[email protected]

@arlowhite What do you actually disagree with??

A talented writer, but so utterly biased (& with skin in the game) in trying to crush a threat to Golf’s American dominated status quo. I’ve worked in sports broadcasting, in various roles, for 25 yrs. I’ve never experienced institutional media bias like I have in Golf!

@st3v381 @BoothCricket Which kind of proves my point! They’re bottom and we haven’t had the privilege of playing them. As for Leicester, Surrey couldn’t beat them. Yorkshire who we played best Somerset and to cap it off we beat Warwickshire. Your argument has a fair few holes..

@nicksmithy73 @BoothCricket You havent played them yet but they are bottom?

They are not: three wins out of five now (more than anyone in division one) and would be top but for the 12-point deduction because of financial mismanagement.

@adamboultonTABB Never your fault, is it??

I was right but should not have lost my temper. He was just a spinner who tried pathetically to get me sacked afterwards.

@PhilMyers53 That promise has cheered me right up! Would you leave Twitter, too?

How many feel as I do? If Keir is removed, I will quit the Labour Party

@st3v381 @BoothCricket I don’t understand the Hants reference?

@nicksmithy73 @BoothCricket Yeah tour right its got nothing to do with them being predicted to go down. How comes hampshire are bottom then?

@st3v381 @BoothCricket Reason they’re bottom is we’ve turned them over twice!

@BoothCricket Bit of context, you have played 3 of there games against the bottom 3 and only 2 against top 7. The fixture system is a shambles and results in an unfair championship

@rudkin_abigail Different opinions to you? Oh dear

@CharlesDagnall @RichAbson Rookie error to think Twitter is the place for subtlety and nuance…

@RichAbson Oh Rich. Do you think I’d have put a scoreboard up with him doing so well if I had meant what I said above it. That’s why understanding punctuation matters!!!

@clairebubblepop What’s your issue with people who have right wing views?

Oh fuck off right wing weirdos… you bang on about protecting women and girls yet non of you bring up the Epstein files. Literally not fucking one of you.

@clairebubblepop Yeah-you’re as thick as a dungeon door

So when Russia attacks Ukraine the world is outraged. Trump attacks Venezuela, it’s liberation. Trump attacks Iran, it’s i don’t know wtf (obvs for Israel). Israel commits genocide against Palestinians, its self defence. Do we see the problem?

@Heccles94 But can you buy yourself some shampoo??

I will always stand alongside my medical colleagues campaigning for fair pay and conditions. I will always stand against role substitution. I will always stand for full restoration of NHS funding and all NHS wages. I will always stand for my profession and for advanced nursing practice. We are a team. We need all of the MDT together to see the NHS at its best. No more substitution. No more division. No more austerity.

@Heccles94 Farage

Who should be our Next PM? Reply with ‘Zack’ or ‘Farage’

@Heccles94 Looks like he’s got nits

Vote for Harry Eccles for Lake South on May 7th Let’s turn the island Green 💚💚

@richardpbacon Can you block me? You’re a cock

Outrageous. The Israeli Government kills the people telling the story.

@Heccles94 You look like you’ve got nits

Out leafleting tonight and met two woman coming out of some flats. ‘Are you the Green?’ Me: ‘yes’ ‘Great, you’ve got our votes, we need to stop reform, kick out the Tories and save the planet’ 💚💚💚💚💚💚💚

@markofagenius Are you pissed?

So Keir didn’t lie. That will do for me today.

@GordonFielden Are you on drugs?

Today in Parliament, Keir Starmer set out the position on vetting with clarity, stating that neither he nor any minister in the Labour Party had been informed of the concerns in question. He addressed the matter directly, including the circumstances surrounding the individual linked to Epstein who was removed once serious failings came to light. Crucially, he also stated that a senior official within the Home Office had advised that such vetting information could not be shared with him. If that is accurate, it raises serious questions about process and accountability. It is difficult to accept that a Prime Minister could be constrained in that way on matters of this sensitivity, and it points to a deeper structural issue within the system itself. Amid the usual noise and theatrics, his tone stood apart. He appeared sincere and answered the questions put before him. Many will recognise that what has unfolded bears the hallmarks of a broader political effort, driven by opposition forces, elements of big business, and voices on the far right, aimed at weakening the first Labour Prime Minister in fourteen years. For my part, I accept what he said. Not because he claims perfection, but because his record shows he has faced questions in public and not stepped away from accountability. No one in business or politics gets everything right, but that willingness matters. There is, at present, no clear alternative within the party who commands greater public confidence. Angela Rayner does not yet carry the necessary authority for such a role, and Andy Burnham has sought the leadership before without success. To attempt to remove the current leader now would be a serious misjudgement. The wider context cannot be ignored. The focus on the Epstein material, while serious, risks becoming a distraction from the immediate task of rebuilding the country. The United Kingdom must use this period to re establish its direction, with a more pragmatic alignment with Europe increasingly important. It also raises a fair question as to precedent. When James Cleverly held senior office in the Home Office, was he similarly restricted from receiving such vetting information, or is this an inconsistency in how the system operates? That point alone may warrant further scrutiny. Nigel Farage offers a fundamentally different path. The Conservative Party, under Kemi Badenoch, appears diminished and uncertain, struggling to present a coherent alternative. Their leader comes across as persistently complaining, circling the same arguments, and shifting position on key issues rather than offering clear direction. The country cannot remain stuck in a cycle of accusation and counter accusation. If no new substance emerges, this matter should now be brought to a close so attention can return to governing and moving forward.

@JaneFeathersto1 Are you pissed??

You are the worst leader of the opposition I’ve known. You are arrogant with no reason .. and make personal insults against our prime minister. Thing is we like him. We think he’s decent hard working and a man of integrity. He’s successful on the world stage

@JenniferJS_ @SamCoatesSky Are you pissed???

Poor @SamCoatesSky - he must be so disappointed that Keir Starmer told the truth, didn't mislead Parliament, hasn't been forced out and didn't resign. In fact he came out of that session stronger and with more support than ever.

@Anniepop2027 @SkyNews lol

Brilliant by Starmer 100% on his brief. Obviously honest. He didn’t know. And like everything else, he’s fixed it. Badenoch opines about correcting the record when Johnson took months and still didn’t. You’ve lost again. Get over it. @SkyNews