Max Wikström

2.3K posts

Max Wikström banner
Max Wikström

Max Wikström

@maxwiks

https://t.co/Bp1P1LH1hQ Working with MS data stack, consultant, tech geek. Always learning. Always sharing. Aspiring blogger. Views are my own.

Stockholm, Sverige Katılım Ağustos 2012
360 Takip Edilen591 Takipçiler
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
@MicahDail You are welcome 🙂 We actually have a similar case where we have separate measures per dimension attribute. After this update we will be able to streamline this logic
English
0
0
1
71
Micah Dail
Micah Dail@MicahDail·
YESSS!!! Thank you!!!! This is actually an excellent example. I think the key here is that we wish we could invoke iteration through any arbitrary set. Screenshots below. First is just a price/volume effect without iteration, and the rows are accurate but the total does not match our intuition. We can fix this via a measure that does iterate through product to get the accurate total, and you can see second screenshot of this measure and the correct totals. But then if we wanted price/volume effect and contribution for other dimensions, this breaks (again). Looking at country groupings, again, we are back to the original problem. So now we create a measure to handle this country iteration, and it works now. So I think that this is actually an illuminating use-case, and it highlights the fact that we would essentially love to do arbitrary iteration for fields in scope. Thank you @maxwiks
Micah Dail tweet mediaMicah Dail tweet mediaMicah Dail tweet mediaMicah Dail tweet media
English
1
0
4
289
Micah Dail
Micah Dail@MicahDail·
I still have never seen a valid use case for the need for this 'Custom Totals' feature: #post-32302-_Toc224563865" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/pow… Seriously. Not one valid use case ever. Ever. Can someone give me one valid use case? Just one. Even the blog example provided to justify the feature is inane.
English
4
2
22
3.6K
Ola Bränholm
Ola Bränholm@olabranholm·
Sitter i soffan och får tårar i ögonen över glädjen runt Marcus Grates pallplats. Så vackert att se hans egna känslor och lagkompisarnas lycka över att få se honom lyckas. Idrott är underbart.
Svenska
7
2
143
7.2K
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
Had #jabra #evolve75 for a long time. They were my favorite before switching to smaller earbuds (also jabra). Got very disappointed when mic broke due to poor design of electrical wiring. Boo Jabra! Now needed by someone else in family so I managed to fix them! Its possible!
Max Wikström tweet media
English
0
0
0
384
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
@ehansalytics I agree. Nice to see some old faces. Im glad they didn't ruin the series by doing some cringe sequel.
English
0
0
1
47
Ed Hansberry
Ed Hansberry@ehansalytics·
@maxwiks We watched it last weekend. It is entertaining. Good Netflix movie. Not a good theater movie.
English
1
0
0
65
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
@PowerBIguy Check usage metrics. Perhaps too low tier and you hit CU limits?
English
0
0
0
184
VitalijaBart
VitalijaBart@VitalijaBartu·
Its been a long month, finally, some time to clay therapy, making my own lasagna form 😱🙃🫣😳
VitalijaBart tweet media
English
3
0
6
285
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
Trying to decide which sessions to attend on tomorrow's #DataSatSto. Not an easy task! Seems as the weather gods are with us tomorrow! Hoping for a blast as well as getting to know some new people.
English
0
1
2
220
Eugene Meidinger
Eugene Meidinger@SQLGene·
Join me at Data Saturday Stockholm for an insightful session on "Learning Fabric from Scratch with Magic the Gathering Data." Don't miss out—register now at datasatsto.se!
Eugene Meidinger tweet media
English
1
3
10
467
Max Wikström retweetledi
Marco Russo
Marco Russo@marcorus·
Hints from a book from the future: “Honestly, it would be better to be a good data modeler and a mediocre DAX author than a DAX guru but a poor data modeler. Therefore, if data modeling is not your cup of tea, roll up your sleeves and start learning it. Maybe during the pauses, while reading this book: you will attain two great goals at once.”
English
13
34
164
19.2K
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
@alexdupler Yea that was kind of my point. Are there any case when choosing a low tier f capacity for #PowerBI content gives any benefit over pro/ppu?
English
1
0
0
71
Alex Dupler
Alex Dupler@alexdupler·
@maxwiks so you can't do that today. you have to pick. If you could have one workspace where an F2 is consumed for Fabric items and Shared per User compute is used for PBI items I guess that would be nice, but I don't think there is any major benefit over just using 2 workspaces.
English
2
0
0
126
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
What would be a use case for assigning #PowerBI pro/ppu workspaces to a fabric low tier capacity? E.g. f2? Wouldn't it just be a bottleneck?
English
3
0
0
610
Max Wikström
Max Wikström@maxwiks·
@Datatouille Yes. Of course 🙂 Let me clarify. I meant specifically for semantic models and reports.
English
0
0
0
108
Tristan Malherbe
Tristan Malherbe@Datatouille·
@maxwiks Being able to use Fabric artifacts such as Dataflows Gen2, lakehouse, warehouse, etc.
English
1
0
0
151