Nol

227 posts

Nol banner
Nol

Nol

@neonnette

Chief Executive Fiancée @neontaster HQ

Bahston Katılım Eylül 2017
230 Takip Edilen99 Takipçiler
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@kymatt77777 @no_caprate You have to spend money at the restaurant to get the regular desserts. Sitting at a restaurant and eating your own cake is like sitting there without ordering anything.
English
5
0
97
10.1K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
Cake cutting fees are standard fare at nice restaurants. When I worked as a pastry chef, we charged $16/person, which was the price of our cheapest dessert. You get to bring your cake in, the restaurant doesn’t lose money on dessert (and they cut and plate it for you, too).
Dexerto@Dexerto

A restaurant has responded after charging an influencer a $110 cake cutting fee Poza rooftop restaurant in Los Angeles apologized for not making justinelovesushi aware of the fee prior and offered a refund

English
141
46
3.3K
1.5M
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@no_caprate Is there no cost to the restaurant for the additional 30 minutes the party sits at the table without making any purchases? They could have another party already on entreés in that amount of time.
English
9
1
270
36K
ICR
ICR@no_caprate·
@neonnette I'm stuck tbh. It makes sense to allow outside specialty items for a fee, but menu prices are set based on a margin above cost, mostly food cost. An outside cake has no food cost so cutting is basically pure profit. A more fair fee may be one set to typical profit per dessert...
English
5
0
340
38.1K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@brownandbella So don’t bring the cake to the restaurant 🤷‍♀️
English
1
0
3
191
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@Holden114 @neontaster “…because Tolkien believed even the pagan myths pointed to Christ” is exactly on the nose. He viewed the Bible as a Christian mythology, but one that was true. He didn’t believe myth and truth contradicted each other and saw creation as the greatest expression of devotion to God
English
0
0
1
22
Holden
Holden@Holden114·
Kyle Mann@The_Kyle_Mann

Is the Lord of the Rings Christian? Is it pagan? Is everyone on the internet an idiot? The answer to all three of these questions is yes. Sometimes. Maybe. It's a possibly dead cat in a box situation. The Lord of the Rings is both Christian and Pagan until you open the book and the cat dies. Since my wife is out of town and can't tell me to stop arguing on the internet, buckle up: First: what does it mean for something to be Christian? The disagreement over if a fantasy novel can be Christian if it's not explicitly so comes down to definitions and somewhat to more fundamental issues like your philosophy on art and sub-creation. Which is more Christian: a composition by Bach, or The Newsboys' "They don't serve breakfast in Hell?" One was created by a Christian (well, a Lutheran, but I'll allow it) honoring God through the act of sub-creation, and the other explicitly mentions issues of faith in its lyrics, but isn't transcendent or beautiful (sorry, Newsboys fans). Does it honor God more when a Christian creates something beautiful with skill and excellence for His glory — or when a Christian creates something not to the best of his ability but it says the word "Jesus" 58x in the chorus? But is Lord of the Rings Christian? I think the issue is a little easier with Lord of the Rings, because it certainly has a message, values, and a worldview that is communicated, unlike an instrumental composition. It has transcendent truths that point us to truth, goodness, and beauty. No, Lord of the Rings is not explicitly Christian in the sense that I would expect people to get saved from it, or churches to do Bible studies on it (though I am sure they have lol). But can a fantasy novel written by a Christian glorify God with its themes? Can it make people think deeply about creation, reality, our place in this world, our duty to do what's right? Yeah, it certainly can. And that's a very noble and Christian thing for a piece of literature to do. Not to mention - the act of creating something beautiful is itself a "Christian" act. Christ created you, whether or not you're a Christian. When you create something, you're reflecting the image of God in the act of sub-creation. I guess the question "Is it Christian?" is ultimately beside the point. In one sense, no; in another sense, it's more Christian than a Jesus is my Boyfriend song on the Christian radio. It's not Christian the way we postmoderns have commoditized the word. It probably was Christian in the way the premoderns thought about the term, art, and creating in the image of God. So maybe. Lol. (Hope this helps!) But is Lord of the Rings pagan? When are you going to wrap this up? I'm almost done. So this one is another yes and no. Saying "Lord of the Rings is pagan!" without any nuance is something you only say if you're trying to get attention on the internet (something I would never do). But yes, Tolkien does draw on pagan myths to tell the story. He was doing what Christians have always done - conquer and redeem the things pagans do to the glory of God. Baptizing the pagans' creative works and making them new. (And by the way, is Narnia pagan? It has fauns, satyrs, dryads, naiads, centaurs, IT HAS ACTUAL LITERAL PAGAN GODS LIKE BACCHUS AND RIVER GODS AND WATER SPIRITS.) So yes, Lord of the Rings is very much is "pagan." But Tolkien did this intentionally, because he saw Christ reflected in the great mythologies of the world. And he wanted to create another, one that of course embodied his Christian worldview more explicitly than the myths he drew from. Which brings us to the side note of allegory vs. myth. I think there are two sides of the horse you can fall off in the discussion about Tolkien and allegory. You can try to read way too much into things - "Aragorn is Jesus" "the Ring is the Atomic bomb" "Goldberry is a snack" etc. But you can go the other way too - "Tolkien said he hated allegory, so you can't draw a connection between anything in the books and real-life influences, virtues, vices, and so on." So while I think many people are aware of Tolkien's refutal of those who tried to read it allegorically, it's not so cut and dry as "Tolkien hated allegory and that is that." Allegory spills into myth and myth spills into allegory. Even as the Narnia books went on, Lewis began to develop Narnia's own mythology and include things that aren't necessarily representative of any one virtue, vice, or person. His simple allegory of Christ's sacrifice became more than that. And so I believe it is somewhat opposite with Tolkien. Inspired by the myths of the (Scandinavian, mostly) pagans, he set out to write a mythology his people could call their own. He wanted the Anglo-Saxons to have their own pantheon and their own mythical heroes like Thor and Icarus you could drop into a conversation. (An important point here - yes, England had the Arthurian legends, but they are very explicitly Christian. He felt myth cannot be transcendant if it includes explicit references to your religious beliefs.) Holy crap dude this is X; you used to be limited to 140 characters on here. Will you get to the point? Yeah yeah anyway, this is why Tolkien took almost all mentions of religion out of Middle-earth, other than a couple of small references and vestiges. Myth is larger than life. Middle-earthians lived in the world of gods and angels. As we do, but them much more overtly. Frodo is frightened and wishes he wasn't born during these times. Samwise is good-hearted and stout and loyal but struggles with showing mercy on the pitiful. Gollum has good in him, but has sat in the darkness for so long it's barely a whisper deep in his soul. With noble intent, Boromir gives into temptation for but a moment and nearly ruins everything. If you can't relate to these things, Christian or not, well, you might just be a lizard person. This is the strength of myth. It is far more universal than allegory. Allegory has its place, of course—the Narnia series and The Pilgrim's Progress are some of my favorite books. But the broad appeal of Lord of the Rings is because myth points us to truths that God has put in the hearts of all men. Myth transcends cultures and time and space. This is not because allegory is "too Christian" and myth has taken out the Christian truths. It is because myth speaks to the soul in a way someone who has not yet heard of Christ can appreciate, because God has written eternity in their hearts. Ultimately, while there are no 1:1 Christ figures in Lord of the Rings, I would argue that you can draw pretty strong connections between elements of the works and elements of Christianity. Things he intended us to find. See, because Tolkien believed even the pagan myths pointed to Christ—why wouldn't a myth written by a strong, devout Catholic? There is a lot more to say on all this, and I'm barely touching on some stuff here. I don't remember what my point was. I'm gonna go play Resident Evil 4.

QME
1
0
1
79
Noam Blum
Noam Blum@neontaster·
I showed my fiancée his comments on LOTR being Pagan and said "I'm not even sure why he's making this argument" and she immediately said "oh, probably because of the Colbert news." Nailed it.
TheThinkerAtLarge@ThinkerAtLarge

@DLoesch @HumanEvents Apparently he doesn’t care either.

English
31
30
402
19.3K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
To me this shows the utter extent of Posibiec’s ignorance of Tolkien. His extensive letters are a critical source for understanding his works and the inspiration and intent behind them. Dismissing Tolkien’s letters is ignoring about half of his body of work
TheThinkerAtLarge@ThinkerAtLarge

@DLoesch @HumanEvents Apparently he doesn’t care either.

English
5
7
50
9.5K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@Holden114 @neontaster But I think there’s a difference between a pagan character and a character inspired by folklore. Tolkien didn’t bring pagan gods into his work, and dwarves, elves, and orcs existed in folklore separate from religion. Tolkien’s “On Fairy Stories” also gives good insight
English
0
0
1
21
Holden
Holden@Holden114·
I guess we'd have to define what makes something pagan. I'm not saying Tolkien was pagan or advancing paganism of course. But if you use pagan figures, even to tell a story with Christian themes, the line gets blurry. Probably shouldn't think too much about a Jack Posobiec brain fart anyway.
English
1
0
0
129
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@Holden114 @neontaster Like there’s definitely a point to be made there, but Tolkien really attempted to bring everything in his mythology under the Christian God
English
1
0
0
45
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@Holden114 @neontaster True. But importantly the only “religious” figures are Iluvatar and the Maia experience the same struggle with Morgoth (aka Lucifer) that ends in his banishment. The creatures are creations of Iluvatar and the Maia so in Tolkien’s mythology are all God’s children, like humans
English
1
0
0
58
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@neontaster I’m sure if asked he would say that C.S. Lewis is a true Christian author. Now I wonder which author inspired Lewis’ conversion to Christianity from atheism… surely not the “pagan” author Tolkien??!
English
0
3
45
7.6K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@Holden114 @neontaster Not really. Tolkien was a devout Catholic and was inspired by the mythology of the Norse, Anglo-Saxons, and Goths, but he wanted to create a Christian mythology for Britain with LOTR. He explicitly stated that Iluvatar is the same God as the Christian God
English
2
0
2
83
Holden
Holden@Holden114·
@neontaster Isn't the steelman argument that they are based on Norse mythology?
English
2
0
0
409
Noam Blum
Noam Blum@neontaster·
So if I have this right, Ryan Lizza stuck with Olivia Nuzzi through three separate incidents where she cheated on him with some dude who was 30 years older than her? That's a lot to put up with from Joan Midion.
English
113
180
5.7K
609K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@neontaster A bit weird they’d hire a bird lawyer for this, no?
English
2
1
22
5.7K
Noam Blum
Noam Blum@neontaster·
Because the SCOTUS arguments are audio only, this is all I can think of whenever Sauer speaks.
Noam Blum tweet media
English
13
10
175
12.8K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@neontaster I regret to inform you that if your first texts to me included “what u been up to tonight” we would not be engaged
English
2
0
54
1.2K
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
You will never guess what this person is replying to
hatermike@mikealan564

@neontaster It seems insensitive but if I paid a contractor to fix something for me and he got hurt. He would still need to give my money back if he couldn’t finish the job. I feel like it’s the same thing

English
1
0
2
254
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
What everyone on this godforsaken app seems to not understand is that Critical Role is a business, not a private club for you and your friends. Sorry they’re making decisions that are good for them, not Autism Inc.
🌧🌩️ Kea 🌔@Wally_Wests

Also I can respect the choices for a bunch of logistical reasons Setting aside my personal feelings I get it But I do have to say announcing it before a live show is. A choice ! 'Hey guys here is the single biggest change news in ten years Anyway have fun and enjoy the show!'

English
0
0
3
430
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
Unfortunately for Critical Role, they’ve cultivated a fanbase that can’t handle an ounce of change. I, for one, am excited to see how Brennan does in a large fantasy scape, as is CR’s bread and butter not only for the fans but for the players.
English
0
0
5
223
Nol
Nol@neonnette·
@neontaster I always say my favorite movie is the 4th and my favorite book is the 5th for that reason. I loved the O.W.L. Exams and Alice of life from the 5th book which was totally cut from the film
English
1
0
4
289