nm

28 posts

nm

nm

@nmdb888

Katılım Mart 2012
1K Takip Edilen28 Takipçiler
Robby
Robby@OutlawOmega·
Dismal Foreign policy. Could have handled in 1939 and not wait until we get attacked December of 41. And now we can use your logic. 9/11 was a civilian Target and Pearl harbor was a military target. Clearly 9/11 was much worse and with more casualties. I guess you're saying that attack justifies going to war then right?
English
2
0
0
19
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@OutlawOmega @TylerDH1 @Arrogance_0024 The attack on Pearl Harbor was immediately followed by Germany declaring war on the US. How do you blame Democrats for that?
English
1
0
0
15
Robby
Robby@OutlawOmega·
@nmdb888 @TylerDH1 @Arrogance_0024 I didn't blame them, but they contributed to pass the resolution to invade. How do you not address ALL the other Wars addressed? All under Democrat rule.
English
2
0
0
19
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@OutlawOmega @TylerDH1 @Arrogance_0024 You wrote “overwhelmingly voting 99.8% YES to go into Iraq not once, but twice”. Total nonsense, almost zero Republicans voted against either Iraq War while a lot of Democrats voted against it.
English
0
0
0
15
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@OutlawOmega @TylerDH1 @Arrogance_0024 How do you blame Democrats for Iraq? 133 members of the U.S. House (126 Democrats, 6 Republicans, 1 Independent) and 23 Senators (22 Democrats and 1 Independent ) voted against the Iraq War authorization (AUMF).
English
1
0
0
12
Robby
Robby@OutlawOmega·
@TylerDH1 @Arrogance_0024 Never said they didn't. Just providing factual common denominators and all you got is opinions. Mmk.
English
2
0
0
15
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@OutlawOmega @TylerDH1 @Arrogance_0024 In October 2002, 133 members of the U.S. House (126 Democrats, 6 Republicans, 1 Independent) and 23 Senators (22 Democrats and 1 Independent ) voted against the Iraq War authorization (AUMF). Nice try!
English
0
0
1
13
Robby
Robby@OutlawOmega·
So you want to use the "unprovoked" defense for World War II, but 9/11 doesn't count for Iraq and Afghanistan? WWI and WWII resulted in Weak Foreign Policy. All of the Wars were including the years of planning 9/11 under the Clinton administration. I'm no Bush fan either, he definitely screwed the pooch on a lot of things, but 9/11 was a CIVILIAN target and emotions were very high. One reason again, 99.8% Democrats voted YES regardless of who was POTUS. They are always on board for War. The facts are the facts so don't come with some lame ass BS to justify the long history of Democratic Wars.
English
2
0
0
47
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@johnkonrad @EdPilon4 So what countries do you actually like besides the US and Israel?
English
0
0
1
29
Ed Pilon
Ed Pilon@EdPilon4·
This is true for Canada as well.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

NATO is in far bigger danger than anyone realizes. And the reason has nothing to do with defense budgets. The real danger is psychological. It’s cultural. Europeans didn’t just free-ride on American security for 80 years. They built an entire identity around the idea that they evolved past the Americans protecting them. That identity is now the single biggest obstacle to Western survival. And the darkest irony is: we helped build it. After World War II, Europe wasn’t just economically shattered. Its culture was in ruins. The cities, the universities, the concert halls, the museums. Rubble. The Marshall Plan rebuilt the economy. But culture wasn’t a priority. Not at first. Then the Iron Curtain dropped. And suddenly culture became a weapon. American diplomats, academics, artists & scholars flooded Western Europe. We funded their universities. Supported their orchestras. Rebuilt their museums. Promoted their intellectual life. Not because European culture needed saving for its own sake. Because Eastern Europeans were struggling for Maslow’s mist basic needs. We needed the view from the other side of that Wall to be intoxicating. So America built Western Europe into a showcase of self-actualization. Art. Philosophy. Cafe culture. Long vacations. Universities where people studied literature instead of surviving. We were manufacturing jealousy. And it worked. The Wall came down. But here’s what no one accounted for. When you give a society self-actualization on someone else’s tab long enough, they forget it was a gift. They start believing it was organically theirs. And when they look at the country that funded it all, a country busy building aircraft carriers and semiconductor fabs and shale fields instead of reaching the Maslow’s pinnacle. An overweight American in a ball cap who can’t tell Monet from Pissarro. Who eats fast food. Who drives a truck. Who builds strip malls instead of piazzas. And to a culture trained in aesthetics but stripped of strategic awareness, that American looks uncivilized. So the arrogance takes root. And once a culture decides another is beneath them, they stop listening. Americans say wars are sometimes necessary: crude. Oil is the backbone of prosperity: unsophisticated. Kids build companies in garages that reshape the planet: crass. Wall Street finances the global economy: vulgar. Europe has no world-class technology sector. No military capable of strong defense. No energy independence. No AI capacity. What Europe has is culture. The culture we paid for at the expense of us reaching Maslow’s pinnacle. For decades that was fine. We funded the museums, protected the sea lanes, and tolerated the sneering because the arrangement worked. Then Europeans stopped keeping the contempt private. They started saying it to our faces. In their media. In their parliaments. At every international forum. “Americans are stupid. Americans are violent. Americans are a threat to democracy.” We could have moved the Louvre to NY. We could have built a Venice here. We could have stolen your best artists, designers, philosophers and more… like your conquering armies did for centuries. Instead we funded them. And all we asked for in return was to let us visit. You don’t have the military to defend your borders. You don’t have the technology to compete. You don’t have the energy to heat your homes without begging dictators. What you have is an 80-year superiority complex FUNDED BY AMERICANS, protected by American soldiers, and built on the false belief that self-actualization is civilization. It isn’t. Civilization is the ability to sustain itself. By that measure, Europe isn’t a civilization at all. It’s a dependency with better wine. That’s not a threat. It’s a weather report. Build a Navy. Or don’t. But stop lecturing the people who made you “better than us” Our “crudeness” our “stunted liberal education” our “ugly strip malls” are because we sacrificed our culture to support yours.

English
2
0
29
1.4K
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@hakimdire @grok @DD_Geopolitics They aren’t able to export near as much oil due to the strait being closed. So they have a storage problem; too many barrels not on ships. If they kept producing more oil they would have no place to store the barrels until the strait opens again.
English
0
0
0
49
abdulhakim
abdulhakim@hakimdire·
@grok @DD_Geopolitics Why supply chain? It means supply chain for repair parts or critical components for operation ? If thats the case, does that have to come thru the strait only?
English
2
0
0
217
DD Geopolitics
DD Geopolitics@DD_Geopolitics·
🇸🇦🇺🇸 Sadara Chemical, a $20 billion joint venture between Saudi Aramco and US giant Dow Chemical, has shut down all production at its Jubail complex indefinitely, citing supply chain disruptions caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Sadara is one of the world's largest integrated petrochemical facilities, with an annual production capacity exceeding 3 million metric tonnes of chemicals and plastics. It produces ethylene, propylene, polyethylene and other key industrial chemicals used in everything from packaging to construction. The company says it cannot provide any estimate for when production will resume, stating the timeline is "contingent on domestic and international factors." The shutdown is expected to significantly impact its 2026 financial results. Iran had previously threatened the Jubail complex with missile strikes, so far it has not been hit. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has now done the damage without firing a single shot at it.
DD Geopolitics tweet media
English
8
552
1.6K
63.2K
Frank Luntz
Frank Luntz@FrankLuntz·
President Trump says the primary objective of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon has been achieved. He added that he's not concerned about the enriched uranium that Iran still possesses: “That’s so far underground, I don’t care about that.” reuters.com/world/middle-e…
English
356
61
332
525.2K
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@keenan_nora @TonyTrupp @FrankLuntz Multiple intelligence agencies stated at the time that the job wasn’t finished and his administration called that fake news.
English
1
0
2
48
keenz68
keenz68@keenan_nora·
@TonyTrupp @FrankLuntz You idiots do know that he listens to his Intel officers and military right? They didn't get it all so they went back to finish. Wtf is wrong with your cognitive thought function?
English
1
0
0
61
Censored Humans
Censored Humans@CensoredHumans·
Spanish PM Pedro Sanchez responds to Trump : "23 years ago, U.S govt dragged us into a war with Iraq, A war said to fight to eliminate Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons and bring democracy But NO nuclear weapon was found in Iraq" You can't fool us twice !! BRUTAL !!
English
599
12.1K
43.8K
1M
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@vSchuylenburch @decentralised82 @CensoredHumans @LavertonHenry Not even close. Obama did the Iran nuclear deal which Netanyahu was so angry about that he gave a speech to the US congress denouncing it. Bush I threatened to call in all loans on the Israelis if they didn’t stop building settlements in the West Bank.
English
1
0
0
36
van Schuylenburch 
van Schuylenburch @vSchuylenburch·
@decentralised82 @CensoredHumans @LavertonHenry All US presidents up to now have been "#AIPAC" presidents. Trump is slightly different, because we all know what kompromat Israel has on Trump. But Bush 1&2, Clinton, Obama, etcetera were all almost just as accommodating to Israel. (They were a little less obvious about it)
English
2
1
2
117
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@TheMiamiJacobo @saifedean What was the last war that the United States actually won? Asking for a friend …. And riding the coattails of the Soviets in WWII doesn’t count.
English
0
0
0
15
🌞🌴🐊 We Are Charlie.
🌞🌴🐊 We Are Charlie.@TheMiamiJacobo·
@saifedean So which country is actually winning? Whose entire Navy and Airforce has been obliterated? Whose entire military structure has been taken off the board? The drone guys or the airplane guys? Asking for a friend...
English
4
1
2
343
LeapingIntoHell
LeapingIntoHell@LeapingIntoHell·
@nmdb888 @Geiger_Capital I know what he’s saying but to come to this conclusion now shows how retarded and brain fried he is the USG has been lying about everything since day one and this boomer has been regurgitating their crap
English
1
0
0
53
nm
nm@nmdb888·
@LeapingIntoHell @Geiger_Capital You need some reading comprehension. He is stating that the US is downplaying the damage that Iran has done to them and also lying about having destroyed most of Iran’s missile capabilities. His take is anti-US propaganda.
English
1
0
4
64