Manuel Astudillo

2.2K posts

Manuel Astudillo banner
Manuel Astudillo

Manuel Astudillo

@manast

OSS Indiehacker. @bullmqhq - https://t.co/oCM7Woeqzw - @Castmill https://t.co/xEa0mjIbKn build profitable businesses around Open Source.

Background Jobs that scales Katılım Nisan 2009
80 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@shl I thought tailwind was dead due to vibe coding actually... what is the point to use it when copilot will generate beautiful custom CSS classes for all your particular needs?
English
0
0
0
370
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
The old definition of a programmer, as a person that converts coffee into code, needs to be revisited.
English
0
0
1
107
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
AI made it possible for everybody to release an MVP in a weekend, whereas without AI this was only possible for people like me and @shl. Still, do you think it made it easier to succeed? I think you know the answer...
English
0
0
0
112
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@AStrasser116 "There is a non zero probability that we all become dumber than rocks without AI, there is a much higher probability that we all become dumber than rocks with AI." - Me, a nobody.
English
0
0
5
114
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
"There is a nonzero probability that developing AI kills everybody. There is a much higher probability that not developing AI kills everybody." - Matthew Ginsberg at Google DeepMind
English
29
15
137
16.6K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
The tale of LLMs converging to AGI and ASI is the old tale of "The emperor's new clothes". Sooner or later somebody of importance is going to point out that they are completely naked.
English
0
0
0
91
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
They can hype it as much as they want, but GPT 5.4 is not good for coding... hallucinations and utterly nonsense as I have not seen in at least 6 months. Back to Opus.
English
0
0
0
190
AlphaFox
AlphaFox@alphafox·
Descent turns 30 years old today! This innovative 3D shooter will actually play on a 486 with 4MB of RAM - talk about efficient memory usage! (I tried it)
English
292
257
2.8K
150.6K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@robj3d3 What a waste of resources... merge commits with 30000+ lines, from a guy that does not even know how to use git... this is not going to end well.
English
0
0
2
133
Rob Hallam
Rob Hallam@robj3d3·
This 18 year old literally has 12 $200 Codex plans. Here's exactly how he organizes them to build 100x faster: (we're cooked)
English
195
49
1.1K
582.2K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@jarredsumner Of course BullMQ rely on quite complex lua scripts. A simpler implementation can be implemented probably an order of magnitude faster. At the end of the day the bottleneck is usually on the job processing code itself.
English
0
0
0
86
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@jarredsumner I did a benchmark a couple of weeks ago, I wonder how much faster it could go with BunJS native Redis client. From what I could understand, BunJS is currently saturating my Redis instance, not even using C I could make it faster. bullmq.io/articles/bench…
English
1
0
2
1.2K
Jarred Sumner
Jarred Sumner@jarredsumner·
i still want bun to have a builtin job queue api with redis & postgres backends
English
103
9
1.2K
73.3K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
RT @bullmqhq: New in BullMQ Telemetry: Gauge Metrics. We just added documentation for Gauge metrics in the BullMQ telemetry section. Ga…
English
0
1
0
33
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@yongfook I have a feeling the new SEO is writing more bullshit than ever as AIs are still not particularly good at detecting bullshit.
English
0
0
0
26
Jon Yongfook
Jon Yongfook@yongfook·
As a B2B SaaS this terrifies me: I have basically stopped clicking on google results. The AI summary is good enough, and for other things I just ask ChatGPT. My business relies on SEO, so my own actions are filling me with existential dread. Currently we are not wildly changing our strategy. I am working under the assumption that as long as we make it good for people (SEO) that's also making it good for bots. I'm also experimenting with youtube content, as I have noticed that my consumption of video content has at least stayed the same or increased, LLMs have not affected that (yet).
English
105
1
207
19.6K
Simon Wardley
Simon Wardley@swardley·
Software engineers, you have 5 days left. 14 March 2025. Amodei said that AI would write all the software in 12 months. That's five days from now. Prepare to disappear. businessinsider.com/anthropic-ceo-…
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Dario Amodei just told software engineers exactly how long they have. Six to twelve months. Amodei: “I have engineers within Anthropic who say I don’t write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code, I edit it, I do the things around it.” The people building the most powerful AI in history have already stopped writing code. That is not a forecast. That is the current working condition inside the lab closest to the frontier. Amodei: “We might be six to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all, of what SWEs do end-to-end.” The tech industry spent a decade making software engineers its highest-paid, most protected class. That era has a last day now. When a model can execute an entire software build end-to-end, the ability to write syntax stops being a skill. It becomes a credential for a job that no longer exists. Amodei: “And then it’s a question of how fast does that loop close.” That is the sentence everyone skipped. The code was never the hard part. The hard part was everything around it. The model just learned everything around it. Writing the code is already nearly gone. Testing is next. Deployment is next. When all three collapse into a single autonomous execution loop, the machine no longer needs a human in the chain at all. The corporation or sovereign state that closes that loop first does not gain a competitive advantage. It gains a category of speed that biological engineers cannot match, track, or reverse. That is not disruption. That is replacement at a systems level. Amodei is not describing a future disruption. He is describing the current state of his own building. The loop is already closing. The only question is whether you are inside it or outside it when it seals.

English
284
259
3.1K
386.7K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@arthurk5r @swardley Exactly, he could have not been more right. Now, It could happen that the poster of this post has not embraced AI yet, and believes, in his ignorance, that nobody else has either.
English
1
0
1
164
Arthur
Arthur@arthurk5r·
@swardley And he was right. He didn’t say SWE would disappear, he said that the AI would write most and maybe all of the code. He was incredibly right. Most devs (at least in the X bubble) can’t live without prompting the AI to code for them now.
English
23
0
49
6.8K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@AdamBLiv Great, we all do this and nobody needs to work anymore, who said AI was required for liberating human kind from labour!
English
0
0
0
28
Adam Livingston
Adam Livingston@AdamBLiv·
Did you know you can retire with just $869,565 and NEVER WORK AGAIN? Forget the 4% Rule. That old advice said you needed $2.5 million to retire and safely withdraw $100,000/year. That’s dead. Because STRC pays an 11.5% dividend, tax-deferred, and it's paid monthly. That means $869,565 = $100K/year in passive income. No selling. No stress. No Wall Street roulette. Just dividend checks. Every month. STRC is turning early retirement from a pipe dream into a plan. ✅ Retire in your 30s or 40s ✅ Keep your lifestyle ✅ Live off dividends forever Why grind for decades to save $2.5 million... When you can hit $869K and walk away? Buy STRC. Pocket the yield. Exit the rat race.
Adam Livingston tweet media
English
251
402
2.8K
193.7K
Manuel Astudillo
Manuel Astudillo@manast·
@david_bonilla Pasa lo mismo con muchos productos de electrónica y electrodomésticos. Después de 5 años si te sigue durando da las gracias, porque la reparación practicamente nunca compensa. Para productos más caros lo suyo es comprar un seguro adicional que te amplia la garantía unos años más.
Español
0
0
1
334
David Bonilla
David Bonilla@david_bonilla·
Quiero compartir con vosotros lo que me ha pasado porque me está costando aceptar que las cosas sean tal como me las están contando. Se nos ha estropeado la TV (Samsung QE85 de finales de 2020, enciende, se escucha, pero no hay imagen) y parece ser que es... IRREPARABLE. Según informa el servicio técnico al que nos deriva Samsung, en los modelos grandes (más de 65 pulgadas) no se arreglan componentes sueltos porque —según ellos— el cristal es tan grande que, si lo quitas, rompe. O cambias el panel entero (1700€+IVA) o tiras la tele. Me cuesta aceptar que Samsung (o cualquier otra marca) fabrique paneles que, tras el periodo de garantía, en la practica sean irreparables porque la supuesta reparación cuesta más que una TV nueva con características similares y que no sea algo público y notorio. El propio servicio técnico nos recomienda no comprar paneles de más de 77 pulgadas. Lo cuál también me parece increíble. Que desaconsejen la compra de sus propios productos. Supongo que el mercado de este tipo de paneles es pequeño y el problema no afecta a mucha gente, pero hacer una inversión de más de 3.000€ en algo para que, apenas 5 años después, sea solo un enorme pisapapeles, me parece duro. Y ahora la duda es ¿qué hago?
Español
492
101
548
267.5K