momo

@Polymarket I think what will happen is ai is making things easier then ever so it’s literally reproduce what a company has been working 10 years for in 1

JUST IN: Jeff Bezos predicts AI will create a labor shortage rather than put humans out of work.

@thdxr in the end it doesn’t matter for most people, what ai will do in the end it’s just less and less friction for end users that’s it

i see so many articles "analyzing" the ai industry and it reminds me why it's better to be stupid than only slightly smart these people find very convincing, intelligent sounding ways to be completely wrong

@thdxr @zeeg since there is executive here this is my git github.com/momomuchu

@zeeg at current opus/gpt prices what monthly spend range do you want your employees to be in the range that makes you feel they're taking advantage of this enough and they're not overdoing it

There's some wild disconnect that people believe productivity is spending 6-figures on inference in a month. You know what happens if that remains true? We hire more software engineers and spend less on inference. "Loops" - or any other equiv - only work if compute is cheap.

@codevsdev my skill is having a soul

if AI writes 80% of your code what skill is actually yours?

@ns123abc it’s crazy how they are a 5 years old company but think they are the FTC of ai

🚨ANTHROPIC APOLOGIZES AFTER RESEARCHERS CALLED INVISIBLE GUARDRAILS “SECRET SABOTAGE” >claude fable 5 had INVISIBLE guardrails >secretly degrading users’ AI research >bro what >researchers found out and went nuclear >called it “secret sabotage” Anthropic: “We made the wrong tradeoff and we apologize” New policy: If Claude suspects you’re building frontier AI it will ‘alert’ the user that it’s refused the request or routed it to Opus

@NovaXCode i think it’s the way you use it fable is more a orchestrator then opus but opus is more of a deep executor

Be honest, which model is better for coding? Fable 5 or Opus 4.8

@testingcatalog it’s really hard to trust a company that can just divide the usage limit without a soul knowing

Anthropic is making changes to the way how Fable 5 responds to prompts related to “frontier LLM development” after community backlash. These requests will be transparently routed to Claude Opus 4.8.

the next dev tools are the agents tools

Models perform best when the task is narrow and explicit. Specific task → cleaner context → less ambiguity → stronger signal → better output.

Best setup, imo: Fable orchestrates. Opus plans and reviews. Sonnet executes. Haiku handles cheap utility work.

Mythos-level performance isn’t only about the base model. With the right instruction, Opus, GPT-5.5, or even Sonnet could probably get surprisingly close or even surpass. Most people just haven’t pushed orchestration hard enough yet.

Pure speculation, but Mythos may be loop-based. That could explain both the unusually high benchmark numbers and why access is temporary right now: it may be expensive to run.

Most people are thinking about Fable the wrong way. It’s not primarily an executor model. It’s closer to an orchestration model.

Tout humains confondus: Agir contre les agissements du gouvernement israélien - Signez la pétition ! chng.it/gMCRKtbw via @ChangeFrance #AlAqsaUnderAttack #Palestine #PalestinianLivesMatter #GazaUnderAttack #Gaza

Tout humains confondus: Agir contre les agissements du gouvernement israélien - Signez la pétition ! chng.it/gMCRKtbw via @ChangeFrance