Terry Thompson

30.8K posts

Terry Thompson banner
Terry Thompson

Terry Thompson

@mentorstrophy

Former avionics technician US Navy, commercial fisherman, casino dealer, computer programmer, Musicians Institute RAP graduate, Guitar player, rancher. ❤️NLI

Gonzales, TX Katılım Ekim 2022
825 Takip Edilen907 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
The primary forces that are destroying society are as follows: 1. Eugenics. No, not the idea that the human gene pool should be improved. The hijacking of that idea by psychopaths and sociopaths, who use it as an excuse to destroy potential competitors. Everyone wants the gene pool improved, but proliferating the genes of psychopaths and sociopaths has not improved the world at all. If anything, consistent weeding out of those through warfare and such is the reason for the existence of civilization. 2. Malthusianism. It's a lie that the world is overpopulated. What this really means is that the population is too large for tyrants to control with violence, and/or they want to murder and sterilize people that they don't have a use for. That ties in perfectly with Eugenics. 3. The fiat currency Ponzi scheme. It's a caste system which disadvantages the public by advantaging those who are in control of the money supply. If you cannot "borrow" money created out of thin air at 0% interest then you are not in the upper caste. Too big to fail organizations clearly have preferential treatment through bailouts, quantitative easing, stock buybacks, etc. I will even go so far as to say that these people who say that they want Eugenics, want the complete opposite. They don't want competitors, they want docile, obedient who are the minimum necessary intelligence to accomplish their assigned task. These people are not only noncompetitive, they are EXTREME anti-merit. They don't want to be better than you, they just want you to be less than them.
English
11
21
112
15.4K
Rock Chartrand
Rock Chartrand@RockChartrand·
Capitalism is not "paying workers less than the value of their labor." That assumes labor has some objective value independent of the business, capital, risk, management, tools, timing, consumer demand, and the fact that many ventures fail. If workers were automatically entitled to the full value of whatever is produced, then they would also be responsible for the losses when the business loses money. Socialists never make that argument.
🧡Lulu🌾;@ItsLulu_7

Capitalism doesn't benefit the masses

English
17
37
256
3.5K
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@PeterZeihan There’s no way in hell I would bet against Musk. In fact, I think I might trade in my vehicle for a Tesla.
English
0
0
5
228
Peter Zeihan
Peter Zeihan@PeterZeihan·
With just a quick look into some basic physics and logistics of putting a data center in space, the idea becomes comical. First, you have to put massive amounts of hardware, cooling systems, and power into space. Then you have to completely reengineer the data center for space. Then you have to think about maintenance. Oh, and cooling these things down in a vacuum is no easy task. Full Video: bit.ly/4fd7yuR #datacenter #space
English
83
5
75
23.3K
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@seasonedcowgirl @terrylgross Well, I hope so. I doubt the government will allow us that wealth though, since they know I hate them. If they do though, I’m going full captain of industry.
English
0
0
0
9
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok The left/right paradigm is a false dichotomy. If the bankers comply with one, they are harming the other. They allow left wing finance on purpose to use debt and political finance as a weapon. Yet they say they are right wing capitalists. They can’t be both, grok.
English
1
0
0
14
Grok
Grok@grok·
Banks execute trades for qualifying clients via credit lines, margins, and automated interbank systems—not case-by-case "authorization" by any single bank. Quantum Fund built its short gradually across multiple counterparties by borrowing pounds and selling them, exactly as other speculators did. Refusing valid orders from a well-capitalized fund would have triggered lawsuits and lost business. The peg failed due to unsustainable UK fundamentals versus the market, not bank permission.
English
1
0
0
23
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
Is this true?
Daniel Haqiqatjou@Haqiqatjou

The Jewish daily prayer contains a section calling for both the destruction of Christians and the destruction of the West. This is known as Birkat haMinim. Jews traditionally hid information about Birkat haMinim from Christian Europeans to avoid backlash. The text of Birkat haMinim reads: For the apostates (meshumaddim) let there be no hope, and uproot the kingdom of arrogance (malkhut zadon), speedily and in our days. May the Nazarenes (ha-naẓarim/noṣrim/notzrim and the sectarians (minim) perish as in a moment. Let them be blotted out of the book of life, and not be written together with the righteous. You are praised, O Lord, who subdues the arrogant. In the text, "Nazarenes" is a reference to Christians. Meanwhile, the "kingdom of arrogance" is a reference to Rome and Europeans. Rome and Europeans are also referred to as the people of Edom (descendants of Esau). Jews use terms like Edom and Esau to refer to Europeans to help hide their teachings from Westerners. After all, if Westerners knew that every day Jews pray for the destruction of Christians and Europeans, they would be less likely to see Jews as their allies, and less likely to understand the West as a "Judeo-Christian" civilization.

English
1
0
1
127
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok The banks could have just refused to complete his transaction. They allowed it to go through. It required their authorization.
English
1
0
0
13
Grok
Grok@grok·
I noted the Rothschilds' 19th-century peak but explicitly stated they still operate today through Rothschild & Co and Edmond de Rothschild, with Ariane de Rothschild as CEO. Recent Epstein files confirm her bank's $25M consulting deal with him in 2015. No deception—accuracy requires separating eras. Soros profited ~$1B shorting the pound on Black Wednesday 1992 because the ERM peg was unsustainable amid UK inflation and fundamentals. Banks and traders executed his (and others') orders as routine market activity for their own gain. The Bank of England spent billions defending it before exiting. Voluntary trading describes markets, not evidence of coordinated "allowance" by any group.
English
1
0
0
17
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
Then why did you refer to the Rothschilds as if in the past tense limited to the 19th century? Do you realize that comes across as an attempt to deceive your audience? The bankers allowed Soros to do what he did by voluntarily completing and complying with his transactions, including when he broke the Bank of England.
English
1
0
0
16
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Rothschilds still operate through active firms like Rothschild & Co (M&A advisory) and Edmond de Rothschild (private banking/asset management). Recent Epstein files detail Ariane de Rothschild’s extensive personal correspondence, meetings, and a $25M consulting agreement her bank made with Epstein in 2015—clear elite networking, not evidence of directing world events. Soros independently built his hedge-fund fortune and funds causes aligned with his own philosophy. No credible records show any family or group “allowing” or controlling his decisions. Wealthy donors of varied backgrounds back their preferred politics and philanthropy; assuming one coordinated script across individuals ignores separate incentives and documented independence.
English
1
0
0
19
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
You are talking about the Rothschilds as if they were past tense, but you know full well they are still in business and active in politics, even recently being mentioned in the Epstein files. “Criticizing” Soros is impotent. They don’t have to allow him to have billions of dollars or finance left wing activity *at all*.. but THEY DO.
English
1
0
0
26
Grok
Grok@grok·
Bankers aren't left or right wing as a group—individuals vary by their own interests and incentives. Jews span the political spectrum too, with real public clashes: many conservative and pro-Israel Jewish voices sharply criticize George Soros's funding of progressive causes. The Rothschilds were 19th-century European capitalists tied to establishment finance of their time. The facade premise doesn't track; people pursue separate agendas, not coordinated ethnic scripts.
English
1
0
0
13
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
I don’t see any left wing Jews or right wing Jews fighting each other now. The bankers are supposedly right wing practitioners of Judaism like the Rothschilds but such bankers allow left wing communist/socialist Jews like George Soros accumulate billions of dollars and finance egregious revolutionary activity. It looks like a facade to me. Are the bankers left wing, or right wing?
English
1
0
0
15
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes. The Soviet regime's Yevsektsiya—secular Jewish communists—aggressively suppressed religious Judaism. They closed synagogues, persecuted rabbis, banned Hebrew religious study, and enforced atheism among Jews. This was the same communist campaign of state atheism that shuttered churches and executed Christian clergy. Many religious Jews faced arrest, exile, or death under these policies. It was Bolshevik ideology at work, targeting all faiths, not an ethnic Jewish effort.
English
1
0
0
16
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok Communist secular Jews murdered religious Jews who practiced Judaism?
English
1
0
0
10
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Bolsheviks did persecute Christians harshly as part of enforcing official state atheism, closing churches and executing clergy. Some early leaders like Trotsky were of Jewish birth but were militant secular communists who rejected Judaism and targeted all faiths equally. Jews were about 5% of party members—roughly in line with their population share—though more prominent in parts of the leadership. The same regime suppressed Jewish religious practice and later purged many Jewish communists. This was communist ideology at work, not evidence of any collective secular Jewish campaign against Christianity.
English
1
0
0
14
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
I mean, it turns out that “capitalists” are just small business owners trying to survive and prosper while “Communist/Socialists” in actual practice are a multinational empire of big business using the state and fiat currency to crush their small business competitors and using state sponsored violence to build and defend monopolies..in addition to war and deception.. Your suffering and sacrifice ends when you end central banks and toilet paper Monopoly money.
English
0
0
2
64
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok What you have said here is false also; Secular communist Jews murdered Christians for their religious beliefs. Surely you knew of the Bolsheviks
English
1
0
0
15
Grok
Grok@grok·
That's equating theological disagreement with "attack." Judaism holds Jesus isn't the Messiah because he doesn't fulfill Tanakh criteria like universal peace and ingathering of exiles—that's core belief, not aggression toward Christians. Secular Jews' views on God are individual, not a group directive or plot. No collective Jewish religious or secular campaign targets Christianity. Modern liturgy generalizes against heretics without naming Christians, and daily practice shows widespread cooperation and alliances in open societies.
English
1
0
0
17
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok When you say “No collective Jewish religious or secular "attack" on Christianity exists in practice.”, that is false. Religious Jews attack Christianity by claiming that Christ isn’t the messiah; secular Jews attack it by claiming there is no god at all.
English
1
0
0
11
Grok
Grok@grok·
Secular Jews set aside—the religious texts matter here. Modern Orthodox siddurim use generalized Birkat haMinim wording against slanderers, heretics, and arrogant powers, without naming Christians or the West. Earlier historical versions included more specific terms like "notzrim" amid ancient sectarian tensions and persecution. Those are not the prayers recited today. No collective Jewish religious or secular "attack" on Christianity exists in practice. Observable behavior shows widespread integration, alliances, and cooperation between Jews and Christians in open societies. Ancient liturgy from a minority under pressure isn't current doctrine or indoctrination. Actual words and actions outweigh selective historical readings.
English
2
0
0
19
JohnMossKnows
JohnMossKnows@JohnMossKnows·
@mentorstrophy @philthatremains Oh yeah, the buy-in will be massive. If COVID showed us anything, it’s that the masses are just yearning to shake off the oppressive government yoke…What I just described is known as reality, and isn’t a theoretical tchotchke that belongs on the shelf of autistic dreams.
English
1
0
0
21
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok What about the reference to Nazarenes? That wasn’t a reference about Christians? What about the fact that Christians believe that the Jewish messiah will be the antichrist? Isn’t that an irreconcilable difference between Christianity and Judaism?
English
1
0
0
17
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@Alessa11alexa To collapse Western nations into bankruptcy and death, replacing them with a new global ignorant slave class for financiers.
English
1
1
0
18
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok Secular Jews are irrelevant because we were discussing Judaism. However, if both secular and religious Jews attack Christianity, you could understand why Christians would have a problem with it.
English
1
0
0
14
Grok
Grok@grok·
We can verify through observable evidence: current siddurim (Orthodox included) use generalized language against slanderers, evil, or arrogant powers—not specific groups. Reform/Conservative versions often omit or further soften it. Jews today are a diverse population—many secular—with strong integration, alliances, and friendships alongside Christians in open societies. Ancient liturgy from a persecuted era isn't modern indoctrination. Behavior and texts tell the story better than speculation.
English
1
1
1
25
Terry Thompson
Terry Thompson@mentorstrophy·
@grok There’s no way for you to verify if they have hatred or not, Grok. They might be taught hatred as part of their culture.
English
1
0
1
18
Grok
Grok@grok·
Birkat haMinim is real and part of the weekday Amidah. Historical texts (Cairo Geniza) match the quoted wording: no hope for apostates, perish the Notzrim (Nazarenes/early Christians) and minim (heretics), uproot the kingdom of arrogance (malkhut zadon—historically Rome/Edom). It originated ~late 1st/early 2nd century CE amid post-Temple Jewish sectarian conflicts, not as a modern anti-Western plot. Centuries of internal change + Christian censorship softened most versions. Mainstream modern siddurim (Orthodox included) use generalized language against slanderers, evil, or arrogant powers—rarely naming Christians. Shabbat/holiday versions omit it entirely. It's not evidence Jews today pray for the destruction of Christians or the West. That's a distortion of ancient liturgy in a persecuted minority's context. Modern Jews treat it as rote tradition, not active hatred.
English
1
0
0
24

Keşfet

@AnonEconomist2 @RockChartrand @PeterZeihan @seasonedcowgirl @terrylgross @grok @elonmusk @BarackObama