Ammi Zoaka M

@ojutalayomi @FOjebiyi Yeah, I'm using a MacBook

@moses_mee @FOjebiyi Are you using a Mac or Windows? @moses_mee

Rhema just went fully offline. 🔥 We added local Whisper speech-to-text so you no longer need an internet connection or API key to detect Bible verses in real time. Works on both Windows and Mac. But that's not all. Here's what else shipped: 🎙️ Voice navigation for verses and chapters in reading mode 🌗 Light and dark mode toggle 📚 Add to queue straight from the book search panel 📡 Remote control via OSC and HTTP API 🎓 Interactive onboarding tutorial for new users 🔍 Improved semantic search parsing 🛠️ Unicode crash fix for Windows Bible downloads Rhema is becoming the sermon companion we always wanted to build. More coming soon. #Rhema #BibleTech #OpenSource

@ojutalayomi @FOjebiyi Alright, thanks... I'll try that

@moses_mee @FOjebiyi If you use a Mac, run: export SSL_CERT_FILE="$(.venv/bin/python -c 'import certifi; print(certifi.where())')" before you run: bun run setup:all

@jtrocksforever @SpeedWatkins @MrSaneApps You can't use "freely" and "he created some to..." In the same sentence, either they're free or they're not. God gave man freewill to accept or reject his proposal of love and salvation. That's God limiting his own sovereignty and power to compel, by his own self. That's love!

@moses_mee @SpeedWatkins @MrSaneApps He created some people to freely choose hell, how is this a violation of free will but that isn’t

If God is perfectly good, He would desire to save everyone. If He is all-powerful, He would be able to do so. If both are true, everyone would be saved. Since not everyone is saved, either God lacks power, lacks goodness, or does not exist. Choose wisely.

There are things in this life that Murphys Law will never allow me to contemplate or even try... Ever!!🤣🤣💀💔

This is an oxymoron... You know that right? 🤣🤦🏽‍♂️

@SpeedWatkins @MrSaneApps This is an oxymoron... You know that right? 🤣🤦🏽‍♂️

@MrSaneApps If He is all powerful, He would create everyone to freely choose salvation.

Do Calvinists even believe in intercession or Evangelism? I'd imagine it's pointless to them, as it doesn't help to change the already "predetermined sovereign counsel" of God. 🤔

Oh, yes there are very self evident proofs, people are just not willing to accept it and would rather explain it away. I like to use this funny meme to explain the point😅. When you really study how our world works, you cannot escape the idea that the so-called laws that are self evident were not set by a very intelligent and meticulous method and system. Order doesn't just blip out of chaotic entropy. Science merely explains the mechanisms by which our reality works, it can never explain how and why it came to be that way. The signature of God is all-over, we just don't acknowledge it. Dr. David Berlinski, an American philosopher, educator, and author had this to say about Atheism and the origin of life when responding to Richard Dawkin's book, "The God Delusion".. “Has anyone provided proof of God’s inexistence? Not even close. Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here? Not even close. Have our sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? Not even close. Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought? Close enough. Has rationalism and moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? Not close enough. Has secularism in the terrible 20th century been a force for good? Not even close, to being close. Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy in the sciences? Close enough. Does anything in the sciences or their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? Not even in the ball park. Is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt? Dead on.” ― David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions PS: David Berlinski is an atheist by the way.

@moses_mee @Atomsmade The guy's point, which is incredibly good btw, I wish I'd thought of it, is that if there was a God who created everything, his existence would be self-evident in that creation. Like the Rockstar logo when you boot up GTA5. An unchanging, undeniable fact of reality. Like Pi

Take π for example. No matter how big or small a circle is, the ratio of its circumference to its diameter is always 3.14… It’s constant, predictable, and independently verifiable by anyone. If a god is truly omnipresent, you would expect something similar, not in a physical sense like a circle, but in consistency. Its existence should be universal, unfalsifiable, and independently verifiable, not dependent on belief, location, or interpretation.

I did not say they're subject to it, I said they're observable and it's by the scientific method that they came to be discovered and accepted. So yes, as you said, we must first establish that the physical self-evident facts and laws that we can observe are just that, the canvas on which our reality rests. So it's silly to think you can observe or measure the personality that put those laws and self evident constants there in the first place, with the same methods or paradigms. Just as you don't expect me to be found within the boundaries of a game simulation I created on a computer with my own defined rules.

@moses_mee @Atomsmade Look, mathematical constants, by their nature, can't be subject to the scientific method. This is actually a very interesting topic, but it's beyond the scope of talking about whichever supernatural being you're a fan of or whatever

Yes, many people have claimed to be Micheal Jackson, therefore, Micheal Jackson didn't/ doesn't exist. 😅 That's not a reasonable take, because if there's a consistent theme across all races, cultures, and creeds... It's a pointer that at worst, they're all desperate imitations or perversions of some real thing or entity they just do not really understand yet or want to properly represent. Also, yes, you can try to give evidence of how real you are, it doesn't mean I have to believe you, I can still choose to accept the evidence you're providing or not. You know why? Because when people don't want to believe a thing, there's always something they can hinge on, some insane 'loophole'. Y'all like to imagine God is like humans, well, he's not. So again, there's nothing men are asking for today as proof of God's presence that he hasn't done whether in history or contemporary times, but as it was before, it is the same now, not everyone will accept it, for whatever their personal reasons are. The bible is literally a historical book, with very verifiable records of actual events that can be corroborated by even non- Christian sources. There's more than enough evidence if you really want to take it seriously, unfortunately most of these are just tongue-in-cheek.

@moses_mee @Atomsmade Many religions claim that. If I accepted the bible's claims i'd have to accept them too. Doing the amazing miracles today is one way the one true God can accertain his dominance. I mean I can give you evidence rn that I exist in real time, what's stopping an all powerful God.

Bro! Observation is literally the first item on the scientific method, I'm not sure why you're trying to be intentionally obtuse. How did they discover that self evident fact? Once you go out on that inquiry into how our world works and how certain things are pre-coded constants, that's science... And so, you cannot use whatever known methods that apply to our physical reality to find or test for "God" because if It was my computer,I probably have different situations I'm running with different parameters, and subjects within those simulations will only ever be able to relate with the parameters that have been set in their reality. Nothing would make any sense to them, as it would be deemed "unreal" or "unscientific".🤦🏽‍♂️

@moses_mee @Atomsmade It's more fundamental than that. It doesn't require the scientific method to verify its existence. It is self evident. Like 1+1=2 only even more so. Like, considerably more so

@GreenClermont @Atomsmade What is this? 😂🤣🤦🏽‍♂️... Please what's science? Isn't science the method by which we study, describe and quantify our reality? How is math or Pi not science? 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

@moses_mee @Atomsmade There's nothing scientific about it. It's just a mathematical fact about reality. There's no science involved

I'm not imposing any limit... My comment is to make the point that it's stupid to expect to be able to empirically or scientifically measure or observe God. Because by definition God is not observable within that frame of reference and it's rules, because he made the rules,he exists outside of it. Also, he's not mad, according to Christianity, he's actually reached out in numerous ways, the last time he came down bodily to declare himself and his way, the people still didn't believe him, they mocked, tortured and rejected him, just as many reject him to this day. Lack of evidence is not the problem, it's refusal to accept because it doesn't suit the kind of evidence you're demanding or what human pride and expectations are .

@moses_mee @Atomsmade Then I wouldn’t be mad if half of those subjects didn’t grasp my existence because I didn’t give them the ability to? Mind you coding even has a limit, an omni-potent and omni-scient being does not have these limits you’re trying to impose on him, so it should be easier to do.

@BenbellahOwino @Atomsmade Yep... He did all that, the people still did not believe, they rejected him and killed him. What's your point?

@moses_mee @Atomsmade The god with Omni attributes can literally do anything. Don't impose limits on him when it's convenient. Plus, in the bible he takes physical form constantly and is shown to interact with the physical worlds. What this guy is asking for is as mundane to an omni-god as breathing.

@GreenClermont @Atomsmade It's not a physical quantity, then what is it? It's a self evident truth based on scientific observation. I don't know what point you're trying to make here

@moses_mee @Atomsmade Pi isn't a physical quantity or a scientific phenomenon, it is, effectively, revealed truth. It exists independently of anything else

Yeah, just a little problem in your query... God is not some physical quantity or scientific phenomena to be measured or studied in a lab; because by definition, God exists outside of that construct, outside of his own creation, his signature may be riddled all over the benign details of his creation and will usually only be spectacularly detectable by intentional hints and "out of ordinary" insertions or interventions into the scheme if and when he chooses to (which we refer to as miracles or the supernatural), just like a software developer exists outside of his own game or simulation. Let's imagine you're a software engineer and you developed a game console with subjects within the simulation insisting that because they can't see you or measure your essence based on the context and rules you built into the system within the game, therefore you do not exist. That's stupid right? So yeah, The question of a God is largely not a scientific question, therefore the explanation for God will normally not be a strictly scientific one, because science as we know it is merely an attempt at codifying the rules within our own reality.

@natemcgrady Is it free?

opencode is so much better than claude code like it's not even close

@AndyCB1802 @JonnyRoot_ Okay, so you're being delusional... Got that!

@moses_mee @JonnyRoot_ Jesus will not contradict, but he will understand it better than any tribe. when he says God knows the heart. it’s not up to you. Jesus is what God has to say.

There’s no such thing as an “LGBTQ Christian”