B-loved Dreamer

@Cubfan13241 @GenoVeno73 And very hypocritical coming from a regime where a 9 year old girl can be sold into a temporary marriage, or forced to marry her step father. The regime's problem with Epstein is sex outside of marriage because pedophilia is ok with them.

@GenoVeno73 These are incredible. The one featuring Virginia Giuffre was heartbreaking.

Daammnnnn, watch and listen to Iran's latest Lego video entitled "Ballroom Donnie." This hits hard. This hits truth. 👇👇👇👇

@Abby_Jost @GuyAz The ugliest metaphor.

@GuyAz UAE considered inappropriate to bring mistresses to family dinners.

i24NEWS Exclusive: UAE Delivers Strong Protest to Israel Following Report on Netanyahu’s Secret Visit to Abu Dhabi The publication yesterday of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s secret visit to Abu Dhabi has caused significant embarrassment to the UAE, especially after the visit was officially confirmed by the Prime Minister’s Office. i24NEWS can confirm that, in the wake of the report, the Emiratis conveyed a strong diplomatic protest to Israel. The message was delivered directly by UAE Ambassador Mohamed Al Khaja to officials at Israel’s National Security Council in the Prime Minister’s Office. A source familiar with the matter told i24NEWS: “The Emiratis were very angry. This is not the first time a sensitive leak has come out of the Prime Minister’s Office. That is precisely why Netanyahu has not visited the UAE for years.” The UAE maintains a low profile regarding its ties with Israel despite the fact that security cooperation between the two countries has escalated significantly in recent months — including the deployment of Israel’s Iron Dome system in the UAE and high-level visits by the heads of the Mossad and Shin Bet.

@Simi_2210_ 88/8=11 70/7=10 54/6=9 40/5=8 28/4=7 18/3=6

Only real pattern hunters can crack this one your first answer is wrong

@Simi_2210_ 2*(x*x)=50 x*x=25 x=5 5*y=100 y=20 20*20=400

Only people who actually remember algebra get this right. What’s the answer??

@Simi_2210_ Y=(18/2)=9 X=(9/3)=3 (Y/X)=(9/3)=3

Looks simple, but 95% get this wrong. Solve for Y/X and prove you're in the 5 %

I am the Senior Director of Strategic Communications for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. I have advised four Israeli prime ministers on how to speak to Americans about things Americans pay for but do not wish to look at. I have held this office through three wars, two elections, one genocide ruling from the International Court of Justice, and nine consecutive quarters of uninterrupted American military aid disbursement. My job is to ensure those last two items never appear in the same sentence on camera. I have prepared the Prime Minister for 312 interviews across 43 networks in 11 countries, and I want you to understand that what aired on CBS on Sunday night was not a conversation. It was a delivery system. I built it. I am very good at my job. On Sunday, they did not. The $3.8 billion renewed the same week. No vote required. The 365 members of Congress who received AIPAC checks this cycle did not call for one. That was handled before I wrote page one of the brief. The brief was 94 pages. I labeled it GARRETT — VULNERABILITIES / REDIRECTS. I will walk you through the page numbers that matter because the page numbers tell you everything about what we think an American audience can absorb, and in what order. Page 7: "TIE SELECTION — NAVY PROJECTS AUTHORITY. AVOID RED (READS AS AGGRESSION ON CBS'S COLOR GRADE)." Page 14: "BANDWIDTH SATURATION — if the interviewer occupies less than 22% of total runtime, the audience retains tone, not content. Tone is controllable. Content is not." Page 31: "THE TRANSPARENT DODGE — when a subject announces he will not answer, the audience processes the announcement as confidence rather than evasion." The Prime Minister used this verbatim. He told Major Garrett, on camera: "You're gonna ask me these questions. I'm gonna dodge them second time, third time." The journalist moved on. The question died on tape and nobody performed CPR. Page 47: "GAZA — PERPETUAL MANDATE FRAMEWORK." Page 71: "LEGITIMACY DEFENSE — EXTERNAL ATTRIBUTION (BOTS / PAKISTAN / CAMPUS)." Page 83: "CHILD FOOTAGE SATURATION THRESHOLD — AMERICAN MARKET (Q2 2026 REFRESH)." I am not going to tell you what is on page 83. I am going to tell you that it contains a number, and the number is updated quarterly, and the number has gone up eleven percent since October 2023, which we noted in the margin as "favorable trend — audience tolerance expanding per exposure cycle." I will tell you that the number on page 83 determines how many seconds of humanitarian content we allow the Prime Minister to address before redirecting to Iran, and that on Sunday that number was forty-four seconds, and that Major Garrett's humanitarian questions received exactly forty-four seconds before the Prime Minister said "Iran" and the conversation left Gaza for the rest of the broadcast. Major Garrett had a photograph. I know this because we have a source at CBS who confirms segment assets seventy-two hours before air. The photograph was of a building in Rafah. There were small shapes in the rubble that I will not describe to you because I am the person who decides how long you are allowed to look at small shapes in rubble. The photograph received eleven seconds of eye contact from the Prime Minister during taping. That was seven seconds too many. In the final broadcast, the photograph did not air. Forty-four seconds. Not forty-five. During Saturday prep, when we rehearsed the humanitarian redirect, the Prime Minister checked his watch. He said, "How many more of these?" I said, "Two." He said, "Make it one." We made it one. I want to be precise about the laugh. When Major Garrett asked how enriched uranium would be physically removed from Iran, the Prime Minister said, "You go in, and you take it out," and he laughed. That laugh was rehearsed three times on Saturday afternoon. The first take, it came too early — sounded nervous. The second, too late — sounded cruel. The third landed exactly where you heard it: between "go in" and "take it out," positioned to make a statement about violating another nation's sovereignty sound like a man who finds the question adorable. He asked to do a fourth. Not because the third was wrong. Because he enjoyed it. He said, "Again," the way a child asks to ride something one more time. I wrote "again" in the margin and then crossed it out because I did not want a written record of a head of state asking for an encore on a line about bombing a sovereign nation. But I am telling you now. He liked it. The laugh was not performed confidence. It was pleasure. I noted in the margin of rehearsal three: "Perfect. Sounds like it costs nothing." That is the job. Making things that cost everything sound like they cost nothing. Making nineteen months of war sound like a reasonable Tuesday. Making $3.8 billion a year sound like the check a neighbor splits at dinner. Making 80,000 dead sound like a denominator in a ratio that favors us. I did the math once, on a Saturday, because I am the kind of person who does this math. $3.8 billion divided by 80,000. It comes to $47,500 per dead person. I did not write this number down. I did not put it in the brief. But I know it, and now you know it, and neither of us will forget it, and the Prime Minister has never asked. "One of the lowest in the history of modern urban warfare," the Prime Minister said on camera. I wrote that line. It does not cite a source because the source is us. We are the numerator. We are the denominator. We are the people who decided what counts. During Saturday's rehearsal, the Prime Minister asked me — off-mic, between takes, while adjusting his water glass — "Who counts?" He meant: who does the counting. I told him we do. He said, "Good." He picked up the glass. We moved to the next section. He also said — and I need you to hear this in full — "We're as discriminating and surgical as any army has ever been in history. No other army." I wrote this line too. He delivered it twenty-three minutes after citing the beeper operation as evidence of precision. Twenty-five hundred Hezbollah operatives had pagers detonate simultaneously in grocery stores, living rooms, and hospital waiting areas. The Prime Minister called this "surgical." He said, "We didn't kill — 2,500 people, but we impaired them, knocked them out with surgical precision, no collateral damage, with the beepers." A mass-casualty device detonated in civilian spaces across an entire country — and on Sunday, this was his proof of restraint. I prepped no redirect for this section because none was needed. The journalist did not ask what happens to the person standing next to the man whose pocket explodes in a bakery. Nobody asked. The word "surgical" did the work. It always does. I want to tell you what I did not say back. I did not say 80,000. I did not say that I had seen the photographs on page 83 that determine the threshold. I did not say that the number I carry in my head — 47,500 dollars per person — updates every time the denominator changes and the numerator stays the same. I said nothing. That is also my job. Knowing the number and never saying it in a room where it might be recorded. I want to talk about "two out of four." Major Garrett listed four objectives the Prime Minister stated for Gaza: disarmament, demilitarization, no weapons factories, no smuggling. The Prime Minister said, "Two out of four, largely achieved." He said Hamas "reneged." He said "find me the countries who would do it." On page 47, this is labeled PERPETUAL MANDATE FRAMEWORK, and I will explain why. If the job is permanently half-finished, the job permanently requires doing. If the job permanently requires doing, the funding permanently requires renewing. Two out of four is not a concession. It is a down payment on the next operation.  Incompletion is not failure. Incompletion is a subscription model. And the $100 million AIPAC has staged for the 2026 midterms ensures that nobody in Congress will ask why we are paying for a subscription that never delivers the full product. That question costs a primary. Nobody wants to pay that price. So the subscription renews. I want to talk about the phrase I am most proud of. The one I believe earns me another year in this office. "Every civilian death is a tragedy. For our enemies, it's a strategy." The Prime Minister delivered this in the third act — the extraction window, where we place lines designed for the fifteen-second clips that will circulate on the networks the Prime Minister just told you are manipulated by Pakistani basements. The line works because it contains its own permission structure. If every civilian death is the enemy's strategy, then every civilian death is the enemy's fault. The munition does not matter. The strike package does not matter. The export license does not matter. The $3.8 billion does not matter. The fault travels backward through the supply chain and lands on the man standing in front of the bomb, never on the man who built it, sold it, shipped it, paid for it, or authorized its use. I wrote this line in January. It has now been deployed in five interviews. It will be deployed in the next one. And the one after that. Until one of two things stops. I want to be brief about the "draw down to zero" section because it requires less explanation than you think. The Prime Minister announced he wants to eliminate American military aid over the next decade. He said this while receiving $3.8 billion annually. He said this while $10.1 billion in arms sales were notified to Congress in five months. What he proposed was not ending the money. He proposed moving it from the foreign aid budget — the one journalists can cite, the one protesters can see — into bilateral defense procurement contracts, where the money is larger and the oversight is a locked filing cabinet. He is not ending the funding. He is moving it to a room with no windows. The Prime Minister told Major Garrett that declining American support for Israel is caused by bot farms operating from basements in Pakistan. He said this on a network watched by 8 million Americans. He said the 28 million Americans under 35 who oppose unconditional military aid are not Americans with opinions. They are a basement in Karachi with good Wi-Fi. Basements in Pakistan: manipulation. $28 million from AIPAC to sitting members of Congress: advocacy. $100 million staged for midterm primaries with a 98% win rate: democracy. 129 journalists killed in 2025, two-thirds by Israeli strikes: unavoidable. I want to be precise about this because precision is my profession. The Prime Minister told 8 million Americans that negative coverage of Israel is manufactured by bots in Pakistan. He said this in a calendar year when 129 members of the press were killed covering the conflict, and our forces were responsible for the majority. The coverage is not negative because of basements in Karachi. The coverage is negative because we killed the people producing it. The ones who remain are cautious. The caution looks like balance. The balance looks like both sides. And when Major Garrett presented "both sides" on Sunday, the Prime Minister smiled, because both sides is the product. I built both sides. It is on page 71. The interview aired at 7 PM Eastern on a Sunday. I watched it from my office with a live-feed monitor split-screened against the CBS control room's framing choices. The Prime Minister hit every mark. The laugh landed. The dodge passed. The bot theory absorbed nine minutes of airtime that could have been spent on body counts. The "two out of four" passed without follow-up. Hezbollah's 150,000 rockets received nine minutes of discussion. Lebanese civilian casualties from our operations received zero seconds. I noted this in real time as a structural win — threat without consequence, exactly as briefed. Forty-four seconds on humanitarian questions. Not forty-five. I am very good at my job. I want to tell you about October 7th, because October 7th is the section I am most proud of handling. Every intelligence chief has resigned or been fired. Every military commander in the chain has faced inquiry. The Prime Minister is the only person in the security establishment who held his position before, during, and after the worst intelligence failure in the nation's history — and on Sunday, when Major Garrett asked about accountability, the Prime Minister said, "Everybody bears some responsibility. From the top, from the prime minister down." He paused. He said, "Let's establish an independent commission." I wrote that pause. The pause says: I am being honest. The commission says: later. The combination says: never. The accountability question received ninety seconds and produced no follow-up. Ninety seconds for the worst security failure in Israeli history. I timed it. I budgeted it. The budget was two minutes. He came in under budget. I noted this as a win. There is one more thing I want to tell you, because I am proud of it and because you will not understand its significance unless I explain it. After the interview wrapped, after the cameras powered down, after Major Garrett shook the Prime Minister's hand and thanked him for his time — Major Garrett thanked him — I opened the brief to the final tab. Tab seven: "JOURNALIST INTEGRATION — POST-INTERVIEW SOCIAL METRICS." I checked the timestamped analytics on Garrett's personal accounts to see if he'd posted anything adversarial within the first forty minutes. He had not. He posted the broadcast link with no editorial comment. That is not captured. That is not bought. That is something better. That is a man who spent forty-seven minutes in a room with power and left the room believing the room was a conversation. I build these rooms. I am very good at my job. The job is making sure you watch a man describe permanent war and hear a man describe permanent peace. The job is making sure you hear "it can be done physically" and do not ask what "it" has cost every other time that sentence was spoken in a briefing room for the last seventy years. The job is making sure you hear the laugh, not the dead. You heard the laugh on Sunday. Eight million of you. And then you moved on. Just like Major Garrett did.

@gothburz Brilliant. Thanks.

@Simi_2210_ a+(axa)=20 4+(4x4)=20 a=4 Except that I worked it out in my head, but I've forgotten how to show how I proved it.

99.9% get this wrong because they forget basic order of operations. What’s "a"?

180,000 of you now. I satirize from the perspective of insiders who will never say these things out loud. Pentagon auditors. Hedge fund compliance officers. Health insurance denial architects. Congressional ethics staffers. Oil traders with 21-minute windows. HR directors who renamed layoffs. Surveillance vendors. Opioid settlement lawyers. Deportation logistics coordinators. AI safety researchers who watched the guardrails come off. To every subscriber who reads the quiet parts with me. To everyone who's left a comment, shared a post, or tagged someone with "this is literally my industry." You're the reason this work reaches the people it's about. I write confessions. You make them travel. The community interaction is genuinely the best part of this — not the numbers, but the replies where someone says "I thought I was the only one who noticed this." You weren't. You just didn't have a narrator yet. Thank you. The work continues because you keep showing up for it.

@gothburz @TruthTrumpPost "Tab 5 is just Post-It notes ... " and lots of different coloured bits of wool.

FINALLY. I have been waiting for someone with a platform to say this out loud. I pulled my binder off the shelf the second I saw this. Green three-ring. Six tabs. One for each time we've run this exact play. Tabs are color-coded by decade. Tab 1 is the Mujahideen. Excellent citation. Training program was genuinely world-class. We identified motivated fighters, provided Stinger missiles, and within a few years they controlled most of the country. Program exceeded every deliverable. The graduates went on to establish several independent organizations. Some of those organizations are now tracked by a different department. I don't have access to that binder. Tab 2 is Nicaragua. Similar energy. Identified the freedom-oriented opposition, routed funding through creative channels. The funding got briefly complicated — there was a congressional hearing, someone needed a lawyer, someone shredded documents on live television — but the CONCEPT was sound. Tab 2 has a laminated lessons-learned card. The first lesson is "don't televise the shredding." Tab 3 is Libya, 2011. Armed the rebels. Gaddafi fell in eight months. Country then transitioned into a stable democratic — I'm checking my notes. Tab 3 has a Post-It that says "skip in briefings." There's a second Post-It under it that says "seriously, skip." Tab 4 is the Syrian moderate opposition. Allocated $500 million to train and equip freedom fighters. Produced roughly sixty. That's $8.3 million per graduate. Several defected on day one. One cohort handed their weapons directly to the people we trained them to fight. My colleague called it the most expensive regifting in military history. Tab 4 is mostly Post-It notes and a resignation letter someone didn't send. Tab 5 is Yemen. I'm not going to talk about Tab 5. Tab 5 is just Post-It notes. Starting Tab 6 tonight. Iran. Already bought the divider. Orange. My wife asked why I was labeling a new binder tab at 11 PM on a Thursday. I told her we're doing it again. She said doing what again. I said the thing that works. She asked which one worked. I've been looking for that tab for twenty minutes.

President Trump posts in TruthSocial: Mark Levin: We need to see the opportunity. And by that, I mean that our CIA, along with the Israeli Mossad, make determinations about the best way to determine who to train and arm. We armed the freedom fighters. The Mujahideen in Afghanistan and others throughout the world. Why would we take this off the table? ( Iranian people) want liberation, and I bet they want retribution against this regime for slaughtering tens of thousands of their family members and raping and torturing their young women, their daughters, their sisters, their wives, and their mothers by the tens of thousands. They just need an opportunity.

@gothburz @tedcruz That's quite a problem "Dennis". Nöone is looking out for you if you need to ask for extraction, & your friends who do care about you will cut you off like a rotten arm when they read what you've just blabbed all over the internet. It's so hard to make new friends at your age ...

Senator. I infiltrated my county Democratic Party in 2022. I've been attending their meetings as "Dennis." My real name is not Dennis. Three years. Every second Tuesday. I bring the coffee. They think I'm a retired postal worker who cares about zoning. I am not retired. I have never worked for the postal service. I do not care about zoning. But they don't know that. They think Dennis loves zoning. Here's what I've found: They have a shared Google Doc. Fourteen pages. They call it the "Voter Engagement Strategy." I have read it forty-one times. It contains instructions for knocking on doors and asking people if they're registered to vote. That's it. That's the permanent control mechanism. They just keep asking people if they're registered. Over and over. Year after year. Nobody is stopping them. They assigned me a neighborhood. I've been knocking on doors for the Democrats for three years. I've registered 340 people to vote. I know this is part of the problem. My wife pointed out that I am now, by any measurable standard, one of the most effective Democratic organizers in the county. She says I've "lost the thread." I told her that's exactly what they want her to think. I have spent $4,200 of my own money on campaign literature that I am simultaneously distributing and documenting as evidence. I am the evidence. I am also the crime. I cannot stop. Dennis has a reputation now. They nominated Dennis for precinct captain last month. Dennis won. I need extraction. You're the only one who would understand why a man has to keep volunteering for the enemy. I am in too deep. Dennis is beloved.

If Democrats get control of our government, they will work to seize control forever. They hate President Trump and are only concerned about power.

@effectfully Written by a 22 year old, but not the greatest.

The greatest page of text in human history was written by a 22-year-old.

@RayDeSatya @gothburz @V8_Aston No bullshit. It's all verifyable.

@gothburz @V8_Aston Oh. So you bullshit for a living? Cool, cool…

I am the personal financial advisor to the 47th President of the United States. I have made him $4.05 billion in one term. Let me say that again. Four point zero five. Billion. One term. The presidency of the United States, upon proper management, outperforms every asset class in recorded financial history, including venture capital, petroleum futures, and the sovereign wealth fund in Abu Dhabi that manages $1.7 trillion and employs nine hundred analysts. I benchmarked it. We beat them with a staff of four and a leather binder. I keep a binder in the residence. I call it The Number. The Number was $3.4 billion in August. The Number is $4.05 billion now. The Number has never gone down. I update it every Friday at 6 AM, before the briefing, like a surgeon checking vitals on a patient who can only get healthier. The cover is leather. The tabs are color-coded by sector: Crypto, Finance, Hospitality, Media, Other. "Other" includes a Boeing 747-8 valued at $400 million, gifted to him by the Emir of Qatar while he was sitting President. There is no asset class for that. I invented one. I call it EAGLE-7. Crypto is seventy-five percent of the portfolio. $3.02 billion. I want you to sit with that figure. Three billion from digital tokens and stablecoins. From a man who in 2021 called Bitcoin "a scam against the dollar." His words. The flagship holding is Trump Media's bitcoin stockpile. He holds 42% of the company. The company sold shares to institutional investors. Used their capital to purchase bitcoin. His personal stake from that maneuver alone: $1.15 billion. He drafts national cryptocurrency regulation from the Resolute Desk. Signs executive orders on digital asset policy. Handpicks the SEC chair who will enforce them. His bitcoin goes up when he does these things. The investors' stock goes down. That's a conflict of interest. I'm kidding. I've never used those words in that order. That's the investment thesis. Then there is Alt5 Sigma. I need you to understand Alt5 Sigma. Alt5 Sigma was previously known as Appliance Recycling Centers of America. Founded in 1991. In Minnesota. It recycled dishwashers. Then it became a biotech. Then a digital payments company. Then Zach Witkoff, son of the President's special envoy, became chairman, and it became the primary vehicle for purchasing World Liberty Financial tokens. In 1991 it recycled dishwashers in Minnesota. In 2025 it funneled $562 million to the President's family through a Rwandan subsidiary convicted of money laundering. The CEO was removed. The CFO was fired. The auditor was replaced. Twice. The stock went from $8 to $2. We received $562 million from it. I put it in the binder. I logged it in the binder on a Thursday. I used Garamond. It felt appropriate for a company whose journey from kitchen appliances to international money laundering spanned exactly thirty-four years. The stablecoin is where the architecture gets beautiful. USD1. $136 million in projected interest over the remaining term. I will show you the math because the math is the point. $3 billion in circulation. Times 4% annual return. Times three years remaining in office. Times the family's 38% share. The UAE purchased $2 billion of USD1. Then Binance promoted it. Pumped circulation from $2 billion to $5 billion. Binance's founder had pleaded guilty to money laundering violations. He received a presidential pardon in October. I pardon you. You promote my stablecoin. My stablecoin generates $136 million. The pardon cost nothing. The coin cost nothing. The oath of office cost nothing. The entire apparatus of federal clemency was converted into a revenue instrument and nobody filed a complaint. That's yield. TRUMPcoin. $385 million. A memecoin with the President's face on it, launched days before inauguration. Every person who bought TRUMPcoin at launch and held it has lost 90 cents of every dollar. Every person who bought it made the President $385 million richer on the way in. That's the product. The product is not a coin. The product is belief. We are very long belief. His sons received a 13% equity stake in American Bitcoin. A New Yorker investigation determined they contributed, and I quote, "nothing else of obvious value." I would characterize their contribution differently. They contributed the single most valuable commodity in American commerce, worth more per ounce than lithium, more per gram than fentanyl, more per syllable than any word in the English language. Proximity to the man who pardons people. That's due diligence. Hospitality. $271 million. Mar-a-Lago now generates $50 million a year. It generated $10 million when he took office. Initiation fee: $1 million. You are paying $1 million to eat dinner in the same room as the man who controls the Department of Justice. I set that price. It is undervalued. Saudi Arabia. The Crown Prince visited the White House. Then Dar Al Arkan signed licensing deals estimated at $10 billion. Hotels in the Maldives. Golf clubs in Riyadh. A tower in Jeddah. He sat next to the man who ordered a journalist dismembered and said, quote, "He knew nothing about it." Then he signed the hotel deal. I have the term sheet. Our fee is 2-10% of revenue. We do not ask what happened to the journalist. That is not in our mandate. $106 million is in our mandate. That's client retention. Finance: $340 million, predominantly Persian Gulf sovereign wealth fund arrangements structured through intermediaries whose names I am not going to say in this format. Media: $116 million. Legal fee fundraising and branded merchandise: $128 million. The Qatari jet: $150 million. I have already mentioned the jet. I mention it again because a sitting foreign head of state gifted the sitting American President a $400 million flying palace with gold-plated fixtures and a master suite, and not a single member of Congress has asked a follow-up question. Not one. Not in committee. Not in writing. Not on camera. Five hundred and thirty-five legislators. Zero questions. Now. I am required by my own conscience, which is vestigial at this point, to disclose downstream performance. Every public-facing investment vehicle associated with this portfolio has collapsed for outside investors. I will read them. TRUMPcoin. Down 90%. American Bitcoin. Down 80%. Trump NFTs. Down 80%. Trump Media stock. Down 60% since inauguration. Alt5 Sigma. Down 75%. The family's positions were structured to extract value before these declines materialized. The retail investors' positions were structured to supply the value being extracted. There were approximately 600,000 retail wallets holding TRUMPcoin at peak. Retirees. Day traders. People who believed the branding. Their aggregate losses capitalized the portfolio. Their savings became his tab in the binder. That's liquidity. I want to address the competitive landscape. I am a financial professional. I benchmark everything. In 2016, the President stood at a podium and called Hillary Clinton "the most corrupt enterprise in political history." He said she "turned the State Department into her personal hedge fund." The accusation that ended her career was $153 million in speaking fees. Combined. With her husband. Over fifteen years. Goldman Sachs paid her $225,000 per speech. He said the word "crooked" so many times it became her legal name. $153 million. Fifteen years. Two people. I made him $4.05 billion. In one term. By himself. A 26-to-1 ratio. I wrote it on the whiteboard in the residence. Then there was the Biden family. "The Biden Crime Family," he called them. He held rallies about it. He got impeached over investigating it. The Republican House spent two years and $3.5 million in taxpayer funds to uncover, per their own final report, approximately $24 million in Biden family income over five years. Hunter Biden's Burisma salary was $1 million a year, later reduced to $500,000. The Chinese payments were $664,000. The House Oversight Committee called it "influence peddling at the highest level." $24 million. Five years. Ten family members. My client made that in two days. I have the math. $4.05 billion divided by 365 days is $11.1 million per day. The entire Biden investigation, the impeachment, the hearings, the Fox News segments, the "CRIME FAMILY" hats, all of it, for an amount my client earns before his Wednesday morning briefing. The ratio is 168 to 1. I put it on the whiteboard next to the Clinton number. The President saw it. He laughed. He did not ask me to take it down. "Drain the swamp," he said in 2016. I drained it. Into the binder. The swamp is now a portfolio. It is the highest-performing portfolio in the history of public office, and the man who built it ran for President on the promise that he would stop people from doing exactly what I help him do every single day. That's positioning. When the New Yorker published the full accounting, $4.05 billion across five sectors, and asked the President whether he saw a conflict of interest between the office and the fortune, between the pardons and the profits, between setting crypto policy and holding $3 billion in crypto, he told the New York Times six words. "I found out that nobody cared." He was right. He has been right about that singular fact since the beginning. Nobody cared when he launched the coin. Nobody cared when he pardoned the convicted money launderer who pumped his stablecoin. Nobody cared when a dishwasher recycling outfit in Minnesota became a $562 million pipeline to his family through a subsidiary that had been convicted on three continents. Nobody cared when 600,000 wallets evaporated so the leather binder in the residence could gain another tab. He found out nobody cared. Then he monetized the finding at a rate of $11.1 million per day, every day he has held office, including Sundays, including holidays, including the morning he sat next to the Crown Prince and said the murdered journalist had it coming. $4.05 billion. One presidential term. Zero indictments. Zero congressional hearings. Zero audits. Zero consequences of any kind for any person at any level of the operation. The chart goes up. It only counts his money. There is another chart. It has 600,000 wallets on it. Retirement accounts. People who believed a dishwasher recycling company in Minnesota was a sound vehicle for their savings. We do not publish that one. I filed it under EAGLE-7.

@GenTXer2 So many good songs, and one of my favorites is Watching the Detectives.

Let's give this artist some love: Name ONE great song by ELVIS COSTELLO. I'll start..."Everyday I Write The Book"

@stuzi_pants Big Love, and The Leftovers

Started The Wire from scratch again last night. Managed three episodes in one sitting I still say that pound for pound it’s the greatest drama series of all time, just edging out Breaking Bad and The Sopranos Any other suggestions for one of the top spots?

@bryancsk Garry Wills wrote an essay "My Koran Problem," published in The New York Review of Books, September 19, 2016. He noticed that the books of the Koran corresponded with those of the Old Testament, but were ordered differently. Also interesting: God: A Biography by Jack Miles 1995

When reading the Quran as a non-Muslim you start wondering what kind of esoteric Jewish and Christian cults there were in the Arabian peninsula in the 7th C. What do you mean the Jews say Ezra is the Son of God? What do you mean Jesus brought a table a food from the sky?

@SAlwashahi MB and MB adjacent. I started noticing it in social media in the 2010's.

In your opinion, what is the reason behind the backlash whenever I write something about the UAE ?

@xevekiah In my case, every OBGYN in New Zealand at that time was tainted, and professionally compromised by Greene's unethical experiment. They lost professional confidence for a time, and I got hurt. My daughter nearly died at St Thomas' Hospital in London.

@xevekiah My labor was dangerously prolonged. 30 years later, we nearly lost our daughter after she nearly bled to death following an emergency Caesar bc midwife's failed to notice a breach, & again, didn't call in the OBGYN. The cult of natural midwifery is dangerous, gendered violence

what’s a clear example of medical misogyny you’ve witnessed or experienced?