Marcellos_mg

@antitheistdad Nada disso. Se Deus for um axioma quem tem que demonstrar o contrário é o querelante, vulgo ateu .

Atheists don’t need to disprove God’s existence to theists. Many versions of theistic claims are unfalsifiable, which makes the attempt pointless. The burden of proof should remain on the theist, where it belongs.

@angelica960622 Li uma vez um de 210 páginas em 7 horas ou 420 minutos. Uma página a cada 2 minutos.

¿Es humanamente posible leer un libro de 200 páginas en un solo día?

@MHTruthUltra Sim, mas correlação não significa causalidade. Em ambos os casos.

Being a billionaire doesn't mean you're highly intelligent. It likely means you're a sociopath who will do whatever it takes to obtain more.

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Eu preferiria te chamar de troll mas vejo que o buraco é mais embaixo afinal.

@marcellos_mg @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Whenever you’re done playing definition dodgeball, let me know. I’ll be here for the real talk.

Atheism: The Faith That Thinks It Has No Obligations Atheism is not the default, burden-free position. It carries its own metaphysical commitments—about existence, consciousness, morality, and meaning that require serious defense. The strongest atheist thinkers (Bertrand Russell, Daniel Dennett, Thomas Nagel) acknowledge this openly. Atheism has a price tag. It’s a worldview with hard commitments. Atheism struggles badly with why questions—why anything exists, why it’s ordered, why we can know it, why anything matters. A worldview that cannot answer the deepest questions about existence, consciousness, and morality is not the most reasonable explanation for the way things are. It’s an incomplete one. Ultimately, it boils down to one question: Does atheism offer the strongest, most reasonable and most convincing explanations for reality? Francis Bacon, the father of modern science: “God never wrought miracle to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it. It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion.”

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497

@marcellos_mg @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Obviously not. Your definition is against English and Portuguese dictionaries as well as common use.

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Auto explicativo.

@marcellos_mg @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Prove your assertion

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Falácia da falaciação.

Falácia Definista (também chamada de Definição Persuasiva ou Falácia da Definição)DefiniçãoA falácia definista ocorre quando alguém define ou redefine um termo de forma não padrão, tendenciosa ou conveniente para si, e depois trata essa definição como se fosse o significado universalmente aceito ou “verdadeiro”. Isso permite vencer um argumento manipulando a linguagem em vez de abordar a substância real da questão.Ela introduz uma conclusão não argumentada por meio da própria definição.

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Não existe uma doutrina se não houver adepto, ou ateísmo sem militância.

definist fallacy In English: “-ism is a suffix added to the end of a word to indicate a system of belief, a doctrine, a practice, or a distinctive way of behaving.” Even Portuguese -ismo doesn't mean what you're saying: Official Portuguese definitions: -It forms nouns meaning: doctrine, system, theory, practice, philosophy, tendency, movement, or characteristic behavior. -It is neutral — it carries no built-in connotation of militancy or activism. -Sources like the Houaiss Dictionary, Priberam, and Wikipédia (Portuguese) all describe it the same way: it creates abstract nouns for ideas, schools of thought, etc.

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Sufixo ismo significa militância. Ateísmo é militância Pacifismo também

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Reitero meu ponto

@pitboxer_crafts @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Pacifismo também é militância.

@marcellos_mg @jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Pacifism has entered the discussion

@VidaemOrbita_ Bom, eu nunca precisei que Jesus existisse para ser cristão.

Não existem fontes não cristãs independentes que mencionem ou documentem os milagres de Jesus. Todas as narrativas detalhadas dos milagres vêm exclusivamente dos evangelhos e de textos cristãos derivados deles. As poucas e problemáticas referências externas mostram apenas a FAMA de feiticeiro, mas não confirmam os milagres. Ainda assim, o cristão acredita que está dedicando a vida por uma verdade absoluta e incontestável. É o maior golpe da história.

@Ravenismeee Você põe no acarajé,

When life gives you lemon, you make lemonade, so when life gives you pepper what do you make??

@jebcorliss @anchoredso37497 Ateísmo, como próprio sufixo ismo denota, não é sobre deuses, mas sobre militância.

Atheism isn’t a “worldview with heavy metaphysical commitments”—it’s simply the lack of belief in gods. Most atheists (weak/negative atheism) aren’t claiming “no gods exist with certainty” or that they have all the answers about consciousness, morality, or why anything exists. That’s a common strawman. The burden of proof lies on the positive claim: “A specific God exists with these attributes and intervenes in reality.” Extraordinary claims require evidence. Not believing in Zeus, Thor, or the Abrahamic God until shown sufficient reason isn’t “faith”—it’s the rational default, just like not believing in invisible unicorns. Theism doesn’t actually solve the “why” questions better. Saying “God did it” just kicks the can: Why God? Why this God? Why does God allow evil/suffering/hiddenness? Naturalism has progress via science (cosmology, evolution, neuroscience) on order, life, and mind—even if gaps remain. “God” often adds complexity without explanatory power. Russell, Dennett, and Nagel highlight real philosophical challenges (hard problem of consciousness, etc.), but they don’t concede atheism loses. They’re doing philosophy within naturalism. Many theistic arguments have their own holes (Euthyphro dilemma on morality, infinite regress on cosmology). That Bacon quote is from 1625—pre-Darwin, pre-quantum mechanics, pre-modern cosmology. “Deeper philosophy” today? Surveys of philosophers (PhilPapers) show most are atheists or agnostics. Science’s best minds overwhelmingly are too. Education and inquiry tend to reduce religious belief, not increase it. Atheism doesn’t need to be a complete theory of everything to be reasonable. The universe’s intelligibility is better addressed by evidence-based naturalism than by positing an unevidenced supernatural agent. The post flips the burden while assuming theism wins by default. It doesn’t.

@UtdGotham @iamAtheistGirl Tudo lorota já refutada.

@iamAtheistGirl Stop running away There's historical evidence

these religious folk will say things like “well then there’s no reliable evidence for julius caesar” news flash NO ONE IS TRYING TO CONTROL OTHERS WITH JULIUS CAESAR honestly i don’t give two shits as to whether or not he existed but there is in fact more reliable evidence for him than jesus

@WeimarClub É que tecnicamente o chumbo pode sim, virar ouro...

Nein, und ich muss auch nicht 3.000 Seiten zentralplanerischen Schwachsinn lesen, um zu wissen, dass Kollektivismus Müll ist. Ich brauche kein komplettes Studium der Alchemie, um zu erkennen, dass Blei nicht zu Gold wird. Und ich brauche Marx nicht Seite für Seite durchzuarbeiten, um zu sehen, dass die Abschaffung des Privateigentums, die Diktatur des Proletariats und die ‚wissenschaftliche‘ Vorhersage des Kommunismus in der Praxis immer dasselbe produziert haben: Armut, Gulags und eine neue herrschende Klasse aus Parteifunktionären. Wer echte Freiheit will, braucht keine Marx-Bibel. Er braucht nur zwei Dinge: 1. Die Erkenntnis, dass Individuen Rechte haben, nicht Klassen. 2. Die Einsicht, dass freiwilliger Tausch und Privateigentum die einzigen Wege zu Wohlstand und Frieden sind.

@Terfs_R @VeraVer18501672 @elonmusk @JohnNickla68342 @UN_Women Intersexo não existe. Ou há um ou outro. Ou então, ou há um anômalo, ou outro. Sexo e que nem as duas partes de uma mistura epoxi.

@VeraVer18501672 @elonmusk @JohnNickla68342 @UN_Women Indeed. People with intersex conditions are anomalies. We have five fingers on each hand, but there are anomalies who have six fingers on each hand. That doesn’t mean people in general have six fingers on each hand.

Let women be. Let women lead. Let women thrive. Let women speak up. Let women represent. Let women live peacefully. Let women express themselves. Let women control their bodies. Let women live.

@YourAnonNews Ou talvez seja o seu viesse? Pense nisso.

These billionaires' obsession with accumulating more & more wealth is a mental illness. Think about it. Trump is 80 years old and he's still obsessed with making more money than he'll ever spend. Enough is never enough for these people who don't ever help anyone but themselves.