Michael Herman (Web 7.0 DIDLibOS™/TDW AgenticOS™)

A new study just blew up the entire "vibe coding" movement. Researchers from UC San Diego and Cornell tracked 112 experienced software developers using AI agents in their actual jobs. The finding is the opposite of every viral demo on your timeline. Professional developers don't vibe code. They control. Here's what they actually found. The researchers ran two studies. 13 developers were observed live as they coded with agents in real production work. 99 more answered a deep qualitative survey. Every participant had at least 3 years of professional experience. Some had 25. The viral pitch of agentic coding goes like this. Hand the agent a vague prompt. Don't read the diff. Forget the code even exists. Trust the vibes. Andrej Karpathy coined the term. Tens of thousands of developers on X claim to run "dozens of agents at once" building entire production systems hands-off. The data says almost nobody serious actually works that way. Here is what experienced developers do instead. → They plan before they prompt. They write out the architecture, the constraints, and the edge cases first, then hand the agent a tightly scoped task. → They review every diff. Not because they're paranoid. Because they've seen what happens when you don't. → They constrain the agent's blast radius. Small, well-defined tasks only. The moment a problem touches multiple systems or has unclear requirements, they take over. → They treat the agent like a fast junior dev that needs supervision, not a senior engineer that can be trusted alone. The researchers also found something darker buried in the data. A separate randomized trial they cite showed that experienced open source maintainers were 19% slower when allowed to use AI. A different agentic system deployed in a real issue tracker had only 8% of its invocations result in a merged pull request. 92% failure rate in production. 19% productivity drop for senior devs. The viral demos lied to you. The paper's biggest insight is in one sentence: experienced developers feel positive about AI agents only when they remain in control. The moment they let go, quality collapses, and they know it. This matches what every serious shop has quietly figured out. The developers shipping the most with AI right now aren't the ones vibing. They're the ones with the strictest review processes, the tightest task scoping, and the clearest mental model of what the agent can and cannot do. Vibe coding makes for great Twitter videos. It does not make great software. The next time someone tells you they let Claude build their entire SaaS in a weekend, ask them how much of that code they've actually read. The honest answer separates real engineers from the demo crowd.

BRO WTF 🤬 The dog clocks the gunman right away and follows the shooter into another room twice. The dumb ass guard just walks away. 1/2 a second later the shooter runs out of the same room with a rifle in his hand.

4 men who changed the world from a garage: 🍎 Steve Jobs - Apple (1976) 💻 Bill Gates - Microsoft (1975) 📦 Jeff Bezos - Amazon (1994) 🔍 Larry Page - Google (1998) Every trillion-dollar company started with nothing. Which garage changed the world the most? 👇

Breaking: CEO Satya Nadella admits Microsoft needs to "win back" Windows fans, confirms 1.6 billion monthly active devices Microsoft CEO Nadella confirmed that the company still cares about consumers and that it will "win back" Windows fans. Microsoft recently confirmed it'll give users greater control over Windows updates, including the ability to pause updates for as long as you want, and a movable taskbar. Other features coming to Windows 11 include a faster taskbar, Start menu, ability to resize Start menu and taskbar, faster File Explorer, reduced OS crashes, and dramatically faster performance, especially for gamers. We're already seeing early bits in the preview builds, so the promises are not just words.