@anish_koka It’s also not fair to say the control group is the best at one year. It’s definitely not significantly different than high dose AMT on that graph and potentially not low dose.
English
Maddy Jalbert
133 posts
Maddy Jalbert
@MaddyJalbert
Postdoc @uwcip; social psych PhD @USC. I study misinformation correction and how people make judgments of truth and risk. Otherwise probably in the ⛰. She/her
Seattle, WA Katılım Mart 2012
137 Takip Edilen215 Takipçiler
@anish_koka The mean for high dose AMT-130 at 12 months is different between the two graphs because the Ns change. The first graph has N=17 at one year, the second has N=14. Not familiar enough with the context of these graphs to know why that is - second one might be interim data?
English
From Uniqure’s slide deck.
There's statistically significant separation at one year comparing to historical controls.
That result is directly contradicted by the randomized data at one year.
The sham control arm in the RCT is actually the best performing at 1 year.
I’m not against making all sorts evidentiary leaps for rare disease terminal patients, Uniqure’s data is just crap.
There only source of value is an FDA that will give them approval.
2 options : either this group can’t read graphs, or are unwilling… but please @AppleHelix go on about Mandrola and the y-axis.
John Mason@johnkmason
So many insane misleading things in this article, but this is frankly the most disturbingly misleading quote by @anish_koka. "UniQure’s own randomized data, at one year, showed no difference between treated and untreated patients. Their externally controlled data showed a 60–75% benefit. Both cannot be true. The FDA said so. UniQure’s answer was to go to the press to complain about a rogue regulator." The randomized data was at 1-year. The 75% (cUHDRS) and 60% (TFC) data were at 3 years. Of COURSE they can both be true in a DEGENERATIVE disease. If a treatment has an effect, the effect gets LARGER over time in a DEGENERATIVE disease. Unreal how disingenous and arguably evil these people are to mislead like this.
English
Maddy Jalbert retweetledi
Join us on October 16 for our Science for Society webinar! A panel featuring Lisa Fazio @lkfazio, Mubashir Sultan, and Maddy Jalbert @MaddyJalbert will discuss the latest research on #misinformation—how it spreads and ways to combat its impact.
member.psychologicalscience.org/events/event-d…
English
Maddy Jalbert retweetledi
Keen to contribute to SARMAC? Nominations are now open for 5 positions on the SARMAC Student Executive Board! A great opportunity to help shape the future of the society and gain leadership experience! Self nominations welcome; due 4th Oct. Details here👇
sarmac.org/student-execut…
English
Maddy Jalbert retweetledi
UW doesn’t want to pay Postdocs the living wage minimum for Washington State salaried employees. They’re trying to re-write history to get their way. #FairContractsUW #UWPostdocsRSEs #UWworksBCWeDo
English
Very thankful for the opportunity to give this year’s keynote at WWU’s PsychFest – the place I gave my first research talk as an undergrad. Visiting my former mentors and seeing the incredible work of current students was a reminder of just how special WWU’s psych department is.
Ira -- worried and hopeful for democracy -- Hyman@ira_hyman
Look who the keynote speaker was for our department end of year research celebration (PsychFest). The wonderful @MaddyJalbert Thanks for a great talk with interesting examples and interesting new work on combating misinformation.
English
@drlambchop @MaddyJalbert We can design something at SARMAC
English
Instead of academics using et al., we could follow pop music and start listing ‘featuring’ for our pubs.
Goonawan Moh Amat@Dongoevsky
academia should consider changing "et al." to "& besties"
English
Maddy Jalbert retweetledi
What makes a thought feel intrusive? We have two experiments investigating the question. A new paper with Maddy Jalbert (@MaddyJalbert), Joe Blythe (not on Twitter), and Søren Staugaard (@SRStaugaard). Thread 1/17
English
Maddy Jalbert retweetledi
Understanding the "continued influence effect" can shed light on why myths and outdated information persist, @maddyjalbert of @uwcip writes. st.news/3XEdrqm
English
@ira_hyman Wow, no! Thanks for sharing - definitely the end of an era.
English
Hey @MaddyJalbert did you see this?
English
@ira_hyman @PragyaArya But generally, if people are consuming more news and that news is focused on the people who are still unvaccinated or oppose vaccines, I'd expect this to decrease perceptions of vaccine uptake.
English
@ira_hyman @PragyaArya That's a good question. I'm actually not sure what the divide looks like in terms of whether certain sources focus relatively more on the vaccinated/ vaccine demand or on the unvaccinated/ lack of vaccine demand in their reporting - this would be good data to have.
English
This is way cool. I might have to try this as we approach judgment and decision making in my cognitive class. Looks something like a false consensus effect. @MaddyJalbert
English
@ira_hyman This reminds me of you complimenting me on my edits to the source monitoring paper that were, in fact, your own edits. Love some good academic irony.
English
@MaddyJalbert One of my favorite parts of Marigold Linton describing her autobiographical memory diary study was the confusion of event titles. Her example was sending off the final version of a manuscript. Which she apparently did at least 3 times for the same manuscript. Classic.
English
I spent some time doing ‘final’ edits on a manuscript. I’m fine working on weekends when I choose. And these are the ‘final final’ edits, right @MaddyJalbert? The last ones. Send it away.
Cookie says it’s now nap time. Walks will happen later.
English
Maddy Jalbert retweetledi
A new @washingtonpost article, "9 ways to debunk false claims made by friends and family," features insights from @uwcip postdoctoral scholar @MaddyJalbert washingtonpost.com/wellness/2022/…
English
Great workshop about publishing and reviewing psychology research with editors @QiWang_Cornell @dstephenlindsay coming up on September 29th! Grad students, post-docs, junior faculty, and other early career researchers are welcome. This will be a good one!
Society for Applied Research in Memory & Cognition@OfficialSARMAC
Free online workshop for ECRs on Thurs 29th Sep! Great opportunity to learn about publishing and reviewing psychology research from highly experienced editors @QiWang_Cornell @dstephenlindsay. Registration open now! - mailchi.mp/ac4f2f280158/e…
English