Terry Thompson

The primary forces that are destroying society are as follows: 1. Eugenics. No, not the idea that the human gene pool should be improved. The hijacking of that idea by psychopaths and sociopaths, who use it as an excuse to destroy potential competitors. Everyone wants the gene pool improved, but proliferating the genes of psychopaths and sociopaths has not improved the world at all. If anything, consistent weeding out of those through warfare and such is the reason for the existence of civilization. 2. Malthusianism. It's a lie that the world is overpopulated. What this really means is that the population is too large for tyrants to control with violence, and/or they want to murder and sterilize people that they don't have a use for. That ties in perfectly with Eugenics. 3. The fiat currency Ponzi scheme. It's a caste system which disadvantages the public by advantaging those who are in control of the money supply. If you cannot "borrow" money created out of thin air at 0% interest then you are not in the upper caste. Too big to fail organizations clearly have preferential treatment through bailouts, quantitative easing, stock buybacks, etc. I will even go so far as to say that these people who say that they want Eugenics, want the complete opposite. They don't want competitors, they want docile, obedient who are the minimum necessary intelligence to accomplish their assigned task. These people are not only noncompetitive, they are EXTREME anti-merit. They don't want to be better than you, they just want you to be less than them.

Empire doesn't care about its conscripts. You are all disposable cannon fodder to do the bidding of psychopaths.

@OpalHound @newstart_2024 @EMBurlingame What is your proposal for what to do about high IQ evil people though: Psychopaths that may be inside governments, banks, business, etc? They might be very wealthy and position themselves as sovereign.

@mentorstrophy @newstart_2024 They're called another name, the "resentfuls". I've heard some people like @EMBurlingame speculate they're about 1/3rd of the population in any society & a major source of vigilante-ism. Also source of triggering societal instability via psychological warfare like Mass Formation

Jordan Peterson dropped an uncomfortable truth on Triggernometry. The U.S. military that is desperate for recruits won’t accept anyone with an IQ under 82. That’s roughly 10% of the population. They’ve tested this for decades and found these individuals become a net drain, no matter how hard they work. In complex environments, the disadvantage is real. This lines up with ASVAB data. The military generally requires the 31st percentile (~IQ 92) but can dip to the 10th percentile (~IQ 81-83) in limited cases, confirming Peterson’s core point. Conservatives struggle with it. Liberals often claim anyone can be trained to do anything. Both approaches fall short. This one made me pause. We talk a lot about equality, but raw cognitive differences create real limits that are hard to solve. Ignoring or sugarcoating these realities doesn’t help the people at the lower end, it leaves them without practical paths forward. Do you think society can have an honest conversation about IQ differences, or is it too dangerous?

@sudsmixer @Skwerilleee ..in fact, the fraudulent banking system is plank #5 of communism: centralized credit in the hands of the state with state capital. Support me in my effort to eradicate the communist institution of central banking.

@sudsmixer @Skwerilleee I am 100% anti-communist, and immune to your fake insults

I love when red pill dudes complain about "all women only want the top 20% of men!" as if that's some kind of aberration or a moral failure of modern women. My brother in Christ, it's like that in every species. Always has been. That's literally the mechanism by which evolution by natural selection works. It's the hardwired setting that ensures we keep getting better over time.

@RockChartrand The banking system is sleight of hand wealth redistribution from people who have only cash to owners of assets.

Notice the sleight of hand. First it’s “the rich don’t pay most taxes.” Then when shown top earners already do, the argument shifts to “wealth isn’t income.” Exactly. Which means the debate was never really about income. It was about whether the state is entitled to seize accumulated property itself. Owning stock, businesses, or assets is not the same as receiving cash income. But many people no longer treat property as genuinely private. They treat it as public wealth temporarily held by individuals until politicians decide otherwise.

@techhsiren Shut up, wrench. A man who works his ass off during his shift can do anything he likes when he’s off. Just be grateful we’re still out here holding it up, or you would be an ugly warlord’s concubine.

if the only thing a man chooses to do with his free time is play video games that's not a man

@mcpoole84 It solves slavery for slavers. Machines and programs are obedient.

Am I the only person looking at all the problems in the world and thinking AI is the worst invention ever ? It solves nothing just causes unemployment

@WanderLight2020 @Amyisthebomb I obviously did, and the counterfeiters owe me my purchasing power back.

@mentorstrophy @Amyisthebomb You obviously can’t read.

@lydianmodal Correct, it’s the specific use of the tool and the user

Dissing AI feels like dissing calculators because they made math easier. The tool isn’t the problem. The psychos trying to control the tool are.

@Nickisbackbaby No, you are correct.

I try and tell people that the elites are slowly trying to depopulate the world and people laugh at me! Am I the only person who thinks this?

@RockChartrand No. Humans are largely in favor of slavery, unfortunately.

Do people not feel shame for obsessively aiming to live off taxpayers? They should

@VladTheInflator This is precisely what red pilled me against Democracy: youtu.be/cesSRfXqS1Q?si…

One of the key ways to bring a society down is to let stupid people into high positions of authority. That was the purpose of a racist policy like "affirmative action" aka discriminate against high IQ White men

@CCrowley100 I'm not going to war for these people. Here's what's NOT going to happen: we're not going to die in wars while they sit in a Swiss bunker and collect war profits.

“As Rome passed away, so, the West is passing away, from the same causes and in much the same way. What the Danube and Rhine were to Rome, the Rio Grande and Mediterranean are to America and Europe, the frontiers of a civilization no longer defended.” — Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency

Tim Dillon: “Everything in America right now is a psyop.” “And the psyops are not even good.” “They have no respect for you.” “You cannot escape.” “Like a horde of zombies, you go and vote for [Ed Gallrein] who’s trying to quite literally kill your children.” “Ed Gallrein is a patriot who wants the best for you and your children—who are going to die in the Middle East.l “They’re going to die in Iran.” “These are not campaigns where people are debating ideas.” “This is a psychological operation aimed at the lowest common denominator lizard brain instincts that you have.” “War hero, good, patriot, America, apple, pie, vote.” “It’s like an electromagnetic pulse weapon that Miriam Adelson’s got in Kentucky.” “This is what bothers me.” “It’s not even good if you have a modicum of intelligence.” “They have such little respect for you.” “You’re being treated like an adolescent who is asking too many questions and is bothering them.” @TimJDillon

Sorry, but that's not how they think at all. They view you as a farm animal. They control the money supply, and force you to need to earn it, therefore they are the boss, because they are the ones actually paying. Taxes are actually irrelevant to people who can print monopoly money.

If the government supports Flock cameras, I support political cameras. If you want to survey us, we have the right to survey you. YOU WORK FOR US!!

At first glance, it may seem sweet, but the fact is that "men who know their way around a hardware store" are generally not respected by women because they aren't paid enough money. In fact, the US has been nonstop shitting on working men for the past several decades. They can print trillions of dollars, but can never seem to pay working men low enough for their satisfaction, until they get the price to nothing via slavery.

You go girl

1913: federal reserve bank and what followed 1947: invention of the CIA and what followed 1963: the loss of JFK and what followed. Let me add 1919: women voting and what followed.