mrblank

One more trading day to go for my 8th payout with QT. Having consistent return from prop coming in bi-weekly allows me to take more risk with crypto. If anyone has the trading skillet and wants to give trading a go. Consider @QtFunded Amazing spread & support from the team.

@rotrade93 Always appreciate your content bro. Keeping it real. It's hard to find a genuine guy like you on X nowadays. Keep posting!

I genuinely believe you can achieve almost anything you want in life and yes, that includes trading. But it comes down to four things: 1. A strong purpose Everything starts with your why. Once you find it, the journey changes. Even your lowest moments feel more manageable because you know what you're fighting for. 2. The willingness to outwork everyone else No one can do the work for you. Greatness isn’t built on comfort. You have to build an identity where showing up daily isn’t optional, it’s who you are. 3. Perseverance and consistency You can’t expect extraordinary results if you quit every time things get hard. Feel your emotions, understand your mind but always reflect, adapt, and learn. Growth lives in those tough moments. 4. Time and permission to fail Every great career is built on thousands of hours of focused effort. Stop rushing the process. It doesn’t matter how long it takes as long as you don’t quit too early. Most people stop right before things start to work. Those who stay patient, keep learning, and continue showing up… eventually win.

@trustedprophub Secret to setting up prop review account on X. Write contrarian post without much data support and hope the post gets viral. Do we really need another prop trusted review hub something?

$200K funded account becomes scary! 99% of your payouts will be denied on a $200K account. Is that true?

@neoktrades Who is the copy pasta here? @joker_szn x.com/i/status/20237…

Let me guess... You took a loss on $EU this morning because you longed like this? Classic pattern trading right there lol.

@payeltrades between 2-3RR depending on how early/late we are in the trend. sometimes close it off manually at the end of a session or before news when profit is near 2rr.

I genuinely want to hear different perspectives on profit booking. How do you usually book your profits? Do you prefer partial exits? Fixed R:R targets? Market structure based exits? Or trailing methods? I’m curious to know what works for you and why. Let’s discuss, your insights might help others refine their approach too.

Going to gym let you get used to incremental progress through consistency Something that can be transferred over to trading. You often miss the incremental progress but look back 6 months, you are unrecognizable.

@Enestmt Don't worry, I got it

I missed this setup ; the broker didn't take my order.

🇪🇺🇺🇸EURUSD 4H CRT. Every entry is an exit. Every exit is an entry. 1:3 RR.

@j_intradaytrade But the better life includes traveling and cocktail happy hours too.

The main reason society is going the way it is is because men are told they shouldn’t be men anymore A man’s role is to protect and to provide But when this role is stripped away and he thinks he can just “sit back and chill”, he loses his sense of purpose If you are a man - understand that nothing else in this world will bring you as much fulfilment as your WORK The guy who works hard every single day of the week and provides for his loved ones feels more “free” than the guy who doesn’t work hard, plays video games every day and goes drinking every weekend The secret to fulfilment is not “travelling” or “cocktail happy hours” It’s personal sacrifice so that you can give a better life to the people around you

@AshleyGPT @RajaBanks Amazing you already have your party shirt 7 years ago

Crazy to think 7 years ago I was just learning to trade, with @RajaBanks in the background while I figured out the markets. Fast forward to now: trading full-time, hitting leaderboards across multiple firms, and building a real brand around my name. Full-circle moment. From bunk beds and backpacking the world, to meeting again in Bangkok years later — living a life I once only visualised. Proof that if you stay consistent, stay disciplined, and don’t quit on yourself, the vision becomes reality 💭

@OmarAgag6 It is clean 😺

People will look you dead in your soul and tell you that trading Forex is just as clean as Indices.

@DjGriffith Does what you think matters ?

I think RWA narrative was the biggest disappointment of the last cycle. I dont think they will make any comeback.

@_Master_david Don't make a mistake and accuse the firm. That's a loser behavior dude.

Qt funded SCAMMER SCAMMER QT Funded is wild. Wrong SL placed for a few minutes. Never hit. Equity never reached it. No loss. No real risk. Their response? “Excessive exposure” and funded account denied. Apparently, human error = gambling, but denying traders after they pass = business model. If your prop firm collapses over a typo, you’re not a prop firm you’re a trap. @QtFunded @AlexQuantTekel @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmMatch @Propfirm @Propfirmedge

@_Master_david @fxNikhil Not allowed. Move on.

@fxNikhil So human error is not allowed?? Like are you serious We are human not a robot if that is hard breach then why are allowed to trade and waste our time just give us a breach email why wasting a time if you don't wanna give a funded account at the end

@andrew_nfx At 1:1, I crave for more and I don't mind risking 1r for another 1r 1:2 is really the sweet spot for me 1:3 and above is uncomfortable as it doesn't makes sense for me to risk 2r for another 1r more.

Aiming for 5R trades is just dumb I’m sorry, but aiming for 1-2R trades makes more sense for 90% of traders Your win-rate is higher, drawdowns are lower which means more consistent payouts and you’re less likely to breach funded accounts Lower RR for the win

@rg639090 @collapse_FX @FTr4der92594 @GreenPipsTrade @Intafaz_fx @MeetMattL @QtFunded @JamesQuantTekel @SHINOBI_FUTURES @PropFirmMatch Lol

Friends, can you even imagine this? The so-called “High Exposure” scam of QT Funded is about to be exposed by an Indian creator — and yes, my case has been selected for this expose. This isn’t a random story. This is a $100,000 funded account This is a $9,000 payout rejection And this is rule manipulation to avoid paying profitable traders. Once this video goes live, I honestly believe QT’s business in India won’t survive. Indian traders are not fool s — we read rules, we calculate risk, and we keep proof. I want to thank him from my heart for choosing my case and having the courage to speak against this kind of practice. What QT calls “High Exposure” was never above 0.5% risk, and the screenshots prove everything. This is not just about me anymore. This is about every Indian trader who was silently denied payouts using fake or misleading reasons. QT team — I hope you’re watching. Because once the truth is out, no amount of marketing or discounts will save your reputation. The countdown has started ⏳ #QTExposed #PropFirmScam #HighExposureLie #IndianTraders #FundedAccount #TruthComing

@Intafaz_fx @QtFunded Most of the post are traders not reading rules properly. I am far from being an influencers and I have been paid 10 payouts without issue. It annoys me to see others calling @QtFunded a scam.

It really takes my mind off to see people come on Twitter saying @QtFunded is a scam and i am saying this as a prop firm trader, not because i am a partner. Let’s keep it real for a second. Majority of the people who are shouting “scam" are even violating the rules themselves. Instead of admitting that they are the ones who are mistaken, they are on Twitter, venting. This alone is a reason they are not making any profits. If a trader can’t take responsibility for his own actions, the markets will teach him a lesson, every single time. What’s funny is this pattern keeps repeating itself, someone posts @QtFunded is a scam. @QtFunded responses back with a courteous message asking for email and account ID, they analyze the account, giving the precise timestamp, the rule Bent, and the proof of the rule broken, which shows when exactly the trader broke the rule. And even after that. people continue to disregard the facts, shouting "$cam" from the rooftops. I've never known anybody to have a payout refused, or an account breach, without violating a rule. Not one. In fact, 95% of people who DMed me concerning account breach (or I saw it clearly that they did) that they broke the rules. Over-risking, daily loss limit, consistency rule, news trading – name a rule; they broke it. Another weak argument that keeps popping up is: "@QtFunded only pays influencers.” That's complete nonsense. Go to their Discord payout channel and see for yourself. You’ll see that about 90% of the approved payouts are from traders with no presence on social media, no Twitter followers, no Instagram followers. Just traders who played by the rules and did it properly. Then there’s the funniest part of all. Certain prop firm CEOs are clearly uncomfortable with how quickly @QtFunded is expanding especially with the 50% discounts so rather than competing, they call it a scam. Additionally, with prop firms now becoming a norm in the industry, there seems to be a duplication of existing business models. That alone should tell you a lot. This is not a tweet that i wrote in defense of @QtFunded This is because the prop firm industry requires honesty. There are rules for trading and there are rules for prop firms. Break them and you lose, Follow them and they pay you, Simple.

@I_Am_LPT @joydevk95038459 @QtFunded you are the problem if you don't understand the rule. It doesn't make sense to you doesn't mean it is a scam firm. You failed to follow a rule they set and get denied then take the L and move on. Grow up.

@joydevk95038459 @QtFunded I don’t think you read and understand. That’s your problem anyway. Tomorrow when they set another rule to fail more traders maybe by then you will have sense and understand what I’m fighting for.

Some things need to be stopped in this forex space. Specifically, some prop firms @QtFunded is a scam prop firm and no trader should ever waste their precious time trading with them. I traded four evaluation phases before I finally got to the live account stage and still got denied. Imagine passing four accounts back to back with 8%, 5%, 8%, 5%. At that point, what more proof do you need that the trader knows exactly what he’s doing? Let me break down my experience: For the first evaluation, I passed Phase 1 and Phase 2. I was already expecting my live account when I suddenly received a mail claiming I “exposed my account to a 2.5% risk.” I disagreed immediately, because several traders had been in my DM complaining about the same issue so I was very careful. Then I was told the most shocking part. The 2.5% wasn’t even on a single trade. Meaning you can’t take two trades and risk 1% or 1.25% each. So imagine people who trade 3, 4, even 5 pairs daily, they’re already violated whether they know it or not. And here’s the annoying part: There is already a daily drawdown set at 5%. So explain to me how a firm sets a 5% daily DD, then quietly adds a hidden 2.5% risk exposure rule on top of it. For what reason? Statistically, we already know that only 4–6% of funded traders make it to payout with a 5% daily drawdown. So what exactly is the goal of adding this extra rule? Nothing else but to fail more traders. This is why we’re starting a movement. If your daily drawdown is 2.5%, then set it clearly. Don’t set DD at 5% and then hide a risk-exposure booby trap behind it. It makes absolutely no sense. And that’s not all oo , this is where it becomes pure manipulation: Why would a trader supposedly “violate” the 2.5% rule, yet the firm sends no warning, no stop-trading email, nothing? They allow the trader to continue trading, continue passing, continue getting excited… Then when it’s time for a live account or payout, that’s when they suddenly remember you “broke a rule.” Meanwhile, your dashboard was showing live and valid the entire time. Tell me a clearer method of scamming. From today onwards, any prop firm that adds risk exposure on top of an existing daily drawdown should be tagged as scammers. Do not trade with them. If we don’t stop this now, they will keep adding rules to make more money while suffering traders. If you don’t have what it takes to run an honest prop firm, leave the business and find something else. That’s not all I will talk about the second evaluation shortly. Tag a trader or send it to any trader you know. Let’s stop this madness. As a matter of fact, if there’s any other firm with this rule, report them to my dm. I drag them for free. This nonsense must stop this year.

@I_Am_LPT @Danian_Research @QtFunded It's not funny but it's also not right to say QT is a scam firm. Also, the 2.5% is not a hidden rule. You can dislike the rule, but you can't blame them if they deny you for not following it.

What exactly is funny here? Which side are you on? You are a trader and these guys are setting rules to fail your colleagues everyday and make money off them and you are here typing lol? What is the good thing about 2.5% risk exposure when there’s a daily drawdown? Someone is trying to speak up and you are here laughing. What’s funny here ?

@stoictrader08 @fundingticks You can bounce back G.

After 8 continuous winning days and just $150 away from locking my 3rd payout with @fundingticks I tilted.

@DASK4I Wow looking like top g

@turtleonchain @base @virtuals_io Cool. will be disappointed if it's just $vpay

@mrblank_tan @base @virtuals_io Not in this case. Read again.

Found a new @base gem 🟦 - Currently below 1M MCAP circulating - Web2 competitors range between 500M - 2B MCAP - Partnered with an omnibank - Expecting ripple effect with omnibank + @virtuals_io expansion - I'm gay for not giving away the ticker