
Hamza Çiçek
168 posts



“Hâşâ! Biz (sahabîler) namaz kılmaya kıbleye yönelen kimseyi kafir olarak görmezdik.”







"(Fârâbî ve İbn Sînâ gibilerinin felsefesine) İslam felsefesi diyorlar. Halbuki Yunan felsefesidir o. İslam'ın felsefesi Kelam ilmidir!" |Salih Ekinci Hocaefendi, 15.07.19, Fatih

بشرى سارة لطلبة العلم والباحثين في الحديث النبوي وعلومه، وللمتخصصين في علم الكلام وتاريخ المعتزلة على وجه الخصوص! يُحقق ويُطبع لأول مرة.. يصدر قريبا (خلال أسبوعين) عن منشورات إيداف (İDAV) @idavyayinlari بتركيا: كتاب: شرح الحديث (شرح مسند ابن أبي شيبة) تأليف: الإمام أبي علي محمد بن عبد الوهاب الجبائي (ت 303 هـ / 916 م) تحقيق: حسين خانصو شارك في التحقيق: سعيد أرقم بوز

Anlaşılmadığı için çok "derin" zannedilen eserlerin anlaşılamamasının sebebi çoğu durumda düpedüz "saçma" olmaları.


"(Fârâbî ve İbn Sînâ gibilerinin felsefesine) İslam felsefesi diyorlar. Halbuki Yunan felsefesidir o. İslam'ın felsefesi Kelam ilmidir!" |Salih Ekinci Hocaefendi, 15.07.19, Fatih


Iran was the rehearsal. The Turkish file is already open. 👇 Operational Assessment | @IsraelHayomEng This is not escalation. It is structure. Akkuyu. Ballistic range. Launch corridors. The Turkish occupied north of Cyprus. Somalia. Hamas sanctuary and funding. A state aligning rhetoric, prosecution and force into a single system. Integration. Erdogan has defined intent through precedent. Libya. Karabakh. Entry. Statements that Turkey could “enter Israel” as it did there. This is operational language. In current Israeli assessment, this is not treated as rhetoric. It is treated as input. The same execution logic applied to nuclear infrastructure and terror command networks in the Iranian file has already been executed, including actions against Hamas operatives in Qatar and operations across multiple theatres. It is now applied to the Turkish one. Akkuyu is not an energy asset. It is a structural vulnerability inside alliance space. A system that can be constrained, degraded and, if thresholds are crossed, addressed accordingly. Article 5 does not alter that. It is a consensus judgment. Where a member state enables threat architecture, that consensus fractures before it forms. Range completes the structure. Ballistic systems moving into the 1,000 to 3,000 kilometre band. Space capability converging with delivery systems. Trajectories already plotted. Capitals already planning. This is not a Greek problem. It is a European one. Cyprus is a forward node. Somalia is an external flank. Together, an arc of reach. For Israel, that arc places its cities within range. The threshold is conduct, not language. Once territory is used as a base for attacks on civilians, Article 51 extends across the chain. The Iranian precedent is not analogy. It is method. It now applies westward. In Jerusalem, this is not debated. It is planned against. This is no longer a scenario. It is a sequence. 🔗 israelhayom.com/opinions/iran-…





