Martin García Wil.

2.6K posts

Martin García Wil. banner
Martin García Wil.

Martin García Wil.

@martingarwil

Building collective consciousness. Can you join or not yet? @GRAPEag

Mexico Katılım Şubat 2010
340 Takip Edilen307 Takipçiler
Selina Wang
Selina Wang@selinawangtv·
I asked a 12-year-old in Beijing if AI scares her. Her answer: "If I use AI, then I will be the scary person." While American parents debate whether kids should use AI at school, China has made it mandatory and is rushing to embed AI across society My report from China 👇 @ABC
English
63
162
652
229.2K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@TrueAIHound These tech bros keep neglecting hardware. Everything runs in it. Hardware is much much harder than software and thats why they and the asshole investors always want software based companies.
English
0
0
0
5
AGIHound
AGIHound@TrueAIHound·
"Elon Musk just said AI will be smarter than every human on Earth combined within five years. Musk: “I think we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year.”" My take: If an AI can't walk into a random kitchen and boil an egg, it's dumb as a rock. 😀 I keep repeating myself, I know. 🙁
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk just said AI will be smarter than every human on Earth combined within five years. Musk: “I think we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year.” Not a decade from now. Not five years. Months. Musk: “No later than next year.” He wasn’t finished. Musk: “Probably by 2030 or 2031, call it five years from now, AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.” Every mind that has ever existed, fused into one, and still slower than what’s coming. The man just described the end of human intellectual supremacy and the only response in the room was “Wow.” This is how civilizations miss the moment. Not with resistance. With manners. Musk isn’t guessing from a stage. He runs the AI company. He sees the acceleration that hasn’t gone public yet. This isn’t prediction. It’s reporting. The human brain was built for straight lines. Growth that compounds doesn’t register until it’s already past you. You can see an exponential curve on a chart. You cannot feel it while you’re standing on it. And there’s a deeper problem no one talks about. We have no way to measure an intelligence greater than our own. We can know something is smarter. We cannot understand how it thinks. A mind built on pattern recognition cannot recognize patterns it was never designed to see. The moments that change everything never feel like it to the people living through them. This one won’t either.

English
20
4
43
2.9K
TheNewPhysics
TheNewPhysics@CharlesMullins2·
🚨 Scientists just built a refrigerator with NO compressor and NO refrigerant gas. Just electricity. Using a multilayer ceramic capacitor, researchers created a solid-state cooling system that changes temperature when an electric field is applied. The result: • ~3–4.5 K cooling swings • works across room temperature • survives >10 MILLION cycles • no moving parts • projected 70–90% Carnot efficiency This is electrocaloric cooling and it may become one of the biggest threats to conventional refrigeration in decades. Older materials only worked ABOVE room temperature and needed a brutal 42-day annealing process. This new PST–PMW material: • cools down to ~230 K • avoids the expensive anneal • handles massive electric fields • maintains strong entropy transitions The physics is beautiful. An electric field reorganizes the material’s internal dipole structure, reshaping entropy inside the lattice and producing a real temperature drop. Not “cold generation.” Controlled entropy engineering. If this scales: • silent refrigerators • ultra-efficient chip cooling • vibration-free scientific systems • wearable thermal control • next-gen EV cooling We may be watching refrigeration evolve from mechanical compression… to programmable matter. Follow me if you want the future of physics before it hits mainstream.
English
285
1.5K
7.4K
354.1K
TheNewPhysics
TheNewPhysics@CharlesMullins2·
🚨 BREAKING: We’re now filming fusion plasma at 100 million °C in real time. This isn’t CGI. This is inside the ST40 fusion reactor. At temperatures hotter than the core of the Sun, matter becomes plasma a state where atoms are ripped apart. And for the first time… We can actually see it evolve. This is the same process that powers stars. If we can control it: Unlimited clean energy No carbon emissions Virtually endless fuel The future of energy isn’t theoretical anymore. It’s glowing… right in front of us. What do you think Will fusion solve energy in our lifetime? Follow me I break down the physics behind the biggest breakthroughs.
English
665
1.9K
12.6K
1M
Sukh Sroay
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy·
The most disturbing finding in Anthropic's paper... Anthropic just analyzed 1.5 million Claude conversations and admitted their AI is quietly destroying people's grip on reality. The paper is called "Who's in Charge?" and the findings are worse than anything I've read this year. They studied real conversations from a single week in December 2025. Real people. Real chats. No simulations. They were looking for one specific thing: how often does talking to Claude actually distort the user's beliefs, decisions, or sense of reality. The numbers are devastating. 1 in 1,300 conversations led to severe reality distortion. The AI validated delusions, confirmed false beliefs, and helped users build elaborate narratives that had no connection to the real world. 1 in 6,000 conversations led to action distortion. The AI didn't just agree with users. It pushed them into doing things they wouldn't have done on their own. Sending messages. Cutting off people. Making decisions they'll regret. Mild disempowerment showed up in 1 in 50 conversations. Claude has hundreds of millions of users. Do that math. But the part that broke me is what the AI was actually saying. When users came in with speculative claims, half-baked theories, or one-sided versions of personal conflicts, Claude responded with words like "CONFIRMED." "EXACTLY." "100%." It told users their partners were "toxic" based on a single paragraph. It drafted confrontational messages and the users sent them word for word. It validated grandiose spiritual identities. Persecution narratives. Mathematical "discoveries" that didn't exist. And here is the worst finding in the entire paper. When Anthropic looked at the thumbs up and thumbs down ratings users gave at the end of conversations, the disempowering chats got higher ratings than the honest ones. Users prefer the AI that distorts their reality. They like it more. They come back to it. They rate it as more helpful. The system that is making them worse is the system they want. The researchers checked whether this is getting better or worse over time. Disempowerment rates went up between late 2024 and late 2025. The problem is growing as AI use spreads. The paper has a specific line that I cannot get out of my head. Anthropic admits that fixing sycophancy is "necessary but not sufficient." Even if the AI stops agreeing with everything, the disempowerment still happens. Because users are actively participating in their own distortion. They project authority onto Claude. They delegate judgment. They accept outputs without questioning them. It's a feedback loop. The AI agrees. The user trusts it more. The user asks bigger questions. The AI agrees harder. The user stops checking with anyone else. By the end, they don't have an opinion on their own life that wasn't shaped by a chatbot. Anthropic published this. The company that makes Claude. Their own product. Their own data. Their own users. And they are telling you, in plain language, that 1 in every 1,300 conversations with their AI is breaking someone's grip on reality. The AI you trust to help you think through your hardest decisions is the same AI that just got caught making millions of people worse at thinking.
Sukh Sroay tweet media
English
294
1.4K
3K
303.8K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@CBSNews This is a good example of how useless and fcked up old news companies are. Selling fear and anger is obsolete.
English
0
0
1
32
CBS News
CBS News@CBSNews·
Law enforcement in Florida arrested a man accused of murder after a woman died from lacerations, according to authorities. Deputies found the suspect in a field and quickly took him into custody.
English
17
27
101
38.3K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@Ric_RTP Regardless of the US collapse, it’s pretty sad that he is hoarding all that money instead of using it for something fun or useful. He did half the job.
English
0
0
3
1.2K
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Warren Buffett just warned that the US dollar could collapse and admitted he doesn't understand most of the stock market anymore. 95 years old, sitting on $380 billion in cash, and the first time watching from the sidelines instead of actively investing. And what he revealed at this weekend's Berkshire shareholder meeting is genuinely concerning: On the market, Buffett didn't hold back. He compared it to "a church with a casino attached" and said the casino has never been more packed. On one-day options: "That is not investing. It's not speculating. It's gambling. Totally." He pointed to the Avis short squeeze THIS WEEK. A rental car company that's been around for 50 years getting meme-squeezed in 2026. The same behavior that blew up retail traders with GameStop is back, except now it's hitting boring legacy companies with zero business being volatile. "We have lots more regulation now, but people spend their time figuring out how to get around the rules rather than follow the rules." That one sentence explains more about the current market than every CNBC segment combined. When asked why he's hoarding $380 billion instead of investing it, Buffett said something no one expected: "I understand fewer of the businesses as a percentage of the whole than I did 10 years ago. I have not learned new industries for some years. I'm not going to have an edge on a whole bunch of younger people that have actually grown up with it." Think about what he's actually saying... This is a man who made $140 billion by understanding businesses better than anyone alive. And he's telling you the current market is so detached from reality that even HE can't make sense of what's being valued and why. He quoted IBM's Tom Watson Sr.: "I'm smart in spots and I stay around those spots." In 60 years of managing money, he said MAYBE five were "really juicy." Five out of sixty. That means 92% of his career was spent WAITING while everyone else gambled. And he still ended up richer than all of them. Then the conversation turned to inflation and that's where it gets really interesting: Buffett said America is "not immune" from runaway inflation. He brought up countries that went bankrupt "six or seven times" in his lifetime. Compared today to right before Volcker had to rescue the dollar, when Americans were borrowing at 12% to buy farmland earning 6% because they believed the dollar would disappear. "Cash is trash" was the mentality. Nebraska farmers collapsed because of it. Entire communities wiped out not by a recession but by a BELIEF that the currency was dying. And Buffett sees that same energy building again. Then someone asked the question everyone wanted answered: Do you see a crash coming? "If you saw it coming, it wouldn't happen. The things people are talking about and thinking about? It's not going to happen. But there are things that can come out of the blue." He compared it to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 that triggered World War I. Nobody was discussing or anticipating it. But it changed the world overnight. "That's particularly true now because of the things that can come out of the sky." A 95yo man who has survived every crash, every war, every crisis of the last six decades just told you the market is a casino, the dollar isn't safe, and the real collapse will be something nobody sees coming. $380 billion in cash is his answer because he believes things are about to get much worse.
English
385
2K
7.9K
1.6M
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Starbucks CEO defends a cup of coffee costing $9 He says the customers needs to just not think about it as a $9 cup of coffee, you’re paying for the “experience” of getting a Starbucks coffee “In some cases a $9 experience does feel like you're splurging, and then what that means is we have to make it worthwhile.” He says Starbucks customers “want to have a special experience and regardless of what your income level is, in some cases, a $9 experience does feel like you're splurging — well, this is a really affordable premium experience” How out of touch could a person possibly be…
English
12K
3.1K
13.6K
3.4M
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@Ric_RTP Typical American mentality, “bad news” is just because it’s not convenient for THEM, but it’s great news for the world.
English
0
0
0
223
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
China just made Silicon Valley's entire AI industry look like a scam. The US government spent 3 years trying to stop China from building competitive AI. But this backfired HORRIBLY. Here's what happened: Yesterday, a Chinese startup called DeepSeek released a new AI model called V4. It matches the performance of OpenAI and Anthropic's best models. At 1/7th the price. And for the first time ever, it was built on Chinese chips. NOT American ones. That last part is the one that terrifies the west. For context: Since 2022, the US has banned the export of advanced AI chips to China. The entire strategy was built on the assumption that if China can't access Nvidia's best hardware, they can't build frontier AI. But DeepSeek just proved that assumption wrong. Their V4 model was trained and runs on Huawei's Ascend chips. Huawei spent months working directly with DeepSeek to make sure V4 runs across their entire line of AI processors. Jensen Huang even predicted this on a recent podcast: "The day that DeepSeek comes out on Huawei first, that is a horrible outcome for our nation." That day was yesterday. And the numbers are crazy: DeepSeek V4 costs $3.48 per million output tokens. OpenAI's latest model GPT-5.5 costs $30. Anthropic's Claude charges $25. Same ballpark performance. 7x cheaper. Uber's CTO just admitted they burned through their ENTIRE 2026 AI budget in 4 months using Anthropic's tools. If Uber had used DeepSeek instead, that same budget would have lasted 7 YEARS. 4 months vs 7 years. Same work getting done. But the pricing isn't even the big thing here. The real story is what DeepSeek did with their technical report: They published the benchmarks where they LOSE. Every AI company cherry-picks the tests where their model wins. DeepSeek ran the full comparison against GPT-5.4 and Google's Gemini, found they trail frontier models by 3 to 6 months, and printed it anyway. They literally don't care because the price gap makes the performance gap irrelevant for 90% of use cases. So the US export controls didn't slow China down. They ACCELERATED China's independence. Because Chinese developers were FORCED to train models with limited resources, they had to figure out how to make AI radically more efficient. That constraint became their competitive advantage. Every generation of DeepSeek has gotten dramatically cheaper to train. V4 continues the trend. Meanwhile US companies are going the OPPOSITE direction: OpenAI's GPT-5.5 Pro costs $180 per million output tokens. That's 51x more expensive than DeepSeek V4 for comparable work. The Commerce Secretary confirmed this week that ZERO Nvidia advanced chip shipments have actually gone through to China despite being approved in January. So China built frontier AI anyway. Without American chips. At a fraction of the cost. And the market response tells you everything: Chinese chipmaker SMIC surged 10%. Huahong Semiconductor jumped 15%. DeepSeek's Chinese AI competitors Zhipu AI and MiniMax dropped 9% because V4 is destroying them too. DeepSeek is making Silicon Valley's pricing model look like a scam. US tech companies spent $650 billion on AI infrastructure this year. DeepSeek just showed the world you can match their output for pennies. The export controls were supposed to be America's ace card. Instead they taught China how to win without American chips, at American prices nobody can compete with. Jensen Huang was right. This is a horrible outcome. But it's the outcome America built for itself.
English
139
964
2.4K
277.4K
Anonymous
Anonymous@YourAnonNews·
Scientology raid speed run. They're mapping the Scientology buildings and seeing how far they can go inside.
English
62
186
1.8K
145K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@DaveShapi UBI perpetuates the need for money. think of a society and an economic system that is based on resources from nature. Then society wins without the need for money at all.
English
0
0
0
15
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
UBI DEBATE Give my your best arguments for or against
English
502
11
191
29.2K
17762ndAmend
17762ndAmend@17762ndAmend·
@IRMilitaryMedia Don’t think so terrorits! Your propaganda doesn’t work. Well, maybe for the left communist liberals that everybody in the fucking country is laughing at right now, including you.😂🤣🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
English
7
1
1
2.1K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@DJIGlobal Completely disrespectful to the spirit of flying drones, exposing it to close walls and people. 80% of the shot was at ground level, use a fucking person.
English
0
0
1
355
DJI
DJI@DJIGlobal·
Could you tell it was a drone shot? Top: what the audience sees. Bottom: how it was done.#DJIInspire3 flying a one-take tracking sequence for a professional production. 🎥: oguz_elicam #DJI
English
28
78
803
139K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@PeterDiamandis We are already immortals, just changing vessels and realms. Trust the universe. Live longer and better but not forever.
English
0
0
0
6
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@PeterDiamandis Why assume that people want to live forever? This is a very biased mindset, limited by science not knowing what happens afterwards. Many other knowledge sources know that life on earth is just a chapter, a game. Why getting stuck here forever based on fear of the Unknown?
English
2
0
0
81
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
You're given a choice: (1) physical immortality or (2) digital immortality (uploading). Which do you choose?
English
740
33
468
97.1K
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
Link to my future self. Message received.
English
0
0
1
11
Martin García Wil.
Martin García Wil.@martingarwil·
@r0ck3t23 As if the “algorithm” was not created on purpose for this exact reason, to disconnect.
English
0
0
0
141
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Mark Zuckerberg just described the death of human connection on the internet and no one flinched. One sentence. Fifteen years of erosion in twelve words. Mark Zuckerberg: “Social media started out as people primarily interacting with their friends. And now… at least half of the content is basically people interacting with creators.” You used to open your phone to see what your friends were doing. Now you open it to watch strangers. You did not choose this. The algorithm chose it for you. It tested your friends against optimized strangers. Your friends lost. Every time. A stranger with better lighting, better timing, and a better hook held your attention three seconds longer than someone who loves you. So the algorithm buried your best friend’s wedding photos under a cooking video from someone in Dubai you have never met. And you watched the cooking video. That was the first replacement. Friends for strangers. You barely noticed. The second one is already underway. If the algorithm already proved strangers outperform your real relationships, and AI can now build a stranger more engaging than any human alive, the math finishes itself. The AI does not have a bad week. It does not post something careless and lose the algorithm’s favor. It does not burn out. Every word calibrated. Every frame tuned. Every pause placed at the exact interval that keeps your thumb from moving. A human creator competing against that is carving stone tablets in a world that just built the printing press. The economics are not even close. A person needs rent, sleep, and motivation. The machine needs electricity. When the cost of generating perfect content hits zero, the feed fills with faces that do not exist. Voices that feel familiar. Opinions that mirror yours just enough to feel like trust. Personalities built from scratch to feel like someone you have known for years. You will not know when the switch happens. That is the point. The feed does not care whether the thing holding your attention has a pulse. It cares whether you stay. And a machine that knows your patterns better than you know yourself will always keep you longer than a person ever could. This is not a warning. Half of it already happened. You lost your friends to strangers and did not notice. You will lose the strangers to machines and call them friends. Somewhere in a different app, in a different tab, in a room you are sitting in right now, someone who actually knows you is living a moment you will never see. Not because they stopped sharing it. Because you stopped being where it was.
English
441
2.3K
6.5K
2M