(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈

21.5K posts

(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈 banner
(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈

(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈

@mikecryptolife

Crypto maximalist, Privacy, Sound Money advocate. X posts = what goes on in my cat brain. My MEOWs are NOT financial advice!

Under a Tree Katılım Eylül 2020
692 Takip Edilen11.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈
#Litecoin is the biggest beartrap. Ever heard the phrase "when Litecoin pumps, it's over?" Imagine we send Litecoin when Bitcoin hits $100k+ Every trader boy scrambling to sell, just as we continue our bullrun and start the actual altseason 👿
GIF
English
10
5
46
28.9K
LTR
LTR@maybeltr·
what should be my first beer when i turn 21 this summer
English
21
0
21
3K
Genesis Systems
Genesis Systems@_GenesisSystems·
Water security shouldn’t depend on infrastructure. Now it doesn’t. WaterCube 10 creates clean drinking water from the air — no pipes, no deliveries, no dependency. Awarded by the U.S. military. Recognized by TIME. Most people still don’t know it exists.
English
5
3
55
56.9K
java ౨ৎ
java ౨ৎ@javajrr·
like where are they getting this misinformation from 🤣
java ౨ৎ tweet media
English
1
0
6
216
naiive
naiive@naiivememe·
Pick one
naiive tweet media
English
50
5
308
20.8K
IncomeSharks
IncomeSharks@IncomeSharks·
One of the big criticisms of crypto not too long ago was that it's "too volatile". Now the stock market is trading like crypto with 10 to 20% daily moves and crypto trading like it's issuing bonds. The space needs to give up on memes already or it's getting left behind.
English
84
39
898
52.7K
(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈
@RivettaGiorgio I think it causes the price to be more stable overall. Volatility gets dampened coz one coin going up/down makes up for the other ones that didn't. The one that goes up could get sold for the ones that didn't to speculate. So it dampens volatility to both the up and downside.
English
0
0
1
58
Crypto Lama
Crypto Lama@RivettaGiorgio·
DISPUTATIO #1 $LTC $DOGE $BTC "Production cost, merge mining, fair value" PROPOSITIO: 1) In proof of work coins like Bitcoin, market price tends to gravitate around production cost. 2) Litecoin merge mining produces both LTC + DOGE + others. 3) Swapping every coin you mine for LTC yields more LTC. 4) Merge mining lowers the effective production cost per LTC. ------------------------------------------------------- Conclusion) Merge mining makes Litecoin cheaper to produce and therefore market price will tend to gravitate around a cheaper price compared to a scenario without merge mining. Any counterarguments for this? OPPOSITIO? What do you think? Is this argument wrong? Why? What are you rejecting? 1) 2) 3) or 4) ?
English
3
2
23
1K
CL
CL@CL207·
@bryan_johnson are there oral health benefits to eating out a vagina with great vaginal microbiome ?
English
65
22
1.4K
122.9K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Just gave Kate oral sex. Goodnight everyone.
English
3.8K
1.4K
31.4K
7.9M
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
This is her vaginal microbiome report. 100/100 score. Top 1% of all vaginas. Her sample is dominated by the single most protective bacterial species a vagina can host (Lactobacillus crispatus). Only about 25-30% of reproductive age women globally are L. crispatus-dominant, and “dominant” usually means above 50%. Kate is at 98.7%. The lab found nothing bad to report. (no gardnerella, Candida, STIs, opportunistic pathogens, aerobic vaginitis markers, etc.) This is linked to lower risk of BV, UTIs, yeast infections, HPV persistence, HSV-2 and HIV acquisition, preterm birth, and improved IVF outcomes. A vaginal microbiome is downstream of everything: sleep, glucose control, stress, gut health, sexual health, immune function, what you eat, and what you put in it.
Bryan Johnson tweet media
English
2.5K
1.1K
20K
20.8M
(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈 retweetledi
Flippin finance Ⓜ️🕸
The reaction to the post-mortem released by the Litecoin Foundation, from entities such as @AlexAuroraDev and @vinibarbosabr, just revealed a big knowledge vaccum in this space. Where does responsibility lie, in an open-source, decentralized protocol such as Litecoin? To begin, the Litecoin Foundation has ZERO obligations to serve as "gatekeepers" or "official disclosers" of any event or development going on in the Litecoin protocol. Their decision to take-on responsibilities to serve thus far, is entirely by choice. This clarification seems trivial, but is very important, and here's why. The mistake of viewing them through such obligatory lenses as one would the Ethereum Foundation or the Near foundation, comes from a complete disregard of the fact that they are not being paid and have never been paid by the Litecoin protocol to function in such capacity, unlike with the other foundations. To break it down simply: - Both Litecoin and MWEB codebases are open-source, - Access to the network and subsequent info is open and decentralized, - Every Litecoin was farily distributed from scratch, thus, Foundation not paid for by the protocol, - Thus, the Litecoin Foundation has no obligatory requirement to serve as a central source of responsibility. On the other hand, - Near and Ethereum code bases are open source, - Access to network and info is decentralized, - They both recieved insider allocations from the presale, thus paid by the protocol, - They have direct obligatory requirements to serve as central sources of responsibilities. @vinibarbosabr called Litecoin an "unserious project" by citing what he percieved as "improper handling" by LF. And this sentiment was also furthered by Alex. I blame neither of them, because as far as I know, they have only worked with projects which have Foundations that are paid for by the protocol, and are therefore centrally obligated to "handle" responsibilities within it. However, it is ignorant for them to point fingers at percieved representations of the authority figures they are used to in their space, when it comes to Litecoin. This is not a moral argument, just a clarification of responsibilities. Litecoin, unlike NEAR, is for every user, and every user, including the Litecoin Foundation, is equally responsible for it. No more, no less. The responsibility of spotting and disclosing bugs is for everyone, including the team responsible for Litecoin's integration in Near intents. Anyone disatisfied with the way LF handled the incidents and/or disclosure, is thereby highlighting the fact that they themselves, failed to contribute their own due diligence.
Flippin finance Ⓜ️🕸 tweet media
English
7
11
46
1.2K
Flood
Flood@ThinkingUSD·
Crypto is paying a high price for years of altcoin scams and grifts. It can feel like a toxic industry where very little value is created. It's easy to feel disillusioned and wish you were focusing on AI-related trading, businesses, or working at a startup in that sector. Many companies and investment firms have already begun the rotation out of Crypto. Don't let your apathy make you unproductive; it's your personal responsibility to continue learning about the world. If you feel the call of the wild, then go. For the ones brave enough to stick around, not only will the risk-reward be as asymmetric as it's been in recent history, the concentration of upside in a handful of assets will make it EASIER to generate massive returns. There is less capital looking at Crypto exposure than ever before. This all changes with a rapid repricing in Bitcoin this year, which I believe is inevitable. For a long time in Crypto, nothing felt buyable due to an excess of capital being forced to deploy in a sector with limited opportunity. We're in a new regime now. We're reaching a similar level of apathy that I felt during 2019 and 2022. I almost quit Crypto to go back to TradFi. It's no surprise those were the years where I generated the bulk of my returns (sans Hyperliquid). Outside of trading, if you're passionate about the space, companies that are still building during this period will be positioned to take advantage of the inevitable reacceleration of this industry. Working at top-tier companies in the space is more accessible than ever due to a shortage of people entering the field. Don't undervalue your time.
English
183
308
2.8K
229.5K
(Kitty)🐈 Ⓜ️🕸MikeCryptoLife 🛡🐈 retweetledi
Alan Austin
Alan Austin@alangaustin·
Claims that Litecoin Foundation considers this behavior “normal” are incorrect. As outlined in our postmortem, the activity occurred on an invalid chain that was later reorged out. Independent platforms such as NEAR Intents operate their own services, facilitate transactions, and generate revenue from those activities. With that comes responsibility for system design, risk management, settlement policies, and monitoring of network conditions. Litecoin is an open, permissionless network. @LTCFoundation is a nonprofit that does not operate the network or custody user funds, does not operate third-party services, and does not determine or influence their confirmation thresholds or risk decisions. Accordingly, the Foundation will not assume financial responsibility for such losses. Service providers executing these transactions, and generating revenue from them, bear responsibility for their outcomes.
Alex Shevchenko 🇺🇦@AlexAuroraDev

LF has indicated they do not consider these losses their responsibility. Which means they consider this chain behaviour as normal.

English
19
18
81
9.3K
TraderSZ
TraderSZ@trader1sz·
@whoislxvi T bag was the best actor in the whole Show
English
4
0
14
2.3K
Levi🕊️
Levi🕊️@whoislxvi·
who acted their role the best????
Levi🕊️ tweet media
English
151
312
587
25.1K