Matt

@Sargon_of_Akkad @BretWeinstein It's no neo-con turn. He said no forever wars. He also said he would bomb the sh!t out of Iran before he ran for president in 2015. Here he is 10+ years later being consistent and bombing them. Not to mention, as he stated in his address, they've been attacking us for 47 years.

@BretWeinstein I don't think any of us expected this full-throated neocon turn, given Trump's consistent anti-war rhetoric, right up until early 2025.

Trump, who I advocated for in 2024, has gone full "mad king." In considering my responsibility, I'd ask you to remember: The case I made rested on the fact that Biden/Harris were figureheads, shielding a cabal that couldn't be held to account, whereas Trump could. And we must.

Good Lord what is happening in there!?

@marybeth5025 @AirForceDad50 @feldonthecat Its called satire. He said it to make Iran mad.

@AirForceDad50 @feldonthecat Real Conservatives are rightly upset about a “praise be to Allah” post on Easter, cultist.

We live in a crazy world. Trump says "Fuck" and the leftists have a meltdown. Muslims in Texas yell "Death to America" and libtards call it freedom of speech. That's exactly why im not a Democrat anymore.

He is risen.

@Divine_Wistaria @CoreCamiloX4 Thank you for the amazing work.

🌌🚀🧑‍🚀 ♪ from “Kai no Kiseki” ©︎falcom

@unusual_whales Considering we foot the majority of the bill there, it's just a waste of money

Rubio: If NATO is just about us defending Europe if they’re attacked, but them denying us basing rights when we need them, then that’s not a very good arrangement.

@WillSmithSpeak @unusual_whales The US didn't start anything. Iran has been attacking countries including the US for 47 years. This admin decided to end it.

@unusual_whales This is from a twisted mind. Always trying to put the blame on others. The USA started an illegal and immoral war on a sovereign country. Nobody want to be associated with that. NATO is a defensive alliance. The USA are the aggressors.

@C_3C_3 @IsaiahLCarter Any of Trump's appointments where they had to be hard fought to approve means they felt threatened by them. Kash Patel and Pam bondi got approved with minimal resistance. Especially Bondi

Anyone get the feeling… The Deep State tried to remove Hegseth so they had control of the military? They didn’t want a man with “We the People” on his arm in control of the military while POTUS Trump cleans up the mess they created to save America and the World. Protect Pete.

He is Risen.

@StuPoll64 @AlanCigarKing And since it's mostly EOs, if they don't codify them in to law they can easily be revoked with the next presidency

@StuPoll64 @AlanCigarKing Well, when Congress sits on its rear ends and passes less bills than any other admin in history, it forces trump to have to do executive orders to get anything done. They go on vacations every other month and then campaign for reelections. Passing off trump's ideas as their own

Obama: Buy health insurance or get fined. Biden: Get jabbed, or you lose your job and medical treatment. Explain to me how President Trump is a fascist dictator again...

Old Mario needs some help 🥹

總結

@Starrtoon Honestly this was a wakeup call I needed Thanks for the post brother

why are you as a Christian following those NSFW accnts? p0rn and lewd art is sinful. "they're my friend" is not an excuse to follow them. "they're a nice person" is not an excuse to follow them. "I'm trying to convert them" is not an excuse to follow them. "I think their art looks nice" is not an excuse to follow them. "I want to support them" is not an excuse to follow them. "I only follow it for the few SFW art" is not an excuse to follow them. do better, obey Jesus and flee sexual immorality, unfollow those accnts.

Hello Punchbowl News, The central finding: "Most K Street leaders (88%) say the Trump administration's approach to immigration enforcement will harm Republicans in the midterms." Eighty-eight percent of K Street leaders. Let me introduce you to Main Street. McLaughlin & Associates conducted a national survey of 2,000 likely voters between February 27 and March 3, 2026 — the same window as your K Street poll. Here is what actual Americans said: 🔹 Seventy-two percent say addressing illegal immigration is an important priority. 🔹 Eighty-two percent agree immigration policy should serve the interests of American citizens, including 71% of Democrats and 81% of independents. 🔹 Seventy-eight percent agree immigration to the United States is a privilege and not a right, including 60% of Democrats and 70% of Hispanics. 🔹 Seventy-six percent agree the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens, including 57% of Democrats and 72% of Hispanics. 🔹 Two-thirds support deporting migrants who enter the country illegally, including 62% of independents and 59% of Hispanics. Your 88% says immigration enforcement hurts Republicans. America's 72% says it's an important priority. Your 88% says the GOP is in danger. America's 66% says deport them. Your K Street leaders are not predicting the midterms. They're telling you what they want, and you're publishing it as news. Now let's talk about who's in the room. Your article identifies the survey partner as "independent public affairs firm, LSG," hyperlinked to teamlsg[.]com... which redirects to locuststreet[.]com, the Locust Street Group. LSG is a Washington, D.C. public affairs firm whose website describes its services as "integrated strategic communications and public affairs campaigns." That is not an independent research firm. That is a lobbying and public affairs shop with registered LDA filings, running legislative campaigns for corporate clients who need things from Congress. And you called them "independent" in the same sentence where you presented their survey of K Street lobbyists as a news finding about American politics. You surveyed the lobbying industry, in partnership with a lobbying firm, many of whose partners also sponsored Punchbowl, and reported the result as though it were a measure of political reality. Eighty-eight percent of K Street wants immigration enforcement to stop. That is an interest declaration from the people who profit from the status quo, laundered through a press credential. About that credential. Senate Standing Rule VI governs the congressional press galleries. The rules require that credentialed members are "(a) not engaged in paid publicity or promotion work" and "(b) not engaged in any lobbying activity and will not become so engaged while a member of the gallery." Your 2026 sales deck offers corporations $300,000 for custom content "mutually agreed upon" between sponsor and outlet. It prices "Fly Out Day" lawmaker appearances at $75,000 to $100,000 a month. It sells newsletter sponsorships at $225,000 per week. Goldman Sachs, PhRMA, ExxonMobil, Meta, JPMorgan, Blackstone, and the American Investment Council (all documented sponsors) are not buying journalism. You are conducting paid publicity for corporate clients under a credential whose rules explicitly prohibit paid publicity. No wonder why John Thune felt comfortable passing a bill at 2 AM that defunded immigration enforcement while 76% of the country, including 57% of Democrats, agrees the government's first duty is to protect American citizens. He didn't need to read the polls. He read Punchbowl. The Standing Committee of Correspondents should review whether Punchbowl News meets the requirements for congressional press gallery credentials. If "mutually agreed upon" content for $300,000, lawmaker appearances priced at $100,000 a month, and surveys conducted in partnership with a registered lobbying firm do not constitute "paid publicity" or "lobbying activity" under Rule VI... then the rule has no meaning, and the press gallery is just another K Street address with better hallway access. You are the story, Punchbowl News.

@CynicalPublius @RobManess Meanwhile I’m literally scouring the OSINT plans of the No Kings organizers to announce the new regime on July 4, “Declaration of Interdependence” and all 😬

oops

Hello Senator Thune, At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP. Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept. You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to. You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to. You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to. Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats. Let's be precise about what you did: 1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer. 2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM. 3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding. The precedent you set: You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins. But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered: • Voice vote to avoid accountability • Empty chamber to avoid debate • Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny • Immediate recess to avoid questions You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one. What you've actually accomplished: Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded. Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded. And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning. The question you should answer: Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM? Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record? You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like. Here's my message: We saw it anyway. Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome. Own it.