MojoSurfer

@ConceptualJames @ryangrim Connecting the dots isn't Ryan's forte.

@ryangrim No, sir, they made it legal to execute members of a death cult, if and only if those death cultists act violently upon their death cult's deadly program.

Okay yes he was indeed popping champagne in celebration of the death penalty law. Absolute death cult.

The failure to connect the dots here is quite remarkable

@AbubakerAbedW Cheers to many more.

The bill has been approved. Israeli prisons will turn into guillotines for Palestinians. Hundreds will be executed in the next few weeks. 9300 hostages now in Israeli custody. Dark day for humanity. Unforgettable memory in the Palestinian cause history.

Give me your guesses as to why the BBC put this story out…

“What do you think? Has it all gone a bit too far?” The only thing that’s “gone a bit too far” is the BBC’s fervent desire to convince us that there are “too many dog-friendly spaces.” So here’s what I think, if you really want my opinion, @BBC Fuck off with your gaslighting.

And you’re a woman beating piece of shit

Orcs were created as demonic entities. Twisted and misshapen in their dedication to evil, wholly without good, bent to the service of evil itself…the left can’t help but to side with and identify with them Leftists would rather identify with orcs than avoid subverting a tale of good ultimately triumphing over evil

@Lordoftheringsu They're gonna have an orc look directly at the camera and say “protect trans kids”, aren't they

Assaulting immigration officers isn't activism. It's a federal crime.

Don’t get this. There has been a daily Catholic Mass at the Pentagon auditorium for decades. I used to attend when I worked for Don Rumsfeld.

Everytown Research: Criminals prefer Glocks because they're cheap. Paul Barrett (the guy who literally wrote the book on Glock): Glocks aren't cheap and they're not found at crime scenes as much as you'd think. I struggle to think of another advocacy group that has this many instances of being plain wrong.

Palestine is the idea that the multiethnic, multiracial, multireligious democracy of Israel should be dismantled by removing/killing seven million Jews, then replaced with a 100% Arab Islamist dictatorship. This idea is affirmed by every faction of self-proclaimed Palestinians.

Fred's shorter version: Whenever you find a crossdresser, you're likely to only be seeing the tip of the fetishistic iceberg. Sail away.

Wait. So you're saying you're NOT a convicted pedophile? Is this you in the 1st screenshot? Is the conviction for the offense of "unlawful contact with minor" NOT accurate? If it is...are you familiar with the definition of pedophilia (pic 2)? Because it seems to be a fit for your convictions. But I fully understand why that might be a sensitive topic for you - as it clearly seems to be. Do you prefer to identify as a registered sex offender instead? Because it's my understanding that this is a designation for life (pic 3). And listen. If you think veiled threats of physical violence are going to intimidate me, you clearly have no idea with whom you're dealing. Even so, that's not actually what this discussion is supposed to be about. If you insist on bringing up shit that has absolutely nothing to do with the substance of this engagement, you're not the only one who can do so. But, that's not why I'm here on this platform. I can talk shit & call names & so on if warranted based on the situation, but that's not what brought me here @X & it's not what the focus of my content is really all about. And tbh, I actually don't give 💩💩 about your sexual tendencies (past, present, or future) or criminal record. Some readers may consider that to be important context, but for me personally I'm more interested in the substantive discussion. So, as...enlightening as this exchange & our previous one has been, I really do have better shit to do with my time than trade insults with the likes of you. As such, I'm going to give you ONE LAST CHANCE to offer really...well, anything at all of substance to this discussion. No hype. No rage bait. No ad hominem attacks. And no more bullshit. If you can't manage that, it's off to the block farm with you. You can take your bile somewhere else. In case it would be useful to have a prompt to get you back on track, here you go: You said, "When a suspected war crime is committed, there is a duty and responsibility to inform the public." I responded that what you should have said is "civilians are protected from being made the object of attack 'unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities'" and because this was an attack reportedly directed at a civilian DPH, "no 'suspected war crime' means no 'duty and responsibility to inform the public.'" In case it's useful to have a refresher for what US doctrine indicates on the subject (even though we ARE talking about an @IDF strike in 🇱🇧 but okay), I've attached AGAIN a relevant excerpt from the DoD Law of War Manual. Now, over to you. With just one bit of substantive insight instead of your usual hostile drivel. Your substantive response to my main point is..." [fill in the blank here]". Go.

@RealScottRitter @BrianCox_RLTW You're a little man with a complex. Nobody cares what you did, except that you're a pedophile.

Fucking clown hiding behind Israeli standards. Yeah, that Israel. The one that committed genocide. You have no idea what I’ve done. That much is clear. But I’ve operated at levels you never got close to. You jumped out of airplanes. Big fucking deal. I was a Marine. So fuck you. Your combat deployments were as a combat cameraman in Iraq and an “operational law advisor and chief of international and operational law for Regional Command-East.” What fucking targeting did you do, dip shit? Nothing resembling a strategic air campaign. You haven’t done shit in the real world. That’s why you sound like the Cornell Academic you so obviously are. And fuck you again for smearing American sensibilities with IDF bullshit. Oh, yeah. I also did for years liaison with Israeli Military Intelligence. How much Kirya time do you have, dip shit? Go cheer for war crimes elsewhere. Why you try and explain why what we are doing isn’t a violation of the UN Charter and the Constitution? That we aren’t guilty of the same war of aggression crimes that allowed us to hang the Nazis by the neck until dead? Fuck you. A “lawyer” who shills for Israel and excuses American war crimes. That’s all you are.

Convicted pedophile says "fuck off with this click-bait bullshit you’re posting" while posting a steaming heap of click-bait bullshit. Now I have seen it all. Ritter may claim to have "done combat targeting at the state, operational and tactical level," but it's obvious he knows fuckall about the law of armed conflict. How can you tell? Easy. Start with this...insightful claim: "When a suspected war crime is committed, there is a duty and responsibility to inform the public." I mean, he's right...in the way that a broken clock is right twice a day. But the threshold requirement is that a suspected war crime HAS been committed. And that's where Scott's...colorful commentary goes off the rails. Because he goes on to claim "deliberate targeting of a journalist is a war crime." Close...but not quite accurate. What he should have said is civilians are protected from being made the object of attack "unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities." That's what international law actually says (pic 1). Although neither #USA nor @Israel have ratified the conventional (treaty) source of that rule, both recognize it as customary & both implement some version of the rule in their fundamental targeting doctrine. So, when is "deliberate targeting of a journalist" NOT a war crime? That's right! For such time as the "journalist" is ALSO a civilian taking a direct part in hostilities (DPH). Then, it's not a "war crime." It's just...targeting. An activity Ritter claims to have done "at the state, operational and tactical level." Maybe that's true. Who knows? But he obviously wasn't very good at his job if he thinks deliberately targeting a "journalist" who is also DPH is a "war crime." Whether one believes it or not, the explanation by @IDF for attacking Shaib is that he was posing as a journalist but was actually a #Hezbollah operative. That means he was assessed anyway to be civilian DPH. And so deliberately targeting him was NOT a war crime. So if directing an attack against a civilian DPH isn't actually a war crime, any guesses what that does to Ritter's claim that, "When a suspected war crime is committed, there is a duty and responsibility to inform the public"? That's right. No "suspected war crime" means no "duty and responsibility to inform the public." But wait! How do we know when a "journalist" is ALSO a civilian DPH?!? I can already hear it now, so read on. As far as I know, the doctrinal IDF DPH standard isn't released to the public - just the fundamental "for such time as, direct part" rule. But I also know from previous experience their standard is pretty similar to @DeptofWar version. And DoD Law of War Manual presents fairly thorough coverage of what does - and does not - qualify as DPH at least by our interpretation. As our doctrine conveys, DPH "includes certain acts that ... effectively and substantially contribute to an adversary’s ability to conduct or sustain combat operations" (pic 2). And one of the specific activities the Manual explicitly considers DPH is "providing or relaying information of immediate use in combat operations" (pic 3). Which is precisely what @LTC_Shoshani said about Shaib. So if IDF doctrine is similar to ours (which, it is), then deliberately attacking this "journalist" was NOT a war crime. Same is true for the Kunduz attack he references. I've studied & written about that incident at great length (will include a sample in 1st reply). So I know it was never investigated as a "war crime" from the outset (pic 4). But since Ritter knows fuckall about LOAC, he's free to spout off any erroneous bullshit and seemingly actually believe he's proving someone wrong. Here's my challenge to you, Scotty boy. Next time you show up in my mentions, have something constructive to say. While I have better things to do with my time, I also don't mind exposing you as the ignorant fraud that you are when you DO show up with this bullshit dressed up as informed commentary.

@reduxx This dilemma could be solved by executing child rapists

Yes we did! Stay tuned!

Good riddance! The fact that he doesn’t mention — much less show any contrition for — UNRWA‘s involvement in October 7, nor their infiltration by Hamas, is a perfect example of how UN officials dodge accountability through moral grandstanding.

An obese man in his mid-40s who took a decades long break from competitive weightlifting made it to the Olympics because he was allowed to compete "as a woman."