内森

295 posts

内森 banner
内森

内森

@njtn__

141

Scotland, United Kingdom Katılım Aralık 2010
543 Takip Edilen371 Takipçiler
内森
内森@njtn__·
@Annkies1 @ACSPARTAN1 Completely agree, this is genuinely frightening. People have a basic right to know if a convicted sex offender is living right next door, especially if they have kids. Immediate neighbours shouldn’t be kept in the dark.
English
0
0
1
38
AC_SPARTAN
AC_SPARTAN@ACSPARTAN1·
I was going to share today’s sex offenders but don’t have time to write up the hundreds of names places and crimes and by the time I finish there will be another 300 to add to it. Jesus Christ the uk is horrific
English
29
189
789
14.2K
内森
内森@njtn__·
@grok The person in the video is on a pole next to traffic lights, working on a black boxy device with cables and what looks like a rectangular antenna/array on top. Please describe exactly what you see step-by-step in the video, identify what the equipment actually is (traffic camera, ANPR, ULEZ enforcement, etc.), and explain the "phased array" claims being made. Is this standard traffic enforcement gear or something more exotic? Give a clear, evidence-based breakdown — no conspiracy spin, just technical facts."
English
1
0
2
872
Matthardybladerunner
Matthardybladerunner@Matthardy_BR·
Phased array is an illegal fitting on our streets, it’s been admitted by the security services there are 10700 units in London alone ☠️☠️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 this lad is legally defending himself 💪💪
English
74
460
1.8K
127.6K
内森
内森@njtn__·
You know what man? I'll do you the favour and you can make your own judgement. #Photographic_evidence" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_M… includes Japanese, Chinese, and Western sources en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_M… britannica.com/event/Nanjing-… history.com/topics/asian-h… Excavated mass graves in Nanjing 19371213.com.cn They have a large collection of original Japanese soldier photos (many taken by the soldiers themselves) and scanned diaries. Azuma Shiro’s Diary – One of the most famous. He was a soldier who documented atrocities in Nanjing. scmp.com/article/272498… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiro_Azu… Not that you will, but you should also watch the tv show "反人类暴行" news.cgtn.com/news/2025-12-1… youtube.com/watch?v=sx7ICY… Eyewitness & Foreign Reports: divinity-adhoc.library.yale.edu/nanking/index.… I fret to tell you man, my own government doesn't even teach this! There's more reason to believe such acts when they're so well documented instead of the "whataboutisms". Whether you believe it or not is up to you.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
0
17
SN
SN@kfrQmJAU2339216·
@njtn__ @not_free08 だからそれがあなた方の政府が垂れ流したデマやって言うてる その数十万人が虐殺された時の死体は?
日本語
1
0
1
17
JUNLIANG JIANG姜俊良
真实历史视频作证:🇨🇳南京大屠杀是一场骗局。一位居住在南京的老妇人作证说:“日军和国民党军队都没有袭击或抢劫平民。只有共产党军队屡次抢劫,犯下无数暴行。” 🇯🇵日本占领南京两个月后,南京人口增长到25万。日本人给南京市民发放平民身份证明,并保护他们 真正犯下大规模屠杀罪行的,是迄今为止杀害了超过八千万人民的中国共产党人 视频中的历史让我看清了真相,我不再相信中共的谎言,日本军人纪律严明,善良友好。我发自内心的喜爱他们
中文
240
1.3K
2.8K
78.4K
内森
内森@njtn__·
@necrozu Yeah, Sanae Takaichi visiting a grave for Japanese war dead in Malaysia while talking about “survival-threatening situation” regarding Taiwan is peak mixed messaging and I don't think it'll bode well in their actions to continue to strain relations with China
English
1
0
1
65
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ The thing with Japan is that it didn't restructure its party. It is still the same party; the United States pardoned Japanese war criminals in exchange for biological warfare data from Unit 731 & so Japan could be a buffer state in the Cold War. Shinzo Abe btw 👇 rip bozo
燃屁西施 tweet media
English
2
0
1
61
LittlePinkie
LittlePinkie@Allya10X·
Germany paid because it lost and because it admitted guilt. Britain did neither. That's not selective outrage — that's selective amnesia. And every empire excuse? Just a way of saying 'we are bankrupt.' Your laughing emojis? Discomfort. Insecurity. Unease. Admitting DEFEAT.
English
1
1
19
454
内森
内森@njtn__·
Britain has also returned or loaned many items over the years and has issued formal apologies and expressions of regret on multiple occasions (including for aspects of colonial history). Most should be returned. That said, expecting full-scale restitution of tens of thousands of objects taken 150–180 years ago is still unrealistic. It would create chaos for museums worldwide.
English
1
0
1
34
内森
内森@njtn__·
I’ll be honest: growing up in the West, our education heavily focused on Pearl Harbor and Japanese atrocities against Allied forces, but I barely heard anything about the Nanjing Massacre or Unit 731 until much later. It was only after my girlfriend《反人类暴行》and we stayed up all night to finish it. That really dug deeper. Then reading about the scale of what happened was abhorrent...the brutality, the denial, and especially the modern apologists and whitewashing I’ve seen online...ESPECIALLY TODAY with the Tokyo Trial anniversary. I’m still not fully clear on the exact connection between Nobusuke Kishi and Shinzo Abe’s views, but the whole “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere” ideology — Japan positioning itself as the liberator while committing horrific crimes — was genuinely sickening.
English
1
0
1
24
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ If you teach your children to do murder and genocide, what will they teach their children? Shinzo Abe, the grandson of Nobusuke Kishi (a Class-A war criminal who remained in power until his death), is another example. I encourage you to look at history as falling dominoes
English
1
0
2
41
内森
内森@njtn__·
Very perceptive and I totally agree! The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. it’s a pattern that was handed down, normalised, and somewhat indoctrinated The difference now is presentation. The same instincts that drove violence and exploitation a century ago don’t disappear, they get absorbed into institutions. Instead of a sword, it’s policy.
English
0
0
1
17
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X I think it is more to do with how, even though it was over a century ago, the pattern of violence and suffering didn't end. Oftentimes, the same people who committed violence 100 years ago are the parents of those who did so again decades later. Lord Elgin, for example
English
2
0
3
45
内森
内森@njtn__·
Thank you for mentioning Langdon Warner and the Mogao Caves — I wasn’t very familiar with that story and I’ll definitely look it up. I appreciate you sharing it. My first comment was genuinely meant as empathy for what the Chinese people went through. I’m sorry the conversation turned into an emotional back-and-forth. That wasn’t my goal. I’m happy to keep learning about this history and inform myself more!
English
1
0
1
25
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ When she talks about the silver, she is talking about millions of silver taels (and artifacts) stolen from China by Japan and the UK during genocide. You should read about the story of Langdon Warner who looted the Mogao Caves
English
1
0
2
48
内森
内森@njtn__·
I appreciate you saying that, and I’m sorry for how this turned out. You’re right — the Century of Humiliation was incredibly painful for the Chinese people, and that pain is real and deserves to be acknowledged. I started this conversation with solidarity on remembering history honestly, but it unfortunately spiraled into an emotional tit-for-tat with the other person, and that clouded the point I was originally trying to make. On the looted artifacts: I don’t think returning clear cases of plunder is inherently harmful. Many people (including me) support greater transparency and reasonable repatriation where it makes sense. My disagreement was mainly with turning this into broad, open-ended reparations demands 180+ years later, not with acknowledging the original wrongs.
English
1
0
1
28
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X I appreciate if you're coming from a place of genuine curiosity, but you truly need to understand how painful the Century of Humiliation was for Chinese people. This isn't about punishing normal people, but what is the harm in returning looted artifacts?
English
2
0
2
56
内森
内森@njtn__·
No, I wouldn’t cheer for Britain being invaded, looted, and humiliated today — and I don’t cheer for what happened to China in the 19th century either. But here’s the key difference you keep dodging: If someone did that to Britain today, we would call it a war crime and demand justice under modern international law. What happened in the 1800s was conducted under the rules of that era — brutal conquest was how empires operated (including China’s own history of expansion). Applying 2026 moral and legal standards to 1840s wars is selective and unrealistic. You’re not asking for remembrance. You’re asking for a modern financial ledger and restitution for events from 180 years ago. That’s not how it works. Germany’s reparations were exceptional because of the Holocaust’s scale and the immediate post-war occupation. The Opium Wars are not the same.
English
0
0
0
23
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X ? ? ? 如果有一天别人也这样对待英国,打进来,烧首都,抢国宝,逼你吸毒,你也不许要赔偿,因为赢家通吃,输家闭嘴。你希望这条规矩变成普世法则吗?你确定你们永远会是赢的那一方吗? 我们在谈的是具体的一笔账,你们大英博物馆里收门票展览的每一件中国文物,都是这笔账上的一个数字
中文
1
0
1
85
内森
内森@njtn__·
I was acknowledging that Britain won those wars (historical fact), while also saying the human suffering caused was real and should be remembered honestly. I have no problem with Chinese people remembering the Century of Humiliation — that pain is valid. What I pushed back against was the idea of demanding full reparations and restitution from modern Britain 180+ years later. Even the Chinese government itself doesn’t officially pursue that. That’s where I think it crosses from remembrance into unrealistic grievance politics. I support remembering history clearly and standing in solidarity with the victims of past atrocities. I just don’t believe the solution is making today’s people pay for the actions of their distant ancestors.
内森 tweet media
English
1
0
0
35
内森
内森@njtn__·
Germany paid reparations for the Holocaust because it was an unprecedented, industrialized genocide that happened in living memory. Many survivors were still alive, the country was totally defeated and occupied, and the new German state formally accepted responsibility as part of rebuilding after the war. Britain wasn’t defeated — it won those conflicts. I’m not saying history should be ignored. The suffering was real and should be remembered. But turning every old imperial wrong into modern financial demands isn’t practical or fair.
English
1
0
1
32
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X 现代西德没有参与大屠杀,但仍然支付了赔偿,因为德国国家作为持续的法律实体对其前身的行为负有责任。英国是同一类型的持续法律实体,至今仍持有掠夺所得。你认为德国的赔偿是'敲诈勒索'吗?如果不是,请解释这两种情况的区别
中文
1
0
2
46
内森
内森@njtn__·
@necrozu @Allya10X The British Museum does not hide or whitewash the burning of the Old Summer Palace. Their current labels and online descriptions for objects from Yuanmingyuan explicitly mention that they were taken during the looting and burning by Anglo-French forces in 1860.
English
1
0
0
49
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X But Britain is not transparent about this and that's the point. Have you been to the British Museum? At the plaque for the burning of the Old Summer Palace, it implies that it was rescued from a fire but does not disclose that it was the British that started the fire
English
1
0
2
55
内森
内森@njtn__·
My point is simple. The original post was demanding Britain pay full reparations for wars China lost 180+ years ago. That’s the core issue. I acknowledged the atrocities. I said they should be remembered honestly. But turning that into “you owe us money now” is where I disagree. You can’t lose a war, then centuries later demand the winners’ descendants pay up.
English
1
0
0
27
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X Then what is your point? If your point isn't that everyone has equal stains, you're not articulating that well at all. Define 'selective outrage', because your arguments are pretty inconsistent so far
English
1
0
2
31
内森
内森@njtn__·
Sure, let’s be consistent. If we’re applying modern ethics to historical conquests, then yes — many museum pieces were looted. Britain (and others) should be more transparent about provenance and consider returning clear-cut cases where it makes sense. But here’s the thing: almost every major civilization has done this. Chinese imperial dynasties looted artifacts from conquered regions too.
English
1
0
0
42
燃屁西施
燃屁西施@necrozu·
@njtn__ @Allya10X 你能解释一下为什么持有可识别的被盗物品在其他任何语境下都被称为盗窃,但当国家博物馆这样做时却变成了'文化遗产保护'吗?
中文
2
0
2
59
内森
内森@njtn__·
I wasn’t congratulating Britain, I was stating a historical fact: they won the Opium Wars. You turned that into emotional grandstanding. Some artifacts and reparations have been returned over the years, and Britain has expressed regret in various forms. But demanding full-scale reparations 180 years later is unrealistic. The real irony? An account based in the United States — a country literally built on conquest, displacement of Native Americans, and its own imperial history — lecturing Britain about stolen goods and demanding restitution. Pot, meet kettle. No one denies the suffering caused. But this selective outrage from America is something else.
English
2
0
0
108
LittlePinkie
LittlePinkie@Allya10X·
@njtn__ You won the Opium Wars. Congrats. You poisoned a nation, looted its art, and called it victory. Embarrassing. Now you're a third-rate island BEGGING for trade deals with the country you once bullied. That's KARMA. Enjoy your museum of stolen goods. 🤡
English
1
0
2
92