Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bond
1.1K posts

Bond
@lvsbnd
Designer | Founder | Ruthless Optimist | Love, Art & Discourse.
Manhattan, NY Katılım Eylül 2021
419 Takip Edilen107 Takipçiler
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi

ed catmull basically solved one of the hardest organisational problems in creative work: how do you keep very high standards of taste without turning the people who hold that taste into gatekeepers that slowly strangle new ideas?
his answer is elegant and I think underrated: you separate the people who set the bar from the people who make the final calls.
English
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi

This is why you have to strip yourself of Eurocentrism. If your exposure to global history is limited to a Western point of view, then you’re missing a great deal of important detail.
I could look at this picture alone and write a dissertation on China versus Europe, on how differences in resource distribution, political structure, and cultural outlook helped shape colonial attitudes and their lasting impact on the world today.
Historically, China often operated from a position of relative abundance and self-sufficiency, especially during its strongest dynasties. It held its civilization in very high regard and viewed itself as the center of the world, prioritizing internal stability and regional influence over sustained intercontinental expansion.
They hardly suffered from a lack of capacity; they had formidable naval and economic power. There were literally Chinese pirates with fleets rivaling those of some powerful European states, this is not an exaggeration.
Of course, they had some periods of outward engagement but they were followed by deliberate withdrawal, and most of the expansion they did was continental or tributary rather than overseas or settler-colonial.
Western Europe, by contrast, was relatively constrained in land and resources and remained politically fragmented for much of its history. Competition between states, combined with commercial ambition, greed, their fascination with mercantilism cum capitalism and some advances in navigation which China had way before them, helped drive maritime expansion and, in many cases, exploitation abroad.
Many don't know that, for a time, Europe was deeply fascinated by Chinese goods, from porcelain, prized as a luxury, to tea, silk, and more. Meanwhile, China maintained controlled trade and had limited interest in European goods beyond silver. In response to this imbalance, British traders introduced and expanded the opium trade to disrupt and eventually decimate Chinese society.
China had the capacity to project power more broadly, but global domination was never a sustained objective. Its priorities were shaped more by internal governance and regional order than by overseas empire-building. I don't think much has changed in their approach to geopolitics, even today.
DaVinci@BiancoDavinci
14th century Chinese explorer Zheng He's ship compared to Columbus's.
English
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi

NYC just launched yet another social club.
It's called Stylus. It's in the Lower East Side.
They have an 'acoustically engineered' listening room and performance space. Took 2.5 years to design.
There's also a recording studio, terrace, private salon.
750 members max. For ppl who care a lot about sound and music.




English

consumer products need utility for sure. but utility alone rarely creates pull. the products that actually earn repeated attention tend to fuse usefulness with something more alive with things like play, delight, curiosity, aesthetic pleasure, & entertainment.
most ai products today lean far too hard on pure utility & miss that second layer entirely.
the winning ai consumer product likely won’t win on pure capability alone. it’ll win by merging capability with entertainment so tightly that using it feels less like labor & more like desire.
English
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi

23. Companies should not be publishing manifestos on how our societies should operate and function. The act of private companies attempting to take on the role of government and/or policy construction should be seen as a threat to national security and the Western way of life.
Unless Palantir or others are willing to accept direct democratic oversight and accountability, they should remain entirely outside of the realm of policy formation or decision-making.
We are a freedom-loving people with values, principles, and rights that are not gifted to us by government, or corporations, or narcissistic drug addicts suffering from god complexes.
If corporations will not or cannot understand this, and stand in support of fundamental Western values (free speech, privacy, individual liberty, etc.) they should be broken up or temporarily nationalised in order to bring them back under direct democratic accountability and control, and until new laws and/or constitutional amendments can be made to protect free citizens from infringements on their god-given rights.
English
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi
Bond retweetledi



























