Mike

1.4K posts

Mike banner
Mike

Mike

@mobik76

Part Brummie part Yam Yam. All Yummie Yummie. 🐺

Birmingham, England Katılım Haziran 2016
4.7K Takip Edilen347 Takipçiler
Wolves FPA
Wolves FPA@WolvesFPA·
.@MattMurray20 meets. Part 1. His Wolves mentor and the club’s most used goalkeeper…Mike Stowell. Two of our finest between the sticks!
Wolves FPA tweet media
English
3
7
149
3.6K
Mike retweetledi
Danny Baker
Danny Baker@prodnose·
VAR is no good. It's just not. It doesn't need tweaking or resetting - it's just no good for football. Referees make bad errors every now and but so does this billion pound tech overlord bullshit. What have we gained? Nothing. What have we lost? Live football.
English
138
269
2.5K
70K
Mike retweetledi
Fans against VAR
Fans against VAR@FansAgainstVAR_·
thousands of games happen across England every weekend, TEN have VAR. A world without VAR is not some kind of crazy thought, it's a reality in nearly all other games.
English
30
112
827
36.7K
Mike retweetledi
Henry Winter
Henry Winter@henrywinter·
Premier League fans deliver damning verdict on VAR. 75% of 7,946 fans polled by the Football Supporters’ Association “didn’t support the use of VAR”. Too long, too forensic, too much of a joy killer, fans say. Findings shared with Premier League and PGMO. 92% of fans surveyed “agreed” that “VAR has removed the spontaneous joy of goal celebrations” (82% of them “strongly agreed”). 85% of match-going fans “strongly disagreed” with the notion that “VAR makes watching football more enjoyable”. And 83% of those watching on TV. 85% of match-going fans “strongly disagreed” that “VAR decisions are generally resolved in a reasonable amount of time”. Echoed by 83% of those watching on TV. Only 18% agreed that “VAR has improved the overall accuracy of refereeing decisions”. 72% are “concerned about the expansion of VAR beyond its current remit”. 79% “strongly disagreed” with the suggestion “that the match-going experience is better with VAR”. 67% “strongly agreed” that they preferred “watching games that are played without VAR to games with VAR”. 84% “strongly support” goal-line technology. 34% “strongly opposed” to the idea of a challenge system (two per game per team). “These findings back up the FSA's previous survey in 2021, where fans expressed misgivings about the introduction of VAR,” says Thomas Concannon, @WeAreTheFSAPremier League network manager. “The vast majority are reporting the same concerns five years on - the loss of spontaneity when celebrating goals, and an overall worsening of the match-going experience. We have shared the survey results with the Premier League and PGMO, and look forward to discussing its findings with them.” Fans surveyed of all PL clubs and all ages (Under-18 to 65+).
English
413
453
2.6K
646K
Prof. Frank McDonough
Prof. Frank McDonough@FXMC1957·
17 March 1999. Rod Hull died (aged 63). He always appeared with Emu, a mute and highly aggressive arm-length puppet. Hull died in a tragic accident while trying to adjust the TV aerial on the roof of his bungalow, then slipping and falling to his death.
English
270
621
7.7K
1.8M
Mike
Mike@mobik76·
@MikePetalengro Out of darkness. Still pgmol ltd though. Although they do like a blue eyed boy.
English
0
0
1
52
Mike Petalengro
Mike Petalengro@MikePetalengro·
Dystopic. The whole Wolves mentalscape at the moment is a dark place but me and Wayne strangely looking forwards to Championship footy. The Premier League is a shadowy place.
English
6
0
26
1.9K
Mike retweetledi
Mark Stephenson
Mark Stephenson@markstephenson2·
If the FA apply a points deduction proportionate to Luton's 10-point deduction to Chelsea (based on Luton's payments to agents being £160,00 and Chelsea's being £47.5m), then Chelsea will be deducted 2,970 points.
Henry Winter@henrywinter

Good result for Chelsea: club fined only £10m and given a suspended transfer ban after Premier League found 36 separate undisclosed payments totalling £47.5m made “to 12 persons or entities on behalf of the club”. Lenient sanctions. No sporting sanctions. Yet these are serious offences, as the sanction agreement between the PL and Chelsea makes clear, stating “they were not only obvious and deliberate breaches of the rules but also because they involved deception and concealment in relation to financial matters”. Yet no points deductions. Just a manageable (if record) fine and a “suspended one-year first-team player transfer ban (suspended for two years)”. Surely they gained a sporting advantage by recruiting such players? So surely a sporting sanction should be in order? And where's the consistency? In 2008, Luton Town received a 10-point deduction for irregularities in dealing with agents (nb from FA). There still could be some further sanctions by the FA following its "ongoing investigation". PL points to mitigating factors: current owners Clearlake/Todd Boehly in May 2022 voluntarily self-reported potential historical breaches from the Roman Abramovich era. Club co-operated extensively and helped provide (with others) 10,000 documents for PL investigation. PL established “that between 2011 and 2018, undisclosed payments by third parties associated with the club were made to players, unregistered agents and other third parties”. Payments related to the purchases of players including Eden Hazard, Willian, Samuel Eto’o, David Luiz, Andre Schurrle and Nemanja Matic - there is no suggestion any were aware of the illicit payments. The detailed work of the investigators – and level of Clearlake’s co-operation – is impressive. The sanctions less so. It is a legitimate debate: should a club be punished for offences under a previous owner? Yes, most fans of other clubs would scream. It's a deterrent. And the value of those players' contribution and subsequent sales arguably still benefits the club. PL also investigated “potential breaches of the Premier League’s Youth Development Rules, committed by a former senior employee, relating to the club’s registration of Academy players between 2019 and 2022”. Again, self-reported by the club, this time in 2025. Chelsea punished with £750,000 fine and immediate nine-month ban from registering academy players from PL and EFL clubs. #CFC

English
51
1.1K
8.9K
664.1K
Mike
Mike@mobik76·
@paddypower No, pgmol ltd stopped booking all our players in the first 10 minutes.
English
0
0
2
2.2K
Paddy Power
Paddy Power@paddypower·
Wolves really woke up one morning and decided they were going to ruin everyone else's season for a laugh.
English
22
396
5.5K
120.5K
Mike retweetledi
Steve McVeigh
Steve McVeigh@Boxingscience20·
Chelsea and City cheated their way to the top of the football pyramid. The years of subterfuge and skullduggery helped them to subsequently win in years where deception wasn't judged or found. It all stinks. The PL isn't fit for purpose. Everton/Forest got points deductions.
English
47
422
1.8K
35.3K
Mike retweetledi
Chris
Chris@CWeatherspoon_·
Quite remarkable that Chelsea breaking rules to sign seven players (+ three unknown) who during their respective times at the club helped win a Champions League, the Europa League twice, two Premier League titles, two FA Cups and a League Cup didn't merit a points deduction
English
9
134
928
30.4K
Mike retweetledi
Giulia Bould
Giulia Bould@GiuliaBould·
£47.5m is more than double Everton's breach that led to a Premier League record sanction of 10 points being deducted (it was recalculated to 6 on appeal) While this is a different charge, the commission said EFC "gained no sporting advantage" but still agreed a deduction.
Martyn Ziegler@martynziegler

Updated: Chelsea receive £10.75m fine from Premier League for secret payments to players + unlicensed agents during Abramovich era. £47.5m spent off the books to sign Hazard, Ramires, David Luiz, Willian, Eto'o, Schurrle, Matic. thetimes.com/sport/football…

English
103
580
2.8K
271.7K
Mike retweetledi
Brian Viner
Brian Viner@vinerbrian·
Chelsea found massively in breach of the rules but of course, and to the amazement of absolutely nobody, no points deduction from the craven @premierleague. Spineless at best, corrupt at worst, all hidden in plain sight
English
23
109
698
17.8K
Mike retweetledi
Peter Dodd
Peter Dodd@doddster78·
Paragraph 135 of the judgment in the PL v Everton ‘…a financial penalty for a club that enjoys the support of a wealthy owner, is not a sufficient penalty’. Chelsea get a financially penalty. Of course they do. City will get same. Corrupt. @premierleague
English
29
430
2.3K
79.4K
Mike
Mike@mobik76·
@AdamCrafton_ It's nothing new. Just they have a greater reach these days.
English
0
0
0
1.1K
Adam Crafton
Adam Crafton@AdamCrafton_·
That Louis Theroux documentary: v watchable and jolting but a bit too much ‘look at the dangerous weirdos’ and not enough ‘why are there so many dangerous weirdos and what’s the path out of the dangerous weirdos’ imo.
English
116
116
3.3K
186.6K
Mike
Mike@mobik76·
The world has lost all semblance of sense for money.
Mike tweet media
English
0
0
0
23
Mike retweetledi
WhoScored
WhoScored@WhoScored·
Hwang Hee-Chan is the lowest-rated player (6.17) in the Premier League this season (1000+ mins). 😬
WhoScored tweet media
English
21
27
467
43.1K