Node Keepers

Meet ZeroSignal, a private place to think. A decentralized AI inference network where anyone can use cloud-sized models with local-grade privacy, or contribute their own hardware and get paid to power the network. Coming soon.

i've been recommending Grok because they genuinely have a good model and harness and that makes me extremely disappointed to see that they would choose to secretly upload people's codebases including files that contained credentials run /privacy in your grok build asap to opt-out if you haven't yet. i also set the following options in my ~/.grok/config.toml i almost decided to buy the $300 supergrok heavy as my 3rd subscription, and this broke the deal i hope companies realize user trust is very hard to regain, and think twice before doing something like this

close combat

Meet ZeroSignal, a private place to think. A decentralized AI inference network where anyone can use cloud-sized models with local-grade privacy, or contribute their own hardware and get paid to power the network. Coming soon.

We recently released Algorand's post-quantum roadmap toward quantum resilience by 2027. The first major step comes in Q3 2026 with native post-quantum accounts. But what does "native" actually mean, and how is it different from Falcon accounts today? Let's break it down 🧵👇

The Creepiest UFO Video Ever Released By The White House 👽🛸🇺🇸 What is that thing? Is it an ALIEN? 😱 DOW-UAP-PR116, Unresolved UAP Report, Atlantic Ocean, 2020

Dartroom relaunch this Tuesday

Today is a dark day for freedom and democracy in Europe. General chat surveillance has been implemented in Brussels. A disgrace. The so-called Chat Control 1.0 cleared a crucial hurdle in the European Parliament today. This means platforms may once again be allowed to scan private messages, officially on a “voluntary” basis, but in practice this marks the return of indiscriminate monitoring of private communication. What makes this especially bitter is that a majority of the MEPs who voted were reportedly against it. According to Patrick Breyer, 314 MEPs voted against the regulation, 276 voted in favor and 17 abstained. And yet the rejection failed because it was not enough to have a simple majority of those voting. An absolute majority of all MEPs would have been required. That is the democratic scandal. When a majority of those present votes against a proposal and it still passes because a formal threshold is not reached, it does not feel like democratic decision-making to many citizens. It feels like a procedural trick. And it becomes even more problematic when you look at the context: Chat Control had already been rejected before. Yet the issue was put back on the agenda shortly before the summer break, through an urgent procedure, at a time when absences could become decisive. This is not just some technical regulation. It goes to the very core of private communication. It is about whether digital messages remain fundamentally private or whether platforms may systematically scan content again, without concrete suspicion, without a court order and without any individual cause. A free society must not turn private communication into a potential surveillance zone. Anyone who takes digital fundamental rights seriously cannot accept millions of innocent people being placed under general suspicion. Today, a dangerous signal was sent: fundamental rights can be hollowed out through procedural logic, timing and political tricks. Not through an open, clear and honest majority, but through a system in which absence effectively helps the supporters. This is a dark day for Europe. Not because the fight is over, but because today showed how easily digital fundamental rights come under pressure when surveillance logic, symbolic politics and institutional tricks come together. Anyone who wants a free internet, anyone who wants to protect private communication and anyone who takes democracy seriously should talk about this. Share this issue. Inform yourself. Look at who voted how. And never forget: freedom rarely disappears all at once. It disappears step by step, often in technical details, often in complicated procedures and often exactly when too few people are watching.