丁丁

黑洞。霍金的黑洞我只能想成这样儿：）

@Cbluepacific @freakoutsideofx I get it. But who handed WH to Trump? Let’s always remember the sequence.

@meedoo_doo @freakoutsideofx When was that? Dotard is building a fucking arch to show our imperialism.

The Barack and Michelle Obama statue at the new Barack Obama Presidential Center opening soon.

@Cbluepacific @freakoutsideofx We’ve been taught to be humble and self reflective. Then we turn around and worship the opposite. What an irony!

@meedoo_doo @freakoutsideofx It’s his library.

@Cbluepacific @freakoutsideofx So?

@cxqd56789 上州有间华人开的“王子茶室”-Prince Tea House，生意兴隆，顾客大半非华人。

一间叫“王子咖啡屋”的室外场地。

Brutalism in Armenia.

by Kazuaki Horitomo

I don’t want to hear about my carbon footprint ever again. x.com/SawyerMerritt/…

Dirac couldn't get hired as an electrical engineer. A 19-year-old with a Bristol degree in 1921, during a post-war depression that had no use for him. So he stayed at Bristol and studied math for free because there was nothing else to do. Two years later he got a fellowship to Cambridge. His advisor, Ralph Fowler, handed him proofs of an unpublished Heisenberg paper in August 1925. Dirac read it and realized the math resembled Poisson brackets from classical mechanics. Within months he had built an entirely new mathematical framework for quantum theory. He published 11 papers before submitting his thesis. Eleven. Most PhD students struggle to publish one. Dirac had a body of work that constituted an entire theoretical foundation, and he still needed to package it into a dissertation to satisfy the degree requirements. The thesis title tells you everything about the confidence level. When you title your PhD "Quantum Mechanics" at age 23, you are either delusional or correct. Dirac was correct. It was the first PhD thesis ever written on the subject. Two years after that he wrote the Dirac equation, unifying special relativity with quantum mechanics and predicting antimatter before anyone had observed it. By 1932 he held the Lucasian Professorship of Mathematics at Cambridge. The same chair Isaac Newton held. He was 30. Nobel Prize at 31. The youngest physics laureate at the time. The entire arc from unemployable engineer to owning Newton's chair took 11 years. The field he named his thesis after is now the operating system of modern physics.

@zzNeutrino 真勇敢！道出了大家都不敢直面的小九九😄

非常反感逃离舒适区这句话，我只喜欢待在舒适区，唯一能让我逃离舒适区的，是我发现了更舒适的舒适区。

@LXLotsofun The problem is no party really represents the national interests for all. Between competing parties, we’ve never had a truly good choice.

This time, they're targeting property. Next time, when they run short of money again, they'll come after superannuation. That's what worries many people like me. That's what happens when governments see people's hard-earned savings as a revenue source. The Labor Party's greed is becoming increasingly obvious.

😂😂😂 Modelling, modelling, modelling— If it agrees with me, it's wisdom and truth; If it disagrees, I pretend it doesn't exist.

After being raped for 23 days she formed a gang and killed 22 of her rapists 🙌👑

If this goes forward — $250 bill with Trump's face on it. — Chinese will get a huge kick out of it. "250" (二百五， èrbǎiwǔ) is a common Chinese insult meaning a half-wit, a blockhead, a fool. Comedy writes itself. 笑死.

In 1961, a man with an 8th-grade education picked up a pencil in his prison cell and accidentally changed American history forever. Clarence Earl Gideon was a poor drifter with weathered skin, gray hair, and a lifetime of bad luck behind him. He bounced between odd jobs, cheap rooms, and occasional jail time, barely surviving from one day to the next. When he stood trial in a Florida courtroom in 1961 for allegedly breaking into a pool hall, he had no money and no lawyer. The evidence was weak. Someone claimed they saw him near the building with coins in his pocket. A little cash and some beer had been stolen. That was enough. Before the trial began, Gideon made a simple request. “Your Honor, I request this court to appoint counsel to represent me.” The judge refused. Florida only provided lawyers for capital cases, not for poor men accused of smaller crimes. So a man who never finished middle school was expected to defend himself against trained prosecutors. He tried anyway. He questioned witnesses. Argued his innocence. Did everything he could. The jury found him guilty in minutes. Five years in prison. Most people would have accepted defeat. Gideon didn’t. Inside the prison library, he slowly taught himself the Constitution. He read about the Sixth Amendment and became consumed by one question: How could justice exist if only rich people could afford real defense? After Florida courts rejected him, Gideon sat down in his prison cell with a pencil and wrote directly to the United States Supreme Court. Five handwritten pages. Misspelled words. Shaky handwriting. But the message was clear: This is not right. Against impossible odds, the Supreme Court agreed to hear his case. They assigned him attorney Abe Fortas, one of the best lawyers in America. Fortas argued something painfully obvious: if even great lawyers hire attorneys when accused of crimes, how could an uneducated man defend himself alone? On March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Gideon’s favor. Every poor defendant charged with a serious crime now had the constitutional right to an attorney. The decision changed the American justice system forever. Gideon received a new trial, this time with a lawyer. The prosecution’s case quickly fell apart. Witnesses were exposed as unreliable. Doubt flooded the courtroom. The verdict came back: Not guilty. After more than two years behind bars, Clarence Earl Gideon walked free. He died poor years later, buried at first in an unmarked grave. But his words survived him. Today, every time someone hears, “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you,” they are hearing the echo of one man sitting alone in a prison cell with a pencil in his hand. Clarence Gideon proved that sometimes history changes because one ordinary person refuses to stay silent.

"Israel envió a mi casa a 2 tipos para ofrecerme un sobre con 500 dólares para que dejase de investigar sus crímenes en Palestina. Después el jefe del Mossad, Yossi Cohen, me amenazó a mi y a mi familia para que dejase de investigar a Israel" Fatou Bensouda, ex fiscal jefe de la Corte Penal Internacional, denuncia las amenazas y el intento de soborno que "Israel" le hizo para que parase de investigar sus crímenes en Palestina. En esta entrevista, Fatou cuenta cómo los sionistas controlan a los jueces internacionales, a través de las amenazas y los sobornos, al igual que el imperio de EEUU, que bloqueó sus cuentas bancarias y le hizo la vida imposible por intentar juzgar sus crímenes. Así funciona el mundo capitalista, los poderosos controlan a los jueces para que no les juzguen y solo persigan a sus enemigos, todo es corrupción y mafia.

In 2003, a 28-year-old translator working for British intelligence received an email she wasn’t supposed to see. What she read convinced her that governments were trying to manipulate the world into war. Her name was Katharine Gun. She worked at GCHQ - Britain’s top-secret intelligence agency. On January 31, 2003, she received an email from senior NSA official Frank Koza. The US wanted British intelligence to help spy on members of the UN Security Council. Specifically, diplomats from Angola, Chile, Pakistan, Cameroon, Guinea and Bulgaria - nations whose votes could decide whether the UN backed the invasion of Iraq. The operation was simple: bug phones, read private emails, uncover secrets, weaknesses, fears and anything that could pressure diplomats into supporting the war. Katharine read the email in disbelief. This was not ordinary intelligence gathering: it looked like an attempt to manipulate the UN into approving a war. She knew what leaking the document could cost her. Prison. The destruction of her career. Under Britain’s Official Secrets Act, she could face years behind bars for exposing classified intelligence. But she leaked the email anyway. On March 2, 2003, The Observer newspaper published the secret NSA request on its front page. Suddenly, the world could see evidence that intelligence agencies were allegedly targeting UN diplomats ahead of the Iraq War vote. Inside GCHQ, panic exploded. Investigators began interrogating employees, searching for the source of the leak, monitoring staff and creating an atmosphere of fear throughout the building. Katharine watched innocent coworkers fall under suspicion. That’s when she made another decision that stunned people around her. She confessed. Rather than allow others to suffer for something she’d done, Katharine walked into her manager’s office and admitted she was responsible. She was arrested. Suspended from her job. Formally charged under the Official Secrets Act. By late 2003, she faced trial at London’s Old Bailey with the possibility of being sent to prison. But her legal defence created a dangerous problem for the British government when her lawyers argued she acted to prevent an illegal war. To challenge that claim, the government would need to release confidential legal advice discussing whether the Iraq invasion itself was lawful under international law. Then came February 25, 2004. The courtroom filled. Katharine Gun sat waiting as prosecutors prepared to move forward against one of the most famous intelligence leaks in modern British history. Then, without warning, the government collapsed the case. “The Crown offers no evidence.” After months of preparation, the trial ended almost instantly. Katharine walked free. Many observers believed the government feared the public release of its own private legal doubts surrounding the Iraq War more than it feared letting the whistleblower go. Years later, former Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg called Katharine Gun’s leak one of the bravest acts he had ever seen. Edward Snowden would later cite her as one of the people who proved intelligence systems could be challenged from the inside. And perhaps the most remarkable part of the story was this: Katharine Gun was not a politician. Not a famous activist. Not a powerful insider. She was simply a young translator who read one email and decided her conscience mattered more than her career. Two governments. Major intelligence agencies. The full force of secrecy laws. And one woman still chose to stand up and speak out. After the case was dismissed, reporters asked whether she regretted leaking the document. Katharine Gun answered calmly: “I have no regrets. I would do it again.” WE ALL NEED TO BE THIS BRAVE. WE ALL NEED TO DO THE RIGHT THING. WE ALL NEED TO BE MORE LIKE KATHARINE GUN. Good morning, everyone!

Wish I was 28, but I am 82 today. Those candles just switched on their own. Crazy candles!

@cxqd56789 只好引颈就戮！

@meedoo_doo 总有一款适合你！😂

在老爸面前脱口而出“富商巨贾(假)”，老爸出手如风，当即指正：念古，富商巨贾(古)，脸上闪过一丝不易察觉的得色，好吧，算我给老人家尽个孝心，开心一下。诚实讲有谁也把巨(古)念成巨(假)？阴谋论一下：之所以念(古)皆为避讳(假)声其实道出了贾的某些天然特质，富商巨假😄

@cxqd56789 夸人一般用欲扬先抑之法，损人常常先赞后砸，感觉被砸中了。

@meedoo_doo 老先生一定是国学深厚，治学严谨的人！ 教出来的儿子也不差！ 就是喜欢抬杠！🤪