FU€K 👉🇪🇺🇩🇪🇮🇱🇺🇸🇷🇺

The plan remains: - minor gains from Ukraine - standstill - successful russian offensive - false flag with nukes - destruction of russian black sea fleet and half Russian ground forces by NATO - maximum tension / eve of WW3 - deescalation from Russia - conflict frozen AKA Korea 2

Je vois beaucoup trop de gens chez mes amis libéraux qui ont une analyse trop grossière de l’intervention étatique en matière industrielle. Ils pensent trop souvent que l’État se plante forcément quoi qu’il fasse. Cette vision des choses s’appuie sur des exemples réels mais en généralisant à outrance, elle nous prive d’outils de puissance majeure. Il faut vraiment distinguer les types d’interventions étatiques, des plus foireuses à celles qui marchent : 1. Le truc toujours foireux : créer des champions « européens » à coup de subventions Le réflexe classique : « on est trop petit face aux Américains, faisons un consortium européen ». Non seulement ça crée des trucs pas compétitifs par construction, mais en plus personne ne pilote. Quand on pense aux projets qui mettent vraiment la honte, on pense le plus souvent à des projets de cette catégorie : Unidata, consortium informatique CII-Siemens-Philips, dissout en deux ans ; Quaero, 200 M€ cramés pour un moteur de recherche franco-allemand que personne n’a jamais utilisé ; Gaia-X, le cloud « souverain » européen noyauté immédiatement par AWS, Azure et Google. C’est le pire cas parce que les subsides deviennent eux-mêmes l’enjeu. Personne n’optimise pour faire un bon produit, tout le monde optimise pour capter sa part, dans un contexte de lutte entre entreprises et entre pays. Chaque décision technique devient une négociation diplomatique. Le produit, s’il sort, n’a aucune chance d’être compétitif, puisqu’il n’a pas été pensé pour ça et doit porter des sur-coûts politiques et organisationnels massifs. Astuce : dès qu’on entend « l’Airbus de machin », c’est très probablement que l’on est face à un truc méga-foireux. Ce qui est drôle est qu’Airbus n’a jamais été un « Airbus de l’aviation ». Airbus est un projet entrepreneurial, qui n’a pas essayé de remplacer Boeing, mais au contraire de répondre au besoin dans les années 70 d’un biréacteur moyen-courrier économique que personne ne proposait. Au début ils utilisaient des moteurs General Electric américains parce que Rolls-Royce avait pris du retard. Leur directeur commercial pendant 23 ans, John Leahy, était américain, ancien de Piper Aircraft. L’objectif c’était un produit compétitif dont le marché avait besoin, pas « construire l’Europe ». Résultat : 12 à 15% d’avantage de coût sur Boeing dans les années 90, une vraie entreprise qui fait des avions compétitifs, utiles, et avec un marché pour de vrai et qui peut construire ensuite sur ces bases solides. 2. Le truc le plus souvent foireux : subventionner ses géants locaux en espérant que les subventions les transforment en mégastar d’un nouveau secteur. Variante moins catastrophique mais souvent même résultat : on prend un acteur national de grande taille dont on suppute qu’il saurait vaguement faire ce dont on a besoin et on le perfuse en espérant qu’il innove. Spoiler : il n’innove pas beaucoup, mais en revanche il optimise beaucoup pour garder la perfusion. Les échecs français répétés dans le cloud de type Cloudwatt et Numergy qui ont reçu des centaines de millions d’euros pour que les grandes stars du CAC40 créent des rivaux à AWS et Google sont des cas d’école d’autant plus cruels qu’au même moment, un OVH devenait le premier acteur européen du cloud sans un euro d’argent public. Ces configurations ont peu de chance de marcher car les grands groupes ont des structures de coût massives qui boivent la subvention comme le sable l’eau et surtout un problème insoluble : on leur demande de concurrencer des solutions existantes, plus avancées, dont tout le monde est très content, en se lançant avec 10 ans de retard. Même pour des entrepreneurs de génie ce serait un défi majeur. Pour une grande administration complexe, c’est une mission quasi impossible. Le point commun entre les cas 1 et 2 : l’argent public finance l’offre en espérant que la demande suivra. La demande ne suit jamais. 3. Le truc qui fonctionne pour de vrai : créer une demande captive, s’assurer qu’elle est captée par des acteurs nationaux. Si ces derniers sont nazes, assurer le transfert de technologie depuis l’étranger. Le seul modèle qui marche vraiment historiquement en France, que les Chinois ont copié et aujourd’hui tous les pays ambitieux comme l’Inde. Quasiment tous les succès français sont sur ce modèle : Framatome : en 1958, la France n’a aucune compétence en réacteurs à eau pressurisée. L’État achète une licence Westinghouse, commande 58 réacteurs en 25 ans à partir de 1975. Pas d’argent gratuit mais des bons de commande et un cahier des charges. Framatome maîtrise la technologie, l’améliore et l’exporte. Le marché captif a créé la compétence. TGV : en 1974, la France n’a pas de train à grande vitesse. Pompidou approuve le projet, la SNCF commande 87 rames à Alstom en 1976. Le prototype tournait aux turbines à gaz, le choc pétrolier force le pivot vers l’électrique. Pas grave : on itère sur commande, on cherche à répondre à un besoin, pas à une capacité abstraite. Mise en service Paris-Lyon en 1981. Le réseau national (2 700 km de LGV) donne à Alstom le volume pour amortir sa R&D. Résultat : export en Espagne (AVE), au Royaume-Uni (Eurostar), en Corée (KTX), aux États-Unis (Acela). La Chine copiera exactement ce schéma vingt ans plus tard, en forçant Alstom à transférer la technologie en échange de l’accès à son marché. Ariane : en 1973, l’Europe dépend des Américains pour mettre un satellite en orbite. La France prend le leadership, le CNES garantit les commandes institutionnelles (satellites militaires, scientifiques, télécoms). Ce socle captif permet à Arianespace de développer le lanceur et d’atteindre la fiabilité nécessaire pour attaquer le marché commercial. Résultat : plus de 50% du marché mondial des lancements commerciaux pendant vingt ans. Rafale : dans les années 80, la France quitte le programme européen Eurofighter (cas 1 : consortium, disputes de part de subvention, compromis techniques) et décide de faire son avion seule. L’État ne subventionne pas Dassault : il lui passe commande de 234 avions via la DGA, avec un cahier des charges et un calendrier. Le volume domestique finance 40 milliards d’euros de programme. Les exports viennent après, une fois l’avion mature : Égypte, Qatar, Inde, Grèce, Croatie, Indonésie, Émirats. Aujourd’hui le plus gros succès commercial de Dassault. Sans les 234 commandes françaises, le Rafale n’existerait pas. Carte à puce : invention française (Roland Moreno, 1974). Dans les années 80, l’État pousse les banques à adopter la carte à puce comme standard national, dix ans avant le reste du monde. 60 millions de cartes bancaires, puis des millions de cartes SIM. Ce marché captif domestique fait de Gemplus et Oberthur les deux premiers fabricants mondiaux. La France domine le secteur pendant vingt ans. Pas de subvention aux fabricants : un standard imposé qui crée la demande. Il est crucial de comprendre la différence entre ces trois cas. Car sinon on réagit de façon épidermique à toute ambition stratégique de l’état, échaudé par les cas 1 et 2, alors que le cas 3 est la seule solution existante pour construire des nouvelles filières industrielles quand on part avec des décennies de retard. Oui on peut juger avec euphémisme que le système fiscal et social français n’est pas idéal pour les entrepreneurs. Mais même avec une fiscalité et un coût du travail de niveau singapourien en France pendant deux siècles, cela ne serait pas suffisant pour créer des GAFAM français ou une industrie nationale du GPU. Nous entrons dans une période spéciale de notre histoire économique, une période où la question du rattrapage technologique et de la maîtrise souveraine des chaînes d’approvisionnement critiques deviennent des impératifs géopolitiques non négociables. Il est donc indispensable de réactualiser notre manuel de la puissance, nous rappeler les outils qui sont à notre disposition, et ne pas laisser de coté nos armes les plus puissantes au prétexte que depuis 30 ans nombre de dirigeants se sont plantés dans les grandes largeurs sur leur application.

@devchart I’ve not heard the far right (RN) criticize Israel once in the last 10 years. And the ultra far right (reconquête, the party of Zemmour) is ultra-sionist (in Paris, it seemed as if all their district candidates were Jewish).

A really bad night for the zionist lobbies in France. The mayoral election was overwhelmingly won by the far left and the far right and a bunch of pro-Israel mayors failed to get reelected.

@Tezcatl61654308 @labar0nn3_ Ceux qui rient pensent sincèrement qu’il y’a des gens de droite qui font ce genre de blagues pour se moquer des féministes de gauche.

@labar0nn3_ Si tu as une analyse de pourquoi une telle merde fait rire certaines personnes je suis preneur. Là vraiment je ne comprends pas. C'est objectivement de la merde !

C’est rigolo à aucun moment, c’est même pas bien écrit, il y a zéro talent. Les mecs jouent la pseudo transgression des codes ultra féministes de leur milieu, en surjouant des blagues beaufs adolescentes mal écrites, c’est complètement nullissime… mais bon à l’image de ces mecs et de l’humour de gauche en général.

Message from a German friend: Germany is over. If you have time, read the following post from Reddit. Bear in mind, Germany's only resource was always education and good institutions. r/DePi Experiences as a teacher at a school with a high proportion of refugees - it is even worse than you think Hello everyone, I studied mathematics and am currently working as a secondary school teacher in the Ruhr area, partly due to the current precarious labor market situation. The proportion of refugees at my school, as at many other schools here in the region, is quite high. Most refugees are taught in separate integration classes, as integration into regular classes is simply not possible due to the desolate level of education. I teach two such integration classes several times a week and just wanted to share my experiences with you here. Even before starting my current job, I was extremely critical of the current migration, but my experiences in the teaching profession make my worst fears at the time seem like a benevolent utopia. For context: A large proportion of the integration classes consist of Marrocans born in Spain, but Syrians, Afghans and Roma are also strongly represented. The rest is a wild potpourri of Ukrainians and refugees from other Arab or Muslim countries such as Lebanon or Somalia. One class consists mainly of younger students between 11 and 13 years of age, the other class consists mainly of teenagers around 16 years of age. Now a small summary of my observations: In about half of the classes there is no significant literacy in their own language, just over half understand, even after years in the local school system, in about as good a German as I understand Mandarin. At least in math (I can only judge the other subjects to a very limited extent), the level of education is an absolute fiasco, even among older students. Truly the simplest arithmetic problems (5+6 or 7-4) are already very difficult. The cause often seems to be cognitive, because even if I illustrate the numbers with objects, many students are unable to solve corresponding tasks. It is currently Ramadan. Ukrainian students who do not fast must leave the room if they want to have a drink or eat. On the one hand, this is a rule imposed by the classes themselves, but on the other hand it is also tolerated or even actively supported by large parts of the other teaching staff and the social worker. Some male students refuse to sit next to female students for religious reasons. This is also tolerated. Fights are commonplace and that is no exaggeration. In fact, there is at least one fight almost every day. There are no properly maintained school folders or generally a careful handling of school materials. Most come to class wearing only the clothes they wear on their bodies. About half of the class with the older students is always delayed by at least 10 minutes at the first lesson, or sometimes 20 or 30 minutes. Even after the breaks, the class is actually only 10 minutes late each time. During Ramadan, also tolerated by other school staff, a good proportion sleep regularly in class by placing their head on the table. Female students are regularly labeled with highly obscene terms. The punishment of such statements either does not take place at all or is so restrained that repetition is encouraged. On parent-teacher conferences, 90 percent of parents, even after several years of residence in Germany, can only communicate via interpreters. A few days ago, some students proudly told me what new cell phone models their siblings and parents have, which, mind you, receive almost exclusively transfer payments. Female colleagues generally have it more difficult than my gender counterparts, who are usually at least rudimentarily respected. Some students often do not show up at school for months without apology. A rejection of other religions is very clear in many situations. For group work in other subjects that spans weeks, the results have a scope that can be achieved by those with normal abilities within five minutes. There is no mixing with other students. You like to keep to yourself. Even among refugees, groups usually form according to their respective origins. With all the negative impressions, there are a few positive experiences. A handful of students are actually making an effort and progress. These students are also the only reason why work doesn't seem completely pointless. I myself try to counteract this to the best of my ability, but this is hardly possible if there is no support from the staff and the school administration. I have already capitulated on some points because a corresponding commitment only breaks your nerves without changing anything. Many of the older students are leaving our education system anytime soon, and with that, the state is losing pretty much the only way to exert any influence. I fear that the situation in other schools often looks little better. This leads us to send school leavers into the wild year after year who neither write, read nor master the most basic primary school mathematics. Such people are not fit for any kind of work and are doomed to languish in our welfare system for life. Muslim and African students, in particular, often have an absurd number of siblings by German standards. If one assumes that this reproduction rate will not break with the current generation, but perhaps even increase given the fantastic conditions here in Germany compared to their countries of origin (not for locals, but certainly for people from countries with a per capita GDP of $800), the problems are compounded exponentially. I lack any imagination as to how the catastrophe that lies ahead could be averted in any way, and this is increasingly frustrating me. Just wanted to share this with you. Thanks to those who stuck with it until the end of the text and gave themselves my whining.

@getrichordietri @DoctorLemma Being the second guy is super easy. Either other follow you and it’s a win or nobody follows you and you just hi-five the first guy who recognize you tried to help him launch the movement. In both cases you win. I know. I’m always the second guy.

@DoctorLemma This is still one of the purest things on the internet. Shoutout to the FIRST follower who made it safe for everyone else. Movements don't start with the leader they start with the brave second person.🔥

Sixteen years ago, one man stood alone on a grassy hill at a music festival in Washington State, USA, and started dancing by himself. People glanced over and looked away. Some laughed. His roommate leaned in and warned him people were filming him. He did not stop. Then one stranger got up and joined him. Then another. Then the hillside tipped. Within minutes, hundreds of people were sprinting from across the field to be part of something that, thirty seconds earlier, had been one man being laughed at in a field. Someone filming from higher up the hill said quietly: "See what one man can do. One man can change the world." The clip spread across the internet in 2009. Entrepreneur Derek Sivers played it at a TED conference to explain how movements actually begin. Not with the first person brave enough to start, he argued, but with the first person willing to join them. Collin Wynter, the man dancing alone, later said he had no idea he had done anything special. He was just tired of watching everyone sit still.

My net worth peaked at $1.2 million. None of it was real. I don't mean that philosophically. I mean it was located on servers that have since been turned off. I own eleven properties in the metaverse. Three in Decentraland. Four in The Sandbox. Two in Voxels. One in Otherside. And a beachfront villa in Horizon Worlds that I bought for $214,000 because Mark Zuckerberg called it "the next frontier." The frontier closed last week. It's a mobile app now. Last year I mass DM'd 340 people the phrase "you don't understand how early we are." I have since stopped doing that. Not because I was wrong. Because most of them blocked me. I got into metaverse real estate in November 2021. Everyone was buying. Someone paid $450,000 to be Snoop Dogg's neighbor. In a video game. With no legs. The avatars didn't have legs. I thought that was bullish. "The legs are coming," I told my Discord. "Legs are a roadmap item." Three hundred people reacted with rocket emojis. I called myself a "digital land baron." I put it in my Twitter bio. I put it in my LinkedIn headline. I said it on a podcast that had eleven listeners. Three of them were bots. The rest were my alts. My virtual property has more square footage than my actual apartment. My actual apartment has furniture. Location, location, location. My most valuable asset was a plot next to a virtual Gucci store. Gucci left in 2023. The store is still there. Nobody's in it. It's like a mall in Ohio but with worse graphics and no food court. I held. Diamond hands. That's what we said. "Diamond hands." It means refusing to sell while your investment loses 94% of its value. We turned financial paralysis into a personality trait. A guy in my Discord paid $2.4 million for a 618-parcel estate in Decentraland. Prime district. High foot traffic. I asked him what "foot traffic" meant when the platform had 38 daily active users. He said I didn't understand the technology. I didn't. I still bought more. We had a DAO. A decentralized autonomous organization. That means we voted on decisions. There were nine of us. Three never showed up. Two voted on everything without reading it. The other four were me and my alts. We voted to "acquire strategic parcels." The vote passed unanimously. I voted four times. My portfolio peaked at $1.2 million. I told everyone. I made a spreadsheet. I projected 40x returns by 2025. I made a pitch deck. The pitch deck had a slide that said "WE ARE BUILDING THE DIGITAL ECONOMY." The slide had a rocket emoji. That was my entire financial model. In 2023 I bought a Bored Ape for $189,000. It's worth $14,000 now. I don't talk about the Ape. I still use it as my profile picture. People ask me about it. I say "I'm long-term bullish." Long-term bullish means I can't sell it without crying in a Panera. My mom asked me what a Bored Ape was. I said "digital art on the blockchain." She asked why it cost more than her car. I said "you don't understand Web3." She said "I understand you live in a studio apartment." She's not in my Discord. Justin Bieber bought one for $1.3 million. It's worth about $90,000 now. I felt better about mine after I heard that. That's community. WAGMI. We're All Gonna Make It. We said that every day. In the group chat. While the floor dropped. While the volume dried up. While 95% of all NFT collections went to zero. We're all gonna make it. None of us made it. But we said it with conviction and a laser-eye profile picture. That counts for something. It doesn't. But we said it did. That's decentralized consensus. Meta spent $84 billion on the metaverse. I need to say that again. $84 billion. More than the GDP of Luxembourg. More than the GDP of Iceland, Luxembourg, and Malta combined. They spent it on a platform where the avatars had no legs, the graphics looked like a 2006 Wii game, and the peak user count was lower than the lunch rush at a Chipotle in Des Moines. They just pulled Horizon Worlds from VR headsets. It lives on as a mobile app. My beachfront villa is now a mobile app. Location, location, location. Zuckerberg renamed the entire company for this. Facebook became Meta. A $900 billion company changed its legal name because the CEO watched Ready Player One and said "I want that." Reality Labs lost $10 billion in 2021. $14 billion in 2022. $16 billion in 2023. $18 billion in 2024. $19 billion in 2025. That's not a strategy. That's a speedrun. They laid off 1,500 Reality Labs employees this year. Shut down three VR studios. Killed Supernatural. Put the entire VR social vision in a casket and said "we're pivoting to AI and wearables." The pivot took four years and $84 billion. I pivoted too. I'm an AI real estate investor now. I bought a virtual plot in an AI-generated world that doesn't exist yet. The founder said it was "the intersection of spatial computing and large language models." I don't know what that means. I gave him $40,000. He has a whitepaper. It's 47 pages. I read the title and the tokenomics section. The tokenomics section is a pie chart. I love pie charts. They make everything look like a plan. The project has a roadmap. Q1: "Build community." Q2: "Launch beta." Q3: "Scale ecosystem." Q4 is blank. Q4 is always blank. That's where the exit scam goes. My accountant asked me to value my metaverse portfolio for tax purposes. I said $1.2 million. He said "current market value." I said $6,400. He stared at me for eleven seconds. I know because I counted. He asked if I had any other investments. I showed him my NFTs. He stared for longer. I told him they were "cultural artifacts with long-term provenance." He asked if I'd considered a 401k. I told him a 401k was "legacy finance." He told me to leave his office. The metaverse is dead. I don't accept that. I am a digital land baron. I own eleven properties across four platforms. I have a beachfront villa in a mobile app, a plot next to an empty Gucci store, and a cartoon monkey that cost me more than my actual car. Location, location, location. The location is nowhere. But I'm early. I'm always early. That's the same as being wrong except you get to say it with confidence.

Sometimes I think about how Jared Kushner, who had Netanyahu staying in his wealthy Jewish family's childhood home during U.S. visits, ended up marrying the daughter of a man who became a two-term U.S. president.

Let's unpack this.. What if the White House has no intention of reopening the Strait of Hormuz? What if this war is really about ships & tariffs? I had a long discussion with senior DOE official yesterday on background. I can’t share any details but it’s clear everyone’s Strait of Hormuz calculus is wrong. We need to go back to the drawing boards. That's it. That's the tweet. Now a hypothetical 🧵 with my personal thoughts.

@FFLose youtu.be/sK-iyzpZGPk?is…

La remontada de Chelsea

The investigators at Died Suddenly have received a very concerning piece of intel that we wanted to share with our followers regarding the war in Iran. Over the course of the last 4 years, this same source has given us intel that we have shared that has never once been wrong. Please feel free to pray about this and use discernment in what we are about to share: America has only one week of missiles left to defend allies in Middle East. Nukes, invasion, and war with Russia all on the table. Joe Kent resigned for one simple reason: He knows the Iran war is going poorly, was started purely by Israel lying and manipulating Trump, and he refuses to lie about those facts publicly. I have spoken to several national security sources and this is the summary of what they have told me. 1) America is one week from exhausting our supply of interceptor missiles, without which we have NO EFFECTIVE MEANS of stopping incoming missiles and drones to Israel, Jordan, Qatar, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Iran knows this and has intentionally kept back their biggest, most advanced, and deadly cruise missiles. Attempts by the U.S. to destroy those missile sites have failed and a good portion remain operational and ready to launch. If America cannot protect our allies in the region, they will sue for peace without us. And without protection, Israel will suffer massive casualties. The stockpile is dangerously low from the Trump administration using missiles to defend Israel since the Oct 7 attacks, and the war in Ukraine. 2) The current Supreme Leader of Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei, survived the decapitation strike and follow on attempts, and has now successfully fled to Russia, where the U.S. is weighing committing another act of war, with Putin, by trying to kill him in Moscow. AI videos or not, Iran will never surrender if they find out they successfully killed or gravely injured the “Great Satan’s” puppet master. 3) America has no good options to end this war, which needed to be finished quickly due to tyranny of variables stacked against the U.S. such as terrain, distance, lack of ground forces, and durability of the Iranian government. Options now being considered are nuclear, and futuristic weapons, like the ones which were deployed in Venezuela, that struck fear into the minds of all our adversaries, the same adversaries now watching in shock and laughter as America falters in this half cocked, expedition against one of the strongest nations in the Middle East. 4) China is weighing an invasion of Taiwan by July of this year, because of the very real distraction and depletion of U.S. military stock piles, troops, and resources, for the Iran conflict. 5) U.S. casualties have easily reached 500, with many injured and dead that have not yet been admitted by the Pentagon. America has lost 4 fixed wing aircraft, more than we’ve lost in 20 years of war combined. The aircraft were not shot down “accidentally” as previously thought. They were downed by sympathizers in the Kuwaiti Air Force. The pilot indeed went rogue, and other fractures in the shaky Middle East alliance are plausible as this war drags on. Russia and China have been capturing data from the combat operations, and providing satellite and intelligence support to Iran, and as part of this, have cracked the signal communication for America’s B-2 bombers, meaning, one of our primary deployment means for nuclear weapons, previously stealth and untraceable in radar, can now be tracked in flight and shot down, a major blow to nuclear deterrence and MAD threat against other super powers. This war may have effectively “evened the playing field” for China. America’s only options are bad, and Kent knew this when he resigned. Best thing we can do is literally and figuratively “put down the shovel” and stop digging our hole deeper. Cease all combat operations before this escalates into a new world war, and more Americans and allies are killed.

Tucker correctly points out this is most unpopular war in American history… Where are the protest???? The reality is mass protest are by and large organized by jewish NGO’s and jewish liberals…. They support this war. Thats why there is silence. 🤐 Politics you see on TV is kosher theatre. Whether it’s “leftist protest” or “republicans” clamoring for Israeli support, they both lead back to a jewish power structure.

@pjourdan1967 @SouveraineTech Le débat émerge aujourd’hui, sérieux ?

🔎 Et si l’Europe s’était trompée sur plusieurs grands choix stratégiques ? Depuis quelques années, l’Union européenne a voulu se positionner comme une puissance normative et morale dans la mondialisation : transition énergétique accélérée, électrification rapide de l’automobile, ouverture commerciale, politique migratoire oscillant entre humanisme et contrôle. Mais le débat qui émerge aujourd’hui est plus profond : ces orientations ont-elles été décidées trop vite, ou sans intégrer pleinement leurs conséquences économiques, industrielles et géopolitiques ? Sur l’énergie, l’abandon progressif de certaines sources pilotables, combiné à la dépendance aux importations d’hydrocarbures ou de composants énergétiques, a parfois fragilisé la sécurité énergétique européenne. Sur l’automobile, la stratégie du tout-électrique décidée au début des années 2020 a placé l’industrie face à une concurrence mondiale intense, notamment chinoise, alors même que l’Europe dépend largement de l’Asie pour les batteries et certains composants stratégiques. Sur le commerce et l’industrie, l’Europe découvre progressivement la réalité d’un monde redevenu protectionniste, où les États-Unis, la Chine ou l’Inde assument ouvertement des politiques industrielles offensives. Enfin, sur les questions migratoires, plusieurs États membres révisent leurs positions face à des tensions politiques et sociales croissantes, illustrant la difficulté à concilier principes, souveraineté et réalités démographiques. Résultat : depuis 2024, les institutions européennes elles-mêmes amorcent plusieurs ajustements — qu’il s’agisse des normes automobiles, du protectionnisme commercial ou des politiques migratoires. Ces revirements posent une question stratégique : 👉 l’Europe est-elle en train de corriger des choix trop idéologiques… ou simplement d’entrer dans une phase de réalisme géopolitique ? Un article intéressant revient sur ces évolutions récentes : Automobile, protectionnisme, immigration… Les grands revirements de la Commission européenne depuis 2024 lefigaro.fr/conjoncture/au… #Europe #Géopolitique #Industrie #TransitionÉnergétique #Stratégie #Souveraineté @souverainetech

@agenceONCT @maxseddon

Belgium’s PM Bart de Wever: “We must normalise relations with Russia and regain access to cheap energy. That is common sense. [...] We must end the conflict in the interest of Europe, without being naïve towards Putin.” ft.com/content/4ce019…

Merci à nos amis belges de continuer à faire vivre l'humour.

@nntaleb @Devon_Eriksen_ close to zero.

Now I am curious: which well-known people (currently alive) you think are close to 0.

The USA has been the most anti-Christian regime on the global stage of the past 35 years. One more time: Bosnia Yugoslavia/Kosovo Nordic Macedonia Chechnya/Russia Iraq Libya Syria Egypt Armenia/Azerbaijan In every one of these conflicts, the USA has sided with Muslims over Christians

"it should have been handled by the rabbis"

this is actually insane > be tech guy in australia > adopt cancer riddled rescue dog, months to live > not_going_to_give_you_up.mp4 > pay $3,000 to sequence her tumor DNA > feed it to ChatGPT and AlphaFold > zero background in biology > identify mutated proteins, match them to drug targets > design a custom mRNA cancer vaccine from scratch > genomics professor is “gobsmacked” that some puppy lover did this on his own > need ethics approval to administer it > red tape takes longer than designing the vaccine > 3 months, finally approved > drive 10 hours to get rosie her first injection > tumor halves > coat gets glossy again > dog is alive and happy > professor: “if we can do this for a dog, why aren’t we rolling this out to humans?” one man with a chatbot, and $3,000 just outperformed the entire pharmaceutical discovery pipeline. we are going to cure so many diseases. I dont think people realize how good things are going to get

On June 18th, I had a text exchange with Charlie Kirk. He said he was spending two full days at the White House trying to persuade President Trump not to initiate a war with Iran. Given that Charlie was close with the President and that he represented a large constituency essential to Trump, and given that many proponents of the war with Iran saw a U.S. attack as urgently necessary to the survival of Israel, it is reasonable to wonder if his refusal to back down from his steadfast opposition somehow resulted in his murder. A good investigation could have settled the matter. What we got only increases the reason for concern. Asking this question may be unforgivable, but it is in no way unreasonable. Charlie was in a strong position to keep us from doing what we have now done, and the timing of his death removed him from the equation and likely changed the course of history--as Charlie himself worried it might.

S'il était élu, Mélenchon ne ferait rien du tout. Mélenchon est un vieux sénateur socialiste, ex-prof de lettres et franc-maçon. C'est pas Chavez, c'est René Coty. Même dans Tropico 4 on ne fait pas une révolution avec ça, et encore moins une dictature.