Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)

58.8K posts

Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) banner
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)

Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)

@luminousmethods

PhD: trauma+CanLit. Currently: public health + policy student, epi + stats geek.

Kwikwetlem territory Katılım Kasım 2011
5K Takip Edilen8.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
This is a Tweet for everyone missing @Arley_McNeney, who maybe feels very alone in that missing because social media grief is weird and odd in its transience but I really miss her today and I know many of you do too. <3
English
5
14
121
59.9K
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
Melissa Wear
Melissa Wear@MelissaMWear·
The Pope should release an encyclical about the search function in Outlook.
English
30
1.1K
10.4K
201K
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
Ramona Coelho
Ramona Coelho@rljcoelho·
If a surgeon faced repeated complaints tied to concerning circumstances surrounding patient deaths, the public would demand accountability. But in MAiD? An Ontario doctor facing multiple MAiD complaints is still allowed to practise under supervision. Canada’s euthanasia regime lacks meaningful oversight and accountability. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
English
0
33
52
4.7K
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
Rebecca Tidy
Rebecca Tidy@DrRebeccaTidy·
I read all the papers I cited at least four times – probably far more. That's why it's called reading for a PhD. And I could instantly tell when students cited papers they hadn't read. It's really obvious to anyone that's actually done the reading.
Lenka Zdeborova@zdeborova

@eiszett Have you read all the sources you ever cited? During my PhD we, along with dozens of other papers, cited a paper that I later found did not contain the result for which it was commonly cited. I should be banned I guess.

English
21
66
894
17.6K
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
Sometimes that's done deliberately. You have to look in the methods to be like oh, yeah, they acknowledged that this was an open-label trial or a very underpowered study. So many people aren't even trained on methods research. But they're gonna use LLMs to do it for them? Naw.
English
0
0
0
49
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
Doing things like risk of bias training is so, so humbling because reviewing the quality of evidence for studies, guidelines, meta-analyses is so contingent on being able to read VERY carefully for how things were done. It's not always well- or clearly-described.
English
1
0
0
55
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
People not reading the shit they cite for AI-researched papers is always fun when you have experience doing evidence synthesis including abstract and full-text screening. Manually screening hundreds of abstracts and seeing if you need to get full-text and then screening those...
English
1
0
3
222
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
microplastics rectifier
microplastics rectifier@facetedcarapace·
The first step to any research project is a literature review, which includes actually reading the existing papers about your topic of study. This was covered on the first day of my research class in graduate school.
Lenka Zdeborova@zdeborova

@eiszett Have you read all the sources you ever cited? During my PhD we, along with dozens of other papers, cited a paper that I later found did not contain the result for which it was commonly cited. I should be banned I guess.

English
31
696
7.5K
93.1K
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
I remember the first time I did an annotated bibliography in undergrad and being both like "WTF is this?" because it took so much time and I just wanted to write and then being like WHOA, look at all these IDEAS!? Reading in order to cite is the great puzzle and joy, goddammit!
Chris Grocott@DrChrisGrocott

Academic Twitter is having a meltdown because some people have just learned that you should actually read the sources you cite. This really shouldn't be as controversial as it appears to be.

English
0
1
10
849
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
The abstract creative "Muse" is just cloud computing, which is to say, unless we have citational practices, which is why reductive notions of "creativity" in the face of AI right now is just not it, I fear. Where are we imagining the future FROM? (Data. Whose data?)
English
0
0
0
61
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
As a researcher and educator, it's my job to keep going back to get data. "Go back and get it" - the Akan principle of Sankofa, literally drives my work every day. Responsible data governance includes knowing how to be creative with what is in the archives.
English
1
0
0
40
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they)@luminousmethods·
I want to challenge this. #Data are important. We need data to see patterns in bloodwork, migration patterns of animals, in climate change, in the archeological and geological record. How you GET data, from whom, where, and what you DO with it are the power questions. #AI
Wholesome Side of 𝕏@itsme_urstruly

I heard an interview today about AI in creative spaces and the man being interviewed said “AI is data, and Data can only look backwards. Creativity looks forwards.” And I need to sit with that in the best possible way.

English
1
1
3
337
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
Gabrielle Peters 👩🏻‍🦽
Just a reminder that our treacherous disability org in BC told me I should move into a nursing home and stop fighting for my right to live in community (2010). Same org has woman on board who launched legal case to expand MAiD.
English
1
5
20
355
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
proton
proton@ProtonInspector·
Very strange that it seems some people see citations as essentially flavour text to puff up your credibility and not a mechanism to provide crucial context and foundational information which your work relies on
English
18
591
4.4K
39.8K
Lucia Lorenzi (she/they) retweetledi
Matthew Lutz
Matthew Lutz@MattLutzPhi·
I feel a cold fury whenever I open a pdf of some paper to read and Adobe is like "Hm, this looks long. Would you like me to just summarize it for you?" No, fuck you, Adobe. The paper is long because it contains a lot of details that matter. Why wouldn't I want to read them?
English
47
722
10.5K
86.4K