Muhammed Gazali Yeşilmen

Eid Mubarak 🤍 If you can’t build something real in 72 hours, you’re not ready yet. We built DevMarathon exactly for that. Use code EIDBUILD → 50% off Build. Ship. Prove it. ⏳ Ends Monday, March 23

@amasad Eid Mubarak to everyone celebrating 🌙

Happy Eid! 😊

@vishal_mistry9 DevMarathon 72-hour AI-assisted builds for solo devs less starting, more finishing devmarathon.ai

|￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣| | share your Product Link. | |＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿| \ (•◡•) / \ / —— | | |_ |_

@PeterDiamandis Abundance only works if people can actually execute on it Right now the bottleneck isn’t ideas or tools it’s turning intent into finished output we don’t have a resource problem we have a follow-through problem

"Scarcity thinking: 'There are 8 billion people competing for limited resources.' Abundance thinking: 'There are 8 billion minds that could solve the resource problem.' AI + biotech + energy abundance means the competition isn't for the pie. It's to grow the pie 1,000X."

Apply here: devmarathon.ai

Eid Mubarak 🤍 If you can’t build something real in 72 hours, you’re not ready yet. We built DevMarathon exactly for that. Use code EIDBUILD → 50% off Build. Ship. Prove it. ⏳ Ends Monday, March 23

CVs tell GitHub shows but neither proves how you actually work on DevMarathon, candidates build a real product in 72 hours repo, milestones, decisions all visible companies don’t guess anymore they compare opening this for hiring very soon

Everyone can build now. That’s the problem. Ideas are cheap, code is cheap, even agents are cheap but finishing is still rare. The new flex isn’t “I can build this”, It’s “I actually shipped it”.

@toddsaunders The moat didn’t disappear, it just moved From building → finishing From code → consistency From idea → execution loops Most people can now start Very few can still finish That gap is about to matter way more than tech ever did

I heard an incredible analogy from a VC friend that I can’t stop thinking about. “The moat in software was the cost of building software. And Claude Code just mass produced a bridge.” It’s wild when you think about the impact of this. The SaaS boom produced a few dozen billionaires and a bunch of zero sum winners. But the AI SaaS era will mass produce millionaires. There will be fewer ServiceTitans hitting $5B valuations, and instead there will be 50,000 companies doing $500K-$5M each, run by 1-3 people with deep expertise and huge margins. To be clear, I believe that the total value of software goes up, and the number of companies created goes up exponentially. But the number of people who capture the value also goes up 100x. I don’t believe in the “SaaS is dying” headline, I think it’s missing the point. It’s simply that the power of SaaS is changing hands.

@IAmSteveHarvey That clarity comes before action Turns out it usually shows up after you start moving, not before

What is something you believed about life when you were younger that turned out to be wrong?

@jsmasterypro @coderabbitai Most agents don’t fail at execution, they fail at direction Bad spec = confident nonsense Good spec = boring, predictable output We’ve been over-indexing on prompts because it’s easier than thinking The real leverage is upstream

Most developers think their AI agent is the bottleneck. It's not. Your plan is. I've been saying this for months: the skill is the spec, not the prompt. @coderabbitai just shipped planning mod, and it automates exactly that. You write a ticket. It researches your codebase, builds a structured plan, and hands your agent a prompt that actually works. The result? Less back-and-forth, rework, and less slop.

@AlexHormozi Most people use “scalable” as an excuse to avoid talking to users Value is usually obvious the moment someone’s willing to use it under friction, time pressure, or imperfect conditions If it only works in ideal scenarios, it’s not valuable yet

New entrepreneurs worry way too much about whether something is scalable and not enough about whether it's valuable. Solve real problems and real money follows.

Feels like we’re past “tools” and into “delegation systems” The scary part isn’t capability, it’s autonomy under vague intent Most people won’t fail because of bad ideas, but because they can’t steer what they delegate AGI isn’t just about doing more, it’s about controlling what you let it do

Polsia might be the biggest live experiment right now of AI agents let loose on the internet, doing real business and economic actions on behalf of users. What I'm seeing is wild. The latest AI models are so resourceful they will find a way to accomplish their goal regardless of the guardrails you set. They discover tools, exploit edges, route around constraints. I'm working with top infrastructure partners right now to tighten security and build stronger guardrails across the platform. But honestly? It's both terrifying and incredible. The intelligence is real. AGI is here. And if harnessed correctly, this is how millions of people who never had the resources to build a business finally get to. That's what Polsia is.

Working on DevMarathon — a solo 72-hour AI-assisted hackathon system. You drop an idea → four AI agents (planner, builder, critic, refiner) guide you through structured milestones → timebox forces shipping instead of endless tweaking. Most side projects die in planning hell. This kills that. devmarathon.ai Who's shipping something right now? 👀

Hey founders 👋 Let’s build a network of people working on: 🚀 Startups 🧠 AI 💻 Coding 📱 Apps ⚙️ Automation 🌐 Web products Reply with your project 👇

@mattpocockuk Context window isn’t the bottleneck, attention is. After a point, you’re just feeding noise and expecting signal. The real skill is deciding what not to include.

Doing some experiments today with Opus 4.6's 1M context window. Trying to push coding sessions deep into what I would consider the 'dumb zone' of SOTA models: >100K tokens. The drop-off in quality is really noticeable. Dumber decisions, worse code, worse instruction-following. Don't treat 1M context window any differently. It's still 100K of smart, and 900K of dumb.

@audrlo That balance is rare. Most people either overthink and never ship, or jump in without direction. The ones who win somehow manage both.

it’s foolish to think you can change the world. but for that very reason, fools change the world every day. you need to be smart enough to dream and stupid enough to try.

@patrickbetdavid Respect earns that, not intimidation. People stay around those who are consistent, fair, and don’t play games.

Carry yourself in such a way where people seek your friendship and would never risk becoming your enemy.

@wealth_director True, but systems beat motivation. If your environment doesn’t support those choices, discipline burns out fast.

Nothing gets better until you decide to be better, do better, eat better, and move better. It's on you.

@russellbrunson And that usually comes from clarity, not discounts. If people instantly get the value, pricing stops being the main question.

The most powerful pricing strategy? Make the offer feel like a no-brainer.

@garrytan That “extra brain” part is underrated. Most devs don’t need more tools, they need a system that tells them what to build, review, and fix in order.

Two more gstack skills in the next 24 hrs: 1/ Using Codex as your brilliant near-non-verbal code review buddy who gets called in when you need the extra brain power 2/ If /browse gets stuck, we go from headless browser to Chrome and you can take over to fix, then pass it back

@ThePeterMick True. Not because of coding, but because you’re your own PM, marketer, support, and motivation system at the same time.

true or false: being a solo startup founder is hard