Loch Wansbrough‏

@nicole_clash i can respect that as a first to market enjoyer

@lwansbrough Normally I’d agree (look how much shit I have put public recently LOL), but trust me in this case it’s something that is easy af to build (relatively speaking), first to market is the moat.

Just staked my entire runway on a series of seemingly stupid investments that has a non-zero chance of turning into literally nothing. And I am ok with that, cus there is also a non-zero chance of it turning into a multi-trillion dollar company. If I don’t follow up this tweet with some batshit insane shit by this time next month, I most likely have gone full broke and have temporarily reset my wealth to 0, and we’re gonna pretend this tweet never happened.

@jasonc_nc there is a separate requirement that a wheelchair be able to do a 3 point turn (idk why) so this point is somewhat moot

I ask myself this question all the time

@Noahpinion noah this is who you're arguing with

AI: Here's a totally bullshit argument with a bunch of sources that directly contradict the argument Me: Don't your sources contradict your argument AI: Yes, that's fair, I was full of it Me: So what's the truth AI: (reverts to initial bullshit argument)

@WoodridgeRyan @volksholx83011 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem lol

@lwansbrough @volksholx83011 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Stop lying Bud. Kids from the NS are cool. I’m one of them

Sen̓áḵw doesn't really "break all the rules." Meets City massing standards. Follows the Residential Tenancy Act. Built to BC Building Code. Funds public art at the same rate as projects in the City. It also has heights comparable to dozens of buildings within 2 km.

@WoodridgeRyan @volksholx83011 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem born and raised on the north shore. what’s your excuse for being ignorant?

@volksholx83011 @lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem He’s prob from Ontario like most of the Land Back Dipshits

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem This goes back to my original point: those who own the land should be able to develop it how they see fit. Council got in the way and created a housing crisis. The natives are fixing the crisis for their people. Council should do the same for the rest of us.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Government should never be in the business of building houses .. and neither should bands … these brand new units are going to be thrashed in 3 years .. I work for the current Van indigenous housing society and all I do all day long is rebuild thrashed housing by natives

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Perhaps the entire project could have been avoided if we simply built more houses to begin with. Then people would be able to afford housing. So yes, I blame council entirely.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Can you blame them for avoiding it … there will be zero funding coming from the project .:: yet they will demand the services

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Development is still under the purview of city council as it has to adhere to zoning bylaws.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Perhaps dude … you need to understand what taxes pay for what … building of schools is provincial responsibility

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem I would direct you to council, which is blocking the development of homes which DO contribute taxes. The Senakw development is a positive change because it creates more demand for services and forces council to take action to supply those services, which they are avoiding.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem And where do you think funding for local services roads , sewage , garbage collection, snow removal , schools etc comes from … adding 6000 units that contribute zero to services is problematic

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Perhaps council should stop blocking the development of more schools then.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Pick on the easy one … local schools already at capacity… no problem but when you have 6000 units many of which will be contributing kids to the system .. yet zero funding coming from those 6000 units … these issues already raised by council ..

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem I think that's certainly evidence of NOT understanding the situation. Vancouver has a shortfall of housing supply of 15000 units PER YEAR.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Perhaps 6000 new units in the market place … ( current vacancy rating 3.7 % ) displacing 6000 units that do pay property tax and pay for services is key to understanding the situation

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem i think understanding what vacancy chains are is table stakes for having a conversation about housing economics.

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem ??????

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem vacancy chains bozo

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem Zero property tax pal …zero … income tax is a different animal,and don’t forget the highly subsidized natives in those buildings will also not be contributing income tax … try and keep up ..so there is another dent in the health care side of things that income tax does affect

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem the 6000 units house at least 6000 new tax payers. do you think perhaps their tax income could pay for those services?

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem The fact is they were colonized… 150 years ago and now some wing nuts like Eby and Trudeau are handing back land with all the fixings on it … if you are going to build 6000 units at least you can do it pay for the services

@WoodridgeRyan @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem what problem is that ryan?

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem You are part of the problem

@bbgaleni7777 @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem so you think people who don't own the land should have control over it

@lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem “ ohhh … you are native ? “ Do whatever the hell you like

@volksholx83011 @WoodridgeRyan @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem lets get another car in your driveway bro, surely you will fix it

@WoodridgeRyan @lwansbrough @SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem He's what you would call a "cuck". Careful, I also assumed his gender

@SteveSaretsky @Khelsilem can you point me to the legislation that says first nations are subject to city bylaws? you can't break rules that don't apply to you.

@Khelsilem Well It doesn’t follow height or parking bylaws despite tying into city sewer and infrastructure.

interesting @JimMcMurtry01 -- what's this? why, in your mind, should the first nations not have the freedom to develop their land legally?