Müller Pretorius

3.7K posts

Müller Pretorius banner
Müller Pretorius

Müller Pretorius

@mullerpr

My first name is Michael it originates from the Hebrew name מִיכָאֵל (Mikha'el), which means "Who is like God‽"

Katılım Haziran 2009
187 Takip Edilen237 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Müller Pretorius
Müller Pretorius@mullerpr·
Since we live in a drastically new world I would like to point to this futuristic analysis I first made in 2016... Everything is on track, and I praise God while I prepare for a rough ride. My prayer is that this analysis will give you the freedom to think as big as God intended for all who bear his living Image in Jesus Christ.
English
1
1
18
4.2K
Müller Pretorius retweetledi
Ernst Roets
Ernst Roets@ErnstRoets·
I had the privilege of meeting @IuliaL27 during her recent visit to South Africa. Her commentary on developments in South Africa and elsewhere has been spot on. Well researched and presented in a wat that's easy to follow. Give her a follow!
IuliaL@IuliaL27

Everyone's up in arms over @elonmusk calling B-BBEE 'extremely racist'. He's not wrong. But over 20 years of data tells an even darker story. Unemployment up. Black unemployment even worse. Crime exploding. Rural internet crippled. Starlink blocked because Elon isn't Black enough. This is what happens when you put racial revenge over reality. ANC is starving its own people of safety, jobs, and tech, all to keep power. Full breakdown → nationalinterest.org/blog/techland/…

English
26
282
1.2K
52.1K
Müller Pretorius
Müller Pretorius@mullerpr·
Hierdie weergawe van 'n artikel wat ek in Afrikaans geskryf het verduidelik wat elke gemeenskap in ag moet neem as dit kom by ware vooruitgang... daardie tipe vooruitgang wat deur sogenaamde "Progressives" verkoop was. maroelamedia.co.za/leefstyl/tegno…
Nederlands
0
0
0
6
Müller Pretorius
Müller Pretorius@mullerpr·
🤔
Ernst Roets@ErnstRoets

Lex Libertas Media Statement 24 April 2026 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Lex Libertas opposes MK Party’s attempt to repeal Section 235 of the South African Constitution - A direct attack on the inalienable right to self-determination PRETORIA — The right to self-determination is an inalienable right that would remain applicable even if the text were to be scrapped from the South African Constitution. As a result, removing Section 235 (the self-determination clause) from the Constitution would not remove the right, but it would strengthen the conclusion that minorities in South Africa are being persecuted. These are some of the main points put forth by the think tank and advocacy group Lex Libertas in the submission that was presented today to the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development and the Parliament of South Africa. In the submission, Lex Libertas makes it clear that it rejects the proposed repeal of Section 235 of the South African Constitution. The Constitution Twenty-Fourth Amendment Bill, 2026, introduced as a Private Member’s Bill by MK Party MP Mzwanele Manyi, seeks to repeal Section 235 of the Constitution – the only provision that explicitly recognises the right of communities sharing a common cultural and language heritage to pursue self-determination. Section 235 was included in the 1996 Constitution as part of the negotiated settlement precisely to reassure communities that the new political order would not result in the suppression of their collective identities. It does not grant automatic secession or independence. It simply states that the right of the South African people as a whole to self-determination ‘does not preclude’ the recognition of such rights for communities ‘within a territorial entity in the Republic or in any other way, determined by national legislation.’ By seeking to delete this provision, the MK Party is entrenching division. It is an attempt at removing the very constitutional foundation that allows for the exploration of decentralised models of self-government, which Lex Libertas has consistently argued is the only sustainable path forward for all communities in South Africa. Repealing Section 235 would: - Confirm that the political system remains disconnected from grassroots realities; - Intensify feelings of existential threat among minority communities, including Afrikaners and other Western-oriented groups; - Undermine the 1990s constitutional compromise that made the transition to democracy possible; and - Send a clear signal internationally that peaceful avenues for self-determination are being deliberately shut down. Lex Libertas therefore calls on Parliament to reject the bill in its entirety. Instead of erasing the constitutional recognition of diversity, the National Assembly should move toward activating the right to self-determination as suggested by Section 235 through national legislation that gives practical effect to community self-government. Lex Libertas’s submission is shared below and can be accessed on the institution’s website. Lex Libertas is a think tank and advocacy group working towards a viable political dispensation in South Africa, based on the principles of freedom, decentralisation, and self-governance. To join the Lex Libertas media mailing list, contact: media@lexlibertas.org.za. Statement issued by: Dr Ernst Roets Executive Director Lex Libertas

ART
0
0
0
3
Müller Pretorius retweetledi
Koketso Resane 🇿🇦
Koketso Resane 🇿🇦@KoketsoResane·
@NkululekoMhlaba If it’s done with laws that factors race, it’s a race-based laws. A race-based law is racist by definition. Calling it redress or transformation or lawful discrimination or whatever new term will be coined tomorrow won’t change the fact that it is, fundamentally, racist.
English
43
216
954
20.8K
Müller Pretorius retweetledi
Dirk Hermann
Dirk Hermann@SolidariDirk·
Multinational companies should automatically qualify for participation in equity-equivalent programmes rather than having to argue for it. Qualification requirements should simply be removed. Since this only requires regulatory changes and not legislative amendments, it can be implemented quickly.
Michael Jordaan@MichaelJordaan

As seen below @elonmusk clearly agrees with BEE/ transformation. Just not 30% equity. But 5000 schools connected for free. And other forms of equity equivalence. Rural areas need this.

English
3
14
59
2.7K
Müller Pretorius retweetledi
Martin van Staden
Martin van Staden@Martin_ASFL·
The South African press is not to be trusted, seriously. The government claimed this months ago. It is plain disinformation. Most Apartheid race laws were repealed /before/ 1994, and hundreds of new discriminatory laws were adopted primarily from 1998 onwards. No "fact-checks"?
Martin van Staden tweet media
English
12
157
410
5K
Müller Pretorius retweetledi
Visegrád 24
Visegrád 24@visegrad24·
BREAKING: UEFA fines French football club Lille €17500 for “transmitting a message not fit for a sports event.” The large tifo in the game against England’s Aston Villa depicting Joan of Arc with a sword in hand, and the words “French never die” was considered to “incite hatred.” The decision came shortly after UEFA drew anger by fining Red Star Belgrade €40,000 for a Christian tifo in their match against Lille. Critics say the decisions show that UEFA are anti-Christian as they allow tifos depicting the devil or push political messages connected to LGBTQ and BLM without ever fining clubs for such tifos.
Visegrád 24 tweet media
English
79
376
3.5K
283.6K
Müller Pretorius retweetledi
Dirk Hermann
Dirk Hermann@SolidariDirk·
Raswette verryk net ‘n klein groepie plunderaars. I rest my case.
Dirk Hermann tweet media
Nederlands
12
146
424
3.8K