LIVET real est ltd
5K posts

LIVET real est ltd
@nehemiahCE0
Facility Mgrs(IFMA), British Project Mgt Professionals; Mortgage Consultant; V.President- https://t.co/aMAEc6K96Y ;CEO-Nehemiah Okon; [email protected]























🇳🇬 JUST IN: “INEC Wants Us Out. Unless Court Rules, We are Locked Out” ~ ADC Accuses INEC of Engineering a Silent Disqualification Plot by Blocking Submissions While the Election Clock Ticks Down The African Democratic Congress has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission of taking steps that could prevent it from fielding candidates in the upcoming elections. In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the party said INEC’s decision to stop receiving its correspondence pending a case before the Federal High Court creates “a direct and dangerous conflict” with the Electoral Act (2026). The ADC said it is “compelled to raise serious concerns about a developing situation that appears designed to prevent” it from participating in the elections. According to the party, INEC had previously received notice of its July 29, 2025 NEC meeting, monitored the process, and updated its records to reflect the current leadership, including Senator David Mark as National Chairman and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary. The party also cited INEC’s own affidavit in court, which it said confirmed that the leadership transition had been completed and recognized, and that such internal party matters are not subject to judicial interference. Despite this, ADC said INEC has now refused to receive any of its communications while at the same time maintaining a May 10 deadline for submissions. “In simple terms, INEC is effectively threatening that unless the courts deliver judgment before May 10, it will prevent the ADC from producing candidates,” the statement said. The party warned that this creates “a clear pathway to artificial non-compliance” that could be used to exclude it from the electoral process. ADC also rejected INEC’s claim that its decision was meant to protect court proceedings, insisting that the Commission has instead “undermined the very process it claims to protect.”
























