@adgmodular Of course, who wouldn’t want to pay $16 for unlimited stuff.
But not me, nor any font foundry have reach of a Netflix. We are a niche business with licensing system as any stock library.
If I wear the t-shirt to a meeting with a lead does that mean it’s generating revenue? Is that business use? Would you tolerate a clothing brand even keeping tabs on this?
Why is usage after the sale any of your business? Whether a freelancer or an agency or a corporation with a million hits a day buys your product, once the sale is done, it’s done.
I’m not trying to be combative here. I’m trying to highlight the absurdity of this idea. It’s a bad idea, it never should have been accepted as the default way to charge for this stuff. You’re not the first nor will you be the last to try and charge this way, but it is not the way to do it.
Every font foundry goes out of business and gets bought by Monotype trying to do it this way. Consumers struggle to understand it, hate it once they do understand it, and like you said, try to cheat the system to get around it.
Instead of trying to find a foolproof way to force them into this, why not ask your customers how they’d like to pay you? Me personally, I’d love to pay a subscription fee to a mockup store and have unlimited unconditional use of your collection for the duration of the subscription, like a Netflix model. Predictable, recurring revenue for you, simplicity and peace of mind for me.
@adgmodular I get your point, but it’s not the same. A t-shirt is personal use. Assets are used to create work that generates revenue.
Usage isn’t equal. A freelancer’s portfolio use and a team using it across client work are very different.
Licensing exists to reflect that difference.
Can I ask why you’re licensing by use to begin with? As a purchaser of these kinds of things for myself and on behalf of my clients. Licensing agreements add a lot of unnecessary friction to the checkout experience.
Make an asset, charge what you think it’s worth, don’t worry about how much I’m using it.
A clothing manufacturer doesn’t care how many times I wear the t-shirt I buy from them. They don’t care how many people will be at the party I wear it to. They don’t care if I let my wife wear it around the house sometimes.
Buying a t-shirt is easy. Navigating these licensing agreements is hard. Make it easy for your customer give you money.
The font foundries need to reflect on this too.
@mockup_lab Since Figma updated their MCP yesterday I'd think all you need now is Claude Code or Codex with the MCP and plugin installed.
figma.com/blog/the-figma…
@percen_one That is too niche a platform, not many people use it 🤷♂️
Affinity, when I tested it last, has similar features to Photoshop, but still not all, so only a part of the mockups would work.