Sabitlenmiş Tweet
the push for many to "take up" the so called principles of sacred geometry is also the push for "cosmic humanism". These principles and the quest to find some form of unity fail due to their emphasis not only on the "seed" and "flower of life" but also on the topology of the torus. This structure has NO foundations in anything BUT narrative forms, linking the basic seed structure of 6 circles, to the 6 days of creation. Being a template employed in Ancient Egypt, i believe for the purpose of simplifying the utility of geometry as a template that supports the a higher degree of perfection in the outer regions due to the constant addition of more and more circles, in a manner that does NOT EXPOSE the true foundations which arise from gnomic study of the sun earth relation...... a two body problem, and one that is modelled simply with two circles, their centers anchored to the gnomic point (derived from the tracing of arcs of shadow time, on the ground plane from a simple upright and fixed rigid structure, which at their crest, indicate the "noontime code" that reveals the ratios of day to night, the extremes and means of the annular cycle. From the noontime points of the Extremes: being the noontime point of the shadow marked on the longest and shortest days of the year.
The topologically coherent model of this cycle's PROJECTION, which is accessible to ALL as it is a trace through space over time recorded on the ground plain; which remains OUTSIDE THE SPHERE OF HUMAN INFLUENCE, and provides access to OBJECTIVE TRUTH, through transcending the recognition of t he APPEARANCE OF SUNS MOTIONS, and leads to the gathering of data sets that include the measure of the angle observed from the Gnomon, to the circle of the horizon and the position of the sun at dawn and dusk, as the earth's axial tilt makes it appear that the sun shifts its location backward and forth between the EXTREMES of the solstices.
In a book titled COSMIC HUMANISM AND WORLD UNITY by Oliver Reiser, is "a theory of the eight-dimensional cosmos based on integrative principles from science, religion, and art", and has informed the mindset of the "8 fold 8 fold way", that appears to have a resonance taht pays homage to the primary text "Symbols of the Yi King" by ZD Sung, 1934, that informed the 1930's technocracy.
In it, the EYE OF GOD model that arises from the union of two circles forming the vesica piscis, anchored to the noontime points of the extremes of the annular cycle, which I have just described, is treated in an entirely marginal manner, with a relatively obscured reference to both the Moebius Function (a topological transformation of 180 degrees) where the circle (cycle) "O" is itself twisted in the manner of the ANALEMMA "8", thereby effectively indicating the union of opposites, that in terms of circuitry, indicates ON. Although August Moebius is only known today as the inventor of the singled surfaced conveyor belt, he was an ASTRONOMER, the moebius strip, a useful product.
None of this is aired, as the purpose of the work is not to indicate the very structure that has been further marginalised by an INTERROGATION OF SIGNS AND SYMBOLS given by many engaged in various forms of religious fanaticism that rally against apparent occultists and mystics alike, who are themselves NOT ENGAGED in the elementary principles of gnomic astronomical studies, NOT engaged in anything that is, as Pythagoras apparently stated (though we have no primary sources of his work) inside the territory of the EARTH, as the meaning of ESO TERRIC has for thousands of years, been aligned with SELF EMPOWERMENT programs that FAIL TO INDICATE THE IMPORT OF THE GNOMIC SIGNATURES, ITS MODEL, and THE MODELS RULINGS that resolve, through the fractalisation of the structure, to a complex isodual matrix, where the cube cage and cube of cubes today used to teach the child simple numeracy, is merely one of all the platonic shapes and forms that are generated simultaneously from the fundamental structural relations of the TWO CIRCLE MODEL.
In skipping over the EYE OF GOD, the MOBIUS AND KLEINBOTTLE FUNCTION (the single chirality kleinbottle known as the purse of fortunatus -its construction shown in chapter 7 Mein Herr, of Silver and Bruno reconsidered, by Lewis Carol), the latter indicating a long history of this enigmatic shape THAT MIMICKS THE WAY LIGHT GYRATES ON THE SURFACE OF THE PLANET, throughout the course of the annular cycle., REISER takes the reader to the FLOWER OF LIFE which obscures the two circle model by creating a figure that repeats the vesica piscis ad infinitum, AND TORUS- a shape that does not unify the inner and outer surfaces.
By popularising arbitrary geometrical models like the Flower of Life, and obscuring the EYE OF GOD or two circle construction and its foundations, the generation of conflict between scientists that can with ease prove the inadequacies of the flower of life model, and more importantly reject it as merely something loosely associated to a narrative 6 base scola, hence NOT relevant as anything that is anchored to anything that remains OUTSIDE THE SPHERE OF HUMAN INFLUENCE, and hence has no real power to reveal anything rigorous about SCIENCE or MATHEMATICS, about NATURAL LAW, or COMMON LAW, or the accoutrements of SOVEREIGNTY, of which the GNOMON, the ROD and STRING are registered as significant elements that together indicate the M(e)S, though not the MES of EGYPT, but rather the M(e)S of MESOPOTAMIA- the roots of the false mindset that insists to ALL that the SUN ACTUALLY MOVES and the EARTH STANDS STILL..... effectively insisting on the general masses engaging in NO SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE.
Today in many nations we induct the child into the tracing of the daily signatures of cyclic projections on the ground plane, showing how they change over time, without indicating the ANALEMMA, and we provide the child with the CUBE OF CUBES, without indicating THE MODEL and ITS RULINGS, and the MANY SHAPES AND FORMS that are known as PLATONIC or ideal structures of which the cube of cubes is NOT PRIMARY.
Arguments rage between those who are engaged in the ARTS, and those engaged in the SCIENCES, and while few ARTISTS tolerate the discipline required to pursue an comprehension of the nature of scientific models, of topological structures, and remain proud of their arrogant DIDACTIC nature, MANY SCIENTIST have been influenced by the mysticism that flourished particularly in the 19th century, as the project engaged by KLEIN and POINCARE and SOPHUS LIE AND OTHERS, became obscured by the generational impact of a system of weights and measures that arguably pursued a level of perfection devoid of any models that employ circles, and devoid of all reference to the PHENOMENA of TIME SIGNATURES. The induction of the greater number into Science of Time that Plato indicated was the necessity to support DEMOCRACY due to the people being aware of the TRUTH that was BLASPHEMOUS (as plato states) to the ruling ELITE who employed a top down structure hegemonic empire, whose WEALTH AND POWER depended on the flourishing of IGNORANCE in the public domain, and hence flourished ONLY THROUGH THE DICTATORIAL IMPOSITION OF A FALSE MINDSET- not a primitive mindset, a FALSE MINDSET that appropriated iconic Egyptian elements pertaining to the gender specific characterisations of both the MALE and its relation to the EARTH, and the FEMALE, and its relation to the SKY, switching both, such that the DESCENT OF THE SKY GODDESS TO EARTH, destroyed all indications of the EARTH as an ACTIVE ENTITY originally indicated as twin entities, exhibiting TWO RUNNING STRIDES, and overtly indicating the GNOMIC SYSTEM through the description of the GNOMON as the PHALUS OF THE EARTH GOD GEB.
hence the iconic images of MALE SKY GODS in winged chariots, appropriate the elements of HOROLOGY and the principles known not only as the Foundations of RA, that is not only indicated by the image of the circle with its center shown, but also as the OVOID STRUCTURE OF THE EYE AND MOUTH, or LENS shape of the vesica piscis, but as the SHIELD OF OSIRIS, which also indicates the fractal of the vesica piscis, though 90 degrees orientation from the element known as RA, and where the notion to RETURN TO THE STAR TEACHINGS SBA, which concerns us with the PENTAD, (5 spoked wheel) that arises from the ruling of a cluster of 6 or 12 hexagon shells, to the point that the 30 and 60, 15, 10 and 5 spoked wheels are accessible from the 5th of 6 or 10th of 12 shells, all of which arise from the ruling of the BASIC MODEL that is rooted to the noontime points of the longest and shortest days of the year.
WHY ARE THESE RULED STRUCTURES IMPORTANT other than for the modeling of the daily and annular cycles and the provision of all platonic shapes and forms (this fact is given in Timaeus where the reverse engineering of "what the artificer has done" is provided)?
To this day they inform the entire body of work that is understood as CRYSTALLOGRAPHY and ULTRASTRUCTURE research..... itself obscured by the utility of a convention known as FISHER PROJECTIONS introduced in the early half of the 20th century, that simplify the ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION OF THE MATRIX STRUCTURE SUCH THAT THE AXIS which APPEARS merely as a center point on a 2D image, reveals the 3rd Dimension, as VERTICES OF A CUBE.
For those seekers who are not aware of the philosophical issues that prevail in contemporary science, who are unaware of the disconnect from NATURAL SCIENCE emergent from gnomic astronomical signatures, its model and rulings, and who are ARTICULATED by the FEAR driven through POPULAR MEDIA, or of their RELGIOUS CONVICTIONS, or arrogance that comes from assuming THEY KNOW HOW TO INTERPRET not just complex images and patterns that they are studying WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING ANCIENT LINGUISTICS and its significance for unpacking the very thing that informed A GLOBALISING MINDSET that I believe -due to the explosion of knowledge at the time, was originally intended for the INDUCTION OF THE GREATER NUMBER, into the science of time, and was OBSCURED in the process of destroying meaningfields from PREDYNASTIC MSS, through the many and various periods of usurpation of the this civilisation, as a considered necessity that served the interests of HEGEMONS willing to use this information in either service to the SELF or for the GREATER GOOD, which is reason for the DISSASTEROUS situation we are in today.
Through studying Plato, Vitruvius, Ptolemy from his ANALEMMA, Copernicus, we find THE ONE AND SAME MODEL IN EACH AND ALL OF THESE STUDIES. From the Ptolemies Almagest, the obscuration of the model given in his ANALEMMA is complete and the desire to provide a greater level of detail in the mapping of epicycles for examples, is apparent. From Copernicus, the SAME MODEL IS EMPLOYED, being the 2 circle model of the EYE OF GOD MODEL, or VESICA PISCIS, but once again his interest in precision is behind his denigration of anyone who believes that all of this knowledge simply comes from the study of the EQUINOXES AND SOLSTICES, which is not a false statement, as the RULINGS OF THE STRUCTURE, which i might add inform the major works of POLYMATHS, regardless of whether or not they are aware of its astronomical origins that are constantly obscured by scientists and mystics alike, (re for eg John DEES monas hieroglyphics).
The fact that this same structural foundation of the model, informs the ground plan of STONE HENGE, (see first comment) is also indicative of the desire for this knowledge to be not only out in the open, but in its monumental structure, would survive whatever man made or natural catastrophes would impact it.
So what can be said of GAUSS's attempt to reckon how the ancients discovered PI, (the initial point of interest given in HILBERTS geometry and the imagination) or of MODIUS' LAW OF EDGES, which informs the initial point of interest in FELIX KLEINS geometry from an advanced standpoint, or of SOPHUS LIES "string things" that treat the structure in a manner that fails to reveal its foundations whilst providing much meat for the questing ROMANCE OF MANY DIMENSIONS, (re edwin abbott abotts Flatland) or for that matter, the SYMBOLS OF YI KING, the obscuration of the DAOIST model of the YIN YANG that is a model of the ratios of day to night, and the obscuration of the roots to the square of squares?
all of these indications outside of the work of Moebius and Klein, begin with the SQUARE OF SQUARES and the inspiration of the DELIAN ORACLE being the quest for the squareing of the circle, the doubling of the cube and trisection of angles (all of are shown in Knorrs, ANCIENT GEOMETRICAL PROBLEMS with solutions provided by Plato), likely due to the indication of the name of the FIRST RULER of ancient Egypt, IMN, being associated with the checkerboard, even though the heiroglyph itself indicates the cutting or division of a block into 9 or 10 pieces with 8 or 9 lines or cuts, AND the hermeneutics that arise from the far east, and their reckoning of five elements, five "notes" etc that inform the QUEST FOR FIVE POWERS, that is indicated by NEWTON, as a CONVENTION given by PAPPUS the ALEXANDRIAN, who appropriated PLATONIC reckonings.
What can said of the fact that whilst Aristarchus of Samos well understood the relation between the GEOCENTRIC AND HELIOCENTRIC PERSPECTIVES OF THE ONE TWO BODY PROBLEM BTW THE SUN AND EARTH, the majority of cosmic notions projected the acceptance of a world of appearances, as if the EYE does not lie, and the INDIVIDUAL IS INCAPABLE not only OF INITIATING an INDEPENDANT STUDY OF THE GNOMIC FOUNDATIONS, (in many cultures including in the reign of AKHENATEN, the flying of flags from all significant points as if in celebration expended the means of sourcing such gnomic information) but of PROVIDING ANY REAL ACCOUNT OF A STUDY THAT CAN destroy the projected mindset given by hegemons.
there is so much that can said of this work that it is impossible to convey the full account of how these cosmological shapes and forms, inform a unity of disciplines that proves the fallibility of mathematical means of describing anything close to a theory of everything.
x.com/mcp358/status/…
English
