maxi

@pickover Relativity pi is 4 from 1st person view; GO up down left right pi is circumference ÷ diameter from 3rd person view; - noun aperture = walker's count = 4 - verb aperture = observer's ratio = 3.14... measuring is a verb always gonna be 3.14 result is a noun, will be whole #'s

For you math nerds. This mysterious and wonderful proof that pi = 4 has been circulating widely on the Web. At which step does it go wrong?

@kossnocorp @FFmpeg in 1 -4 years there will be an open source OS written in ASM; that will take the world by storm; windowns/mac/linux - will be more or less obsoleted.

The size difference between what random online "ICO converters" give you (15-370 KB) and what you get with a single @FFmpeg command (2.3 KB) is crazy! ffmpeg -i favicon-32.png favicon.ico Imagine all the disk space and traffic we're wasting because of them!

@rookepoole i lied one more image; lol

@rookepoole i'll add one more thing to go with this; not sure if it will make sense;

@rookepoole TLDR: Computation is like the universe. Computation is like a discrete spacetime lattice.

@rookepoole when you coding a website you reach for - html - php - javascript when you coding a game you reach for - c - c++ - rust the right tool for the job - the right lang for the job

@rookepoole The universe is... -particles -math -computation -geometry -philosophy wrong! BUT right at the same time-flip it -particles -math -computation -geometry -philosophy ... is like the universe particles==math==computation== geometry==philosophy numbers==words==code

@Leophilius Pre-Copernicus +1 : earth was center of universe 0: NOT -the bit flip in action Post-Corpernicus -1 : earth wasn't center 0: 400 years latter... copenhagen +1 : YOU are at the center of the universe

@Leophilius pedantically; there aren't negatives; neither are there positives; hell there aren't even numbers or words for that fact; everything is just a relation to something else; the observer (viewpoint) is the angle of the relation.

You absolutely can prove negatives. Here's a rule of inference for doing just that: (1) If p, then q. (2) ~q C. Therefore ~p.

@KateXGate I'd argue; they are the same thing; - language word = number = glyph 2 + 2 = 4 isn't more correct then i wasn't happy with my two apples so i grabbed two more, so i could have four same thing lang is relation to context in China or France; - speaking English isn't optimal;

Physics cannot persist without philosophy because philosophy is the structural attempt to understand the unseen, from which the study of the seen physical world ultimately emerges- aka physics. You cannot fully understand the depths of one without the other. Physics measures reality. Philosophy interrogates the framework beneath it. We need both.

@Shaun_Fosmark @jimmymikemc pro tip - use assembly; then you don't need to simulate the universe in python; you can just make the real thing;

@jimmymikemc Every one of my papers is the result of rigorous computation. I probably have 3-400 python scripts, some taking as long as 24hrs to run. Nothing gets put on paper with being ran first.

At its smallest scales, the universe looks like computation, not because it's a simulation, but because the universe sets the rules for how all computation must be done. Conciousness must be quantum computation at its most basic construction.

@Shaun_Fosmark The universe is... - particles - math - computation - geometry - philosophy wrong! BUT right at the same time-flip it - particles - math - computation - geometry - philosophy ... is like the universe. particles == math == computation == geometry == philosophy number==words

@SidTheArgent @Shaun_Fosmark quick more detailed overview

Yeah this translates really well ... Couple small tweaks for precision: The RTZ spectral floor is the primordial refusal-to-zero ... the raw compulsion (wave = force) that drives everything and refuses to collapse. Parity creates the forks/choices at every step. Mirror recursion then builds the coherent structure (lattice / buffer states) on top of that floor. So the lattice isn’t the floor itself ... the floor is what forces the recursion to keep generating the lattice. Otherwise the mapping is clean ... the Cayley-Dickson tower and finite bounded structure ... same fundamental code, just different layers. Then I am going to suggest if the two of you tried resolving disagreements you would find your work actually maps very well together.

There is no invisible lattice in space. A lattice is a scaffold for chopping up space into pieces for the ease of calculation and conceptually understanding, but it doesn't actually exist. 2D holographic space doesn't exist, it's how we chop up the universe to describe interactions. The planck scale is owned by the particles themselves.

@Shaun_Fosmark @SidTheArgent literally reminds of something I'm in the midst of working on; they are real, an dynamic, part of a static structure;

@SidTheArgent @maxi_j309 We need to stop trying quantum things as "not real". It's all real.

@SidTheArgent @Shaun_Fosmark does that translate?

The RTZ spectral floor is the deeper base layer ... the raw compulsion that refuses to collapse to true zero (wave = force). Parity creates the forks/choices at every step. Mirror recursion then builds the coherent structure (lattice / buffer states). Your while_loop + buffer model is the clean, efficient implementation running on top of that foundation. Same fundamental code, just different abstraction level.

@SidTheArgent @Shaun_Fosmark hmm, not sure best way to answer; i guess, the simple answer - all READs involve an observer - so einstein's special relativity... - where the fuck are you looking from? lol i feel maybe its deeper, you trying to comment towards the universe not having infinities; its finite; ?

@maxi_j309 @Shaun_Fosmark I'm suggesting it's the same code.

@SidTheArgent @Shaun_Fosmark "But I think you’re still missing my deeper point." - yeah you are probably correct there;

This is clean validation ... the buffer pattern is universal and nails the ratios without any mystery stuff. Appreciate it. But I think you’re still missing my deeper point. Quantum interactions are pure structure (real, but not physical “things”) — the mirror-reflected lattice / coherent pathing. Gravity isn’t quantum. Gravity is the physical propagating compulsion walking through that structure. The while_loop runs on top of the RTZ spectral floor, not the other way around.