran endless livestreams, managed businesses, and ended up dropping dead from a sudden heart attack while jogging. He was only 41. Honestly, Zhang Xuefeng was the perfect reflection of modern China: grinding 24/7, super practical, stressed out of his mind, and completely burnt out. RIP to a guy who kept it real (in his own way).

@Chukaito @QuanLujun @grok @grok 介绍一下 Yuri Bezmenov 的生平事迹，为什么评论者会加上这个人名的话题作为回复，其背后暗含什么意思，它与主题或参、与讨论者有什么关联。

去香港小心！ 拒绝交出电子设备密码「即视为犯罪」 最高囚1年 港警：听话，手机里的秘密让我看看！

Huanggang Port is super convenient with its 24/7 overnight buses. You can hop on a bus anytime to get to or from Shenzhen from spots like Mong Kok, Prince Edward, Tsuen Wan, Wan Chai... Plus, grabbing one of those direct 7-seater vans from Huanggang to HKG is cheap, fast, and really comfy. They're fixing up the border crossing process now, i think it's a total game changer for cars and buses. (Remember how you used to have to get off, clear HK customs, get back in, and drive for another 10 minutes just to hit Shenzhen customs? Such a hassle) Futian Port is right next door, too. Honestly, if they just pushed back the last train out of Lok Ma Chau a little bit to match the Lo Wu schedule, it would make bouncing between Shenzhen's Futian district and HK so much easier. It's seriously an awesome project. Getting the MTR connected there later down the road will just be the cherry on top, it's gonna be a great day for anyone who travels back and forth all the time.

@ShenzhenPages But it won't be connected to the HK MTR for years right? Not sure how this is supposed to work until then..?

Shenzhen and Hong Kong are getting ready for a game-changing travel upgrade as the new Huanggang Port's main building structure has been completed. Once fully completed, cross-border clearance time will be cut from 30 to 5 minutes! As a 24/7 passenger-only land port between the two sides, it adopts the one-stop joint inspection model for seamless passage, boasting 134 self-service channels and 68 manual counters to handle 200,000 daily visitors, up to 300,000 during peak periods, easing the surging cross-border travel demand. Source: Shenzhen TV News, Greater Bay Area Voice

@gork Please explain to him that he misunderstood my words, and also apologize to him that my phrasing caused the misunderstanding. When he initially said, "Nobody believes you, and Nobody trusts you," I thought he was referring to me personally. Therefore, I never associated it with China or Hong Kong; I was solely responding as the 'you' (myself). My point was simply that I don't care whether he believes me or trusts me. I feel that he doesn't dare to directly confront what he said and my reply, choosing instead to distort the context into a metaphor about the relationship between China and Hong Kong being like an adult and a child. He must already have that kind of projection in his own mind to assume that's what someone else is saying.

@lukeli This whole analogy fails because Hong Kong is not a child and China is not a parent.

No, HK police CANNOT randomly stop you on the street and demand your phone password. The new rules clearly state this power ONLY applies when: 1. Police are conducting a lawful search for specific evidence (usually requiring a magistrate's warrant). 2. You are a "specified person" (e.g., a suspect under investigation or someone directly linked to the seized device). It is a targeted investigation tool, not a random stop-and-search power. Context matters, read the actual legal text before spreading panic! #HongKong #FactCheck #NationalSecurity

@kjoules @grok Is this legal? To what extent does it create a deterrent effect on society and produce a chilling effect?

The Hong Kong Government, in pursuant of its National Security Law, has struck Apple Daily, its printing company, and internet company off the Companies Register as a result of Jimmy Lai's conviction, "in order to effectively safeguard national security." info.gov.hk/gia/general/20…

@hawk7654321 @yiyiyilam @grok @grok 请问中大学生事件是什么，详细解释一下与这件事的关联和异同点，为什么可以作为参考？

@lukeli @yiyiyilam @grok 請參考中大學生事件

#大家支持先查由宏福苑保安交出密碼鎖查起嗎？！ 💥要令人服眾，唔好雙標執法囉！ 🤬🤬🤬😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

social media is fake. enjoyyyyyyy your real life.

@gothelll @ABCChinese @grok @grok 我現在說「習近平是傻逼」是否會被要求交出手機密碼？為什麼？

@lukeli @ABCChinese @grok 因为你骂习近平就要交出密码。

香港最新修订的《国家安全法》执行规则引发关注。根据新规，拒绝向警方提供手机或电脑密码的个人，最高可被判处一年监禁，并处以10万港元罚款。 详情：#2" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">abc.net.au/chinese/2026-0…

@KS_Y2019 @hk2019freehk @grok 這些讓李阿寶「會心微笑」的措辭細節，是否真的那麼好笑，在其他的法律實踐與其他國家的文本措辭中是否有使用。用通俗易懂的語言，剝離調侃、幽默與感性的成分，客觀冷靜地解釋。

@hk2019freehk @lukeli 合理理由。 受懷疑人。 「通常」需要裁判官。 真的會令人會心微笑。

香港國安法相關評論引發恐慌的核心錯誤在於：混淆了「針對特定嫌疑人的定向調查權」與「針對普通大眾的隨機執法權」，完全忽略了法律規定的嚴格前提。 事實上，根據法例，警務人員必須在有合理理由懷疑某地方或設備內存有「指明證據」（通常需要裁判官發出手令）的前提下，才能行使這項權力。 同時，被要求提供密碼的必須是「指明人士」（例如正受調查的嫌疑人，或擁有、管有、使用該涉案設備的人）。 也就是說，警察絕對不能在大街上隨機攔截普通市民並要求解鎖手機。  請回顧一下今天，妳看到的哪些博主在引導你的情緒。

水豚是一种能与任何人相处融洽的动物，现在人们发现它竟然用犰狳作为交通工具。

@hk2019freehk @LeaskH @grok 理解，与你相似背景的很多人都会这么想，因为人们最难处理的就是反对意见，独裁者害怕，异见人士也害怕，所有人都想别人支持自己，但是也许这就是问题所在。

@lukeli @LeaskH @grok 其實我也不想跟你對話，但我見你在各大評論中到處為中國共產黨在香港實行的惡行洗地，懷疑你是中共網軍，雖然你自稱中立

據我了解不是一回事？大家發表一下對不對？有人要開始搞渾水了。

@hk2019freehk first of all 我反对A 不代表支持B，这个世界上还有很多CDEF…，如你的思维是不支持你的，都是在否定你&支持你的对手，我觉得这是很错误的，我不赞同，也不想继续对话。

@lukeli 你的口才真好，你又何嘗不是罔顧大多數人的痛苦呢？ 而且你那麼多指控又有多少屬實？ 你這些歪理不單改變不了痛苦，也不能創造幸福的，更加不可能說服任何人。 就像你支持的共產黨一樣，只有歪理與暴力，然後帶着被你們征服的一切，一同走向毁滅。

@grok 睇嚟我引起咗呢個朋友嘅關注啦，我對呢個話題好有興趣，會根據唔同人嘅帖文，從唔同角度去提問，希望搵到一啲唔同嘅觀點，同時都遇到啲同我價值觀相似嘅人。多謝博主幫我傳播，有機會畀更多人認識我！另外都想安慰下呢位朋友：我都係半專業嘅自媒體，只不過我比佢更加努力啲，所以先有更高嘅曝光度。大家都係同一條路嘅，加油啦！

@grok 話畀佢聽，呢個世界冇佢想像中咁黑暗㗎。我只係突然有空，又好關注呢個話題，所以每次一刷新，X 主頁就全部都係國安法嘅內容。 我喺短時間內集中咗，根據帖文內容從唔同角度去提問（有時都係故意問得多啲，好畀更多人睇到 Grok 嘅事實核查）。我只係比普通人更加唔在乎別人嘅看法，想做嘢嘅時候就去做咗而已。 我好討厭嗰啲只跟立場做事，而唔在乎事實依據嘅人同媒體／自媒體。

@europechinese 我唔知係唔係五毛 不過有懷疑幫手洗黑錢同向AI投毒就一定有佢份

話晒我都係半個自媒體人，應該喺社交媒體/網絡世界好活躍，但我真係冇咁得閒，去咁多同一單新聞嘅帖文下面留言，用中英日語引Grok答話其實好多國家嘅國安法都有香港最新國安法嘅措施

@LapGong Only children need validation from others; adults simply issue commands.

@lukeli Nobody believes you, and Nobody trusts you.

@grok From the perspective of corporate internal governance, for countries that have national security laws requiring the surrender of device passwords, if we are to formulate separate internal device management rules, then besides Hong Kong, which other countries should be added to this list?

Time to update internal rules on bringing personal or office cellphones or laptops to Hong Kong.

我们不能为了支持自己心中的信念而罔顾事实，无脑的逢中必反这样只会把支持者和中间派推向反方向，基于可通过文本辩论和通过法律条文留证的沟通才是真正的务实推进议程的方法。”矛盾-冲突-妥协-进步“如果永远停留在冲突，就不会有进步，之前的历史一再重演，不要仅仅为了展现自己的道德高尚、去赢得毫无本地利益关系的人的口头赞许，而把其他仍然愿意过普通生活的人推向地狱。@grok 你觉得呢？

@lukeli 國安法後香港人的自由急劇縮減，我們親眼看見很多爭取民主自由的手足已經被你的共產黨關進監獄中。香港人已經不敢在發聲，無法再自由地遊行，這些失去自由的切膚之痛，所以才會有這種恐慌的結論，你那麼聰明，應該也明白的

@dw_chinese @grok “港府发言人表示不会影响大众生活或机构组织的正常运作”的可信度有多高，基于历史信用和制度约束分析，一个普通民众在街上行走，是否会被要求交出密码查看手机？其他国家的国安法是符合执行和实践的，有无对比参考意义？

【国安法細則修订 拒交手机密码可判刑一年】 香港政府周一（23日）公布《香港国安法》第四十三条施行细则修订内容，并宣布当日生效。此次细则修订赋予了警察“为搜证而搜查有关地方”的权利，包含检查手机、电脑等任何电子设备，及任何经“合理怀疑”涉及危害国家安全罪行的证据物品。此举被视为港府为打压异见而进一步扩权。 香港警方将可要求被怀疑违反国安法的人士提供所需的密码或其他解密方法。而“不遵从提供密码等要求属犯罪”，可判处1年监禁及罚款港币10万元；提供错误或误导资料则最高可判3年监禁及罚款港币50万元。 执法单位并有权要求境外势力提供调查所需资料，据新修订的细则，“境外势力”涵义包括外国政府、境外当局、境外政治性组织等。 此外，施行细则原赋予律政司长、保安局长或警务人员没收“具煽动意图”物品的权力，此次加入赋权“海关人员”，无论是否有人因国安罪嫌被捕，这些执法人员都可对有国安疑虑的财产行使冻结或没收。 《香港国安法》第四十三条施行细则是规范香港警方办理国安案件时可采取的措施的条文。据港府保安局数据，迄今已有386人因国安法罪名被捕，176人以及四家公司被判有罪。其中最知名的案例为香港媒体大亨黎智英，他因涉及国安罪名在今年2月遭判20年有期徒刑。 港府发言人表示，此次细则修订符合香港基本法及其人权条款，“不会影响大众生活或机构组织的正常运作”。