Winston Smith

@drakopoulos_j @SenMikeLee @CIA @CIADirector They are.

@SenMikeLee @CIA @CIADirector This official post by the CIA is effectively showing contempt of congress! Th CIA has gone rogue for so long they think they are above the law and practically untouchable.

The @CIA needs to watch how it speaks to Congress. One way the @CIADirector should speak to Congress is in public hearings, where he can answer our questions about the serious allegations made against the agency.

@AAbrariaIOTF @BasedMikeLee Yes, he does.

The president doesn't have authority to declassify material unilaterally. Huge national security risk. You guys don't even understand that the propaganda and trauma programming actually saved us from a far worse fate. Ask them about why they put Affleck in Paycheck, if it isn't related to Looking Glass I'll STFU. I should be getting paid for real instead of doing all of your analyst work with a civilian cell phone and SSDI and EBT as a salary for it. Government is getting good value out of this MK Ultra baby.

The Deep State: It’s real And dangerous

@Africa_Dabra @jac85343 @DrNeilStone Appeal to authority is the highest stupidity.

@jac85343 @DrNeilStone Profile pic=Sitting in a mediocre, 80 style kitchen, at a formica top table, would suggest a very moderate income, suggesting a working class background . Nothing wrong with that. Hard graft is honest graft. But to have the balls to call a doctor stupid is dumb - explains a lot

The worst part of Covid was that 20 million people died

@BlackTomThePyr8 @rosscoulthart @CIA It’s all linked…. Dude.

@rosscoulthart @CIA Why are so many people seemingly tasked with shifting the focus of this hearing to UFOs/MK-Ultra/JFK, rather than to the proof of the very recent global bio-warfare genocide it was actually about? Your government just tried to kill you with bio-weapons. The aliens can wait.

A new Church-style Committee investigation is definitely warranted into the @CIA’s and other agencies’ continued suppression of UAP data. It’s time for the blowtorch.

@syyhlxx @rosscoulthart @CIA Blow torching the cia is moving towards less government…

@rosscoulthart @CIA Absolutely WRONG! We don't need MORE government. Average people with NO government experience should be treated to the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Government has become too relevant...too consequential. You see what happens.

@rosscoulthart @CIA The best time was decades ago… the next best time is now.

@MickWest It’s all “classified”….. even the most mundane tripe….. so easy to flood the zone with noise. Do you even have a tiny bit of thinking ability?

The head of AARO explains the problem with detecting military UFOs is largely one of insufficient data and cautions against jumping to premature characterizations. Do the work, then characterize based on a solid foundation. "I have found it surprising that, in this age of ubiquitous sensor coverage, it is still so difficult to get high-quality, actionable data suitable for resolving, or even just advancing our understanding of some of the more intriguing cases. That said, I have also found that many of these initially baffling reports are fully explainable once you apply a rigorous, scientific process. It is easy to look at a strange video and jump to a conclusion. But time and time again, when our team of analysts and scientists dig in, we find the answer. It has been a powerful reminder of how important it is to stick to the data and not let assumptions get ahead of the evidence, regardless of how compelling a good mystery can be. In spite of all the noise, I always try to stay focused on the cases that may demonstrate true anomalies. " nps.edu/documents/1107…

@subniferus @WallStreetMav Covering up the corruption is a national security issue…

@WallStreetMav But what if the extent of corruption makes it an issue of national security?

The Director of National Intelligence has full legal authority to declassify WHATEVER the President orders declassified. The CIA can’t overrule that. Our federal agencies are still operating as an unelected fourth branch of government.

@DavidF1969 @DanielPriestley Been to the US? Lobster roll $7. Australia $40.

@DanielPriestley Just for the record. Today, now, the median (middle) Australian has the second highest wealth in the world. More than double the wealth of the median American.

I grew up in a different time. Australia around the 2000s was unbelievably great - we took it for granted, we didn't know how good we had it. The Government of the day was lead by John Howard for 11 years. His approach was to make government as small and unobtrusive as possible. Every decision was based on the idea that the "Aussie battler" should be better off. If you work hard, take risks and add value to society the government should not get in your way. They paid off the national debt. The economy was strong. There was a boom in entrepreneurship. It was easy to build housing. Life was great - possibly the best it's ever been in history. Contrast this mindset with Australia and the UK today. Both governments this week announcing higher taxes, more debt, more regulations, more restrictions on those who do the right things and more benefits for those who don't. They believe the answer to every problem is bigger government. They see the hard working, risk taking, value adding people as the piggy bank. They think the problem with millions of people who don't work or who commit disproportionate crime is that the government hasn't thrown enough money at it. I've run businesses and lived under many governments in many places now. In every case where the country is working, the government does a few things very well and aims to leave productive, law abiding people alone. In every case where things seem to be getting worse and worse, the government has the delusional belief that it can tax, borrow and spend its way to utopia. Big Government is not the answer to most things - productive, hard working, entrepreneurial, value adding members of society are the engine room and should be protected and encouraged.

@RealJoeBonanno @RandPaul @WillCainShow The CIA are fucking liars and head fuckers… ignore.

@RandPaul @WillCainShow Correction , Edman is NOT a whistleblower, his appearance is from the subpoena you served him, this same testimony was given in a private setting, This current CIA calls this hearing “ Political theater” and has 0 bearing on any new or worthwhile testimony

ICYMI: Fauci went to the CIA and overruled their own scientists. He commissioned papers in secret, then cited them as independent evidence. The people determining the origin were the same ones who funded the research. The cover-up is unraveling. More is coming. @WillCainShow

@jefflee2015 @MickWest 🤣🤣🤣😂

@MickWest Look at the reaction from some of the most popular content creators that operate outside of Ufology; these releases from the last few years have been met with, for the most part, skepticism and ridicule. This is the zeitgeist. None of it is convincing. Ufology has failed.

"UAP" is quickly becoming synonymous with "UFO", and inheriting the stigma that comes along with that. In this fascinating article, former AARO Science Advisor Dr. Randy Bostick suggests holding off even on the designation "UAP" and instead going with "Provisional UAP" (PUAP?) until it can be more clearly demonstrated to be unresolvable and actually anomalous. It's a good point. The vast majority of UFO/UAP reports are just distracting noise. If there's something interesting in there, then filtering out that noise would be very helpful. But I fear the terminology horse has already bolted. nps.edu/documents/1107… "UAP reporters (and anyone interested in or pursuing UAP research) should not feel obligated or allow themselves to be coerced into providing an immediate analysis of what they saw or what their instruments detected. For example, the assessment of a hot, fast-moving object should be left to validated analysis and not an initial description. The self-assessment by an observer that something is “weird” or exotic threatens to lead to the UFO supposition and a reluctance to report and the much-discussed reporting stigma. The focus should be on reporting the observable characteristics that led the observer to deem the object as hot or fast moving and on providing any associated oral, written, or instrumented data. This information provides the basis for scientific investigation; the reporter should be required only to report, not to provide the assessment. An approach to reducing the stigma of reporting is to use the term UAP in its proper context as an object that is literally unidentified and/or is behaving anomalously with no assumption of origin based on the initial sighting. To alleviate the implied association of UAPs with UFOs, the initial UAP report may be designated a “potential UAP,” indicating that data and information have been provided, but that further analysis is needed before concluding that it is truly unidentifiable or anomalous and why. This suggestion is analogous to a citizen reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement and letting those professionals investigate whether a crime is actually being committed and by whom. Perhaps the potential UAP ends up being identified as a balloon, drone, or something incredible, but that should not concern the observer making a report."

@MickWest Bad take.. Lame.

@ArtGonzo_ @Paul__Templeton Tax is voluntary.

@Paul__Templeton I might stop paying tax and base my defence off of this post 😉

The single idea that explains everything. Legal positivism. Most Australians have never heard the term, yet it is the quiet philosophical revolution that dismantled the original Australia. Legal positivism is the belief that whatever the Parliament passes and the courts uphold is automatically legitimate law — there is no higher moral, natural, or historical authority. If the state declares it, it is law. End of story. This single philosophical shift is the master key that unlocked every major problem we face today. Because once you accept that the state can redefine the nation without the consent of the people, then everything else follows. And here is the brutal truth: If you are truly Australian — if you are proud of this nation and how it was built, if you believe in the original compact between the people and the state — then you are forced to reach one unavoidable conclusion: The current managerial state is morally illegitimate. It has no moral right to rule over us. It changed the fundamental character of this country without ever asking the Australian people for their consent. It replaced the old constitutional compact with a new post-national order, and then declared its own actions lawful under the rules of legal positivism. Every grievance we see — mass immigration without consent, the erosion of free speech, the institutional inversion of ASIO, the expanding surveillance powers — all of it flows from this one philosophical root. Of course they will call this destabilising. But questioning the moral legitimacy of the state has always been the first step toward real change — because no system that has lost its moral foundation deserves to endure. Legal positivism didn’t just change the rules. It replaced the moral foundation of the nation with raw state power. And that is why the old Australia and the current managerial state are fundamentally incompatible.

@SockPup36521336 @Paul__Templeton They have the guns.

@Paul__Templeton If the government no longer serves the people it needs to be replaced. If it doesn’t happen by ballet, it will inevitably happen by bullet.

The state's behaviour is becoming clearer by the day. The $74 million surveillance centre, the push for permanent ASIO questioning powers, and the refusal to properly engage with public submissions aren't signs of strength or leadership. They're defensive reactions. When a government shifts from serving the people to protecting its own power from the people, something fundamental has changed. Every new control mechanism, every attempt to monitor and manage narratives instead of addressing legitimate concerns, reveals the truth: they're in survival mode. This isn't governance. It's institutional self-preservation. And the fact they're forced into this defensive posture shows the battle of ideas is already shifting against them.The people are waking up.

@davi49452 @Clingdaddy1 @SenRandPaul @CIADirector @CIA Yes. The clearest threat to the world for the last hundred years has been the USA.

@Clingdaddy1 @SenRandPaul @CIADirector @CIA and what about our foreign intel? You want to just dissolve all that?

I just sent a letter to @CIADirector asking him to personally review CIA whistleblower Jim Erdman’s written testimony from yesterday’s hearing. The CIA is on formal notice: there must be no retaliation against him for complying with a Senate subpoena. hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…

@LiquidityAlpha @ausvstheagenda Can you implicitly trust EVERY future government?

@ausvstheagenda If you haven’t committed a crime, you got nothing to worry about ? We still have principals of due to process.

Liberal Senator Maria Kovacic has confirmed what I already knew: The Coalition struck a deal with the Labor Government to pass the ASIO amendment bill on the condition the sunset clause was reinstated. Both parties agree the government should have the power to interrogate people without suspicion of committing a crime.

@slomdumballs @EricBurlison Like the church did for 600 years?!? You really trust these fucking liars to curate reality for you?!?!? WTF is wrong with you?

@EricBurlison . @EricBurlison how much time have you put into considering that maybe "they" are right & the info that theyve found needs to be hidden??? What if what theyve found is extremely disturbing & theyve been protecting us? Surely you assign a >0 chance of this being the case?

If you really want to hide something from Congress, you don't put it in a government file cabinet. You hand it to a private contractor. That's why my investigation is following the trail into RAND, MITRE, Aerospace Corp, MIT Lincoln Labs, and the Northrop Grummans of the world.

@sully1879 @MrHustleMCR @EricBurlison 🤣🤣😂🙏

@MrHustleMCR @EricBurlison Because normally when someone whistle blows the authorities then come completely clean and divulge all. It's standard protocol.

In 2023 David Grusch made extraordinary claims about aliens, dead pilots and recovered spaceships. Congressman @EricBurlison put him on staff but 3 years later: no craft, no bodies, no evidence. Just recycled stories - and a guy involuntarily committed twice. #ufotwitter

@MrHustleMCR @UFOSecrecy @EricBurlison Whatever dude… Get educated.

@UFOSecrecy @EricBurlison He’s also lied about contact with AARO. He also stood them up when a meeting was scheduled. He’s refused a SCIF because they wouldn’t pay his flight. He’s suing left right and centre. He’s been in the nut-house twice. These are all pretty big deals.

@MomsProllyMad @EricBurlison Dude… it’s all linked.

@EricBurlison i wouldnt say Trump's "demanding". He knows these will distract from those little epstein thingees.... On to the next thing, right

I’m currently on my way to CIA headquarters with @RepLuna. Will report what I learn after the meeting.