Christopher John
8K posts

Christopher John
@mrchriswiacek
Finding my way through this crazy life, one day at a time
New York, NY Katılım Nisan 2009
344 Takip Edilen267 Takipçiler


@mrchriswiacek @GOP__Ls The best life you could ever imagine is in the south.
English

@8ironmike @GOP__Ls Furthermore, as someone who jas applied to over 400 jobs in the last year alone, ‘weak as a day old dishwasher’ doesn’t even cut it, old man. Your boomer ass generation screwed us all ✌️
English

@mrchriswiacek @GOP__Ls No and I don’t think you did either. You have options you can discuss with private sector insurers or even temporary government assistance if you need it. Quit being a crybaby and get off your ass. Weak as day old dishwater.
English

@8ironmike @GOP__Ls Lmfaooooo do you live in NY? Dump and his cronies gutted assistance programs and they’re not avail anymore to ppl who need it. Just staying facts, so feel free to double check with them specs. I will say- a day washer wreaks less than the fat orange turd in the Oval Office though
English

@Cho_Perspective @GOP__Ls Yeah… a competition for ppl who can actually afford the bottom of the barrel insurance that’s being offered to ppl who don’t make as much. It is about stopping ppl from their health care, as the mandates were struck down years ago.
English

Typical fear-mongering from the radical Left.
This isn’t about "stripping" insurance; it’s about ending the bloated, inefficient government mandates that drive costs through the roof and limit real choices for families.
Competition, not more taxpayer-funded dependency, is the only path to better care.
English

@8ironmike @GOP__Ls Oh fuck you, Michael. Did YOU get kicked off your health insurance because you can’t afford the “tax cut premium”? I expect not because you’re still searching for the “truth” when the “MO” is actually affecting Americans.
English

@GOP__Ls A liberal will read this and believe every word of it. None of you will bother to look for the truth. You will believe this lie. This is the MO of the Democrat party.
English

@NightskyKeith @GlobalUpdates24 Oh fuck all the way off, Keith. Gay and Trans people aren’t new and have been around longer than the Catholic Church and its mistranslations of the Bible. People’s lives aren’t “fads”.
English

@GlobalUpdates24 When you see something new that has not been accepted for the past 1000 years, you know it's a fad.
English

@CrazyVibes_1 It looks like it could be Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis. My best friend has that from a Lyme Disease infection… not sure if that’s what you have, but you should test for autoimmune diseases
English

@aboardgravyboat @TheGalacticRam And furthermore, what’s hilarious to me is how much y’all cherry pick SO HARD from the Bible w/ verses to rationalize your discrimination.
Have fun eating your shellfish and validating rapists or whatever you all get up to. Peace be w/ you… or not. ✌🏼
English

@mrchriswiacek @TheGalacticRam I know this is difficult to understand.
I can disagree with someone without hating them.
I get that is incomprehensible to you. I don't expect you to get it. It's just illuminating that it shows how you feel about people _you_ disagree with.
English

@aboardgravyboat @TheGalacticRam It’s not difficult to understand that your brand of Christian dislikes gay ppl. You call them gross/lifestyle gross etc.
I don’t expect you to get THIS, but treating someone inferior for something that they’re born as hurts.
You’re not born a Christian, it’s learned prejudice.
English

@TzniusTifa @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork I care about the righteousness of treating people with dignity and respect regardless of sexual orientation. Discrimination and acting the way Christian’s do towards them because of what a silly book says is wrong.
English

@mrchriswiacek @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork Well clearly you do, because you quoted our Bible
English

@Oldsoldier65 @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork Wow sounds like 99% of the world’s population aren’t getting through those pearly gates! Oh drat!!
Honestly, ain’t no hotter club than Hell these days! Already got my weekend bag packed 🎉
English

@prolife_linda @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork So say’s you, cherry picking Linda lol. Did Jesus tell you that himself? What else did he say?
No book that’s been re/mistranslated over the last 2,000 years should influence societal norms/dictate over others.
English

@mrchriswiacek @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork In addition to what others have said, Jesus himself affirmed marriage as between a man and a woman. From the beginning, God said a man and his wife would become one flesh. He commanded they be fruitful and multiply. A homosexual pairing cannot become one flesh or procreate.
English

@TzniusTifa @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork Congrats, I’m not Hebrew, so I don’t care. 🤷🏻♂️
English

@mrchriswiacek @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork Wrong. The original Hebrew is referring to homosexuality.
English

@lcbchefperry @morrowdaniel @chipgaines @magnolianetwork Honestly all I got from this was 1. Did you pay for twitter premium just to do a super long post? 2. Thanks for detailing how homophobia has been prevalent in the Christian religion dating back before ppl could basically read. Feel better? 👍🏼
English

Your assertion is a common LGBT talking point with no legs to stand on. The English language evolves quickly and therefore study guides, educational text and the Bible are updated with the latest vernacular. This is only to help the reader understand the original language in their understanding of the English language. The original text remains static and unchanged.
First, regarding your claim about Leviticus 18:22 being mistranslated in 1946 and that it was the first time homosexuality was explicitly mentioned.
Leviticus 18:22 in Ancient Hebrew: The Hebrew text of Leviticus 18:22 reads(from right to left): "וְאֶת־זָכָר לֹא תִשְׁכַּב מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה תּוֹעֵבָה הִוא."
Let's break this down:
"וְאֶת־זָכָר" (v'et-zakhar): "And with a male" or "And a male."
"לֹא תִשְׁכַּב" (lo tishkav): "You shall not lie" (second person masculine singular, imperative negative).
"מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה" (mishk'vei ishah): "the lyings/beds of a woman" or "the lying of a woman." This phrase refers to sexual intercourse performed with a woman.
"תּוֹעֵבָה הִוא" (to'evah hi): "It is an abomination."
Meaning in Context: The phrase "תִשְׁכַּב מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה" very clearly denotes sexual intercourse from the perspective of the male engaging in it. When applied to a male, as in "You shall not lie with a male the lyings of a woman," it unequivocally refers to anal intercourse between men.
Pre-1946 Translations: The idea that this verse was first explicitly translated to refer to homosexuality in 1946 is incorrect.
Septuagint (LXX) Leviticus 18:22:
καὶ μετὰ ἀρσενὸς οὐ κοιμηθήσῃ κοίτην γυναικείαν βδέλυγμα γάρ ἐστιν.
"καὶ μετὰ ἀρσενὸς" (kai meta arsenos): "And with a male."
"οὐ κοιμηθήσῃ" (ou koimethese): "you shall not lie" (second person singular, future indicative, passive or middle voice).
"κοίτην γυναικείαν" (koiten gynaikeian): "a female bed/lying."
"βδέλυγμα γάρ ἐστιν" (bdelugma gar estin): "for it is an abomination."
This Greek translation, centuries before the common era, conveys the same meaning as the Hebrew: male-on-male sexual intercourse.
Latin Vulgate: Jerome's Latin translation of the Bible (late 4th century CE) translates Leviticus 18:22 as: "Cum masculo non coibis coitu femineo: abominatio est."
"Cum masculo": "With a male."
"non coibis": "you shall not lie/have intercourse."
"coitu femineo": "with a female coitus/intercourse."
Again, the meaning is consistent with the Hebrew and Greek, specifically prohibiting male-on-male sexual acts.
English Translations before 1946:
King James Version (KJV) 1611: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." "Mankind" here is used to mean "male person."
American Standard Version (ASV) 1901: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
As you can see, the understanding and translation of Leviticus 18:22 as prohibiting male homosexual acts has been consistent across major ancient and pre-20th-century translations, stemming directly from the meaning of the original Hebrew. The idea of a "mistranslation" in 1946 does not align with facts or the textual evidence of historical biblical translation.
English

@aboardgravyboat @TheGalacticRam lol your childish bs is exhausting. Gay ppl aren’t “gross” either.
Am I wrong tho that your fragile sense of self must really be rattled when facts are stated? Don’t think so. Your brand of Christian DO NOT LIKE gay ppl. Period. So color me confused on where the lie is.
English

@mrchriswiacek @TheGalacticRam you went from "hate? I never said hate! of course you can disagree without hate!" all the way to "yep! I said hate because your disagreement is clearly hate you hatey hater!" like super fast.
English















