Marik vR (@MvonRen) - Twitter Profili | Zamantika Mersobahis Locabet

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

Marik vR@MvonRen·15 Haz

Scientific analysis of the “Gimbal” UAP: Video: youtu.be/WsbMIm9QtEA Paper: drive.google.com/file/d/1uoORs8… 3D reconstructions corroborate aircrew accounts of highly anomalous flight characteristics (advanced maneuvers with no discernible wings or propulsion). Not a “distant” jet.

YouTube

English

141

398

1.5K

742.4K

Marik vR@MvonRen·33m

@MickWest @BeWinstonSmith @LazarusGet26934 @MIDJAM @i11umin8ed Hi @MickWest, beyond the spherical UAP moving through the clouds and the Syria instantaneous acceleration, you seem to have missed the latest. The MQ-9 MTS-B is tracking quite rapidly (at a generally constant rate), which makes these independent maneuvers of particular interest.

Marik vR@MvonRen

‘ORBS’ ACCELERATE/DECELERATE RAPIDLY, MANEUVER ABRUPTLY: Two UAP move erratically, making abrupt, instant direction changes, despite *constant camera motion.* Importantly, the UAP move rapidly *independently of each other.* Fascinating! (And, no, there’s no “flapping”) PR088

English

0

4

13

591

Mick West@MickWest·1h

@BeWinstonSmith @LazarusGet26934 @MIDJAM @i11umin8ed Like which?

English

1

0

64

Mick West@MickWest·2d

About 90% of these newly released UFO videos are parallax illusions, often compounded with manual tracking, like this one. Here, after-the-fact stabilization and sensor noise patterns exacerbate. Relative to clouds, it's a straight line. Parallax

English

358

74

727

136K

Marik vR@MvonRen·38m

@kyle_ferriter @KCegj4491 @MickWest @liteshaper2 @adastra1950 @ThomasH_Synth Take a look, @kyle_ferriter: Metabunk agrees with @liteshaper2 on the UAP moving through the clouds. Great to see! Also, where has @MickWest been? Despite these huge UAP releases (which falsify his “theories” *and* include new anomalies) he has refused to engage substantively.

Marik vR@MvonRen

If the Syria UAP’s apparent acceleration is due to camera movement, there would be *no* diagonal background movement when the object accelerates. But there is (compare red arrow to background motion). The camera (background) motion only changes *AFTER* the object accelerates.

English

2

4

17

665

Marik vR@MvonRen·3h

@kyle_ferriter @KCegj4491 @MickWest @liteshaper2 @adastra1950 @ThomasH_Synth There are several issues with the “lens flare from the sun” claim: -The way the object is obscured and reappears is natural to its movement through the clouds -Underacted video shows that the camera pans ~30° *up* and 13° *left* -The UAP does not emerge from the second cloud

English

1

9

110

LiteShaper@liteshaper2·1d

This is a much better version than the original previously released by Corbel. If this object is interacting with the clouds it likely eliminates parallax & lens flare as possible causes - strongly implying that 90 degree turn is in fact a 90 degree turn. Any theories?

English

36

20

245

34.5K

Marik vR@MvonRen·3h

@kyle_ferriter Hi @kyle_ferriter - the “flapping” was included somewhat facetiously following uninformed commentary yesterday. No, they are not birds. If you think otherwise, please explain your reasoning. Account for the rapid camera motion. Thanks.

English

0

17

Kyle Ferriter@kyle_ferriter·4h

“No flapping” Marik good lord do you have no shame?

Marik vR@MvonRen

‘ORBS’ ACCELERATE/DECELERATE RAPIDLY, MANEUVER ABRUPTLY: Two UAP move erratically, making abrupt, instant direction changes, despite *constant camera motion.* Importantly, the UAP move rapidly *independently of each other.* Fascinating! (And, no, there’s no “flapping”) PR088

English

1

0

111

Kyle Ferriter@kyle_ferriter·4h

Is this @MvonRen hyping up a video of birds again? Tragic.

Marik vR@MvonRen

@AdamKinzinger Please watch this. Note constant track by the MQ-9 MTS-B. See also the below re: instantaneous acceleration (also MQ-9 MTS-B).

English

8

0

3

1.6K

Marik vR@MvonRen·3h

@kyle_ferriter Hi @kyle_ferriter - the “flapping” was included somewhat facetiously following uninformed commentary yesterday. No, they are not birds. If you think otherwise, please explain your reasoning. Account for the rapid camera motion. Thanks.

English

1

2

38

935

Marik vR@MvonRen·4h

@MiddleOfMayhem So, like West and the other pseudo-skeptics, no thoughts on the instantaneous accelerations? How about the way this object is obscured, maneuvers, and reappears through the clouds? How does the UAP not emerge from the second cloud? (Lens flares obscure clouds, not vice versa)

LiteShaper@liteshaper2

@kyle_ferriter Here you can see cloud partially obscuring object in a very natural way. A flare, because it is on the lens, should obscure this cloud. And if it’s a translucent flare it should be apparent in other areas not associated with natural cloud pockets.

English

8

18

104

5.4K

Steven Greenstreet@MiddleOfMayhem·5h

@MvonRen Sure. I'll take a crack at it. It's not aliens.

English

4

0

11

480

Steven Greenstreet@MiddleOfMayhem·8h

The U.S. military blew up a kids balloon with a $500,000 missile and the media reported it as a spooky mysterious "UFO".

English

10

7

75

4.9K

Marik vR retweetledi

Marik vR@MvonRen·6h

@MiddleOfMayhem Hi @MiddleOfMayhem: Since you seem to be the only one on the pseudo-skeptical side engaging (disingenuously) on the videos, would you like to take a crack at the two below and the orb moving through clouds over Afghanistan? For some reason West and his acolytes have gone silent.

Marik vR@MvonRen

If the Syria UAP’s apparent acceleration is due to camera movement, there would be *no* diagonal background movement when the object accelerates. But there is (compare red arrow to background motion). The camera (background) motion only changes *AFTER* the object accelerates.

English

6

10

79

5K

Marik vR@MvonRen·8h

@AdamKinzinger Please watch this. Note constant track by the MQ-9 MTS-B. See also the below re: instantaneous acceleration (also MQ-9 MTS-B).

Marik vR@MvonRen

If the Syria UAP’s apparent acceleration is due to camera movement, there would be *no* diagonal background movement when the object accelerates. But there is (compare red arrow to background motion). The camera (background) motion only changes *AFTER* the object accelerates.

English

2

13

55

3.5K

Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦@AdamKinzinger·8h

Please watch this

English

62

278

1K

40.5K

Marik vR@MvonRen·8h

@JadogaPhotoArt @MickWest @azrathetical That is incorrect. I recommend reviewing the unredacted footage, which shows that there’s no change in the aircraft’s trajectory. The MQ-9 MTS-B drops the track *after* the object begins accelerating. It’s plainly obvious visually and in the data. Please see below for more.

Marik vR@MvonRen

SYRIA UAP: Effects Do Not Precede Causes This video analysis demonstrates how UAP “debunker” Mick West makes demonstrably false claims to assert a false causality. Three lines of evidence (UAP maneuvering, acceleration, IR signature) indicate a highly anomalous object/incident.

English

0

1

57

Javier Domínguez 'Jadoga'@JadogaPhotoArt·8h

@MvonRen @MickWest @azrathetical At the exact moment the military recording platform changes its trajectory from left to right — shifting diagonally and then upward — the object continues on its original path, creating the false impression of an instantaneous acceleration.

English

1

0

44

Mick West@MickWest·2d

Syria 2021, still poor quality and redacted, but much better than the leaked version. We can now see even more clearly that the "zip off" matches the background, stopping moving in that direction - exactly what was predicted by the on-screen data. It's parallax.

English

76

20

227

38.8K

Marik vR@MvonRen·8h

@DaniLavelle @MickWest I encourage you to watch this, which addresses West’s claims directly. I also discussed this (and provided additional context) on Matt Ford’s podcast. If you have substantive, good-faith questions or responses, I welcome them. West, per usual, has provided none.

Marik vR@MvonRen

IMPORTANT: New discoveries in the ‘Gimbal’ UAP Video *DEFINITIVELY* Falsify the ‘Glare’ and ‘Distant Jet’ Theories The object conducted extraordinary maneuvers despite lacking wings or apparent means of propulsion. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=hk_cuD… @DoW_AARO H/t: @ZaineMichael1

English

0

4

16

252

Daniel Lavelle@DaniLavelle·8h

I concede that some of these are perplexing. I’m afraid I disagree with you about Gimbal, GoFast, Tic Tac and others. I do think @MickWest ‘s analyses of these adds up. What I’m certain about is that none of them provide a shred of evidence for ET. I believe the laws of physics would not allow us to be visited given the vast distances between solar systems. Wormholes and warp drives barely work on paper let alone in practice.

English

8

0

1

85

Daniel Lavelle@DaniLavelle·1d

I have to say all the future planning in the world wouldn’t have prepared me for the unexpected surprise I got by how furiously angry people are at my last tweet. I think those with a close proximity to the UFO topic want true facts not the regular routine of mockery from someone with a past history of skepticism.

Daniel Lavelle@DaniLavelle

I love how excited the UFO community gets over terms like "INSTANT ACCELERATION." As opposed to what, exactly? I’ll-be-with-you-in-five-minutes acceleration.

English

8

0

8

1.9K

Marik vR@MvonRen·8h

@PostDisclosure @MickWest @liteshaper2 @adastra1950 Agreed. The silence from West (and the lack of any substantive analysis at Metabunk) following these releases is quite telling. On that note, this video is truly fascinating:

Marik vR@MvonRen

‘ORBS’ ACCELERATE/DECELERATE RAPIDLY, MANEUVER ABRUPTLY: Two UAP move erratically, making abrupt, instant direction changes, despite *constant camera motion.* Importantly, the UAP move rapidly *independently of each other.* Fascinating! (And, no, there’s no “flapping”) PR088

English

0

1

99

Post Disclosure World@PostDisclosure·8h

@MvonRen @MickWest @liteshaper2 @adastra1950 I'm no video expert, but the idea that this is a glare seems pretty unlikely. Not sure why Mick West exudes such confidence.

English

2

0

3

163

Marik vR@MvonRen·8h

@DaniLavelle I think - just like Gimbal, Tic Tac, USS Jackson, Nellis, USS Omaha, Syria, Afghanistan, GoFast, etc. - this is an example of truly perplexing flight characteristics. Another example: No rational person can dismiss extraordinary, multi-witness incidents like this out of hand.

English

1

4

14

173

Daniel Lavelle@DaniLavelle·8h

@MvonRen I don’t have the expertise of resources to analyse this video. Probability dictates that something prosaic will explain it. I don’t know what it is, you don’t know what it is. Will you please answer my question, do you think it’s evidence of aliens?

English

1

0

47

Marik vR@MvonRen·9h

@DaniLavelle What do you think could explain this video? Is there evidence of anomalous flight characteristics that appear to violate the rules of aerodynamics as we understand them currently?

English

1

0

4

51

Daniel Lavelle@DaniLavelle·9h

@MvonRen Ye it’s cool. But I’m looking for evidence of aliens. Do you think this gets us there?

English

1

0

54

Marik vR@MvonRen·9h

@JadogaPhotoArt @MickWest @azrathetical Both the data from the unredacted video and visual evidence indicate that the object accelerates *before* any change in camera motion. The visual evidence (below) is really all you need, but ultra-precise MGRS data confirm this, as does the object’s apparent trajectory change.

Marik vR@MvonRen

If the Syria UAP’s apparent acceleration is due to camera movement, there would be *no* diagonal background movement when the object accelerates. But there is (compare red arrow to background motion). The camera (background) motion only changes *AFTER* the object accelerates.

English

1

0

1

65

Javier Domínguez 'Jadoga'@JadogaPhotoArt·9h

@MickWest @MvonRen @azrathetical Simply put, the military camera platform itself moves upward vertically at the same moment the supposed UAP appears to accelerate. A frame-by-frame analysis using the central reticle and the dark cloud layer as references makes this clear. @MickWest analysis is correct.