真音 maonnote.bsky.social

"Instead of a power plant strike, a plague of the firstborn - tomorrow evening, eliminate the children of Vahidi, Araghchi, and Ghalibaf. If we can't get to the parents, hit their children" Israeli analyst Orit Perlov, of the INSS think-tank, affiliated with Tel Aviv University, calls to murder children in Iran. She later deleted this tweet. Here's a translation of the full tweet: "Please replace the state approach with a cruel religious approach. Instead of a power plant strike, a plague of the firstborn - tomorrow evening, eliminate the children of Vahidi, Araghchi, and Ghalibaf. If we can't get to the parents, harm their children (it took us two years to do it in Gaza. We haven't done it in Lebanon yet). These are religious patents. No state rationality is working right now. Instead of a "mad landlord" approach, we need a cruel landlord. Trump can't promise hell - that's exactly what they want. Hitting power plants would be counterproductive If they drag us into a boxing match and ping-pong games - We lose."

- Strait of Hormuz is not closed. Ships hesitate because insurers fear the war of choice you initiated—not Iran - No insurer—and no Iranian—will be swayed by more threats. Try respect - Freedom of Navigation cannot exist without Freedom of Trade. Respect both—or expect neither

トランプがイランの発電所を壊滅させた場合、イランはホルムズ海峡を完全に封鎖し、湾岸諸国の重要インフラを攻撃する、と宣言。 これが現実になれば世界は終わり、あとはslow painful death to everyoneだ。

BREAKING: Iran says it will shut the Strait of Hormuz 'completely', and hit vital infrastructure in the region, if Trump goes through with threat to 'obliterate' Iranian power plants if the Strait is not opened within 48 hours.

Trump: “You will soon find out what will happen with the ultimatum on the power plants. The result will be very good. There will be the total destruction of Iran, and it is going to work great.” Source: Israel’s Channel 13

BREAKING: US Treasury Secretary Bessent says the US will have “50 days of higher prices for 50 years of no Iran nukes.”

How to Identify War Propaganda 101: Who was the outlet who initially released the report on Iran supposedly firing missiles toward Diego Garcia? Who owns the Wall Street Journal? What are their connections and motivations? Start there. Next, analyze the content of the report. Does it provide adequate details or evidence to support the claims being made by those sharing the report? Keep in mind, the report hasn’t been confirmed. However, even if the report is accurate, here are some starting points: Did the missiles actually have the capability to reach Diego Garcia? We know from the report that one of the missiles failed entirely and that the US refused to comment on what supposedly happened to the other missile. So let me ask what should be an obvious question: if 1 (or 50%) of the missiles that were launched completely failed, and the report doesn’t provide any evidence or details on the effectiveness, capability, accuracy or result of the other missile that was launched (besides the fact that we know it didn’t reach Diego Garcia) … then how can any honest person suddenly claim Iran has effectively demonstrated this increased capability that no one knew about? Finally, observe the individuals who are part of the coordinated astroturf media campaign. What are their motivations and policy positions? Who do they work for? What is their track record of being accurate and honest? Finally, you need to consider the timing of a report like this in the context of the current state of the war or conflict itself. I hope this helps.