Alex Hennig 🇺🇦 🇪🇺

Congratulations. I'm sure there is definitely much more behind it. Especially on a pricing side. In the last 6 years many hotels have tried implementing "work from hotel", but never achieved a meaningful result. A concept of transformable high-end small office on weekdays and a hotel suite on weekends - a dream for many hoteliers that never came true... But also converting a meeting space into an office didn't capture enough demand.

Massive untapped real estate opportunity: Lack of supply of high-end suburban small office suites. This is why demand for WeWork was so high. But if you're a CPA, attorney, wealth manager, or therapist, you don't want co-working. We just did this, and it's crushing it!

It's not about highway driving. Teslas' EAP is already there and could have probably handle 97% of that route. For the EU authorities it is probably about some edge cases, like icy asphalt during a snowfall in the night on a narrow two-way rural road without proper illumination. But also the fact that drivers will be more prone to using smartphones as their trust in FSD will be high.

@BLKMDL3 @DBurkland @AaronS5_ @Tesla_AI @Tesla Every mile of that 2,833 mile run without disengagement is a data point @elonmusk's regulatory case is built on. Ireland, Europe, every pending FSD approval just got 2,833 new reasons to accelerate their timeline. The record isn't a stunt. It's evidence.

WE SET THE NEW YORK CITY TO LA FSD CANNONBALL RUN RECORD! Zero disengagements or human intervention on FSD v14.3.2 for 2,833 miles! 49:55:57, beating previous record by ~8.5 hours! Huge shoutout to copilots @DBurkland @AaronS5_ for joining along. Videos coming soon. @Tesla_AI

@EFIEBER_ANDRE Dramatisch ist das schon. Vor allem in der Kombination von Teslas Umstellung auf Abomodell ab dem 21.Mai 2026. Ein Nein auf der EU-Ebene benachteiligt Besitzer, die kurzfristig FSD gekauft haben, um ungewisses Pricing bei Abomodellen für EAP und FSD vermeiden wollten.

Der schwedische 🇸🇪 Artikel klingt erstmal dramatisch: „Wenn die EU Nein sagt, wird das niederländische Ja zu Tesla FSD zurückgezogen.“ Aber was heißt das wirklich? Aus meiner Sicht: Die Niederlande haben Tesla FSD nicht einfach endgültig für ganz Europa freigegeben, sondern eine Art nationales Vorab-Ja gegeben. Die große Frage ist jetzt, ob die EU und die anderen Mitgliedstaaten diese Entscheidung mittragen. Dass so eine Genehmigung theoretisch wieder zurückgezogen werden kann, ist erstmal nichts Ungewöhnliches. Das ist eher eine Absicherung im Zulassungsprozess. Die spannende Frage ist doch: Warum sollte man sie zurückziehen? Wenn FSD in den Niederlanden sauber funktioniert, überwacht bleibt und Tesla die Anforderungen erfüllt, wäre ein pauschales Zurückziehen schwer zu begründen. Dann müsste es schon konkrete Sicherheitsbedenken oder regulatorische Gründe geben. Für mich klingt das deshalb weniger nach „FSD ist gescheitert“ – sondern eher nach: Die Niederlande gehen voran, aber Europa will am Ende nochmal gemeinsam entscheiden. Also: kein endgültiger Durchbruch, aber auch kein Rückschlag. Eher der nächste wichtige Schritt im europäischen Zulassungskrimi. 🇪🇺⚡

Eine Frage des Preises/Finanzierungskonditionen. Bei einem reduzierten Preis und 0% oder 0,99% Zinsen können andere Hersteller nicht mithalten. Das macht aber in der Zukunft neue Preissteigerungen (wie zuletzt in Deutschland um +1000 EUR) schwerer durchsetzbar. Was bleibt dann von der Profitabilität übrig?

Wenn Tesla jetzt schon (wieder) die weltweiten Elektroauto-Verkäufe anführt, wie soll das erst aussehen, wenn autonomes Fahren weltweit verfügbar ist?

1) Vollkaskoprämien sind um ein Viertel teurer. Das Model Y ist traditionell hoch eingestuft (oft in den Klassen 23 bis 25). Viele klassische Verbrenner der Mittelklasse liegen eher im Bereich 17 bis 20. 2) Auch wenn Tesla einen Stromverbrauch von 15 kWh/100km zeigt - tatsächlich sind es etwa 5 kWh mehr. Bei aktuellen Preisen immer noch günstiger als ein Benziner, aber nur knapp unter einigen Dieselfahrzeugen. 3) Manche Teslaeigenschaften gehören verboten werden: Dashcamaufnahmen im Sentrymodus (Passanten rum herum wissen nicht über laufende Videoaufnahmen); Blitzerwarner in der Navi (in der Schweiz muss man mit Bussgeld rechnen alleine wegen Verfügbarkeit dieser Funktion; zum Glück für Deutschland reicht es diese Funktion auszuschalten). 4) Reifen halten in der Regel bei Verbrenner der Mittelklasse länger. Alleine wegen Gewicht des Autos. 5) Querlenker und Stabilisatoren(!) bleiben eine Problemzone. Außerhalb der Garantie kann es teuer werden. Ganz zu schweigen über die fehlende Sicherheit. etc.

Man muss muss nicht auf hohe Benzinpreise warten, um Tesla zu fahren. Allein durch den Wegfall von Sprit und Ölwechsel habe ich ca. 15.000 EUR gespart. Berechnet man den Steuererlass, THQ-Quoten, Null EUR Wartungskosten/Instandhaltung, noch hinzu, sind wir bei über 20.000 direkter Ersparnis. Kostenlos inbegriffen: Mega Stauraum, fernsteuerbare Klimaanlage, 100% Verlässlichkeit, eine irre gute Soundanlage, 5-Sterne-Sicherheit, maximalen Komfort und die Zeitersparnis, nie wieder an Tankstellen zu müssen und unendlich viele andere Vorteile. Stom kann sich jeder machen. Benzin nicht.

@EFIEBER_ANDRE Verstehe ich das richtig: vor FSD v14.3 fand keine Anpassung an Wetter- ind Straßenverhältnise an? Wenn ja, dann war es echt mutig FSD unter solchen Bedingungen zu verwenden. Dies setzte bestimmt das Leben alle Verkehrsteilnehmer in und um Tesla aufs Spiel.

📍Tesla FSD wird immer beeindruckender. Das System erkennt nicht nur die Straße und den Verkehr, sondern bewertet inzwischen auch aktiv die Wetterbedingungen und passt das Fahrverhalten in Echtzeit an. Besonders wichtig in Situationen wie Aquaplaning, Schnee oder Eis auf der Fahrbahn. Wenn das Fahrzeug potenziell gefährliche Bedingungen erkennt, reduziert es automatisch die erlaubte Geschwindigkeit und reagiert vorsichtiger, genau so sollte moderne Fahrassistenz funktionieren.

Nein. Das wusste ich nicht. Mein letzter Wissensstand war: Teslas FSD kann manchmal beeinträchtigte Sichtverhältnisse wie Blendung nicht angemessen erkennen und den Fahrer nicht darüber warnen. Wenn es aber Tesla tatsächlich gelungen ist dieses Problem komplett und dauerhaft zu lösen, dann wird der Abstand zu der Konkurrenz noch deutlicher. "The agency wrote that Tesla FSD may sometimes fail: “to detect and/or warn the driver appropriately under degraded visibility conditions such as glare and airborne obscurants.” In crashes reviewed by the agency, Tesla’s system “did not detect common roadway conditions that impaired camera visibility and/or provide alerts when camera performance had deteriorated until immediately before the crash occurred.” cnbc.com/2026/03/19/tes…

Wusstet ihr das? Wenn die Sonne uns blendet, bedeutet das noch lange nicht, dass Teslas Kameras nichts mehr sehen. Während wir nur noch Licht erkennen, rekonstruiert das Tesla-AI-System weiterhin wichtige Bildinformationen, genau deshalb funktioniert FSD selbst bei extremer Blendung oder nachts erstaunlich gut.

@teslaxander @Tesla x.com/i/status/15320…

@teslaxander @Tesla x.com/i/status/15320…

Wieder ein Grund mehr, bei @Tesla zu bleiben.

@teslaxander Über Skoda Octavia schon. youtu.be/uGhZLbp9NBw?is…

Warum gibt es eigentlich keine Lieder über Skoda oder Kia? 🤣

@Houseofyogi Imagine this deal went through. Now we would probably lose both JB and Spirit resulting in less competition. In the current situation JB can still get slots for the most profitable routes. Hire best Spirit employees. Lease best aircrafts.

Spirit Airlines died tonight at the hands of the socialist crusader, Elizabeth Warren She must be so proud to add another casket to her achievements. Tonight at 3am, Spirit turns off the lights. 14,000 jobs gone. 30+ smaller airports lose service. JetBlue offered $3.8 BILLION in cash to buy Spirit in 2022. Shareholders, flight attendants union, literally everyone voted yes. The combined company would have held 9% of the US market against a Big 4 that already owned 80%. For anyone who understands numbers: 9% isn’t a monopoly against 80%. Warren said no. She wrote letters. She pressured Buttigieg. Biden’s DOJ sued. A federal judge killed the deal in January 2024. Her argument: the merger would cost consumers $1 billion a year. Now look at her collateral damage she dusts under the rug. 510 pilots gone in the months after. 1,800 flight attendants furloughed in December. 14,000 jobs in 2023. 7,500 last week. Zero tonight. And that’s just the people in Spirit uniforms. Catering goes. Fuel guys go. Baggage crews, gate agents, airport coffee shops, hotels and rental cars in 70 cities Spirit flew to. Every airline job carries 3 more on its back. 40,000 people out of work because of one woman’s moronic crusade against the market. And the math ain’t mathing. Spirit abandoned 90 routes during the death spiral. Fares on those routes are up 14% on average. Oakland to Newark: $135 to $288. Fort Myers to San Juan: $92 to $219. Kansas City to Newark up 66%. That’s reality. Not some BS number from a “study.” So @SenWarren tell me how this saves the consumer money? Cheap carriers in a market drop fares 21% across the board. Southwest did this in the 90s and saved Americans $68 BILLION over 20 years. Warren killed it. That’s what moronic politicians led by socialism do. Then with her own blind arrogance, she tweeted Spirit’s collapse is “a Biden win for flyers.” A win. 14,000 people are reading termination letters tonight. And she’s taking credit. This is socialism in 2026. A senator who’s never made payroll thinks she knows how to run a market better than the people who own and work in the company. She saved you a billion on imaginary paper. She cost you ten times that in real life. She didn’t protect consumers from anything. 14,000+ will go from working to welfare. She will make sure to blame billionaires, hardworking tax payers, AI, capitalism and whatever monster they will make up tomorrow hiding under your bed. Higher taxes. Fewer jobs. More expensive everything. She called it a win. I hope you enjoy winning.

Trotz fehlende Endpreistransparenz bin ich mir sicher, dass der o.g. Autobesitzer hat nie den vollen Listenpreis bezahlt. Je nach Portal findet man schnell Aktionen mit bis zu 17% Rabatt auf iX3. Eine oder andere Extraaustattung kommt vielleicht noch on Top. Es würde mich nicht wundern wenn sein Verkaufspreis nur um 6000 Euro hinter dem ursprünglich bezahltem Betrag liegen würde.

Interessantes Posting dieses BMW iX3 Besitzers. Weil sein Auto so toll ist, kündigt er an, es bald wieder zu VERKAUFEN. Mit 24.5000 € !!! WERTVERLUST

Investment backlog into a hotel property is quickly visible for a trained eye, and a clear sign that the owner of the building should be approached for a deal. Almost always their price expectation is a fantasy projection of revenue and far away from real numbers, and/or based on money already dumped into the project plus a hefty profit. But, earlier or later reality kicks in. Staying in touch over those years gives one a first row seat for negotiations.

Es wird ein Gamechanger in der Hotellerie sein. Autonomer Shuttle-Service für die Gäste zu deutlich geringen Kosten als bei externen Dienstleistern. Auch als Arbeitgeber könnte man mit dem Cybercab den Arbeitsweg revolutionieren, indem man Mitarbeitern eine stressfreie Pendler-Option als Benefit anbietet und somit in Zeiten der Fachkräftemangel Attraktivität des Hauses steigert.

Hier sehen wir das erste offizielle produzierte Tesla Cybercab aus der Giga Austin. Nicht wundern, der Frunk ist offen, daher das Gap. Wenn es das Cybercab irgendwann auch in Europa zu kaufen gäbe: Würdet ihr eins kaufen?

Es wird ein Gamechanger in der Hotellerie sein. Autonomer Shuttle-Service für die Gäste zu deutlich geringen Kosten als bei externen Dienstleistern. Auch als Arbeitgeber könnte man mit dem Cybercab den Arbeitsweg revolutionieren, indem man Mitarbeitern eine stressfreie Pendler-Option als Benefit anbietet und somit in Zeiten der Fachkräftemangel Attraktivität des Hauses steigert.

I wouldn't make such a big news out of it. Cutting off partners after performance reviews is a typical approach in big companies. At the same time new staff members will be promoted to Partners and Directors. This is a circle of life... 2019: "According to reports from business news provider The Financial Times, KPMG is set to axe as much as a tenth of its UK Partners by Christmas." consultancy.uk/news/amp/22946…

KPMG is laying off 10% of their audit partners. You might have missed the news amidst today’s announcement that Meta is also laying off 10% of their employees. I’ll be blunt: If you work in front of a computer, your job isn’t safe. It doesn’t matter how senior you are (KPMG’s partners literally own the company). Nor does it matter how good you are at your job (Meta’s engineers are among the best of the best in the tech industry). Your job is at risk, and it’s incumbent on you—and no one but yourself—to plan for what you do in your career to proactively manage that risk. Four reasons why this is happening: 1. Competition: AI is reducing barriers to entry across every industries, from professional services (such as the audit and advisory services provided by the likes of KPMG) to software and everything in between. Reduced barriers to entry mean increased competition, which means lower pricing power, margin compression, and pressure to reduce costs—especially fixed costs such as labor, which is the number one expense for most white-collar businesses. 2. Need to Invest: As incumbents face increased competition from new entrants to their market and from substitute products (e.g., vibe-coded homebrew SaaS replacing expensive vertical SaaS products that previously enjoyed virtual monopolies within their respective target markets), they are forced to make sizable investments in technology to remain competitive. In the case of professional services companies, this means large investments in proprietary software (all of the Big Four firms are investing billions in new technology right now); for big tech companies, this means tens of billions of dollars going into data centers and physical infrastructure. Essentially, capex and opex are in the middle of a zero-sum battle in corporate budgets. As companies face the need to invest more in capex and R&D—and as capital markets become increasingly averse to providing them additional liquidity to fund it, out of concerns that the ROIC on said capex will not be accretive to earnings—opex is cannibalized to fund capex. And, again, the primary lever CFOs in white-collar companies have to instantly reduce opex is layoffs. 3. Automation: These competitive pressures are compounded by AI rapidly automating work faster than incremental revenue is able to be generated. In other words, workers are being made redundant faster than companies are able to come up with the new business that might otherwise save those jobs. Some in the tech industry (people far smarter than me, I will add) conjecture that, on a net basis, AI will create more jobs than it will destroy, due to an AI-facilitated period of hypergrowth and a corresponding boom in corporate earnings. But with every company I advise, across the worlds of startups, SMBs, and large industrial companies, I’m simply not seeing that yet, and I don’t know anyone who is. 4. It might feel like ancient history at this point, but many companies are still dealing with the excesses of the Covid-era labor market. Money was loose, talent was in short supply, and software companies, financial services firms, and professional services companies hired too many people too fast, with standards that were too low. They’ve made significantly progress in right-sizing their workforces over the past couple years (return-to-office mandates, for example, have essentially created “soft layoffs” at many large companies), but much work still remains. If you’re picturing your career and your company as you read these words, I can’t emphasize it enough: Plan ahead. Build a network of people outside your company who would want to work with you if your current job were made redundant. Think about businesses you might want to start (it’s a lot easier to keep your job if no one but your customers can terminate you). Set money aside. Be proactive, not reactive. Be a predator, not the prey. Because these trends are inexorable, they’re unstoppable, and, chances are, they’re coming for all of us. Start planning. And start planning now.

@HansMokeNiemann Who was your greatest inspiration when using computer assistance when playing online? chess.com mentions around 100 games chess.com/news/view/carl…

In the darkest moments of my journey over the past few years, I began to wonder how I could possibly overcome being blacklisted and defamed by nearly every international media outlet. With no sponsors or support, I was left with just one friend. My greatest inspiration became Bobby Fischer. If he could defeat the entire Soviet machine on the chessboard without any help, then my own problems seemed smaller by comparison. I immersed myself in his life: reading everything I could, meeting his former friends and bodyguards. Eventually, I got to the core of what made his character so special. At that point, I understood what it takes to become a world champion. I don’t know how long the journey will take, but I’m certain it will happen one day. I’ve overcome too much to stop now. Let this be a reminder to everyone, that no matter what you are dealing with, faith, perseverance, and rising above your detractors is the only solution.

@dgriffinchess The emblem of this championship was quite impressive (created by a graphic designer of a local "Sportivna Gazeta"): numbers 5 and 3 combined into a chess knight. Years later a chess club near Madrid (Spain) adopted it for some reason. ajedrezcolladovillalba.com

40 years ago today, the 53rd USSR Championship final got under way in Kiev. It ran until the 28th April 1986. Final cross-table below. The Chernobyl disaster took place on 26th April 1986, just over 100km from Kiev...

@JohnBes39294195 @ivan_8848 Stepan Bandera was born in Galicia region in 1909. Western Ukraine (Galicia and Volhynia) was occupied for the first time by the USSR in 1939. Soviet prisoners surely didn't have contact to Bandera who was inprisoned in Sachsenhausen concentration camp.

@mb_n34 @ivan_8848 Ukrajina byla republika v Ussr, bandero.

On March 22, 1943, the Nazis burned alive the 149 inhabitants of the village Khatyn, in Belarus Everyone in the USSR knew about the tragedy of Khatyn. They wrote books, opened exhibitions, erected monuments. But they never told the truth. The lie about Khatyn is one of the most shameful pages, deftly inscribed in the history of the war. They did not want to call the killers by name. "Who burned Khatyn?" – "Dirlewanger". It would seem that there is an answer, everything is clear, everything is simple. And here are the real names of those who burned people in Khatyn. The main executioners are Grigory Vasyura, Vasily Meleshko, privates - Lukovich, Sakhno, Spivak, Topchiy, Kozynchenko, Katryuk, Shcherban, Petrichuk, Varlamov, Khrenov, Iskanderov, Khachaturyan... In the name of the friendship and brotherhood of the Soviet peoples, it was necessary to keep quiet about the fact that the 118th Schutzmannschaft Battalion was almost entirely Ukrainian.