Steven Sinofsky

1.1K posts

Steven Sinofsky banner
Steven Sinofsky

Steven Sinofsky

@stevesi

Subscribe https://t.co/Xm1OaUU8jk • seed investing • writing • ॐ •🙏• I use '—' and no AI to write • tweets saved 90 days • 📷

🌏 Katılım Şubat 2008
5.5K Takip Edilen209.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. CS Lewis
English
3
4
37
2.6K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
Historically, finance as been the first scale adopter for every technology I have lived through. First to PC. First to GUI. First to C/S. First to Unix. First to WWW. First to Mobile. Even first to things that died like OS/2 and Palm Pilot. I think the clinical trial use case is interesting but in terms of cost of testing, that is primarily gated over human trials / subjects and the lockup Pharma has on that process excepting the regulation of steps/evidence by governments.
English
0
0
0
6
Lili Balfour
Lili Balfour@lilibalfour·
@stevesi Why do you think finance is "most excited" about AI? I work in finance and don't feel AI will make that big of an impact. Clinical trials seems like an obvious use case. Decrease the cost of testing.
English
1
0
1
6
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
@JoannaStern Yes. Completely. Chat is in the corner but nothing is available from launch other than launching and managing stuff. Like if gmail showed you only an expandable root folder at launch. Plus private and temporary seem completely missing. And delete chats is only archive.👿
English
0
0
0
57
Joanna Stern
Joanna Stern@JoannaStern·
So did OpenAI basically just destroy the ChatGPT Mac app? I'm great with Codex and Work being integrated but nobody puts Chat in the corner.
English
30
5
220
20.8K
Scott Clark
Scott Clark@DrScottClark·
@stevesi That's fair. Now we just need models that work natively with differential privacy so everything is always encrypted and there's nothing to seize, until quantum breaks crypto in 2030...
English
1
0
1
11
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
Absolute minimum is 4th amendment. The problem is establishing probable cause will be (as we have learned with cell phones, GPS, street cams, and more) a pretty low bar. 5th is tricky because there's no compelled speech. Maybe this is part of the penumbra? jk
rob🏴@rob_mcrobberson

conversations with ur ai should be privileged and subject to fourth and fifth amendment protections, legally they should be considered an extended mind reading ai transcripts without consent is not discovery it is compelled testimony against the user

English
2
0
6
1.8K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
Creating weights is clearly first amendment and the weapons claim I would bet is as well given the Bernstein case on encryption. Using weights feels like object code which can be copyright. The 4th is more about due process as it does not confer "privacy" just process which is why it worries me given what's happened w/ all digital info.
English
1
0
1
24
Scott Clark
Scott Clark@DrScottClark·
@stevesi I think it'll also be interesting to see if open weights is 1st amendment and if using it is 2nd (since itar claims some are a weapon for non-export), then 4th for using it locally and keeping it yours.
English
1
0
1
10
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
@ramez My point was how they got started. I also think the US market knowledge with Solar as a customer and pushing like roof panels was a positive assist. Much of the argument around tech mfg and the moat China has boils down to US investment and being a client pushing the learning.
English
0
0
1
33
Ramez Naam
Ramez Naam@ramez·
On EVs, some benefit to China 5-10 years ago. Not in the last few years in which Chinese companies have gained the advantage. On solar, it went the other way. Tesla / SolarCity was never a major solar manufacturer or a big customer. Tesla PV manufacturing efforts struggled, so they shifted to buying Chinese panels. Germany was an important customer, though. Chinese solar manufacturing really started in response to German solar subsidies and the booming German market. No shortage of customers in compute. And China can and is doing teardowns of ASML machines. Physical process is the main advantage US companies have right now, and that's something China is adept at catching up on. Software won't remain a barrier. One-time software moats like CUDA aren't anymore, and export controls are just accelerating that.
English
1
0
1
58
Ramez Naam
Ramez Naam@ramez·
China produces solar, batteries, EVs, nuclear power, & robots at a lower cost, higher volume, & often higher quality than the US. It's naive to think they won't catch and surpass the US on GPUs and AI compute. Export restrictions can only slow China's AI efforts temporarily.
English
5
3
22
3.7K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
In the US we see this in "company formation" which is also a measure of entity (LLC or CORP) formation simply for liability or tax/estate/privacy reasons versus economic output. The rise in "company formation" for COVID was mostly a rise in fraud to obtain free money. Even that associated "job creation" was frequently friends and family frauding together. Still local politicians love to count this company formation data as a measure.
English
0
0
0
373
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
This is one possibility. Another is that the fraud methods vary by country. ?
Patrick Collison@patrickc

It's been interesting and puzzling to witness the problems with accuracy in UK economic statistics over the past few years. (See the links in the next tweet for more.) It seems that the Office for National Statistics, ONS, now struggles to effectively measure basic figures such as employment, trade, and inflation. This resulted in a quite scathing government report published last summer, where Robert Devereux, a former permanent secretary, concluded that "most of the well-publicised problems with core economic statistics are the consequence of ONS’s own performance." There's a lot of discussion about the travails facing the UK these days (including this big piece in The Atlantic a few weeks ago[1]), and the problems with the ONS feel like an unsettling microcosm of diffuse decline in broader institutional competence. Anyhow: at Stripe, we became curious about the UK's published entrepreneurship data. While we observe a boom in many parts of the world, official figures don't show a similar increase in the UK. In the latest Stripe Economics post, we dug into the data, and, as far as we can tell, the official figures are probably misleading. The good and the bad news (mostly good, I think!) is that the UK is almost certainly witnessing an unmeasured boom in entrepreneurship: stripeeconomics.com/p/is-the-uk-mi… UK-specific issues aside, I suspect that this measurement question is illustrative of forthcoming econometric challenges. Keeping the world's macro indicators up-to-date in response to the faster-than-usual changes wrought by AI will be both increasingly difficult and increasingly important in the coming years. [1] theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/…

English
10
5
83
37.8K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
@asif_aleem @ry_serene The UX that almost always wins for tech products is "feels in control" versus "automagic." People like automatic, but it needs to work 100%. If it works—for them—99% of the time then all they remember is it being 1% wrong. Repeatedly wrong 1% of the time is "can't control."
English
0
0
0
10
Asif Aleem
Asif Aleem@asif_aleem·
@ry_serene Physical controls keep winning for one reason, and it is not nostalgia: you can work them without looking. A touchscreen charges every action in eye contact, and in a moving car that bill is paid in meters. Feedback you can feel is the feature, not the styling.
English
0
0
5
812
serene.rain 🪁
serene.rain 🪁@ry_serene·
Physical switches and buttons are highly desirable in this age of touch-screenification, but these are two of the most regressive trends in modern design.
serene.rain 🪁 tweet mediaserene.rain 🪁 tweet media
English
9
2
100
70.8K
tae kim
tae kim@firstadopter·
Arm CEO Rene Haas makes a great point in the AI data center debate. The same factions who railed against the gutting of the U.S. manufacturing base to China risk repeating that mistake if the AI factory ecosystem gets blocked domestically. Tae: AI is going to happen. Do we want the jobs and manufacturing ecosystem here in the U.S. or not? Or are we going to be dumb and defeat ourselves again? Welp.
tae kim tweet media
tae kim@firstadopter

Why are politicians so dumb?

English
3
14
71
13.6K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
@KairosPraxis @firstadopter It is a physical plant that requires massive IP and capital. While an electronics factory provides direct employment, AI will provide significant indirect employment via the uses of AI and AI-powered devices and factories. It's an upleveling like we saw with previous tech waves.
English
0
0
1
13
Kairos
Kairos@KairosPraxis·
@firstadopter I don't think the factory analogy is accurate. Datacenters employ a lot of folks during the construction phase but in steady-state, you barely need 200-300 people.
English
1
0
3
475
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
At first you think you don't need a speaker but I think speaker is the wrong word. It is a listener (which could sound creepy given early travails with these devices)—it isn't speaking as much as listening and then answering. I never use my Google/Apple speakers for music/pods. What I find is that I use the speaker quite a bit for "answers" but the problem is I don't want to place multiple speakers in the home. That gets right back to the need to wear the device and watch or just phone are the best entry points. If my wifi access points listened that would be cool. I have Sony TVs that can be Google listeners which is awesome but they have the challenge of being highly directional and overly sensitive even at low setting (so nearby rooms bot hear a query), and Google only.
Techmeme@Techmeme

Sources: OpenAI's first device will be a moveable, screen-free smart speaker with a camera and sensors, meant to serve as a humanlike AI companion (@markgurman / Bloomberg) (Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)

English
3
1
6
2.7K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
@mgsiegler Certainly no one would have thought a slab of glass would become a "wearable"...nor EarPods then AirPods. Just like no one thought balls of foam connected by a wire connected to a tape deck would be a "wearable."
English
0
0
1
209
Eylon Levy
Eylon Levy@EylonALevy·
‼️Holy shit Jeremy Scahill presses Rep. Ro Khanna to say he supports the October 7 Massacre. Khanna: “It’s a scale of 1-10. You’re a 10, I’m saying let’s go 6, 7, 8.”
English
108
188
1.3K
324K
Steven Sinofsky retweetledi
City Journal
City Journal@CityJournal·
Data centers haven’t been raising residential bills. The sharpest increases are found in states that have pursued the country’s most aggressive climate policies, not those with the most data centers. California, with some of the nation’s fastest-rising electricity rates, has seen relatively modest data-center growth. Virginia, where data centers consume more than a fifth of the state’s electricity, has experienced price increases near the national average. @Shawn_Regan in the City Journal Substack: cityjournal.substack.com/p/data-centers…
City Journal tweet media
City Journal@CityJournal

x.com/i/article/2077…

English
32
266
1.1K
203.5K
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
@jasoncrawford People rallying against AI and/or data centers on TikTok, bluesky, or reddit certainly make that point clear.
English
0
0
1
211