Svetlana Lokhova@RealSLokhova
JORDAN: 5 weeks ago, because of the work of Director Patel, we learned that the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee and current United States Senator [Adam Schiff] leaked classified information. We learned this because a whistleblower came forward. A whistleblower with 23 years' experience in the intelligence community, a Democrat staffer on the committee, said this. They were pressured to leak classified information, which sort of raises the obvious question.
Why would the head of the intelligence committee, the chair of that committee, who's supposed to be guarding our secrets, why would he be encouraging the leaking of classified information? Whistleblower told us that answer as well. The leaked information was supposed to be used, the leaked information, false information was going to be used to indict President Trump. Now the former chairman wasn't the only person leaking information. Jim Comey was also sharing things he wasn't supposed to share. Again, don't take my word for it. The inspector general told us this. In his report, he said, quote, James Comey violated FBI policy by disclosing classified information. And what was Comey's motive? Same as the senator from California. To sabotage and undermine President Trump's first term.
And we know that Mr. Comey's not been shy about what his objective was. In fact, four months ago, he told us. Remember this? Whoa, 8647. Jim Comey told us just four months ago. Now how'd they do it? How did the former Chair of the Intel Commitee, the former FBI director, and others in our government attempt to undermine President Trump's first term? Seven weeks ago, because of the good work of the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, we learned from another whistleblower, a second whistleblower, that in the closing days of the Obama administration, the intelligence community assessment was changed. On December 5th, 2016, they had one assessment. That assessment said Russia did not impact the election vote count. It was a meeting at the White House on December 9th, 2016, where it was decided, no, no, no, we're not going to have that. We're going to have to come up with a new one. And the new one said Russia was trying to influence election and did influence election, which just wasn't accurate. And that new one is published on January 6th, 2017.
Let's just show you a few things that took place. I want to show you first this email from Admiral Rogers, the head of the NSA. You can see it was December 22nd [2016]. It says to Jim, John and Jim, Jim Clapper, John Brennan, Jim Comey. And he says, “I asked my team if they've had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence, sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points, my team raised concern. Further states, my folks aren't fully comfortable.”
A few hours later, there's an email back to Admiral Rogers. This one is from Jim Clapper and it says this. “It is essential that we be on the same page and are supportive. All of us are supportive of the report in the highest tradition of that's our story and we're sticking to it. We may have to compromise on our normal modalities. This is one project that has to be a team sport. That's our story and we're sticking to it.”
Compromise on normal modalities. That's a fancy way of saying that's the government speak of we're going to have to change the rules. In fact, we're not going to follow our own rules. That's exactly what they did to get the objective they wanted to undermine President Trump.
Now, how did this specifically take place? The whistleblower said that the government officials ignored concerns about discredited information. And what was that discredited information? What was the discredited information that they ignored the concerns about? What did they use, the discredited information? Of course, it was the Dossier. The now famous Steele Dossier that was paid for by the Clinton campaign when they hired the law firm Perkins Coie who hired Fusion GPS, who hired the foreigner Christopher Steele, who wrote all this garbage and lies down. That is what was used to change the Intelligence Community Report.
And what happens next? What do Jim John and Jim do next? They go to Trump Tower on January 6, 2017 to brief then President-elect Trump about the dossier. Again, the Clinton-financed foreign author dossier that the whistleblower knows is garbage and that they know is garbage. And then there's one final step. One final step. Jim Comey leaves that meeting with the president and immediately leaks to the press that they briefed the president on the discredited information. They briefed the President on the dossier and thereby giving it some credibility and creating the basis and the predicate for all they did to the president. They leaked false information. They leaked classified information. They used and leaked discredited information. And they didn't follow their own rules, all to sabotage President Trump's first term.
And but for this guy, Kash Patel, but for this guy, we would never have known this information. The good people of this great country would not have known what took place eight years ago when they were trying to undermine the guy elected by We The People.
I want to thank Attorney General Bondi. She set up a special Strike Force, a special team to look into this and see if there's any criminal liability that exists in what took place.
