BD_Nick

The level of disdain Spencer Pratt has for the unhoused is disgusting. And if you’re fine with this kind of talk, I don’t want to know you. Josh Haskell: “What are your plans for the over 40,000 homeless people in Los Angeles?” Spencer Pratt: “Well, they’re not homeless. They’re drug addicts. Most of these people are addicted to fentanyl and meth… They are choosing to be on the streets because they want to do drugs. They don’t want rules. They don’t want to listen. They want to have animals to abuse.”

In The Boys finale, there is a completely inconsequential scene where the worlds richest man randomly walks into the White House wearing a Dark Homelander hat, says he loves space, has 15 kids, and is concerned about white birth rates. Homelander then flies him away off screen. While The Boys has always had political messaging, the first few seasons had it as a background narrative, never superseding the actual story. This is also when the show was at its best. Conveniently, it also began to dip in quality once the political messaging took precedent over the story, and season 5 was unfortunately the final form of this. The writers were so blinded by their TDS that they completely reworked the show to be a left wing satire of current political events rather than an original story loosely incorporating political messaging. This season felt so rushed because it almost certainly was. They, like the rest of Hollywood, most likely thought Kamala was going to win, so they had written the show in anticipation of this. When Trump won, he threw a bomb on their entire script and made it irrelevant, forcing them to rework it last minute to “satirize” the Trump admin, and constantly revising it through filming to include parallels to at the time current events. All it was missing was an Epstein reference, and you just know they’re kicking themselves for not getting to include one. TDS ruined The Boys.

Hypothetical: You’re the owner of an MLB team. I offer to take $0 salary and sign a minor league contract and go to Low A. If the “he sucks now” crowd is right and I get lit up, you cut me, lose $0 and there’s no risk to the big league club. If the “clubhouse cancer” crowd is right, you see it immediately at Low A and cut me. You lose $0 and there’s no risk to the big league club. If there’s massive negative PR, which we already know there won’t be, you just cut me and move on. The story is dead in a couple days, you lose $0, and there’s no risk to the big league club. But, assuming none of those things happen, which they obviously wouldn’t, if you like what you see, you can promote me to AA and re evaluate me there. Then AAA. Then the big leagues. If I earn it, which you’d be 100% in control of deciding. If you don’t think I’m good enough, you lose $0 and there’s no risk to the big league club. You could take away my “antics”. You could take away my social media. You could ask anything of me. If I don’t comply, you cut me, lose $0, and there’s no risk to the big league club. What logical reason is there to not do this? At worst, you cut me and there’s no risk to the big league club. At best, you get a Cy Young winner for $0 who you know can still pitch and could help the big league team if and when you see fit.

Conservatives are generally happier than liberals. Why? Because we actually have foundation and family values.

Nobody, and I mean NOBODY has fought harder against Trump and the GOP than this guy. Let's reserve judgement until this plays out through the legal system. I'm 100% SKEPTICAL of anything Roger Stone is involved with, especially 4 weeks before an election. This smells rotten.

California's population grew 0.4% in the last decade. The number of state employees grew 24.5%. Total state spending grew 48%, inflation adjusted. You have to ask - where did all the money go?