ゆか

@Ahmetzbek @vali_nasr Preach!!!

@vali_nasr how can you seriously write about Trump making any deals at all? zionist cabal owns him they decide and they want war

There is more talk that the current impasse is unsustainable and so US and Iran could be back at war. But there is now a new Iranian proposal. Trump has another bite at the apple of a negotiated exit. This time there is also the factor of what he heard and learned while in China.

@DariusBarakat @tparsi The murderous regime is the US empire which has killed millions and displaced tens of millions since 9/11 launching illegal wars based on false pretenses. Solution is to resist the crusading terrorists of the west

@tparsi What is your solution exactly, let the murderous regime stay in power and get their money back so they can keep funding proxies and doing everything except take care of the people? Oh right, you’re too much of a coward to directly admit you support this government and all they do

The Mideast is once again teetering on the brink as Trump appears poised to reignite war with Iran. While Trump's threats of war may be theatre designed to force Tehran into submission, Tehran expects the US to attack it within the next 48 hours. We should recognize that restarting the war amounts to an admission that Trump’s previous escalatory gambit — the blockade of the blockade — has failed. That, in turn, was itself an admission that the war had failed. Which was an admission that the threats of war in January had failed. As I have argued before, this relentless search for an escalatory silver bullet capable of bringing Iran to its knees is not unique to Trump; it has become a defining pathology of American Iran policy for decades. And as Washington has come to realize that the blockade is backfiring, a new and dangerous dynamic has emerged: both sides now believe another round of fighting will strengthen their hand in the negotiations that follow. As I argued in January, Trump dramatically underestimated Iran’s strength, while hard-liners in Tehran believed war would strengthen Iran’s leverage by exposing the illusion of Iranian weakness. In their view, the outcome of the conflict vindicated that assessment, leaving them increasingly confident — even emboldened — about what a second round of war could yield. Moreover, just as Tehran believes Trump intends to prosecute the next war with far greater ferocity, Iranian planners are preparing a far more expansive and punishing retaliatory campaign, complete with new strategic objectives and targets. First, they see it as an opportunity to inflict maximum strategic damage on the UAE, citing Abu Dhabi’s active role in the previous conflict and its role in urging Trump to resume hostilities. Tehran is likely to target American data centers in the UAE, a move that serves multiple purposes. Iran sees these firms as participants in the conflict. At the same time, Tehran sees an opportunity to cripple the UAE’s ambitions to become a global artificial intelligence hub — and, in doing so, potentially undermine Washington’s AI competition with China. Read the rest of the analysis on my Substack: tritaparsi.substack.com/p/is-trump-poi…

@EbnHussein1424 🇮🇷

New Mossad Pahlavi realm DLC dropped: Poopak Ali-Akbar Shaytanzadeh has entered the game.

@JS001980 @IranObserver0 How is it stupid to make $ lol

@IranObserver0 Insurance means payment by insurer if insured is impacted. So, this stupid idea (as usual from Iranian corrupt dumdums) is to open the way for their oligarchy to suck off this new cash cow’s tits.

⚡️JUST IN Iran has created an Insurance Company to guarantee safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz Vessels pay their Insurance Premiums in Bitcoin This move will hurt the World's largest Marine insurers

@NaturalEye78321 Too many Karens in Laguna

📍 Laguna Beach, California, United States 🇺🇸

@markvalorian @ChatGPTapp @ajambrosino All your shit digitaly online anywahs lol this guy

@ChatGPTapp @ajambrosino Genuinely curious what percentage of users will actually do this. I would never dream of connecting a model directly to my financial accounts but I’m sure some percentage of people will not think twice. No idea if it’s 80% or 20% though

A preview for Pro users: a new personal finance experience in ChatGPT. Pro users in the U.S. can securely connect financial accounts, see where their money is going, and ask questions based on the information they choose to connect. Your full financial picture, now in ChatGPT.

@CyTab191904 @RezaNasri1 Nothing worse than a Shahi take. Imagine being a nokar of a nokar lol

@RezaNasri1 Some historical truths mixed in with a few myths. Iran was hardly a democracy for the US to "destroy" and the regime you claim was "installed" thereafter (in fact, the Shah was the head of state) was, at times, brutal, but far less so then the one that came after it...

A tip for the American people: Whenever your politicians invoke a grievance against Iran - for example, "Iran seized our embassy", "Iran attacked our troops in Iraq" - just ask two simple questions: What happened before? And what happened after? Ask what happened before, and you get historical context. Those Iranian students didn't storm your embassy out of gratuitous hostility. They stormed it because two decades earlier, your government ran a coup from that same building to destroy their democracy and install a brutal monarchy in its place. Ask what happened after, and you'll find that America took its revenge many times over, even when the matter had been formally settled. The hostage crisis was resolved by the 1981 Algiers Accords. Yet your government proceeded to arm Saddam Hussein to invade Iran, then looked the other way while he gassed Iranian soldiers and civilians for eight years straight. Do this for every allegation on the list. You'll find that none happened in a vacuum, and all were repaid in Iranian blood well beyond any proportion. Then ask yourself a third question: why are you never told the full story? Because unresolved grievances are useful. They justify permanent hostility. And if you look carefully at who works hardest to keep them alive - who funds the think tanks, fills the panels, writes the op-eds - you'll find they are largely not acting in America's interest at all. They are mostly agents and apologists of Israel with a vested interest in ensuring that tensions never truly subside, regardless of the consequences of war.

@mosbatboy Please send some reading and sources on this to help me learn

The project to build the bomb that was dropped on the Natanz facility in Iran had begun during the Obama administration. After signing the nuclear agreement, Obama announced that if he could, he would destroy every last bit of Iran's nuclear facilities. Obama administration Secretary of State John Kerry admitted that withdrawing from the JCPOA was not a spur-of-the-moment idea on Trump's part, and that the Democratic administration had intended to withdraw from the agreement and tighten sanctions. The Obama and Biden administrations never fulfilled their commitments under the agreement, despite Iran's full implementation. Don't believe the gesture of Obama and the Democrats. They are just as war-mongering as Trump and the Republicans.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk And bringing up African intermediaries doesn’t absolve European empires any more than mentioning local collaborators absolves colonialism itself. You’re confusing “slavery existed before” with “all systems were historically equivalent,” which is a massive intellectual shortcut.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk Ancient societies had slavery, yes. They also lacked steamships, Atlantic trade networks, pseudo-scientific racial hierarchies, hereditary chattel systems, and centuries-long economies built around mass human commodification across continents.

“If you got a chance to visit Iran for free after the war ends, would you go?”

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk You’re exposing your own ignorance here. Most African and Asian nations did not build global dominance through settler colonialism, transatlantic chattel slavery, industrial-scale indigenous replacement, and worldwide regime-change operations for corporate gain.

@nomadcfars @uoislame @MrImranPk So.....how all African, European, and Asian countries built their nation's. 🤔

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk By your logic, every human conflict in history is morally interchangeable. That’s not analysis, it’s intellectual flattening to avoid uncomfortable distinctions.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk There’s a difference between wars between states and building wealth through chattel slavery, indigenous erasure, segregation, and overseas coups for economic gain. “Everyone fought wars” is not the profound rebuttal you think it is.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk “Land of immigrants” always skips the opening chapters: indigenous dispossession, slavery, segregation, coups abroad, and wars sold as freedom.

@nomadcfars @uoislame @MrImranPk Of course our culture is imported, we're the land of immigrants that together created the greatest nation in world history. Technically, I think nachos are Tex-Mex, not sure they're actually Mexican lol.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk Fair correction on the nachos — I forgot 🇺🇸 imports its culture too.

@nomadcfars @uoislame @MrImranPk Nachos are Mexican..... "the rest of the world managed to build civilizations before discovering Applebee’s." This however made me laugh for real, well played.

@DanDePetris @AmmarAliQureshi Funny how only America’s enemies get called “regimes.” A country with 700+ military bases, Iraq, Libya, sanctions, coups, and global drone wars lecturing others on “international law” is peak irony.

Iran’s negotiating position is changing. It just so happens to be changing in the exact opposite direction the Trump administration intended. Before the war, the Strait of Hormuz wasn’t an issue. Hundreds of tankers and vessels transited the waterway every day. Oil was getting to market. Shippers weren’t getting shot at or droned. Iran wasn’t using the strait as leverage because it didn’t need to. After the war, the strait became an issue. Trump hoped bombing Iran into Kingdom Come would scare the regime enough to capitulate. It didn’t. Instead, Iran viewed capitulation in the face of pressure—particularly U.S. pressure—as an even worse outcome than losing the war in conventional terms. Iran’s strategy: expand the battlefield to the Gulf States (served two purposes: (1) increased fuel costs and (2) aimed to push the Gulfies into lobbying Trump to end the war), close the strait and survive at all costs. The strategy has worked reasonably well. Iran is actually deterring Trump from further escalation, at least so far (we will see if that continues). The strait remains clogged. The regime’s position on ending the war is tougher. Hormuz is now being wielded as a valuable card by the Iranians, which wasn’t the case before the war. And on the nuclear file, Tehran is signaling it won’t talk until AFTER the war ends and U.S. sanctions are dropped. On this issue, Trump is his own worst enemy.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk Meanwhile AmeriKKKa’s national cuisine is arguing whether the cheese should come before or after the aerosol can hits the nachos. And relax with the fork-and-knife superiority complex, the rest of the world managed to build civilizations before discovering Applebee’s.

@nomadcfars @uoislame @MrImranPk I'm American. We perfectly sear our steaks on grills, we don't boil them. We also use forks and knives in the 21st century......

@jacksdiningroom Pork is haraam

$100,000 for ham... One of the most insane food experiences I've ever had.

@asylumdogg007 @uoislame @MrImranPk The ‘7th century’ joke from people whose history begins at a pub fight in 1066 never gets old. Imagine talking about Iranian civilization while your cuisine’s national treasure is boiled meat

@nomadcfars @uoislame @MrImranPk Yet they never left the 7th century......