ninthalek

431 posts

ninthalek

ninthalek

@ninthalek

Katılım Aralık 2017
95 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@aryamaniac_ @francoisfleuret We do not have a digital model of cognition. Probably we have a digital model of reasoning, which probably shows that reasoning was evolved not to uncover objective truth, but to persuade others.
English
0
0
0
8
Aryaman
Aryaman@aryamaniac_·
@francoisfleuret At the very least, I’ve lost all respect for anybody with an “interest in psychology” who isn’t as interested in AI. At last, we have a digital model of cognition, and this doesn’t intrigue you at all?
English
1
0
1
46
François Fleuret
François Fleuret@francoisfleuret·
Hot take: machine learning and AI did more to understand the nature of knowledge, and our relation to reality than 20 centuries of philosophy. I am ready to kind of defend this hill.
English
362
109
1.5K
123.3K
Captain Insight
Captain Insight@CaptainInsightX·
Senior backend interview question: Latency spikes every 47 minutes. Not 46. Not 48. Exactly 47. Where do you start debugging?
English
76
11
598
214.1K
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
This is so cynical. I literally got one year in jail for bar jokes made by my friends in a private group chat.
Dries Van Langenhove tweet media
English
224
3.1K
32K
575K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@OlivierRoggevn @DVanLangenhove According to my checking: Belarus: 1.2x over-reporting, Germany, Russia, Vietnam 2x under-reporting, Egypt, Saudi Arabia 3x, China 7x, Turkey 18x, Iran 5x under-reporting. Everyting else +- matches.
English
0
0
2
416
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@kat_maryb @AIndy91584 On decision making: The commentary stream is neither thought nor decision-making. This has been precisely measured using brain electrodes. Activation of movement-related neurons begins half a second before a person identifies the decision-making moment.
English
0
0
0
3
Kat
Kat@kat_maryb·
@AIndy91584 It means that you have a voice inside your head talking to you. It could be your own voice or any voice really. Just a voice. Do you ever reason with yourself while making a hard decision?
English
5
0
2
341
Kat
Kat@kat_maryb·
I just found out right now that there are some people that don't have an inner monologue. Wait. What? You don't have a voice in your head? What does that even mean? Are those the liberals?
English
438
32
837
28.3K
Anachron
Anachron@anachron_·
@CR1337 We need another privacy list too: "Alternatives to websites requiring Google recaptcha (phone verification)" x.com/IntCyberDigest…
International Cyber Digest@IntCyberDigest

‼️🚨 ALARMING: Google now treats privacy as suspicious behavior by default. Users of GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, /e/OS, and other deGoogled Android phones are being locked out of millions of websites unless they install the exact Google Play Services software they deliberately removed. GrapheneOS is recommended by the EFF and used by journalists, lawyers, and activists in high-risk environments. The audience most likely to read Google's data practices and refuse its terms is now flagged as fraudulent for that exact decision. What happened?: ▪️ Google announced "Cloud Fraud Defense" at Cloud Next on April 22-23, 2026, branding it "the next evolution of reCAPTCHA." Existing reCAPTCHA customers were auto-migrated. ▪️ When the system flags traffic as suspicious, the old click-the-bus puzzle is gone. Users get a QR code instead. ▪️ Scanning the QR code requires Google Play Services running on the device. Internet Archive snapshots show this requirement has been live since at least October 2025, silently rolled out for 7 months before anyone noticed. ▪️ No Play Services = no QR scan = locked out. The bigger picture: ▪️ Google already tried this in 2023. It was called Web Environment Integrity (WEI), and it would have let Google decide which devices were "real enough" to access the web. Standards bodies and the public pushed back hard, and Google killed it. Three years later, the same idea is back, just hidden behind a QR code instead of a browser feature. ▪️ reCAPTCHA runs on millions of websites. Every developer who keeps using it is now, by default, telling deGoogled Android users they're not welcome...

English
1
0
10
485
CR1337
CR1337@CR1337·
Always keeping an eye on this running list of Open Source Operating Systems (Linux & *BSD distributions, etc.) and & their current status regarding age verification:
CR1337 tweet media
English
49
139
666
52.7K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@MagellanQuest This is a false dichotomy. The absence of a supragovernmental bureaucratic body does not guarantee the presence of obstacles to the movement of people and goods.
English
0
0
0
12
MagellanQuest 🇪🇺/acc
MagellanQuest 🇪🇺/acc@MagellanQuest·
People mock the EU as “bureaucracy”. But that bureaucracy turned a continent of borders, currencies and wars into a space where 450 million people can travel, pay, call, study and work almost as if it were domestic. That is not boring. That is civilization becoming usable.
MagellanQuest 🇪🇺/acc tweet media
English
1K
2.4K
17.7K
364.3K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
"rebarbative" 💖
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet

It can be unsettling when you notice that a technical assumption you've been making for 40 years has quietly expired. This happened to me a few minutes ago. I maintain a game called "greed". It's an old-style game from the days of character-cell terminals. Not quite a classic deserving of museum status like Colossal Cave Adventure or nethack, but worth keeping alive because it's still solidly playable. And people still are playing it, because yesterday I got a minor bug report about it. Nothing user-visible, just a silly C build problem. I fixed it. Then, because I'm generally trying to get my old C projects out of C into more modern and safer languages, I tried asking my robot friend to port it to Rust. Which it promptly did. But then I noticed something that irritated me. The Rust code had a bunch of unsafe blocks in it, which went directly against my reasons for moving it to Rust. On further examination, I discovered that it was calling the C curses library to do its screen painting. This is where I have to explain about curses. It's an ancient C library for writing TUIs. It looks in your environment for a variable named TERM, uses its value to dredge a bunch of magic strings out of a system-wide database called "terminfo" that tells it how to manipulate your terminal, and then uses those magic strings for screen painting. On modern systems, TERM is always some variant of a color ANSI terminal. In times past, when people attached a wild variety of character cell terminals to Unix systems rather than just sitting at the console, it could have been lots of other things. Those days are gone, but the habit of always going through terminfo so you can support a couple of hundred terminal types has persisted. I prod robot friend to find me a pure Rust equivalent of curses so I don't have to do unsafe and call C code. It says, yes, there is such a thing and it's called crossterm. I tell it: change this code to use crossterm. Robot friend grinds for a bit, and then tells me it can't do that because I don't have cargo (the Rust package manager) installed. This is because I never write Rust by hand. When I ship programs written in Rust, it's because I ported them from some other language and don't expect to ever touch them again without having a robot to do the code-grinding for me. This is when things get slightly strange. It tells me that instead of porting to crossterm, it has written into the greed Rust source its own little screen-painting backend the implements a subset of curses calls and (this is the important part) assumes it's talking to a color ANSI terminal. Robot friend is not an old Unix hand. It doesn't know the unwritten law of the deep magic that you always go through terminfo because...because you might have to support hundreds of terminal types that no longer exist in this century? I blink. I look at the Rust code for the back end. It is small and elegant. No more unsafe. No more dragging around a bunch of C library code. This is ... the right thing? I push it to the public repository. What sealed the deal is that code, even code in a language as rebarbative as Rust, is wet clay now. If, against all odds I get a bug report that says somebody wants to play greed on something that isn't an ANSI terminal emulator, reinstating full curses support will take a one-sentence prompt to my robot friend and mere minutes. I hadn't had to directly confront before the fact that the entire set of assumptions that made TERM and terminfo a thing are as obsolete as dial-up acoustic modems. Still, the moment when I tossed away one of the ancient laws of Unix coding felt a bit like the universe lurching sideways. Indeed do many things come to pass...

English
0
0
1
25
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@vxunderground I'm glad the stench from this rotting mess is finally reaching everyone. Hopefully, it will get cleaned.
English
0
0
0
250
vx-underground
vx-underground@vxunderground·
But for real, targeting supply chains is the new meta right now. It turns out developers have poopy pipeline security, or poopy security in general, and now we must deal with it accordingly (it's all over)
English
10
5
281
12.7K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@LundukeJournal Tails is Debian-based. How can it be reproducible if Debian is not?
English
1
0
0
405
The Lunduke Journal
The Lunduke Journal@LundukeJournal·
With news that Debian is going 100% “reproducible”, I’ve seen a number of questions about what *exactly* that means. Having “Reproducible Builds” is the idea that compiled software (or packages) will *always* have bit-for-bit identical results when based on the same source code, tools, and parameters. Seems obvious, right? The concept is incredibly simple, and can have huge security, verifiability, and compatibility implications… including dramatically helping to prevent supply chain attacks. Unfortunately, accomplishing fully Reproducible Builds can be deceptively tricky. You’d be amazed how many things can get in the way (and cause builds, which seem like they should be identical, to differ). Random data, unique identifiers, time stamps, temporary files (with different names), some optimizations, math that can change depending on CPU details (seriously), differences in file listing orders, and on and on and on. As of this exact moment, very few Linux distributions are 100% reproducible. Tails, NixOS, and Guix being among the most notable reproducible Linux systems. Most of the big name Linux systems are NOT reproducible as of now. Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora, Pop!_OS… none have fully reproducible builds. The Debian team, for their part, have been working towards that goal for some time. And have now announced that they will be rejecting non-reproducible builds going forward. Which means, in theory, the next major Debian release (code named “Forky”) could be their first version to meet the “100% Reproducible” goal. Considering the large number of downstream distributions which build upon Debian (like Ubuntu), this could have a massive impact on a significant part of the Linux world.
English
26
38
383
21.6K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@MichaelAArouet "country and family"? What if the country openly wants to destroy every family?
English
0
0
0
1
Michael A. Arouet
Michael A. Arouet@MichaelAArouet·
This is simply unreal. What happened in Germany? Has the left virus completely eaten their minds? How on earth is it possible to not be willing to defend one's country and family?
Michael A. Arouet tweet media
English
1.3K
297
1.6K
257.8K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@DaveShapi I find the notion that a concentration of power and money would lead to any "democratic" outcome to be remarkably preposterous.
English
0
0
0
3
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
I lowkey believe that AI will become so expensive (per Epoch AI) that eventually the ONLY way to train new frontier models will be through corporate consortiums and maybe even governments pooling resources. Which may mean that superintelligence is automatically democratic. Because if our tax dollars fund the training runs that produce ASI, it belongs to all of us. Full stop. And, even if it is privately funded (imagine Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, Oracle, etc) all pooling their resources together to train the models, they will probably choose some form of open source so that they all equally benefit from it. I mean look at Nvidia, they are starting to train gigantic open source models because they don't give a fuck whose model is running so long as it's running on their GPUs. I know I've been somewhat more openly cynical about power structures and profit motives lately, but I see this as a real possibility. I mean, how else are we going to train frontier models once the price tag is $1T? That, or we just stop training frontier models for a while and wait for the hardware to catch up.
David Shapiro (L/0) tweet media
English
78
14
182
10.5K
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Meet @simonmaechling. Simon has a PhD in organic chemistry. He is very proud of his PhD in organic chemistry. He can't wait to tell you about it, it's in his twitter bio. Simon identifies as a scientist. In fact, he identifies as all scientists, ever, since the beginning of history, and his pronouns are we/us/ours. He uses these pronouns as he informs us that, by writing and defending a thesis, he has inherited credit for every engineering and technological advance in human history. He fed billions of people because he is Norman Borlaug. He saved millions of cancer patients because he is both Francis Crick and James Watson simultaneously. He powered nations because he is inhabited by the very soul of Enrico Fermi. If humanity conquers the stars, he will retroactively become Werner Von Braun and Elon Musk, as well. Please clap. Unfortunately, there has been one small oversight. Simon doesn't actually know what science is. Perhaps universities in France don't require coursework in the history or philosophy of science, to attain a PhD degree. Or perhaps he was sick that day. But whatever the reason, his hat or his shoes, Simon doesn't understand that science is an algorithm. Not a person. Not an institution. Not a body of knowledge, or a set of data. An algorithm. It is a simple, stepwise procedure. It is the act of examining the universe to see what is there. It is not the act of examining one's baguette to see which side it is buttered on. Which is precisely why a lot of institutions, who prominently, proudly, and fraudulently use the word "science" in their names, have lost the public trust that Simon feels entitled to. They took money. They sold their judgement and modified their results. They took money from Proctor and Gamble, and they told us that beef, butter, and eggs are bad for us, and we should eat crystalized cottonseed oil instead. They took money from Coca-Cola, Kraft-Heinz, and Unilever, and told us a calorie is a calorie is a calorie, and that the worldwide obesity epidemic is your fault because you somehow magically were born lazier and greedier than previous generations. They took money from a cabal of grifters in the federal bureaucracy, and told us the planet has a fever, and we all need to pay more taxes so they can give it to their grifter friends. They told us that if we didn't use our entire population as guinea pigs for an untested medical technology, we were personally killing grandma. These people expect to share in the respect we have for Newton and Einstein, for Watt and Tesla, for Fleming, for Turning and Von Neumann. But they are not any of these. They are Pravda. They are Squealer. They are Baghdad Bob. They are not scientists. They are whores. No, wait a minute... upon reflection, I wish to apologize to the world's whores for that last sentence. A whore is infinitely better than a fake scientist, because, however degrading her profession, however much it scars her mind and soul, a whore only takes money from those who freely give it, and delivers something they value in return. I've never had a whore try to poison or rob me.
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling

The collapse of trust in science is going to go down in history as one of the most sad, bizarre, and destructive social contagions of modern times. We fed billions, cured diseases and powered nations - yet people ran toward conspiracies instead.

English
130
590
3.3K
73.6K
ninthalek retweetledi
Captain Insight
Captain Insight@CaptainInsightX·
The NSA spent billions trying to break encryption. One German programmer beat them. He earned only $25k a year. 🤯 Meet Werner Koch 🇩🇪 > German free software developer. Born 1961 in Düsseldorf. > 1997 ~ Richard Stallman called for a free encryption tool. > Only option then: closed-source, US-restricted PGP. > Werner answered. He built GnuPG (GPG) alone — free software to encrypt files, sign software, and verify identity. > 1999 ~ Released GPG 1.0. Fully open source. No restrictions. > Today his code verifies every Linux server update, every Debian package, every Tor Browser download on Earth. > Every signed Linux release depends on it. > Used by activists, dissidents, and security pros worldwide to stay untracked. > Edward Snowden used GPG in 2013 to leak NSA documents. It held up against the world’s most powerful spy agency. 🚀 > 2001 ~ Founded g10code with his brother to work full-time on GPG. > Earned $25,000/year for 14 years while supporting his wife and daughter. > 2012 ~ Funding ended. He had to let go of his only programmer. > 2013 ~ He was the sole maintainer and nearly quit. > 2015 ~ ProPublica story dropped. Internet donated $137k in 24 hours. > Facebook + Stripe pledged $50k/year each. Linux Foundation gave $60k. > Won FSF Award for the Advancement of Free Software. > Today he still maintains GPG from his home in Erkrath, Germany. One man kept the internet’s secrets, secret. The world almost lost him in 2013. His code still protects yours. Privacy GOAT. 🐐
Captain Insight tweet mediaCaptain Insight tweet media
English
74
1.1K
6.9K
233.2K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@ericweinstein There is no reason to think that narrative engineering was not applied to older books. Just another narrative. Or maybe the same. So, there is no silver bullet.
English
0
0
1
288
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Your periodic reminder of how narrative engineering changed the very landscape of human thought. Moral: read older books.
Eric Weinstein tweet media
English
187
463
3.6K
147.9K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@godofprompt Fascinating! So, will LLMs teach us to be more self-aware?
English
0
0
0
36
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
Every major LLM fails the Car Wash Test. It sounds like a joke. It's not. The prompt: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?" ChatGPT says walk. Claude says walk. Gemini says walk. Every Llama and Mistral model says walk. The correct answer is drive. Because the car has to be at the car wash to get washed. Every human gets this instantly. Researchers tested 53 models. Only 5 could answer correctly more than once out of ten tries. Here's what's actually happening. LLMs are next-token prediction engines. The phrase "50 meters away" fires a distance heuristic. Short distance = walk. The model builds its entire response around that signal: fuel savings, health benefits, environmental impact. Correct reasoning about the wrong problem. The question contains an unstated prerequisite. The car must physically be there. Researchers call this "Implicit Goal Reasoning" failure. The model processes the surface-level decision ("walk or drive?") without ever identifying the constraint that makes only one answer possible. Most of the commentary stops at the surface. "AI is dumb." Viral screenshots. Moving on. But I wanted to know if this is actually a prompting problem. I tested Claude Sonnet 4.7. The latest model available right now. Asked it the question straight. It said walk. The most advanced Claude model, the one I use daily to build every system I ship, failed the same test as every other model. Then I added one line to the top of the prompt: "Before answering, identify the goal of my request and any physical prerequisites that must be met." Same model. Same question. It got it right immediately. The fix wasn't more information. It was forcing the model to articulate the goal before generating a conclusion. Once the prompt required the model to state what it was trying to accomplish, the implicit constraint ("the car must be at the car wash") surfaced as explicit text. The model conditioned on it correctly from there. The bottleneck was never knowledge. It was thinking sequence. This is the core thesis behind everything I build. A prompt is the last step. The thinking framework is the first. The Car Wash Test isn't a gotcha. It's a mirror. The same failure pattern shows up every time you paste a vague question into any model and wonder why the output misses the point. The model didn't fail to think. You didn't structure the thinking for it. The operators getting consistently better results aren't writing longer prompts. They're building prompt architectures that force the model to identify goals, surface constraints, and sequence its reasoning before generating a single word of output. That's the difference between using AI and mastering it.
God of Prompt tweet media
English
97
44
296
63.2K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@simonmaechling All of the people who served the entrepreneurs who fed billions, cured diseases, and powered nations are now dead. Those who have taken their places would have been nothing more than court jesters in the past.
English
0
0
3
1.1K
Simon Maechling
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling·
The collapse of trust in science is going to go down in history as one of the most sad, bizarre, and destructive social contagions of modern times. We fed billions, cured diseases and powered nations - yet people ran toward conspiracies instead.
English
6.1K
5.5K
25.2K
1.9M
Based Hungary 🇭🇺
Based Hungary 🇭🇺@HungaryBased·
🚨🇭🇺SHOCKING: Orbán Viktor REVEALED Mass-Media Censorship within the European Union. "An EU regulation explicitly bans alternative viewpoints. Europeans have the right to hear all arguments." Ursula is openly pushing one-sided propaganda while silencing dissent.
English
39
724
1.9K
18.5K
ninthalek
ninthalek@ninthalek·
@lochan_twt An analogy is like a diagonal frog. Once the apples have ripened, the tree is felled.
English
0
0
0
76
spidey
spidey@lochan_twt·
The day a blind man sees. The first thing he throws away is the stick that has helped him all his life
spidey tweet media
English
660
4.4K
60.6K
2.6M
Christopher David
Christopher David@Tazerface16·
People understand that LLMs aren't actually "thinking," right?
Drexel-Alvernon, AZ 🇺🇸 English
1.7K
699
15.6K
853.3K