matthewplan

13.8K posts

matthewplan banner
matthewplan

matthewplan

@matthewplan

housing, politics, film, food and music junkie

Los Angeles Katılım Mart 2009
4K Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
More Perfect Union
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS·
The House just dramatically weakened a landmark affordable housing bill that passed the Senate earlier this year. The Senate bill had groundbreaking restrictions on Wall Street’s purchase of single-family homes, but the new House version significantly weakened the bill’s limitations on institutional investors in the housing market. The new version would make it possible for private equity firms and other large investors to purchase more homes than the initial version allowed. The new bill’s definition of a “single-family home” would also now exclude manufactured housing and newly-renovated homes. And the new version removes a controversial mandate that homes built for rent have to be sold to tenants within 7 years, incentivizing companies to permanently rent their properties. When the Senate passed their landmark bill, Wall Street and housing developers immediately started lobbying the House, spending tens of thousands on key lawmakers. That spending appears to have paid off.
English
34
263
908
93K
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
Munetaka Murikama ties Aaron Judge for league lead 14th homer #whitesox What a sound off the bat! White Sox are now .5 game out 😆
English
0
0
4
352
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@cayimby @AndrewDLewis Unfortunately doesn’t AB 130 make it impossible for cities to make building code modifications?
English
0
0
0
30
California YIMBY
California YIMBY@cayimby·
The "missing middle" — duplexes, fourplexes, townhomes — once formed the backbone of American neighborhoods. Yet now, anything above a duplex triggers commercial building codes, raising costs and blocking missing-middle housing.
California YIMBY tweet media
North County Pipeline@NCPipeline760

With median home prices at $810,000, Escondido officials are exploring “missing middle” housing—duplexes, fourplexes and townhomes as one way to restore housing mobility and create more attainable paths to homeownership. ⬇️

English
4
10
98
4.3K
Paul
Paul@LA_Multi_Fam·
We are about $50K into this hillside ADU project in Elysian Park. Soils, architect, expeditor, civil, structural, LADBS fees, BOE fees, DWP fees, etc. It has been a grind. The City is much stricter on hillside submittals, and my own inexperience with the hillside process has definitely shown. There are just way more moving parts: separate retaining, grading, and shoring submittals, plus all the coordination between consultants takes a ton of time and effort. I think we are around 18 months into it now. Choose your structural and civil engineers well. Pay more for availability and detail-oriented people. You want each exchange and correction set with the City to take a few days, not a few weeks. Nevertheless, I think we are almost there. Maybe a couple more months. Have said that before though :) We are using @cayimby legislation SB 1211! Lot tying a 6 unit RSO multi-family property next door to a tiny single family house where we have space to build this 3 unit ADU structure. The Yimby's did amazing work with SB 1211 and 3 units are possible where previously none would be. However after all the time and money I am not sure I will be able to build it! What has changed in the past 2 years? Construction costs are somewhat higher, yes. Scope changed a bit too, and the retaining and shoring component, which I was too naive about early on, will add a meaningful cost. But I could still build through that. The bigger issue is that RSO values have fallen hard and are still falling. GRMs in this market have gone from around roughly 12-13 down to around 9-10. A few months ago I thought maybe we were at the bottom. Now I am not so sure. Since this ADU project is being added to an RSO apartment building, the end value has to be looked at together. Anti-landlord policy and regulatory risk are a major part of this decline. A lot of buyers have left the space, and the ones still active are only buying at steep discounts. A project that looked very good mathematically two years ago looks far worse today, and DSA politics and regulation are a big reason why. Nithya, Hugo, Eunisses are all part of this decline. Second, we are next to Dodger Stadium in a canyon area with homeless encampments in the hills above the property. Every cold season they light fires to keep warm. Over the last few years we have had multiple brush fires started by homeless encampments. @LAFD has done an excellent job getting there quickly and putting them out, but the City Council and Eunisses, who is our council member, have done nothing to help by allowing these encampments to remain in high-risk hillside areas. At this point it is willful. Lives and property are being put at risk. The same goes for other hillside districts (Nithya's) where there is no political will to clear encampments. If one of these fires turns into the next Palisades or Altadena type disaster, the people who allowed it will have blood on their hands. Third, jobs and industry are not where they should be in a city like LA. Hollywood has been crushed for a lot of reasons, but local politics have not helped. Too many politicians are focused on everything except creating a city where employers, investors, and working people can succeed. That economic weakness has hit a lot of our renters too, especially the ones tied to entertainment industry jobs. Coming back to our little 3 unit ADU project. I know it is fairly insignificant in the grand scheme of things, but I think it is also a sign of a bigger picture. Many other small owners and builders like myself are thinking right now why invest a meaningful amount of capital for us, into a property and city that doesn't seem to be going in the right direction. Values continue to drop, homeless encampments risk lives and property, and major industries are struggling. This election is big. If it goes the wrong way I likely won't build this project.
Paul tweet media
English
20
12
112
14.7K
Dennis Block
Dennis Block@DennisBlock·
We are pleased to announce that the California Court of Appeal has ruled in favor of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles (AAGLA), striking down a City of Los Angeles ordinance that required housing providers to pay relocation assistance when a tenant chose to vacate in response to a lawful rent increase. This significant legal victory underscores the constant battles that property owners face against unlawful local mandates.
English
57
156
1.4K
56.9K
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@SoCalLakerGirl Yes there’s more information now but rents went up way more in the 80s compared to the 2020s (so far).
English
1
0
0
35
ᕼOᑌᔕEᔕᖴOᖇᗩᒪᒪgirl80
Underdiscussed point abt housing that deserves more attention is that never before in history have landlords been so attuned to their "market values". In the 80's it was like "that number sounds good & it pays the bills" Now there's 10 platforms telling you to charge more
Tandy Miller@IHateItMost

@Kathastropie Yeah when landlords all switched to a system of “market value” all that good faith went out the window. You want max rent, I want max service.

English
1
0
4
90
matthewplan retweetledi
elenoam
elenoam@ElenoAM·
Recordatorio que Perú tuvo la política habitacional más ambiciosa del contiente. Te permitía construir torres de 30 pisos si destinabas la mitad a vivienda de interés social (VIS). Fue tan exitoso que produjo VIS en el Polanco de Lima. Se quejaron los NIMBY pitucos y se derogó.
elenoam tweet mediaelenoam tweet media
Español
18
102
787
43.5K
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@SinaiLawFirm And yes we’ve had a couple years of reversing the housing x population deficit but look at the hole we need to climb out of
matthewplan tweet media
English
0
0
2
66
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@SinaiLawFirm There is a tremendous shortage of homes which is the entire reason LA and CA are so unaffordable
matthewplan tweet media
English
1
0
4
77
Real Estate Lawyer
Real Estate Lawyer@SinaiLawFirm·
In 2016 we were told there was a housing shortage. We added 1m homes and population is the same, but prices are way up In 2020 we were told there was a housing shortage when homes were 30% cheaper and interest rates were at 3% Maybe there's no housing shortage
English
36
8
101
7.2K
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@najam_ali Especially because it is a clever way to obtain restitution- an important concept in Iranian culture and religion when wrong has been done. Is the the US or Israel going to pay?
English
0
0
0
37
Najam Ali
Najam Ali@najam_ali·
I am genuinely struggling to understand this logic. If the rest of the world is willing to pay a small toll to Iran to keep oil flowing and stabilise markets, then why does the U.S. feel the need to block all shipping, especially when it is not dependent on that oil?
English
12.4K
9K
51.8K
2.5M
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@mattbaran Do you know if cites are requiring the remainder parcel to comply with all zoning?
English
2
0
1
99
Matt Baran
Matt Baran@mattbaran·
Did you know: SHRA allows up to 10 units and lots on qualifying parcels, even with an existing home in place? The catch: that house typically has to sit on its own “remainder lot,” and you’re not touching it as part of the subdivision. Separate permit, timeline, and problem.
Matt Baran tweet media
English
1
1
6
559
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
@WWFerguson2 @FiZxMiKe No - the apartments were already approved. I think it’s just the cost to build vs expected returns - perhaps the financing fell through?
English
0
0
4
29
matthewplan
matthewplan@matthewplan·
We’ve entered the phase of the development cycle where a drive-thru Taco Bell in the middle of LA makes more sense to build bs 123 units.
matthewplan tweet media
English
12
2
286
15.5K
Michael Clark
Michael Clark@midpushMike·
@matthewplan Hey, the Taco Bell brings in the tax money. The 123 units just costs more in taxes to pay people to live their and support them.
English
1
0
1
282