Sabitlenmiş Tweet
DAN · MXVDXN
13.5K posts

DAN · MXVDXN
@mxvdxn
10+ yrs in ads • ai slop
JKT → KL → SG → BKK Katılım Mayıs 2023
557 Takip Edilen18.1K Takipçiler

@karyabangjumawa Interesting! I haven't really thought it as loading screen. Thank you so much!
English

@mxvdxn This feels like a loading screen from a dream. The fog and pacing do a lot of the storytelling here.
English

ドリアン🍍目の前にすると″なりふり構わず″解体するのがタイっ娘🇹🇭の性
タイ人も生活の中で常になんらかの果物を齧ってます。
AJINOMOTO🇻🇳Promax@ngoctran0833
ドリアン🍍目の前にすると″なりふり構わず″解体するのがベトっ娘🇻🇳の性 ベトナム人は生活の中で常になんらかの果物を齧ってます。
日本語

The problem is the “Monetization” part. That’s the core issue.
If you want to make an account that is simply based on other people’s content, then fine. That’s what most unverified accounts do. But they do it for fun, like accounts that only post weird culinary experiments, cute dogs, or very specific memes for certain regions.
Those accounts can also reach millions of views, yet they earn nothing because, again, they do it for fun. Most of them don’t even bother getting the blue check.
So if people want to do that, I think it’s okay, because I also enjoy that kind of content.
But if you expect to monetize every single thing that you scrap from the internet, then that’s a different story.
Perhaps X should create a system like: “Hey, you can post this, but remember you can’t monetize it because it belongs to someone else.”
Just like YouTube, if you use copyrighted music in your video, the system notifies you that you can still upload it, but you can’t monetize it.
I hope X can implement something similar, because yeah, I also enjoy those types of content.
English

Controversy Surrounding "Content Theft"
I'm a very straightforward person, so to sum it up: theft is wrong, and I don't condone it, regardless of the size of the account.
Then I ask: who is the thief? Or, to put it another way, who owns a video?
Is it the first person to post it on a platform, or the actual creator of the video?
In 99.9% of cases, we can't know the true author of the video.
These videos circulate from platform to platform, and the author has long since been forgotten.
So, if I follow this logic, we don't have one thief, but a succession of thieves posting videos on different platforms that, in any case, don't belong to them.
How to address this problem, I have no idea. But this current witch hunt against content thieves seems unhealthy to me.
I subscribe to many accounts that post beautiful videos daily that they don't own, and I enjoy what I see, so in a way, I'm participating in this theft.
I repeat, I don't have THE solution. But it seems to me that the debate should be calmer and focus on the question: at what point does theft occur?
I don't know all the details of the issue, and I might be completely wrong.
Once again, I don't claim to have a magic bullet.
Regardless of the account's size, if I remove a name from a video, it's not right. It would be far better to note in the post that the name displayed is not the actual author, who remains unknown, but rather the source of the post.
But imagine, we delete the big accounts, okay, and the small accounts can then become big in turn by doing exactly the same thing... and then what?
I would appreciate your opinions on this subject, but calmly and without aggression.
If the comments become hateful, I will delete the post.
English

@mxvdxn Akang jawa barat na palih mana, bandung atanapi karawang?
Hoyong pendak atuh☺️
Indonesia

If you just want to run an account that uploads other people’s content, that’s fine. But don’t monetize it lol.
Do it for the shitposting. A lot of non-verified accounts do that just for fun, like compiling videos with a certain theme, maybe epic anime moments or something else. But they don’t monetize it and don’t even have a blue check.
But if you expect to make money from it, then yeah, that’s wrong lol. And that's the huge problem of X.
English

ACCOUNT SUSPENDED?
Nikita suspends monetization for @Rainmaker1973, who has 4.3M followers.
My question is,
Why does the rule apply differently?
Nikita, this is a genuine question.
If you want the platform to grow, you cannot apply rules differently to every creator.
YOU JUST had the same thing happen to @MarioNawfal
Yet you gave him a warning, but this creator gets a death sentence?
It is great that actions are being taken, but suspending monetization needs transparency. This clearly shows you do not have one.
I hope we get clarification soon.
Screenshot credit:
@nikitabier


Nikita Bier@nikitabier
@Rainmaker1973 After sourcing 2759 videos from @ViralRushX over the last 6 months, you're now circumventing attribution by simply cropping out his watermark? You cannot get more shameless than this. This is your last day in the creator program.
English

@UrbanAcolyte LOL 😆😆 But yeah, we have what we called "Kuda Lumping" or "Jarananan". Kinda like a trance dance, but has a bit of hybrid of Pencak Silat too, mostly in West Java. And usually girls get possesed while performing it 😆😆😆
English

@mxvdxn Sheeeiit...that's why I'm glad I never went to Indonesia when I was single...especially when I was interested in Silat! 🤣🤣🤣
English

@SEAWPSG @dreamina_ai Seems that these girls know much about Star Wars universe 😁😆
English

สาวพลังจิตมหาประลัย // Psychic Girls of Destruction
Made entirely with Seedance 2.0 via @dreamina_ai
Just Thai schoolgirls with psychic powers doing totally normal after-school activities. 😊😎 #DreaminaCPP
English

@mxvdxn_illust Di pikiran dia, "Ada2 aja anak muda zaman now..." 😆😁
Indonesia














