Manupa

2.3K posts

Manupa banner
Manupa

Manupa

@manupadev

Co-founder/ex-CTO https://t.co/24RW21b6qe | Software Engineer, AI @TaxxaAI | Technical Consultant

Colombo, Sri Lanka Katılım Ağustos 2022
482 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Manupa
Manupa@manupadev·
@kevin2kelly @dwarkesh_sp Where can I find this ? Your books changed my life. Especially your writings on cybernetics and swarm intelligence got me into AI and CS in 2021
English
0
0
0
10
Kevin Kelly
Kevin Kelly@kevin2kelly·
@manupadev @dwarkesh_sp HA! But thanks. I've already been on Dwarkesh's podcast, when he was starting out. He was already asking hard questions.
English
1
0
0
14
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp·
Who should I interview on my podcast? Open to more AI, but also to random history/econ/etc professors that I might not have heard of before.
English
1.1K
38
1.6K
283.9K
Manupa retweetledi
Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock@mattpocockuk·
Skills should be: - Concise - Responsible for one thing, not multi-step - Composable - Progressively disclosed - Harness-agnostic What else? Or - what did I get wrong?
English
187
82
1.7K
125.1K
Manupa retweetledi
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
I am absolutely more productive using agents. I don't know the factor but it's large. However much of that productivity is spent tuning the agents and hardening the product. I'm guessing 30%-40%. Some might consider that a waste; but I don't. The software I'm creating nowadays is vastly more robust than I'd ever been able to create manually. I don't mean that the code is better. I mean the surrounding tests are vastly better. I have a higher degree of confidence than I ever had manually -- even when I used very disciplined TDD and Acceptance testing. And then there's the ability to quickly reorganize the modules and the architecture while keeping those robust tests running. That is a tremendous boon.
English
116
187
2.2K
296.8K
Manupa
Manupa@manupadev·
Louder for the ones in the back 🙂
Manupa tweet media
English
0
0
5
114
Manupa
Manupa@manupadev·
@codewithantonio With a cli you have to install it on the runtime the agent client lives in, with an mcp its just easy configuration to be done. Matters when you build for non technical users
English
1
0
3
689
Manupa retweetledi
Zara Zhang
Zara Zhang@zarazhangrui·
Great slide from the “How to thrive as an AI-era developer” session at Google I/O today I think this T-shape will apply to not just developers but every job function We need to - go deeper with our domain expertise - go wider with adjacent skills and fields - learn to use AI well on top
Zara Zhang tweet media
English
18
84
563
75.4K
Manupa retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Personal update: I've joined Anthropic. I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D. I remain deeply passionate about education and plan to resume my work on it in time.
English
7.9K
11.1K
148.9K
27.1M
Manupa
Manupa@manupadev·
@mattpocockuk Wouldn't that many flags cause so many branches in the feature surfaces ?
English
0
0
0
174
Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock@mattpocockuk·
Is anyone doing feature flag development with agents? Not tried it, but in theory feature flagging is an alternative model to PR's to getting work on main. 1. Put it on main, disabled by a flag 2. Deploy with the rest of the system 3. Unflag to selected users early 4. Fix bugs for those users 5. Unflag to more users 6. Repeat until shipped Feels like a perfect strategy to pair with agents
English
186
31
826
191.3K
Manupa
Manupa@manupadev·
@EffectTS_ Once you see how your data flows through effect, you can't never go back
English
0
0
0
199
Manupa retweetledi
Rajat
Rajat@rajatsandeepsen·
Vercel's AI-SDK is way better than Google's ADK
English
0
1
2
115
Manupa retweetledi
Jeremy Howard
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward·
This is misleading. This policy redefines the term "interactive" to mean "using an Anthropic front-end". If you use `claude -p` or Agent SDK to do something interactively, it now uses credits, not your subscription limits. So the "interactive use" heading saying "unchanged" subscriptions is not accurate.
Lydia Hallie ✨@lydiahallie

To add some clarity: you don't pay extra. It's the same subscription, same price per month. What's new our sub now covers two separate pools: · Interactive → sub limits, unchanged · Programmatic → new $20–$200 included(!!) credit, metered at API rates

English
44
44
560
91.6K
Manupa
Manupa@manupadev·
@charlieholtz Let's keep improving Big Terminal mode and see how it goes. I have faith in you guys 🫶
English
0
0
0
12
Manupa retweetledi
Kun Chen
Kun Chen@kunchenguid·
since many people are getting tricked by Anthropic’s sugar coating, let me further clarify what the change really is programmatically invoking claude through “claude -p” (and equivalent) is how a lot of people have been using claude. this was an approved use case of the subscription quota since a year ago and people built various advanced tools and workflows with this the change today makes it so that such usage can no longer draw from the original subscription quota. instead, they now get charged at API pricing which can be over 25x more expensive than subscription quota if i keep using my claude subscription the same way, last month it cost me $200. next month it will cost me over $5500 - Anthropic will give me $200 credit back from the $5500 expense so I pay $5300 please don’t get tricked into thinking this is a “new free credit pool”. it’s taking back something that’s been part of the subscription value since the beginning
Kun Chen tweet media
English
23
12
114
14.2K