Martin Larkin

Synthetic folic acid is being introduced to all flour in the UK including ‘organic flour’. No debate in our Parliament and no vote. Mass medication with something which will cause more harm than benefit in the those ( all of us ) who are exposed to it. Does that sound familiar ?

@Manu_Sisti claude

I’m shocked more people aren’t making $10,000/month with Claude. It’s simple. I shared it with a single mom... she now makes $4,000/month working 1 hour/day. Usually, I'd charge $199 for this, but today I'm giving it away 100% FREE (Claude prompts included) Like + comment 'Claude' & I'll DM it to you Must follow me to get DM. FREE for 48 hrs only.

Relentless Robbo ❤️

@TommiPedruzzi Claude

I’m shocked more people aren’t making $10,000/month with Claude. It’s simple. I recently shared this with a retiree... he’s now making $15K every month. Like and reply 'Claude' and I'll send you my step-by-step guide 100% FREE. (All my personal claude prompts included). Must follow me to get this proven guide in DM. FREE for the next 48 hours only.

Ultimately, the power on these decisions rests in America and while FSG have been great owners of LFC in many respects, they have also repeatedly shown themselves to be tone deaf on issues that matter deeply to supporters: £77 tickets, furlough and the European Super League being three obvious examples. This is another one. Announcing that prices will go up for three years running is a line in the sand. They don’t want this debated every year because they don’t want the scrutiny that comes with it. They’ve made that clear. And from what others involved in running Premier League clubs have let slip over time, Liverpool are far from alone in that thinking. This is about avoiding accountability. It’s about testing the water. And it’s about direction of travel. It’s about taking the game further away from the communities the clubs are supposed to represent. It’s about threatening matchday culture as we know it. It’s about making football less affordable, less accessible and less rooted in the people who made it what it is. You can afford it? Sound. But it’s not just about you. What about the next generation? What about the lads and girls opening their curtains and seeing a Premier League ground on their doorstep? What about the generational supporters who have followed their club through the decades, whatever the weather, whatever the football, wherever the game? Just fuck them off if they can’t afford it? Just let the atmospheres go? Let the flags, the banners, the songs, the traditions, the passion all slowly be priced out, leaving us with a popcorn product? And when people say Liverpool’s ticket prices are “not that bad”, ask why that is. We’d have had £77 tickets at Anfield a decade ago if supporters hadn’t stood up and done something about it. People need to read the room. This is about squeezing as much as possible out of what was once a working-class game. It’s about turning football into a premium product for those with the deepest pockets. It’s about the continued repackaging of the game people love into something colder, slicker and less human. And for what? Games abroad. Personal seat licences. Moving supporters from seats they’ve had for decades with friends and family to create more premium areas for experience hunters. “Category A+” £168 general admission tickets. This is not paranoia. It’s happening. It’s being discussed. And the powerbrokers in football don’t give a flying one about the cost of living, about the growing chunk of disposable income it takes for families to keep doing something they’ve always done, or about the communities that built these clubs in the first place. They don’t think it’s the tipping point. They don’t think it will lead to protests, boycotts or campaigning of the sort that won the away cap. So they all keep doing it. And they justify it by pointing at each other, while sitting round the same table and nudging the whole thing in the same direction. How did the European Super League come about again? They could stop. They could call a halt to the arms race. They could say enough, we’ve taken enough from matchgoers. Protect the people in the ordinary seats who create the atmosphere and make the money elsewhere. But they choose not to. It’s not business critical. It doesn’t move the dial in any meaningful way. But they do it anyway. So yes, you can come on here and tell people to “earn more”, or say £1,000 for a season ticket is fine. You can shrug your shoulders, do nothing and wait until it becomes your tipping point. You can ridicule or abuse the people who give up loads of their time trying to fight for football supporters. Or you can try to do something about it. There is an online meeting tomorrow. Come along, listen and have your say. Or don’t. Up to you. 👊🏼

This was an incredible, seemingly impromptu, moment on what has become the best studio show in sports. Bravo to all involved.

𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐁𝐋𝐄 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐅𝐎𝐎𝐓-𝐓𝐄𝐀? Foot-Tea is a FREE one hour football session, followed by a FREE hot meal and indoor activities for pupil premium children who receive government support, aged 4-12 years. In Kent alone, 21% of children receive free school meals during term time, but school holidays can provide a battle for families with financial worries to provide for their children. Our aim is to support disadvantaged families in some small way, providing to those most in need with an evening of entertainment and a cooked meal during the Easter Holidays. Follow the links below or scan the QR in the poster for more information and to register: tonbridge-angels.classforkids.io

Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok. The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet. And yes… you already know where it leads. OneLogin. A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account. This ban is not the end goal. It is one verification type. One tiny draconian token. One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle. And the equation remains the same: OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID. Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do: They’ll introduce the gate first. To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control. It will be a government check. A government login. A government permission slip. You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.” This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front. And once the token exists, it becomes the default. Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement. Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash. Because what they’re building is not an age gate. It’s a permission gate. A surveillance gate. A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled. They will see what you do. When you do it. What you search. What you access. What you post. And people will still be saying, with a straight face: “Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.” That’s the bait. Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?” And notice what he’s really saying. He is not empowering parents. He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted. The same government that has lied to you for years about safety. The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection. The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind. And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again. A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring. Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier: Henry VIII powers. Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction. And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House. They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State. The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen. And it gets worse. Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends. So what exactly are you “consulting” on? A decision that’s already been made. A system that’s already being implemented. A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be. Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children. They will sell it as “tracking attendance.” But it isn’t an attendance system. It is a digital tether. A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions. And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous: A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens. Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply. No access. No platform. No digital participation. No “privileges.” Just compliance. And here’s the part people are missing: They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end. They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it. They can amend laws at any time. They can expand definitions at any time. They can widen the net at any time. Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges. The lawmakers and the enforcers. And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations. That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.” This isn’t safeguarding. It’s centralisation. And it doesn’t stop there. The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation. Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing. No new “big scary bill.” No headline. No national debate. Just silent regulatory expansion. A little more coercion. A little more surveillance. A little more permissioning. Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter. And you’ll be told it’s normal. You’ll be told it’s safety. You’ll be told it’s “for the children.” This consultation is a farce. The law is being passed. Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture. This is not even the start of mission creep. This is another step. Another spoke. Another token. Another gate. And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety. Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number. There are privacy-preserving options. There are local-device checks. There are non-centralised approaches. But that is not the point. Because the point is not safety. The point is control. This is part of the digital gulag. The panopticon. A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key. Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...

Oh look, it rained. Areas of the country where water companies are currently dumped sh*t into rivers and on to beaches. Brown, currently dumping sewage. Red, has been dumping sewage within the last 24 hours.

Residual petrochemical solvents, encapsulated pesticides and heavy metals, GRAS (self declared as safe) and zero long term studies on exposure. What could go wrong?

Possibly one of my favourite ever players to wear the shirt. He was every fan through and through

Thanks for the memories you mad, mad bastard ❤️🇺🇾

@TheAnfieldWrap Never wanted a player to succeed at our club as much as Darwin. Flawed yes but I loved him!

Nunez, Nunez, Nunez! ✊📸

What is wrong with football….seriously?!? Often wonder if the people that run the game even like the game

Reeves, Starmer, Rayner, Reynolds - all creatures of the public sector. Never run a business, couldn’t run a business. I just get so frustrated. They do not understand the pressure of it - I wouldn’t trust any of them with a lemonade stand. So when they throw all of these extra taxes on small business owners, they simply do not understand what they are doing. Extra national insurance for employers? Oh, that’ll be fine. Reducing the threshold? Not a problem, employers can pay. Crack down on dividends? Who cares, that’s one for the owners. It’s so easy to say when you’ve got a comfortable salary, funded by the taxpayer. Politicians and their bureaucrats fear nothing. Civil servants never get sacked, they’re there for life. Running a business in 2025 Britain is bloody difficult. Really, really bloody difficult. I talk to people every day who are struggling. The stress of it is quite something. Constantly checking your emails, all weekend and on holiday. The spouse is annoyed because you can’t switch off. It is constant. The stress never ends. There’s no safety net, there’s no back up. Either you succeed, or fail. There is so much regulation and red tape - you can’t even sack anyone. So what do business owners do? They don’t hire anyone. Why take the risk? It’s just not worth it. So Government then cracks down with IR35, making it impossible for many to take on these contracts. It is brutal. It is relentless. Worst of all? It all comes from people who DO NOT understand what they are doing. I sit there in Westminster, listening to these gnomes drone on about the economy. You’d get more business sense out of a blindfolded toddler. At least they understand incentives. I find it all just so frustrating, I can’t even tell you. The answer is to radically slash tax - corporation, income, dividends. Take a Milei chainsaw to regulation. Be brutal. Tear it all down. A red tape bonfire visible from space. To the brave men and women who run their own business, you have my full respect. Keep going. It will get better. Please know that there is at least one MP on your side.

Liverpool FC. Premier League champions.

Champions. Number 20. And We’re 𝑵𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 Gonna Stop.

Salah has now scored and assisted in more Premier League games this season (11) then Eden Hazard did in his career (10). Comparison.

I want every Jalen Hurts hater to make sure their apology is as loud as the disrespect was.