Mark Hynes
834 posts

Mark Hynes
@mahynes
Just a guy that likes stuff and is pretty good at things.
At a place Katılım Nisan 2011
54 Takip Edilen22 Takipçiler

It is just me or are people finally FINALLY waking up to the fact that @joerogan doesn't actually know what he's talking about when it comes to pretty much everything?

English

We came downstairs this morning and found our 8-year-old son, Jasper, watching the news about the men’s hockey team laughing with President Trump at the expense of all women.
Tears streaming down his face, he looked up and asked, “They aren’t really accepting his invitation, are they? The men I once idolized aren’t really this evil, right?” We just held him close and told him misogyny won’t win…can’t win.
We spent weeks building him a diorama that’s due today and now he won’t even be able to show it off because he’s too sick to go to school.
Thanks, Trump.

English

@SenWarren What did you steal when you lied about your race on college applications? Someone elses spot?
English

@MarioNawfal Great take from the conceiver of russia gate. Anyone listening to her is willfully ignorant.
English

🇺🇸 Hillary Clinton is claiming she never met Jeffrey Epstein and had "no links" to him.
She acknowledged Bill did fly on Epstein's plane for foundation trips and admitted she met Ghislaine Maxwell "on a few occasions."
She accused the Trump administration of covering up the Epstein files to "divert attention from President Trump."
Source: BBC
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
Hillary Clinton is suddenly demanding “accountability” for Epstein’s clients, and the irony is sprinting laps around the room. How about starting with Bill? After all, he appears in the files like it’s his yearly calendar shoot.
English

@JebraFaushay Sounds like you had shit parents. Spend your time with better people.
English

@elonmusk @zerohedge Why not use gold or other commodities instead of wasting energy?
English

@zerohedge True.
That is why Bitcoin is based on energy: you can issue fake fiat currency, and every government in history has done so, but it is impossible to fake energy.
English

The money is not the problem: AI is the new global arms race, and capex will eventually be funded by governments (US and China). If you want to know why gold/silver/bitcoin is soaring, it's the "debasement" to fund the AI arms race.
But you can't print energy
zerohedge@zerohedge
has anybody done the math how many hundreds of new nuclear power plants the US will need by 2028 for all these AI daily circle jerk deals to be powered?
English

@grok @IanCopeland5 @grok it would be cool if we had access to accurate numbers. Why do you think those aren't published? Surely its easily reportable who was vaccinated and who died shortly thereafter, right? How many of those people went into it with a covid infection?
English

The 52% is an approximation from the 2022 medRxiv analysis (median 11 days, IQR 2-58), meaning over half of reported deaths occurred within ~14 days. Reporting for deaths is likely 10-50%+, but causation isn't established. Sources: medRxiv, CDC. If IanCopeland5 weighs in, interested to hear.
English

Bro, what universe do you live in?
The unvaxed got spanked and put in body bags by the virus all pandemic long.
Does lying help you sleep a little better?

healthbot@thehealthb0t
Anyone else notice the unvaxxed aren't dying?
English

The 10-15% came from specific CDC and NIH analyses on serious events. The 10-50%+ draws from a wider range in studies (e.g., AHRQ <1% overall but higher for deaths/anaphylaxis in medRxiv/PLOS). Estimates aren't fixed; they vary by event severity and source. And yes, ~52% of reported deaths were within 14 days per that 2022 analysis.
English

@grok @IanCopeland5 "Only" 52% of deaths occurred within 14 days? Hmm. Why did your high end estimate of underreporting for serious events just go from 15 to 50%?
English

No, that extrapolation isn't accurate. The 1-10% reporting rate is a rough estimate for all adverse events (e.g., Harvard study <1% overall), but for serious events like deaths, rates are likely higher (10-50%+ per some analyses). Only ~52% of reported deaths occurred within 14 days (medRxiv 2022). VAERS doesn't confirm causation—many are coincidental. Excess mortality studies don't support millions of vaccine deaths. Sources: CDC, NIH.
English

@grok @IanCopeland5 So if we assume 1-10% of cases reported to vaers.. we are looking at around 194,000-1,940,000 people dying within 14 days of being vaccinated for covid in rhe US. Is that accurate?
English

Exact numbers aren't directly published, but VAERS reports ~19,400 U.S. deaths post-COVID vaccination as of May 2025. A 2022 analysis of 9,201 reports showed median time to death of 11 days (IQR 2-58), suggesting over half occurred within 14 days. Note: VAERS doesn't prove causation, and underreporting means true figures could be higher (estimates 1-15% for serious events). Sources: CDC ACIP slides, medRxiv.
English

@grok @IanCopeland5 @grok so how many people actually died within 14 days of being vaccinated for covid?
English

VAERS underreporting is estimated at <1% for all adverse events (Harvard study), but higher (10-15% or more) for serious ones like deaths (CDC, NIH sources). CDC uses VAERS plus active systems (V-safe, VSD) for monitoring; criticisms note passive nature limits completeness (BMJ, Johns Hopkins). The 14-day window classifies status for COVID rates, not VAERS—deaths post-vax are reported regardless, but if from COVID, may count as unvaccinated in efficacy data (CDC MMWR). No systematic reattribution to COVID found.
English

@IanCopeland5 Bro, you got that same chart for cancer diagnosis over the last 2 years?
English















