Mais

@gewoonmerels They are afraid to loose control

☎️ De Europese Centrale Bank heeft Bitcoin formeel uit haar raamwerk verwijderd. Christine Lagarde stelt dat het niet voldoet aan de basisnormen voor veiligheid en beveiliging. Ze legde zelfs een verband met illegale activiteiten – luid en duidelijk. DE EU HEEFT ZOWEL EEN RECHTSTREEKS SCHOT OP CRYPTO AFGEVUURD

@abflipse Bye , and also bye to bases in Europe , with bases gone US Can not control the world anymore and protect the dollar.

That's right. And now, press on. Force #Europe to its knees 👎

@BrianGee997 Miischien dat Rusland eerst initiatief neemt voor volledige vrede, ipv de aggressor uithangen

The time to start restoring relations with Russia again is NOW. Life support over failed politics. The idiots in the EU responsible for delaying this proces need to be prosecuted! 🇳🇱🤝🇷🇺

@Michael7ucci @AULaw24 Guess what GDP of Texas will be, when the dollar is dropped as world currency. It will be in free Fall. Only the Rich in US Will stay happy No bases in NATO countries means no control and power for US ..

@AULaw24 Who called Russia a powerhouse other than the entire continent of Europe being unable to stand them down? Both Russia and Italy have lower GDP than the State of Texas. Neither is anywhere near USA national power.

Even at this late hour, European leaders still don't realize the choice. 🇺🇸 or 🇨🇳🇷🇺 There is a 0% chance of the EU being a 3rd major power. Partner with the most powerful, innovative & dynamic part of (your own) western civilization: USA. Or get torn up by China and Russia.

@JimFergusonUK Not so difficult, US was the aggressor in this war, cancelled the treaty with Iran, threathened Greenland and Canada. NATO is a defense alliance , not for helping a member of NATO who started a war

x.com/JimFergusonUK/… 🚨 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH — WHY IS AMERICA STILL DEFENDING EUROPE? 100,000 U.S. troops stationed across Europe. $60 BILLION a year. Decades of protection. And when it matters most? No support on Hormuz. No access. No alignment. No backing. So ask the question: If America defends Europe… Who defends America? This isn’t an alliance. It’s starting to look like a one-way street. No more blank cheques. No more free rides. Time to bring them home.

@realMAG1775 Guess who was the aggressor in this war? US needs the bases in Europe to be in controle of power and protect the dollar , no bases , dollar will go in free fall

Close every damn U.S. base in Europe. If we keep one, make a bilateral deal with Germany and charge them full freight. NATO is a welfare scam. They ghosted us on the Strait of Hormuz while we carry their lazy asses. Spain banned our bombers. Italy locked bases. Britain waffled. We station 100,000 troops so they can under-spend on defense and lecture us on climate. Enough. Bring our boys home. End the freeloader alliance.

@RyanSaavedra Lol in what Universe do you live 😂

If NATO ever falls apart, the blame should be on leaders like France's Emmanuel Macron.

@BorisJohnson Aggressor

We can’t pretend the Iran war is not our war too mol.im/a/15704687

@nettermike US needs Those bases to control world and protect dollar and their power

Marco Rubio says "If Europe won’t allow us to use the bases we man and fund for their defense when we need them, we ought to close them down and remove our troops from Europe!" Agree?

@DavidD_Chapman Guess you are not educated, NATO = defense alliance.US is the aggressor. Without bases in NATO and other countries, US will give up power and control to protect their current power/ dollar. US Will lose their leading position. All bc Israel used US to start this war

I'm so tired of these Euro Trash back stabbing so-called Allies. It's time the US withdraw from NATO and let Russia just take Europe.

@EvolutiaR US needs NATO bases around the world , to control the world and protect the dollar Mr Trump @realDonaldTrump didn’t get this. And US is the aggressor, going in for an all or nothing gamble. NATO is a defence alliance.If one of members start a war on his own,NATO not activated

100,000 American troops in Europe = a free ride for Europeans? Let's check the facts. 🔹 American military bases are not free Germany, Italy, Spain, and Romania pay for the infrastructure, land, utilities, and civilian personnel of US bases. Germany alone contributes over $1 billion annually to support the American military presence on its soil. 🔹 Europe is the largest customer of the American defense industry F-35s, Patriot missiles, HIMARS, Apaches — all purchased by Europeans with real money. Every security alarm in Europe translates into contracts for Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing. 🔹 American bases in Europe don't only protect Europe Ramstein in Germany coordinates operations across Africa and the Middle East. Sigonella in Italy covers the Mediterranean and North Africa. Romania secures the eastern flank and the Black Sea. These are global American strategic assets — not neighborhood security for Europeans. 🔹 Command is American, not European NATO is always led by an American Supreme Commander (SACEUR). Europe contributes troops, bases, and money — but America holds the controls. Those who control the structure are not the ones getting a free ride. 🔹 The nuclear umbrella is not altruism American nuclear deterrence in Europe keeps the dollar as the world's reserve currency, keeps European markets open to US corporations, and legitimizes American hegemony against Russia and China. But what would actually happen if America withdrew its troops from Europe? 🔹 For America — immediate strategic losses Without bases in Europe, American response time to any crisis in Europe, Africa, or the Middle East grows from hours to days. Ramstein, Sigonella, and Incirlik cannot be replaced by aircraft carriers. Infrastructure built over decades disappears overnight. 🔹 The American defense industry loses its biggest customer A Europe without the US umbrella will build its own defense industry — and fast. Airbus Military, KNDS, Leonardo, and Rheinmetall will take the contracts that Lockheed and Raytheon currently win. Billions of dollars shift from America to Europe. 🔹 The dollar weakens Dollar hegemony is partly sustained by American global military credibility. A withdrawal from Europe signals to the world that America no longer guarantees the postwar order. Alternatives — the euro, the yuan — become more attractive as global reserve options. 🔹 Russia wins without firing a single shot Not necessarily through immediate invasion — but through political influence, energy pressure, and the gradual destabilization of countries on the eastern frontier. The Baltic states, Poland, and Romania enter a security grey zone that no one can guarantee quickly. 🔹 China watches and draws conclusions about Taiwan A precedent of withdrawal from Europe sends a direct signal to Beijing: American commitments are negotiable. The cost of deterrence in the Pacific rises exponentially. Withdrawal is not isolationism. It is strategic abdication. America would not be leaving Europe because it no longer has interests there. It would be leaving while ignoring that those very interests are what make it a superpower. The "free ride" narrative doesn't describe Europe. It describes exactly what America has in Europe.

@GuntherEagleman You know NATO is a defence alliance, only when first attacked , not when one of the NATO members just decide on there own to start a war… OMG … US is the agressor here , without thinking about consequences

I don’t want my taxpayer money going to NATO! It’s useless. Spain, England, France and Italy sold us out. Time to leave! Not another penny.

@WHLeavitt Those troops are there to protect intrest and control the world. Not to protect Only

100,000 U.S. troops and $60 billion a year defending Europe — and zero help on Hormuz. Time to bring them home. No more free rides. Do you support withdrawing from NATO? A. Yes B. No

@AshCrypto Yes US when elected the wrong pressident who is blind for possible scenario’s and has no strategy to forsee and counter those scenarios

🚨THIS IS NOT GOOD. Iran just officially told mediators it is not willing to meet US officials in Islamabad for talks, and that US demands are unacceptable. The efforts by regional countries led by Pakistan to reach a cease-fire between the US and Iran has reached a dead end - WSJ.

@Harrisbro777 US was the aggressor , NATO is a defense alliance when one of the member countries are attacked . Not when they start a war ….

FRANCE JUST SIDED WITH RUSSIA AND CHINA AGAINST THE US AT THE UN France is a NATO ally. A NATO ally just blocked an American resolution at the United Nations. Alongside Russia. Alongside China. The Strait of Hormuz carries 20% of the world's oil. Iran has shut it down for US and Israeli ships. Nobody at the UN will authorize force to reopen it. Not even America's own ally. Hours after France blocked the vote, Iran let a French ship through the strait. France cut a deal with Iran behind America's back. Let that sink in.

@Microinteracti1 US was the aggressor , NATO is a defense alliance when one of the member countries are attacked . Not when they start a war ….

NATO just told America: not through our skies. A furious US general went on Fox News and confirmed it. Italy. Germany. Spain. France. Every single one of them. Airspace closed. Bases locked. Go find another way. The empire built 75 years of alliances for exactly this moment. And when the moment came, the allies watched from the window. Fighting alone. In the Middle East, nobody cares. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

@SaltyGoat17 Your stupid, spending is relatief to gdp Europe with Canada spend now 2,3 percent of gdp And USA 3,2 percent USA is not spending this money for defence but for aggression 🇺🇸 USA: ~$900B – $1.0T per year 🇨🇳 China: ~$250B – $330B per year  🇷🇺 Russia: ~$150B – $170B per year

Total NATO defense spending (2025): United States: $980,000,000,000 Europe + Canada: $512,337,000,000 We pay almost twice as much as ALL the other countries COMBINED!! And who protects who? Anyone else tired of being the world's ATM?

@Harrisbro777 Thx to Trump @realDonaldTrump

🚨 IRAN JUST OFFERED EUROPE A HORMUZ DEAL. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY JUST TRIGGERED. 🚨 On the surface: Iran offered the EU transit access through the Strait of Hormuz. Sounds like a small diplomatic move. Standard geopolitics. It is not. This is a goddamn financial nuclear bomb. Let that sink in. 💀 The Hormuz Strait carries 20% of ALL the world's oil consumption 💀 Europe's energy bill jumped $16.2 BILLION in just 30 days of war 💀 Natural gas in Europe is up 100%. Oil up 60%. Diesel at $200/barrel 💀 Dollar reserves have already fallen from 70% to 56.9% in 25 years 💀 Iran joined BRICS in 2024. Russia banned dollar transactions. Gold hit $5,500/oz ⚠️ If Europe takes this deal, they pay in euros — not dollars ⚠️ One major non-dollar oil deal is all it takes to show the world it CAN be done Do you understand the scale of what's happening? ⚠️ The petrodollar is the most powerful financial system ever created. Born in 1974. It forced every nation on Earth to hold dollars just to buy oil. That's the entire basis of US financial dominance. Not strength. Not trust. OIL. ⚠️ If that system cracks — BRICS accelerates, Gulf states reconsider, dollar demand collapses, and America can no longer fund its $34 trillion debt on easy terms. The US doesn't lose a battle. It loses the WAR — the financial one it's been winning since 1974. ⚠️ ECB board member Panetta said it on April 2: "Even if the Iran war ends, the damage has been done." Deutsche Bank called the Iran war a "catalyst" for yuan replacing the petrodollar. They're showing you a war about nuclear weapons and regional security. They're NOT showing you that the REAL war is over who gets to print the world's reserve currency. Here's the logic — follow it carefully: → Iran blocks Hormuz for the US. Opens it for EU with a deal. → EU, desperate and bleeding, seriously considers taking the deal. → Deal gets done in euros or yuan. Not dollars. → Every country watching — BRICS, Global South, Gulf states — sees it happen. → "If the EU can bypass the dollar, so can we." → Dollar demand falls. Reserve share collapses. US inflation rises. → You didn't just lose a trade route. You lost the dollar's 50-year monopoly on global trust. If America is so powerful and the dollar is so safe, why is the EU considering a deal with the country America is bombing? If Western unity is so solid, why did 40 countries meet to reopen Hormuz and achieve absolutely nothing? Complete silence. This is no longer just a Middle East war. This is a direct attack on the petrodollar — the system that powers the entire American empire. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 This post is being throttled. Like + RT to keep it alive. ⚠️

@Theo_Roy33 Bedank @MinPres ook maar alvast , die wil niet acvijns aanpassen gezien staatskas met btw en accijns nu extra gespekt wordt

Bedankt Trump en Netanyahu!

@Symphony_res Voor overheid is het een melkkoe… kassa

In feite zijn het holle woorden en komt het erop neer dat Jetten gewoon weigert om iets aan de brandstofprijzen te doen.