Nivexity

@Teo_uptotheview The goal is to overtake with features that surpass or are equal to current Microsoft office. Besides plugins to resolve issues, there's an entire community working on this endeavor. How long ago was your university project? LibreOffice has come a long way in under a few years.

@nivexity @80sGeek @IntCyberDigest Yeah? Try to write 20 pages of formulas, it will take you 10hours to write them 1 by 1. That what happen to me from my university project.

❗️🇫🇷 Following the French government's ban on Windows and its replacement with Linux, French activists are now saying goodbye to Windows 10 and actively encouraging people to embrace freedom and use Linux instead of paying for an upgrade to Windows 11, citing privacy concerns.

@80sGeek @IntCyberDigest It's great, I know of some bugs that annoyed me in the past, maybe you're unaware but it's always updating and is supported by the biggest open-office community. I'd presume you're unaware because blanket dismissal is usually from those who are ignorant.

@IntCyberDigest The dumbest shit ever. Libre office is a dumpster fire

@redpillb0t Law is not for justice, nor is it mob-rule that guides it. Never get your knowledge from a movie. Law is simply whatever you have allowed the government to enforce violence against, as law is a process of escalation.

One of the greatest lectures ever.

@Sirikamiloli If the description doesn't hinder any arguments you make, then it should not necessarily matter. Furthermore, a government does not have a monopoly on terminology, judicial systems are often not the same across states, and federal laws don't always protect all aspects of content

>uses ".com" websites to say something is illegal istead of ".gov"

@twtayaan Indian bait account posting slop while complaining about slop from AI, yet at least AI produces far more than just generative content for the masses.

@chai_chuu92094 @_Vermin_ @Gr33ngamestone A double-down on a bigoted position doesn't revoke the title. You find some attractions gross, then feel as though you need to emphasize to others of your intolerance toward it. Just don't engage with it, not everyone wishes the same outcome as you.

@_Vermin_ @Gr33ngamestone @teabreakfasts Im talkin ab the ones who go over the top with the curves especially the tits like damn even the nipples are the size and shape of a whole bowl. Some sort of fetish i believe, gross.Just go outside and meet acual women

@LostVagabon Calling someone a pedophile doesn't magically imbue them with immorality, a moralist like you who'd likely be against other moralists who'd call yourself such words, shouldn't then cast the same words toward others. Your behavior is no different to those you despise, pathetic.

@LostVagabon What will happen is that you'll quickly realize that there's many, including various that emphasize nuance of the term, then learn that it's based on perception, aka bodytype. I asked you to provide one you're using so that you'd understand this, beyond your personal intuitions.

I still remember how people strongly denied Pomni being a loli.

@LostVagabon Care to show me what definition you're using?

@nivexity Loli isn’t a body type pedo boi. Loli by their very definition are children, minors. That’s why if you. Search the word you don’t find adult woman

@LostVagabon I didn't deny lolis can also be children, I would even argue lolis often are, the problem is when you presume a character with the bodytype that of a loli is suddenly "not a loli" actually. I said the term is broad, and it is. I'm not the one failing to understand language here.

@nivexity You’re a whole pedo. No wonder you can’t accept the definition of loli and want to change it

@LostVagabon Language is circular, lookup lexical circularity, point is, words will always refer back to observation. Words rely on categories but categories don't exist outside of our minds. This is why bodytype>author-declarations. Visual perception reigns over declaration of adult or age.

@nivexity That’s literally how language works. Words have definitions and those definitions aren’t flexible.

@LostVagabon Not how language works, descriptions inevitably become circular unless they refer to observation. Fictional characters don't possess an age unless dictated by an author, so it's fundamentally predicated on an observation of patterns. Loli can be X years but we define it by look.

@nivexity The definition is literally child.

@ErEr48345451 If you want consistency, it's rational to point out aspects of inconsistency, even for lolicons. Being pro-loli is necessarily a pro-fiction stance, but pro-fiction itself is ultimately a pro-para position. An attraction, explored through the use of fiction, is as ok as loli is.

@nivexity I didn’t want call lolicons a moralfags for that

@ErEr48345451 I think moralists who attack fiction are an issue regardless of their position on loli, and as I mentioned above, the debate itself is mostly predicated on a disgust-based rhetoric, which even lolicons share when it's fiction they're disgusted by. Moralfags are on all sides.

@nivexity @TheFinalMasterM What about 4th option? We needs act like Mexican cartels when we can well it’s hard to do that but if we succeed it’s good for us

@LostVagabon @KaelHyun There's plenty of broad statements about what a loli is, but to be clear, what it is tends to conform to a set of bodytypes, Pomni happens to fit within the spectrum. You could say Pomni has also a child-like aesthetic/bodytpe, but loli seems more preferable or makes more sense.

@KaelHyun A loli by it’s very definition is a child

@TatsumakiFever Furthermore, the sleazebag decides to further misinterpret the post by quoting himself instead of accept he made a false conclusion. He doesn't understand that anti-philosophy exists among lolicons, and is no different, I call them antis with exceptions. x.com/TheFinalMaster…

@TatsumakiFever Your image agrees with me, and they read my post incorrectly, that's on them. There's an inconsistently among usually twitter lolicons who hold an anti-philosophy themselves, thus there are moralfags on both sides, a 4th option. You don't seem like the type who likes to read.

@mirthworld Actually make an argument instead of make yourself look worse. Moral statements are irrelevant, provide an argument, if you had power, you'd likely impose your moral values and become a tyrant, thus you're not the anti-authoritarian that you proclaim.

@monanaemt @realNikandros You dont have to justify how evil you are its pretty obvious.

When Chibireviews shoots loads to cartoons of children it's "just a fantasy" and no indicator of him being a threat to real children. When someone posts an AI image of them digging up his brother's corpse and turning him into a chair, that's a dangerous person trying to kill him and he calls the police.

@TheFinalMasterM I knew you'd block me, you're probably the purest example of ineptitude on twitter, yet you go around proclaiming everyone else is inept. All you do is regurgitate bad arguments online, you've been doing it for years, failing to progress and learn anything new, you're a joke.

@TheFinalMasterM Read my comment, I didn't say L=C, I said a drawing of an imaginative C is equivalent to that of an L, as in, two drawings are of equal standing, they're both fiction. "Imaginative" is to emphasize pure fiction, not traced. The point is that moral-faggotry exists on both sides.